News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile

Your blogmistress is in need of a real vacation...

I've made it to the initial round for favorite progressive blogger in the Air America Cruise Contest. I have to stay in the Top 5 before the second voting round begins, so your vote is appreciated! First voting round:
Nov. 16th - Dec. 3rd, 2009



Join Stop Taser Torture on 12.4.09


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Transcript: Thom Hartmann and NOM's Brian Brown

by: Louise

Fri Apr 10, 2009 at 06:24:02 AM EDT


(NOTE FROM PAM: Brian Brown backed out of an appearance on Countdown last night - guess the meltdown over NOM's ridiculous ad, along with the audition tapes of its actors [now since yanked from YouTube] has him back working on a better line of BS to sell). This interview below shows the vapid, irrelevant arguments are easily shot down by someone on his game, like Hartmann.

Many, many thanks to reptile!!

Am popping up a "cut and paste" right now and will proofread later.
~     ~     ~     ~     ~     ~     ~     ~

Thom Hartmann: Welcome back to the second hour of our show. Thom Hartmann here with us -- with you. And

Brian Brown is with us. He is the executive director of the National Organization for Marriage. NOM.org is their website. And their California version is NOMCalifornia.org. And leading the charge in favor of Proposition 8 and uh -- and in uh -- in opposition, I would say, correct me if I'm wrong, to uh -- in the hopes that the court will not grant gays the right to marry in the state of California. Do I have that right, Brian?

Brian Brown: Right, uh. We want the people's vote to -- to stand and be counted and we're confident that's going to happen.

Thom Hartmann: Okay. As, uh. You know, over on your website, you have a list of frequently asked questions and answers and um... One of the questions is that -- that you put out is, uh "Are you a bigot? Why do you want to take people's rights?" And uh, y'know, your answer to that is essentially uh -- well, I'll let you give the answer.

Brian Brown: Well, we hear this question time and again when people stand up and say they -- they understand that marriage is the union of a man and a woman. Well, y'know (?) immediate response from those that want to redefine marriage, "well, that's just bigoted". But, uh. Y'know. We -- We need to take this argument seriously. If... the entire history of California... and of this country's understanding of marriage is bigoted, what does that mean? Well, it means that, alright, the majority in California -- uh, if we take this too seri- seriously (cough cough), is the power of the law would be used to suppress, marginalize, and punish the majority that understands what marriage is -- so we shouldn't see- be surprised when we see the rights of those of us that believe that marriage is the union of a man and a woman attacked and underlined (?) in states that move in the direction of same-sex marriage.

Thom Hartmann: No, I understand. I absolutely understand. Y'know, I think that when the majority of us believed that it was perfectly appropriate that African Americans be slaves. And we had laws to that effect and we voted on that, even wrote it into the constitution, and uh, that -- that was the right thing, right?

Transcript continues below the fold.
Louise :: Transcript: Thom Hartmann and NOM's Brian Brown
Brian Brown: Well, your history's just plain wrong. What we did was we wrote into the constitution, uh, the fourteenth amendment, which -- which ended up freeing the slaves --

Thom Hartmann: Uh, that got writ into the constitution, sir, a hundred years after the constitution was written.

Brian Brown: The fact of the matter is... that the African American community is tired. And many of us are tired at
the -- of these false comparisons- Thom Hartmann: Are you African American, Brian Brown?

Brian Brown: No, I'm not. But the fact of the matter is that --

Thom Hartmann: You -- You're speaking for an entire community?

Brian Brown: ...seventy percent of African Americans in the exit (?) polling supported Proposition 8. Many of the people that worked to pass Proposition 8, stood up, and were leaders in their churches: African American, Hispanic Churches -- people who have suffered -- suffered under the... the... the... the evils of uh... uh... uh... the...  the priests of a Rights era. They stood up and said, "Enough is enough."

Thom Hartmann: So you're saying that the justification of your bigotry is that within the African American community, there are also bigots?

