News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



CNN report 'Gay Issues Closing In On Obama' shows the MSM is noticing the White House silence

by: Pam Spaulding

Fri May 08, 2009 at 06:00:00 AM EDT


When I walked in the door yesterday evening, I caught the last minute or so of a segment on CNN, "Gay Issues Closing In On Obama." This is an interesting breakthrough, because finally, finally, there is recognition by the MSM that this administration has done everything in its power to remain silent on anything g-a-y, even to the point of looking foolish as landmark rulings in state courts and legislative actions have affirmed that gay and lesbian couples are equal under the law and have the right to marry.

It's kind of hard to ignore a report like this; it even includes PressSec Robert Gibbs giving his feeble response the other day to ABC's Jake Tapper when he was asked about the President's reaction to marriage equality in Maine.

I'm Wolf Blitzer. You're in THE SITUATION ROOM.

A very sensitive issue -- the issue of gay rights. President Obama taking a relatively low key stance right now on what's going on.

Let's go to our senior political correspondent, Candy Crowley -- Candy, it's always a sensitive issue for politicians.

CANDY CROWLEY, CNN SENIOR POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT: Absolutely. And no less so now. It is completely unclear whether same-sex marriage is an issue who's time is coming. In fact, the polls would argue against that. Regardless, it's an issue that can't be ignored -- or can it?

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CROWLEY (voice-over): During the 100 plus days of the Obama administration...

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Congratulations.

CROWLEY: ...three more states -- Iowa, Vermont, and now Maine -- have sanctioned same-sex marriage.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: The legislators understood that this is about families. This is about committed couples.

CROWLEY: But nary a word from President Obama. Think 10 foot pole.

ROBERT GIBBS, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: Well, I think the president's position on same-sex marriage is -- has been talked about and discussed.

CROWLEY: The question is, how long can the silence last?

STEVE ELMENDORF, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: The more states approve it, the more pressure will build on federal office holders, including a president, to take a stand on gay marriage.

CROWLEY: Public support for same-sex marriage has slowly grown over the years, still the latest CNN Public Opinion Corporation poll found that 44 percent of Americans support it, while 54 percent are opposed. Broken down by party, Democrats overwhelmingly favor it, Republicans overwhelmingly oppose it, but this is what makes it politically tricky. The majority of independents, largely the voters who decide elections, are opposed.

CROWLEY: So same sex marriage remains a political hot spot, circled carefully by most politicians, including the president. During the campaign, he said that he supported civil unions. Same-sex marriage did not fit his definition of marriage.

PRES. BARACK OBAMA (D), UNITED STATES: I believe that marriage is the union between a man and a woman. For me as a Christian it is also a sacred union. CROWLEY: Some in the gay community are also restless that the candidates they saw as sympathetic to their causes has seemed less so in office. He has not as promised pushed for repeals of don't ask don't tell in the military. There are complaints the president has not adequately funded AIDS prevention programs. Openly gay people have been given substantial positions in the administration, but some activists hope for a cabinet seat. And the selection of Rick Warren, an Evangelist who opposes gay marriage, to speak at the inauguration still wrangles some in the gay community. Still there is a willingness to be patient. Washington lobbyists and democratic strategist Steve Elmendorf.

ELMENDORF: I think people are very clear that Barack Obama is the most pro-gay president we've had. He's great on 90 percent of the issues that the gay community cares about. At some point they're going to hope that he changes on the 10 percent.

CROWLEY: Elmendorf adds that the majority in the gay community understand that the president has a lot on his plate right now, there is time.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

CROWLEY: In the end, on many of the issues of particular concern to gays, the president is likely to deliver, but given the current political dynamics, his support for gay marriage remains a non- starter. That will take a lot of time. Wolf?

WOLF BLITZER, CNN ANCHOR: All right Candy. Thanks very much.

And there's more; a discussion between Wolf, Mary Matalin and Paul Begala followed that report. Click over for the rest of the transcript.
Pam Spaulding :: CNN report 'Gay Issues Closing In On Obama' shows the MSM is noticing the White House silence
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Missing the point.
They just don't get the point, it's because people are being very vocal in advocating these issues that they're even being discussed anywhere near the MSM. If not for people unwilling to wait, willing to make noise and take a public stand about these critical issues they would be either ignored or given scant lip service.

Other people have pointed it out before much more eloquently than I can manage but that's my two cents worth.


That so many MSM outlets are talking about this
is one more testament to the growing power and influence of the blogosphere.  The MSM are clearly influenced, though they keep denying it.  And Obama and his pals in congress are, slowly but surely, starting to figure it out.

Who knows where this will lead?  Someday the United States might actually become a democracy.

Cynic, n.  A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be.  
-Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary


[ Parent ]
"Sensitive issue"
WOLF:  Candy, it's always a sensitive issue for politicians.

CROWLEY: Absolutely. And no less so now.

Oh please.  Much less so now.  Or you wouldn't even be talking about it, you dinosaurs.

What to make of a Fourth Estate that can't even keep up with Marie Osmond?

"It's not a sensitive topic, I love my daughter."

Earth to Candy:  Donny's "Long Haired Lover from Liverpool" is a sensitive topic.  Marriage?  Equal rights?  Not so much.



twitter.com/ChinoBlanco | youtube.com/ChinoBlanco


Agreed.
The people who hate gay people are about as powerless now as they could be. The general popluation is not only warmer towards general gay rights than at any point in US history, but they have so much real world concern (i.e. not wondering what Adam and Steve are up to next door) on their plates that they could care less about the repeal of DOMA, or DADT, or even federal recognition of civil unions.

C'mon Obama, you are already 'the AntiChrist', 'a communist', 'a terrorist' and 'a fascist'. Why not come out as pro-gay: it won't surprise them and, done with your typical elan, people will just see it as another deft liberal move towards a fairer society.

Which, of course, is what it is.


[ Parent ]
Why not come out as pro-gay?
Maybe.. because he's not. Oh, he's not anti-gay. It's just that he sees no upside any more to keeping up the pretence of support.

He won't refuse to sign the hate crime bill. He won't refuse to sign ENDA. If some legislation gets passed that repeals DADT, he'll sign that too, we have that in writing.

What he won't do is lift a little finger to help, and will make sure nothing too controversial happens that might alienate the black christian churches that currently support him as if he's the second coming.

There is no situation so complex it can't get even worse


[ Parent ]
Good on CNN
for discussing what the rest of us out here in, oh I dunno, THE REAL WORLD, noticed a long time ago!


Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


Pathetic
The White House (lack of) response, and that whole discussion.

DADT: "The public is coming along, the numbers are changing, we just need to give it more time."

75% support repeal of DADT. How big does the majority have to get?

Equality: "the polls don't support it"

Unless you look at the polls over time. And ignore the last year of historic action.

Pathetic.

Cause any fool knows, a dog needs a home; a shelter from pigs on the wing


Way to go, MSM!
Keep up the hard work and you may actually catch up with the blogsphere!

watashi no yomeiri wa doko desu ka

Again as was pointed out...
... in the following segment with Matlin and Begalla, the issue all about timing. Everybody recognizes that this these are issues that have to be dealt with but they don't have to be dealt with RIGHT THIS SECOND.

As Matlin pointed out, the Administration has to choose its conflicts and not pick too many fights at one time. I think that alot of people are stunned that this is being pushed now.

No one seem ready to answer which of the other issues should be abandoned to pass more LGBT legislation? Personally, I'd really like health care. If there is going to be a fight right now, do it over that. Its an issue that impacts ALL Americans.

Political capital is a finite resource. He can either use it to push the bulk of his progressive agenda, like energy, health care, education etc, or he can abandon one of those and focus on LGBT issues. The point is SOMETHING will get sacrificed to do this NOW.

What do you think he should give up?


His silence


There is no situation so complex it can't get even worse

[ Parent ]
HE IS NOT SILENT... he is just SECRET!....I will post it here too.
e.g. the comment I posted under Eugene Robinson's OBAMA MIA column...and other places.

HE's Not MIA: per NYTimes: there was a 'secret'...(we haven't seen minutes yet  have we)  meeting in WHouse about all this 'stuff'
nytimes.com/2009/05/07/us/politics/07obama.html

The White House, aware of the discontent, invited leaders of some prominent gay rights organizations to meet Monday with top officials, including Jim Messina, Mr. Obama's deputy chief of staff, to plot legislative strategy on the hate crimes bill as well as "don't ask, don't tell." Among those attending was Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, who said afterward that while the gay rights agenda might not be "unfolding exactly as we thought," he was pleased.
"They have a vision," Mr. Solmonese said. "They have a plan."

Anyone want to bet all the BClintonistas aren't telling him to DO NOTHING until after he is relected in 2012!



It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


[ Parent ]
They have a plan.
Sounds like Battlestar Galactica.

[ Parent ]
Ha!

It sounds like time to get Secret Squirrel on the case!

-----
~~Autumn~~

As if there were safety in stupidity alone.
--Henry David Thoreau


[ Parent ]
re: BSG / Cylons
Yeah, we were told they (the Cylons) had a plan from pretty much the first episode. Then the finale arrives, the show is wrapped up, and WTF happened to that "plan" of theirs? Was their plan like that of Monty Python's Spanish Inquisition?
Ximinez: NOBODY expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our three weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our four...no... Amongst our weapons.... Amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise.... I'll come in again.

But instead of fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency (I think they might share an "almost fanatical devotion to the Pope"), their weapons are fear (well, I guess they share that one too), lip service, fear, and ruthless ignoring (of the elephant in the room).

And I think they're kinda surprised by recent events, too.

Maybe they're actually the same set of weapons after all.


[ Parent ]
oops
It's late, and I kinda got my analogies crossed. Started off with a Cylon plan topic, brought in MP's Spanish Inquisition, and finished w/ the Obama administration. Hopefully y'all get my general drift.

[ Parent ]
Since when....
...do we listen to Matlin?

This is the perfect time, as there IS TOO MUCH going on. Just sign an executive order repealing DADT as we need all hands on deck with 2 wars going on. And the next state that allows us to marry, our leader should have a prepared statement about how wonderful equality for all is. I think he can 'give that up.'


[ Parent ]
Not what we're after.
Begala: He's got an awful lot of priorities right now. And I will say the Gay rights movement and marriage equality is advancing very nicely, thank you very much, without Obama's help...

I don't think we're asking Obama for help. I, for one, don't much care anymore what his position on gay marriage is anymore. I'll just be happy if he stops sending little messages about how he opposes gay marriage like the one he did after Iowa.


Paul Begala quoted Dr. King out of context - I think . . .
I need some help here.  In the talking heads part of the segment, Paul Begala quotes Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. as saying, in 1962,

I want to be the white man's brother, not his brother-in-law.

in the context of making it seem that Dr. King was taking a position on laws against mixed-race marriage. These laws had been overturned in some states (starting with California in 1948), being vigorously enforced in many others ,(and still others never had such laws (though as we know, at least Massachusetts had a law that forbade non-residents who could not get married in their home states from coming to Massachusetts to get married.) It was not until 1967 that the SCOTUS decided Loving v. Virginia 388 U.S. 1, to set aside these laws.

I always thought that the intended meaning of Dr. King had to do with analogizing being a brother-in-law to being a second class citizen.  I didn't think it was a statement that Dr. King thought laws againast miscegenation were okay.

But Begala uses the quote in exactly that context.

I don't know what Dr. King's position was on mixed-race marriage in 1962, or if the quote was actually related to it at all.  

I never see the quote in context, so it's impossible for me to ascertain whether Paul Begala's spin on it, or my vague memory from high school, is correct.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox