Fundie meltdown week wrap-up

Check 'em out if you missed 'em first time around.

Check out my NOM/KKK Video.  Lots of old images of hate from the 1920s:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

(My ex plays George Washington in this video, BTW.)

When you look for the bad in mankind, expecting to find it, you surely will.

- Abraham Lincoln.

 We have had discussions about that debate, and we all agree Maggie Gallagher is a loud mouth that shouts over her opponent on every appearance she is in.  Joe flat out called her a liar.  I think this time it really stuck.  I have watched that debate over and over a few times.  I watched it earlier today to see if I missed something.  Maggie Gallagher didn't like being called a LIAR and reacted.

Watch it again,

She is reacting to the fact of being called a liar and trying to remove it.  She added to it when she discusses the NJ pavilion case.   Then moves on to her big talking point, which is a complete fabrication.

Wear the Labels well as they fit so perfect, Bigot, Homophobe and Liar.  And they have until April 22 to try to remove it before Maine hears from the public on Marriage Equality.  

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.

I do know for a fact, however, that Brian Brown did not show up for a scheduled appearance on Ed Shultz's "The Ed Show" on MSNBC. On Wednesday, when the NOM ad was introduced, Ed Schultz talked about it, and ended with the announcement that HRC and NOM representatives would debate it the next day:
    http://www.edschultzshow.com/v...
Discussion starts at the beginning of the clip, announcement about the next day occurs at 5:38.

And then on Thursday, we watched the show, waiting to see the NOM guy get shredded. Ed interviewed David Smith of the HRC. Then, he called out Brian Brown for not showing up, even though he had been invited:
    http://www.edschultzshow.com/v...
Discussion about the ad starts at 6:23, and the mention of NOM starts at 12:12.

It was GREAT !!!!!! But who knows, they might be so desperate, they would stoop to saying "Brian Brown didn't cancel Countdown". And that might be true. Of course, they would probably forget to mention that he did cancel The Ed Show.

-Ted-

Some one take it from here, I would have to watch the commercial, or auditions, another dozen times to do more.
And as should be clear to all, I do not have a way with words.

As a person who has trouble putting one word in front of another, I have one word for those auditions, awful.

I had to Google Nation of Marriage since nom.org took me to Nation of Men.  Google gave over 37,000,000 hits, number 5 coming back to Pam's.  

Trusting that a website with an agenda tracks links taken from them I watched several of the parody/counter videos You tube listed after watching their ad.  Trusting that they track how you got there, a sidebar of links to wackos of current interest would be a nice addition to the blend.

 I think this is the site I found a lot of footage from the documentary, but not sure as my other computer crashed and I haven't been able to get it fixed yet.

 I remember there is a lot of footage of how the KKK used the bible to justify their actions.  As well as all the fear mongering that went on during those times.  

 The actions by NOM, and the other hate groups is basically the same as what the KKK did.  

 Again, great job on your first video.

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.

When you look for the bad in mankind, expecting to find it, you surely will.

- Abraham Lincoln.

- Abraham Lincoln.

- Abraham Lincoln.

- Abraham Lincoln.

A storm has been gathering. It has to do with the use of the word "nom."

For years, on the Internet, "nom" has meant one thing: An onomatopoeic description of eating, usually, specifically, a cute animal eating. Sometimes a cute animal nibbling on another cute animal in a playful way. Here are some recent examples: playful fox on fox gnawing, a video of a cat eating a piece of broccoli , and an entire website devoted to "nomming."

However, recently, a group has tried to weaken that definition of the word "nom." The National Organization for Marriage--NOM--this week debuted an ad about gay marriage. It is stupid and lie-filled, with barely capable actors mouthing urban legends (see their audition tapes here) but because of the recent victories for gay marriage across the country, the ad has received a lot of attention on cable news.

And therein lies the danger: The danger that, by sheer dint of their own stupidity about marriage but genius about promotion, the National Organization for Marriage will hijack "NOM." Friends, we cannot let that happen.

Let's stand behind out friends at Air America. I always knew that the fundies would not be happy with just getting opposite sex marriage, now they want to take over our language as well. It's another step in their pernicious agenda to interject heterosexuality into all of our lives.
Fight back now!!!!

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Safe for kids and pets, yet kills "weeds" right down to their evil roots!

So now her position is that if gays can get married, then straight couples marriages will be less special. Gee... how selfish of us. How could we be so cruel to two people that we don't even know? And how exactly would these straight couples know about my impending marriage, since I'm not getting married at their church?