Brian Brown: (Stammers) That's absolutely absurd. It is NOT bigotry to believe in this simple, plain idea that marriage is the union of a man and a woman. And again, when you're say that (sic) -- when you start using that -- that hammer on those of us that believe that marriage is the union of a man and a woman, don't be surprised when the state of Massachussets, for example, forces Catholic charities out of adopting uh, children because its religious beliefs say that it can't adopt children to same-sex children so the state comes in and says, "Well, your- your very religion is bigoted and that's why you cannot do the good that you're doing anymore-"

Thom Hartmann: Well, if you're bringing religion into this. I mean, you know, David had seven hundred wives.

Should we go back to a biblical definition of marriage? Even in the New Testament, Paul said that he thought that, y'know, an elder of the church should have one wife but he certainly wasn't saying that more than one wife was inappropriate. Uh, if we go back to the classic definitions of marriage, they're gonna be very different than what you're advocating. In fact, I would say that the polygamists, with the FLS -- FLDS church would say that -- that I'm a bigot for saying that, uh, monogamy whether it's gay or straight is something that we should be encouraging.
Brian Brown: Well, I -- I brought up religion only in the sense that it's in our first amendment that we have religous liberty in this country and the fact of the matter is that if you believe in this idea that it's bigoted to believe that

there's something unique and special about men and women and marriage and if you use the force of the state to support that --

Thom Hartmann: I believe that it's bigoted to tell a minority group-

Brian Brown: You shouldn't be surprised when the state starts punishing and marginalizing, uh, those of us that believe that marriage is the union of a man and a woman. It's exactly what's happening. It's happening in New Jersey where you saw a Methodist association lose part of it's state tax exemption.

Thom Hartmann: Oh, I know. It's a disaster, I know. When -- When-- When-- When-- When laws that institutionalize a partime (?). When laws that institutionalize the oppression of minorities are torn away -- I understand, y'know, a hundred years ago there were people going, "Oh, my God! Look at this! They're letting black vote! Oh, my God, they're saying we have to -- we might have to hire a bla- an Afri- " people, I mean, just forty, fifty years people were saying, "Oh, my God. My children have to go school with black people's children." I understand how upset bigots like you are -- or, not like you, I'll -- I'll say -- well, yeah. What the hell? I'll call you a bigot, Brian Brown. Cuz I consider your position bigoted.

Brian Brown: ...pulled off. Y'know, I'm glad that you pulled off -- certain smokescreen. Again, you're basically saying the very idea that marriage is the union of a man and a woman is bigoted. Uh, look. As I said before.

Thom Hartmann: I am saying -- no, I am saying, no. I never said that sir. I never said that. I am married. I don't consider myself a bigot for being married to a woman when I'm a man. What I consider bigotry is to say that two people should not be married because they're the wrong race, they're the wrong religion, or they're the wrong gender. I think that that is bigoted.

Brian Brown: Well, again. Marriage is based upon this chief fact of human reality. It's based upon-

Thom Hartmann: That a man should have more than- that a man should have five wives.

Brain Brown: Oh...Uh... Again, you're making -- you're just making assertions not backed up by any evidence.

Thom Hartmann: Well, I'm -- I'm citing the bible here.

Brian Brown: No, marriage has always had the basic contours that we understand today. It's not always been the same. Uh, one of the basic contours is uh, it's uh, marriage is the (stammering heavily here) union at least one man and one woman. In some cultures-

Thom Hartmann: At least? (laughs) Brian- Brian, I think we've- we've kinda beat this one into the ground. Lemme-
lemme move along, if I may, 'cause y- neither one are gonna convince the other on this. And- And I think we've both made our points. Um, if you are so concerned about marriage, and the sanctity of marriage, why not outlaw divorce?

Brian Brown: (long pause) Well, we do have a very real problem in our marriage culture in this country when you have high divorce rates, you have a lack of stability and the people that are hurt are children -- children deserve the chance to have both a mother and a father. That's why the same-sex marriage debate is so important. Those of that
believe that marriage is a union of a man and a woman do so because we believe it's in the best interest of children
inside...

Thom Hartmann: But the gay population in this country is probably less than ten percent of Americans -- maybe
less than five percent of Americans. The divorce population -- the percentage of people who have been married and divorced is in the neighborhood of fifty percent. Shouldn't we- I mean if you're really concerned about marriage, shouldn't you be going after divorced people? Y'know, join the pope and say, "listen, you can't get a divorce".

Brian Brown: That again. Outlawing divorce -- this is just way out in left field. The fact is that if you change the
definition of marriage, you don't just change it for same-sex couples, you change it for the whole society. You change what is taught in the schools. You change what the law teaches. And these are-

Thom Hartmann: But the definition of marriage is "till death do- do us part", is it not?
Brian Brown: Well, the definition of marriage in the law is the union of one man and one woman in most states. In California...

Thom Hartmann: Until when? Until you decide that it's not.

Brian Brown: No.

Thom Hartmann: That doesn't sound much like a definition.
Brian Brown: No, that is the definition and the definition of marriage is based upon the lived (?) experience and the
concrete reality of the fact that, uh, men and women -- only men and women can come together to naturally bear the

next generation. This is- this is just a fact.
Thom Hartmann: So let's make it illegal for infertile people - y'know, I've had a vasectomy. Uh, should I annul my marriage?

Brian Brown: Uh, of course not. Again, these shorts of- ridiculous side arguments that don't deal at all with the main

argument. Even those people that don't have children- they still resent the fact you need both a man and a woman to make marriage. That-

Thom Hartmann: Why do you need a man and a woman to ha- Why can't two men or two women who are in love and have a meaningful, long term, lasting, relationship and contributing to society... Why is that no less important
than an infertile couple than a man and a woman that are not having children?

Brian Brown: Because-

Thom Hartmann: What is the possible difference between the two?

Brian Brown: What's the- Two women or two men are doing is not marriage. It is not. IT IS NOT.

Thom Hartmann: How is it not marriage?

Brian Brown: Because marriage is based upon the union of a man and a woman.

Thom Hartmann: I thought marriage was based upon mutual love, mutual respect, mutual support, building a life
together.

Brian Brown: That may be YOUR definition of marriage, but marriage is public good. It's not nearly a-
Thom Hartmann: Ah, okay. So if I beat up my wife and if I'm just a total ass, and- and- and I- I dump on my kids and
all that, that's fine 'cause that's marriage. 'Cause I'm married to a woman.

Brian Brown: No. Of course that's not fine. Again, you're making a that- that has nothing to do with the matter at
hand. The people of California have the right to amend their constitution to support the definition of marriage that has always been understood.

Thom Hartmann: Yeah. Let's bring back slavery. Let's- uh. Brian Brown, you can read all about it over at National
Organization for Marriage. NOM.org and NOMCalifornia.org

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Mr Hartmann is simply great!!!
And how come the right is seizing on numbers of black Californians that voted for prop 8 that have already been shot down as inaccurate?

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Seriously?
Because it's the only way to divert attention from the reality that religious and party affiliations are much more determinative.

That said, I know you weren't trying to be serious.  Unlike those who call for democratic accountability, but then fall back on the nearest essentialist argument at hand at the first sign of popular disapproval, you're not grasping for whatever approval might somehow - no matter how incongruously - justify your own bias.

twitter.com/ChinoBlanco | youtube.com/ChinoBlanco


[ Parent ]
The figures that NOM is using
have been shown to be inaccurate.

And I have consistently said that Religion had more to do with the triumph of the Right wing in the matter of prop * than did race.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


[ Parent ]
I'd marry Thom Hartmann ...
... if it were legal.  And if he'd have me.

(Which he wouldn't - which, frankly, is a tragedy for us both.)

"There are two kinds of people in this world -- the kind who separate the world into two kinds of people, and those who don't."  -- Gloria Steinem


[ Parent ]
The numbers may have been shot down
by people paying attention, but the hetero-supremacists know that the MSM would never be so rude as to call them on it.  So people hear the numbers repeated, never hear a challenge, and so assume that they must be accurate.

[ Parent ]
This whole episode reminds me of that Hendrik Hertzberg line ...
Like a polluted swamp, anti-gay bigotry is likely to get thicker and more toxic as it dries up.

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/...

By the way, if anyone in the Northeast is receiving emails or alerts from/re an outfit called "United Families International" ... I'd be happy to get a heads up at brother.chino[at]gmail.com ...

