|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile

33|175:175
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |

The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist." (Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger." (MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Tue May 05, 2009 at 09:00:00 AM EDT
|
Lane Hudson of DC for Marriage has shared a primer on what to expect as the DC Council meets today and is scheduled to give final reading and pass legislation to allow the District to recognize valid marriages from other jurisdictions between same-sex couples. I wonder how many fundies and members of the professional "Christian" set will show up to protest?Q: Does this set up a show down with Congress over the freedom to marry?
A: No, the DC Council is affirming that it will honor valid contracts between two people in another jurisdiction. This is in keeping with Constitutional principle and over 100 years of tradition of the District recognizing such legal contracts.
While Congress has legislative review power over DC Council's actions, overturning a DC law requires proactive legislation passed by both houses of Congress and signed by the President. Today's vote does NOT trigger an automatic vote by Congress on marriage.
Q: Has Congress ever overturned a law passed by DC Council?
A: Not since the current legislative review process was instituted by the Supreme Court has Congress overturned DC law by an Act of Congress. However, Congress has used the budgetary process to prevent implementation of acts by DC Council. One example of this is Domestic Partnerships in DC. Congress attached a rider to DC Appropriations for several years forbidding money from being spent to implement the Domestic Partnership law.
Recognizing civil marriage contracts from other jurisdictions, however, does not cost the District money. The passage of the law, for all intents and purposes, is an indication that the District of Columbia will recognize a valid civil marriage between a couple of the same gender at such time that the law demands a determination of marital status. More below the fold. |
| Pam Spaulding :: DC Council meets today to vote on recognition of same-sex marriages from other jurisdictions |
Q: Why set up a debate over the freedom to marry now?
A: The Council of the District of Columbia is not passing a marriage equality bill today. It is simply voting to honor civil contracts legally executed in another jurisdiction. That may prompt some to debate the issue of marriage equality. Trends show us that those on the opposing side are shrinking in numbers.
For the first time, an ABC News poll last week showed that a plurality of Americans support the right of gay people to have the freedom to marry. Polling also shows us that younger generations support this freedom by large majorities, indicating where we can expect public opinion to be in the near future.
Q: What is the position of the President and Democrats in Congress on this issue?
A: Neither the President nor the Democratic Leadership has indicated a position on this specific action. However, many are on the record both supporting Home Rule for the District of Columbia and as believing that the States should define marriage. As Congress treats DC as a State for many purposes, this action would be allowable under their stated positions.
Q: What comes next?
A: After today, a 30 legislative day review period will begin. At the end of those 30 legislative (not calendar) days, the District of Columbia can begin to honor valid marriage contracts from other jurisdictions, regardless of sexual orientation. |
|
|