As the swamp dries, it's become easier to connect the Mormon dots, but perusing the batch of Form 990s related to UFI/NOM/DNA/LDS, I'm reminded of the amazing resilience (and amazingly persistent slipperiness) of amphibian skin in even the most arid of conditions.

twitter.com/ChinoBlanco | youtube.com/ChinoBlanco


Evidence Cache
the audition tapes of its actors [now since yanked from YouTube]

Please tell me someone did the sensible thing and downloaded them? I often do this with videos that could be embarrassing to the Religulous Reich or others, but didn't find out about these videos till too late.

____________________________________
Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum.


Check Autumn's post on Rachel Maddow above
if you haven't already... kudos to both!! :)

I'm grabbing and saving Rachel's clip on my site right now.

"It goes on one at a time, it starts when you care to act, it starts when you do it again after they said no, it starts when you say We and know who you mean, and each day you mean one more."


[ Parent ]
Thanks for the transcription. A few corrections:

"priests of Rights era" should be "pre-civil rights era"

"a partime" should be "apartheid"


Goin' after the bigots...
I really like the fact that Thom Hartmann invites these right wing extremists on his shows... and skewers them. It happens every time. You would think that these folks would learn to steer clear of Hartmann, but they don't. The dude is fierce.

13th not 14th
Someone tell the bigot that it was the 13th Amendment that ended slavery, not the 14th...  The 14th guarantees equal protection under the law, the very amendment he's trying to violate by banning gay marriage..

Hartman was brilliant
I sincerely think that this week has been a turning point that hasn't quite sunk in yet.

The bigots have lost this fight in a big way & the tide is turning.


That was awesome.
I love this part:

Thom Hartmann: Why can't two men or two women who are in love and have a meaningful, long term, lasting, relationship and contributing to society... Why is that no less important than an infertile couple than a man and a woman that are not having children? What is the possible difference between the two?

Brian Brown: What's the- Two women or two men are doing is not marriage. It is not. IT IS NOT.

Thom Hartmann: How is it not marriage?

Brian Brown: Because marriage is based upon the union of a man and a woman.

So Mr. Brown's only argument against same sex marriage is that the people wanting it are the same sex... and by saying "It is not." over and over again. Classic!

Thom Hartmann, you are my hero.


Agreed!
I just love it when the reich-wingers fall back on their circular "logic" to defend their bigotry. The problem is that nobody (including Thom) calls them on it.

"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." ~~~ Thomas Jefferson

[ Parent ]
This is so sweet.
I'm old enough to remember a time when NO straight media figures would have taken such a terrific pro-gay stand, and when any gay people who showed up on such shows would have used pseudonyms and had their faces blurred (on TV, I mean).  Now we actually have straight, mainstream media figures like Olbermann, Stewart and Hartmann, who actually do a better job of smacking down the bigots than Joe Solmonese and the rest.  Now that is change I believe in.

I am not interested in picking up crumbs of compassion thrown from the table of someone who considers himself my master. I want the full menu of rights.  -Archbishop Desmond Tutu


I knda wish TH had hammered on the divorce part...
...'cause Maggie Gallagher actually said she'd like to get rid of no-fault divorce too. As heard on NPR's Talk of the Nation Thursday:
http://www.npr.org/templates/s...

I think it's a bit quiet, but she does say it.

"More than half of modern culture depends on what one shouldn't read." -- Oscar Wilde, The Importance of Being Earnest


You're Welcome, Guys.
I'm very happy to help the movement.

I found it incredibly funny that everytime I had to pause the video, Thom Hartmann had his eyes closed (every time Brown was "explaining" his POV). It's such a shame that the fundies can't think and can't really assess what their own arguments are about. They just regurgitate the same BS over and over, like they were brainwashed (hint hint).  


What kind of reptile are you?
And thanks for the transcription.  I know it takes effort and a high tolerance for tedium to produce accurate results.

[ Parent ]
re: kind
I'm a Mortal Kombat Reptile :)

[ Parent ]
Oh, I was thinking something more along the lines of


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox