News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Maine Bishop Richard Malone: "Same Sex Marriage is Dangerous"

by: Louise

Mon May 11, 2009 at 10:00:00 AM EDT


Seems Maine's 200,000 Catholics have many things about which they need to make up their own minds.

"A Bee in a Bonnet"? I think there should be a massive swarm of outcry at this stage.

From the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland comes the following:


Photobucket
Bishop Malone Issues Statement on Signing of Same-Sex Marriage Bill

Bishop Richard Malone, spiritual leader of Maine's 200,000 Roman Catholics, said today:

"I am deeply disappointed in the Maine Legislature and the Governor for making same sex-marriage legal in our state. We believe that the vast majority of Maine's people believe that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, and that calling same-sex relationships marriage doesn't make them so. Marriage as we have known it for millennia has served as the cornerstone of society. The family, consisting of mother, father and children, has served throughout the ages as the natural place for the healthy development of children into well adjusted and productive citizens.

Same-sex marriage is a dangerous sociological experiment that I believe will have negative consequences for society as a whole. Children will be taught in schools that same-sex marriage and traditional marriage are simply different expressions of the same thing, and that the logical and consistent understanding that marriage and reproduction are intrinsically linked is no longer valid. These are profound changes that will reverberate throughout society with tragic consequences."

So nice of The Bishop to step out of his luxurious posh mansion to release a statement, wasn't it?

Photobucket

Note that the mansion is constructed out of brick, the choice of smart pigs, and not a "glass house", so vulnerable to stones cast by angry parishioners...

While others have wailed that Maine lawmakers should be working on economic issues rather than the now equal marriage LAW, it has been refreshing to see Malone stay far away from THAT particular discussion!

Anyone wonder why? But I digress...

Ah, the children, the children- it always comes back to the wee innocents, doesn't it?

Let's go below the fold and see what Bishop Malone and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Maine together have done to preserve the safety of the children, shall we?

Hypocrisy, Thy Name Is Richard Malone!

Louise :: Maine Bishop Richard Malone: "Same Sex Marriage is Dangerous"
Actually, it seems they have done alot- and that they have HAD to... from this weekend's Kennebec Journal:

A former Maine priest has been barred from the ministry and an Augusta man prevented from church service due to a history of child abuse, according to the Diocese of Portland.

Frederick A. Carrigan, 74, who served at St. Joseph in Gardiner as well as parishes in Bath, Bangor, Dover-Foxcroft, East Millinocket and Hampden, has been assigned to a life of prayer and penance, which means he cannot have any ministry, present himself as a priest or wear clerical clothes, according to a statement released by the Diocese on Friday.

In a separate case, Paul Douin, 69, of Augusta, has been permanently removed from his volunteer position. The Diocese said it made that decision after confirming that Douin was convicted in 1977 of sexual abuse of minor.

Carrigan was permanently removed from service after The Vatican accepted the decision of a tribunal that heard Carrigan's case during a church trial last October. The judges, all from outside of Maine, found Carrigan guilty of abusing a minor.

The tribunal's recommendation was sent to Rome, which gave final approval in a letter sent to Bishop Richard Malone April 22.

Carrigan was removed from ministry in 1989 for "inappropriate behavior" with an adult, the Diocese said. Carrigan was accused in 1991 of abusing a minor in 1972. His ministry ended 2002.

Douin, who was most recently a volunteer at St. Augustine's Church in Augusta, was sentenced to four years in prison in 1977, the Diocese said. He has not been arrested for any offense since his release from prison, according to the Diocese.

Quick action there, kids- the abuses occurred decades ago?

And apparently I'm not the only one who feels handing in your robes is a pretty lame punishment:


Harvey Paul, director of the Maine chapter of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, found little satisfaction in The Vatican's decision to bar Carrigan from service.

"It's way too little, way too late," Paul said.

Carrigan, who lives out of state, lives in anonymity, Paul said.

"We don't know where he is. We know nothing about him," Paul said. "We really have a problem with that."

SNAP is pushing for a Diocese-run web site, similar to Maine's sex offender registry, that would list priest the diocese has determined have abused children.

The Diocese has said only they will consider a site, Paul said.

"They've been thinking about it a few months now," he said. "It should have taken about a day of thinking. In the time they're thinking about it, children are at risk."

No kidding, the kids are at risk. But these are just isolated incidences, right? Right?

Not even close.

Michael Doucette. His confession and story was covered by NYT, as well as by Time, both in 2002.

Raymond Melville. In 2005, Maine Supreme Court Justices found that a sex abuse victim can indeed sue church leaders such as the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland. But thie was the real stunner:


The impact of the case is unclear. Lipman said it opens the door to other suits against the church by sex-abuse victims. According to a report issued in 2004 by Maine Attorney General Steven Rowe, 63 priests and other diocese employees had been accused of sexual abuse over the previous 75 years, but most of those cases would be too old for lawsuits under the statute of limitations. Also, some cases have already been settled by the church and could not be brought again.

The two dissenting justices argued that the impact will be felt by a variety of institutions who could face lawsuits for failing to protect people from their employees.

"With these rulings the court invites lawsuits against businesses, schools, camps, churches and youth sports organizations for real or perceived improprieties by their members or employees that occur outside of the course and scope of the organizations' responsibilities," wrote Justice Donald Alexander.

Not 63 total cases of abuse- 63 SEPARATE PRIESTS HAVE BEEN ACCUSED. That's an overwhelming number and shows a systemic problem within the Maine Catholic community.

Lest we forget:

The late James Robichaud, who rather than face investigators last summer, killed himself in a church rectory.

Remind me again, isn't suicide a big no-no in the Catholic Church?


A priest suspected of sexually abusing a girl in 1979 was found dead Friday morning in the Dover-Foxcroft rectory where he lived.

Police confirmed the Rev. James P. Robichaud, 56, an Augusta native, committed suicide.

Robichaud, who was born and raised in Augusta, became an ordained priest in April 1979 and the same year was assigned to St. Jean-Baptiste Parish in Lowell, Mass. He served at that parish until 1983.

"This is a tragic end to a story that we may never completely understand," Bishop Richard Malone said in a statement released Friday by the diocese. "It is simply our mission to bring the healing presence of Jesus to this agonizing situation."

The same statement noted there is not yet sufficient information to dismiss or substantiate the abuse charge.

So, WHO'S hurting the kids again, Malone? Who's hurting families? Who's hurting Mainers?

Oh that's right- the same gender couples who just won the same rights (well, except for FEDERAL TAX LAWS AND A FEW OTHER PESKY DETAILS) that I have.

Look how same sex married couples ruined Massachusetts over the course of 5 years! Terrible, just terrible.

I'm not buying this, Mr. Malone... alot of people aren't.

When you have a link instructing people "How To File a Sexual Abuse Report" on your own Portland Diocese website under the section marked "Child and Youth Protection", you KNOW you're not doing enough- and that you never have!

Lemme point out that any other Mainer suspected of having committed abuse is taken into custody, not simply told to hand in their robes and behave themselves, as happened with Carrigan.

That the crimes are not covered up by layer upon layer of bureaucracy for decades and victims left to fight your corporation for years in court.

Leave these Mainers alone and let them live their lives in our state, without your judgements or interference, and clean up your own house, Mr. Malone...

 

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Part of the danger in his eyes...
...is that his priests will no longer wish to remain celibate (never mind chaste.)

Hate stops a beating heart.

They're not staying celibate as it is!
unless paedo sex doesn't count?

____________________________________
Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum.


[ Parent ]
Where is the RICO statute when you need it?
As I understand RICO, it is used to prosecute criminal conspiracies by organized entities who engage in systematic fraud in the furtherance of criminal endeavors.

RICO was originally designed to catch members of organized crime with the premise that anyone who was involved in, say, covering up a crime so that the mob could continue to commit crimes and prosper.

I have long wondered why covering up and aiding in the cover-up of multiple sex offenders so that the church can continue to raise money isn't the exact same crime...

Question:  What does an atheist do when they fall to the floor and start "speaking in tongues"?

Answer: Get a CAT scan.


Equality is a "Tragic Consequence?"
because that will be the consequence. If we are equal, if we are visible, we will be less feared.

And that is what the Chistian Right fears, the possibility of people no longer fearing us.

And..the Christian Right loses one of its pet perjoratives that they use to excoriate us...fornication.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


Give me a break!
"Children will be taught in schools that same-sex marriage and traditional marriage are simply different expressions of the same thing, and that the logical and consistent understanding that marriage and reproduction are intrinsically linked is no longer valid. "

I think they already know that marriage and reproduction aren't really linked.  Just ask Bristol Palin or the other many single moms out there.  Anyone who has eyes and a slight bit of intelligence can tell you that the only link between marriage and procreation is the one we have created in our social structure and while useful in many ways, is nothing more than a man-made construct.

Any institution that needs to be "protected" from "outsiders" in order to be valid is in no way natural as they like to claim.

"To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best day and night to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight and never stop fighting." -E.E. Cummings


"THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN NOW WILL NOT BE BORN"
Check out this "Letter To The Editor" from last week's KJ- easily the most unhunged and amusing so far (emphasis mine):


'Thousands of children now will not be born'

Today's Kennebec Journal (May 6) listed local representatives who voted to change the definition of marriage, and also showed a photo of the great celebration after the vote. I wonder if the representatives who voted yes gave any thought to the thousands of children who now will not be born, and will not be around to enjoy childhood or adult life thereafter.

At least the Chinese allowed one child per family. Unless you have a magic wand of some kind your yes vote has reduced that count to zero children per couple. If children are adopted imagine how proud they will be to have two dads and no mother, or two mothers and no dad (or perhaps I'm missing something -- could reducing the number of children in schools be part of your budget cutting process)?

We've got some real winners up here...

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


[ Parent ]
Lol!
Oh the hilarity.  It's not even worth the time to address this type of rhetoric.

Why is there no course on logic in elementary, jr high and high schools?  If this person could just think a little tiny bit through the fallacy he/she has set up in the face of the reality we all share...

Oh well, one can always hope!

"To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best day and night to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight and never stop fighting." -E.E. Cummings


[ Parent ]
old time values about being pregnant out of wedlock
my spousal unit just finished reading a book about early 19th century economic and social conditions in the netherlands.  at that time, the country was VERY RELIGIOUS with catholics and two forms of protestantism.  and yet, it was seen as wise to not marry until a woman was well along in pregnancy, as proof that she was going to be productive.  in other words, people didn't bat an eye at a 5-month pregnant woman marrying, or the fact that she got pregnant while unwed.  rather, it was considered a real risk to marry a virgin, who was an unproven breeder.

just one more fact to poke a hole in the balloons of "marriage is for procreation" and "marriage has been unchanging for 20 billion years".  but if facts mattered to them, they' have deflated long ago.  alas.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


[ Parent ]
Wow, that's pretty interesting...
...about the Netherlands.  Makes as much sense to check for fertility as it does to make sure that the bun in the oven is yours.

I grew up in the South in a pretty strict non-denominational church.  The only thing taught there was of course abstinence and the whole promise ring nonsense.  There was even a course that was anti-dating -- stating that God's will will automatically bring the husband and wife together and that the husband will find the wife.  Apparently no one even needed to get to know one another well first before starting a life together.  Lol.

Needless to say that nearly all the girls that went through this program ended up pregnant out of wedlock before or immediately after graduating high school.  Some even had multiple out of wedlock births.

And you know what, each fatherless birth was celebrated as a "gift from God" and treated as if it hadn't just violated the principles taught at the church.  I always thought this reaction was weird given what the church teaches.  Especially since every Sunday sermon touched on the "evils" of being gay in some highly ignorant manner.  It just seemed so hypocritical.

"To be nobody but yourself in a world which is doing its best day and night to make you like everybody else means to fight the hardest battle which any human being can fight and never stop fighting." -E.E. Cummings


[ Parent ]
"Marriage as we have known it for millennia" has been polygamous
Even in the New Testament, Paul asserts that only bishops and deacons must be husband to one wife. This implies that polygamy was common enough among Christians for Paul to need such a restriction, and this implies that Paul didn't mind that rank-and-file believers be in multiple partner marriages. (Never mind that Paul is asserting that be married and not celibate.)  

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même merde.

Ah, such a bastion of morality
An international cabal that covers up the abuse of children, shelters criminals, and is headed by a Nazi has no business passing judgment on what is and isn't good for families.

I always wondered why Catholic priests are not made to register as foreign lobbyists/agents of a foreign power. After all, they're living in the United States as representatives of an outside state with its own head and diplomatic organization, yes?


God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi


You bet! I have already taken that position!
When I wrote an Open Letter to the new New York Archbishop, I I raised exactly that point, and I also raised it again in my open letter to this apostate prelate.

[ Parent ]
An interesting item from the Maine Constitution . . .
From Article I:

Section 12. Treason; testimony of 2 witnesses. Treason against this State shall consist only in levying war against it, adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason unless on the testimony of 2 witnesses to the same overt act, or confession in open court.

Based on the subversive document inimical to the freedom of the secular government of the State of Maine and of the United States, published by the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on July 1, 2003, entitled "Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons," and Bishop Malone's statement of intent to oppose the law already enacted, one can make a case against Bishop Malone for Treason - for interfering with the democratic process on behalf of a hostile foreign power, adhering to the enemies of the constitution of the State. Anyone who has read the Bishop's inflammatory statement can be a witness to his actions!  He might consider claiming diplomatic immunity - something Cardinal Law was actually considering before he toddled off to Rome.

On a more serious note, though, if Malone wants to push for a constitutional amendment, he'd have to make sure that most of Article I of the Maine Constitution is gutted to make it stick - he'd have to make sure to amend the section on Natural Rights to exclude the minority (Section 1), abolish freedom of religion (Section 3), and provide for unequal protection under the law (Section 6-A).

This is the same sort of problem they have in California with the passage of Prop 8 - it conflicts with several other sections of the California Constitution that were not amended when Prop 8 was proposed and passed - Prop 8 used the wrong amendment process as well!  I am still awaiting the California Court's decision on this - as Prop 8 should be rejected as invalid by any reasonable court.


[ Parent ]
Dangerous Sociological Experiment in Catholic History
These other dangerous sociological experiments have been condemned by the Roman Catholic Church during it's history

Freedom for Serfs

Holding priests accused of criminal acts like rape liable for prosecution in secular courts(see Henry II's battles with Thomas Becket)

Democracy (See 'Syllabus of Errors')

Religious Toleration (see 'Syllabus of Errors')

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of the Press

Equality of the Sexes

Woman practicing medicine or pharmacology(see Inquisition records)

Women Teaching Men (death of Hypatia)

Women in Politics(see condemnation by Bishop Williams of Boston, 1912)

Women's Suffrage (Bishop Manning, Cardinal Wiseman)

Opposition to Tyranny(Chile, Cardinal Soldano handing over liberal priests to Pinochet to be murdered, Pope JPII endorsing Pinochet)

Independence for Ireland(Bishop Walsh's comdemnation of 1916 Rising, earlier condemnations of Fenian movement)

Attending secular or other denominational colleges(Bishop Walsh, Archbishop McQuaid)

Laity reading the Bible

The Bible available in common languages

Socialism

Liberalism

Separation of Church and State

and...the Vatican was the only nation to recognise the Confederacy as a nation.....

So, we are to follow the good Bishop's proclamation based upon the Catholic Church's outstanding record of being on the right side of historical issues?

Use these arguments whenever the Church is used as an authority..I compiled them for a court presentation by a friend concerning the Rwanda crimes

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


My Favorite Lines from the Right
Always starts out "We believe"

We believe that the vast majority of Maine's people believe that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, and that calling same-sex relationships marriage doesn't make them so.

Just because one believes something doesn't make it true.

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." -- Thomas Jefferson


An Open Letter to Bishop Malone
May 11, 2009

His Excellency, the Right Reverend Richard Joseph Malone, Th.D.Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Portland
510 Ocean Avenue - P.O. Box 11559
Portland, ME 04104

Re: Your Statement on the Signing of the Marriage Equality Bill in Maine

Your Excellency:

You may be "deeply disappointed" in the actions of the Legislature and Governor of the State of Maine in their courageous action of ending the discrimination in marriage rights by heterosexist supremacists against those who were created by God to have a same-sex sexual orientation, but your disappointment reveals the disturbed and disordered thinking of a patriarchal bully.

By vowing to lead the charge toward revisiting this issue by having the electorate vote directly on the issue of whether to allow a minority to have the same rights as the majority, you reveal the intrinsic evil of the so-called moral theological teachings of the apostate hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church as they relate to the treatment of persons with a homosexual orientation. And you continue to do harm to God's People.

Your position is morally indefensible and is wholly unsupported by sacred scripture. It appears that the moral bankruptcy of the apostate Roman Catholic hierarchy is driving you to this activism - but a voice crying out from the wilderness must be heard to call you out for your un-Christian immorality.

Why must you persecute my people?  And why must you join in the desecration of the Church by this bigotry?

Why is it that you blindly insist that the extension of the rights, duties, privileges and responsibilities of marriage and family formation be denied to those whose orientation is different from that of the majority?  

The connection between heterosexual marriage and procreation is not affected in the slightest by the extension of civil marriage rights to the gay community.  After all, the majority, whose sexual orientation by nature is heterosexual, will continue to procreate (and sometimes prolifically despite Malthusian considerations and the duty of responsible stewardship of Creation). The right pf heterosexuals to procreate within a marriage relationship is still encouraged by the state, and perhaps also by the Church, even if the Church looks askance at artificial means of procreation.  

The extension of civil marriage rights to the gay community has the salutary societal effect of strengthening families that already exist, protecting children in these families, encouraging societal stability, discouraging promiscuity and the spread of sexually-transmitted diseases, and providing equal protection under the law for all of the people of the state and not just special rights for heterosexist supremacists.

Why is it that you make it appear that heterosexual relationships are worthy of greater protection under the secular law than homosexual relationships?  

Why is it that you hate and despise the children of those who live in same-sex relationships?  Why is it that you wish to make sure that they and their families do not enjoy the same rights and protections under the law as the children in families with heterosexual parents?

Why is it that you wish to discourage stability in a society that needs more families protected?  Why is it that you cannot redouble your efforts to contain the immorality among the members of your own Church and among your own clergy? Divorces are increasing among Roman Catholics, and canon law has made a Church annulment so easy to get that reputable canon lawyers have remarked that there is not a single heterosexual marriage that cannot be annulled under existing canon law. Not one.

Wouldn't it be more prudent to direct your efforts to strengthen heterosexual marriages among the members of your flock, to better protect the children in families whose stability is being torn apart by the inability of their straight parents to reconcile their differences and keep their families together?

Why is it that you wish to encourage promiscuity within the gay community? Why are you not encouraging gays, if they cannot contain their libidos, to partake in civil marriage even though the arcane and contra-scriptural teachings of the Apostate Roman Catholic hierarchy do not permit sacramental marriage to gays?

Bishop Malone, that Th.D indicates that you have a Doctorate in Theology that surely did not come from a Cracker Jack box. Unfortunately, it appears that you were seriously misinformed by your teachers about the meaning of marriage for people who profess to be Christian, as well as the moral issues related to sexual orientation.

The first thing is that the connection between marriage and procreation in Christian teaching is only for those who are married before they become Christians.  For Christians, there is the clear and unequivocal teaching of St. Paul on the subject, in 1 Corinthians 7:8-9, in which the unmarried and widowers are told that the highest calling is to celibacy, and that marriage is only for those whose nature is such that they are incapable of containing themselves, because it is "better to marry than to burn with passion."  This way the weak of will who cannot live chaste and celibate lives may be able to assuage their sex drive within the confines of a marriage, rather than by engaging in fornication.

In Matthew 19, Jesus teaches that a man leaves his parents to become "one flesh" with his wife - but he does not say a single thing, there or anywhere else, for or against marriage involving persons of the same sex.

The only same-sex marriage documented in sacred scripture is that between David and Jonathan, reported in 1 Samuel 18.  Translations of sacred scripture that look beyond the limitations of the Vulgate to go to the original texts, later in the chapter, make it clear that at the marriage of David to his daughter Michal, King Saul exclaims that David is now his son-in-law a second time, the first time being by the marriage to Jonathan.

It is only in this way that David can make the comparison in 2 Samuel 1, in mourning for Saul and Jonathan, slain in battle by the Philistines, that the love of Jonathan was better than the love of a woman.

There is not a single bit of scripture relating to homosexuality that can fairly be deemed to be condemnatory of those with a homosexual orientation, if viewed in a correct context.  I will not go through every reference here, but I can assure you that the position of the apostate Roman Catholic hierarchy is more like the misogynistic and macho position of the men of Sodom, than any loving relationship between two gay men could ever be.

Regardless of the errors in the apostate Church's interpretation of Sacred Scripture, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees your right to the free exercise of religion.

Article I Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of Maine goes into greater detail:

Section 3. Religious freedom; sects equal; religious tests prohibited; religious teachers. All individuals have a natural and unalienable right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences, and no person shall be hurt, molested or restrained in that person's liberty or estate for worshipping God in the manner and season most agreeable to the dictates of that person's own conscience, nor for that person's religious professions or sentiments, provided that that person does not disturb the public peace, nor obstruct others in their religious worship; -- and all persons demeaning themselves peaceably, as good members of the State, shall be equally under the protection of the laws, and no subordination nor preference of any one sect or denomination to another shall ever be established by law, nor shall any religious test be required as a qualification for any office or trust, under this State; and all religious societies in this State, whether incorporate or unincorporate, shall at all times have the exclusive right of electing their public teachers, and contracting with them for their support and maintenance.

It is in this context that your position proves to be both Un-American, and in discord with the Constitution of the State of Maine.  You appear to be advocating against the religious freedom of anyone whose religious belief is different from your own.

Both constitutions protect your freedom of religion.  They protect the right of the Roman Catholic Church, and other religious denominations, to define religious marriage for their adherents as they wish.  But your freedom of religion is not the only freedom of religion that is protected and guaranteed - so are the rights of those who interpret sacred scripture differently, or whose beliefs are not confined by the scripture we share, are based on different writings, even the beliefs of agnostics and atheists.

So why do you oppose the freedom of religious belief for Unitarian-Universalists and Quakers? or of members of other denominations, churches and religions that would bless and sanctify same-sex marriages in a religious context?

And why do you oppose the rights of all people of the State of Maine to share in the equal protection under the secular law for their families?  Secular law is independent of the constraints of a particular religion, and is dictated by the constitutional considerations and the social contract on which they are based.

Bishop Malone, you and all of the Roman Catholic apostate hierarchy and the heresiarch antipope Benedict have much to answer for on the Day of Judgment for misleading your flock and for the evil that you preach in the name of God.  The clear message of Matthew 25 is intended for you - those who you revile and persecute are also the Children of God - and what you do to us, you do to God.  So do not be surprised on the Day of Judgment if you are numbered among the goats and cast into unquenchable fire.

You must understand that the Roman Catholic Church hierarchy, by the document entitled "Considerations regarding proposals to give legal recognition to unions between homosexual persons," issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith on July 1, 2003, has clearly indicated its intent to act against the constitutional and societal interests of the People of the State of Maine and the United States in its demand that Roman Catholics in public life obey the orders of the hierarchy in opposition to the dictates of a clear and informed conscience, to undermine the principles of equal protection under the law and religious freedom guaranteed by the Constitutions of the United States and the State of Maine.  

The Roman Catholic Church is a temporal power in its own right by virtue of its ownership and control of the Vatican city-state, a government with which the United States maintains diplomatic relations.  As the agent of this apparently hostile foreign power as well as the spiritual leader of Roman Catholics in the State of Maine, your interference on behalf of the Church in American secular governmental affairs, solely for the purpose of oppressing a minority, is patently despicable. As you well know, heterosexual marriage is not adversely affected in any way by the extension of equal marriage rights to the gay minority.

I urge you to consider turning away from this evil course.  As the Bishop of Portland, you may not be able to endorse marriage equality because of the dictates of your superiors.  But there is a higher moral duty that calls you under the Catechism of the Catholic Church Section 2358, with regard to "homosexual persons" - "They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided."

While you are constrained to continue to misinterpret sacred scripture in accordance with the misguidance of your superiors, and you do have that evil 2003 document to contend with, there is something that you as bishop can do to resolve the conflict between the moral teaching of Section 2358 and that inimical document - and that is to refrain from doing evil.  While you may not be able to retract your statement, I urge that you do not do anything further to call for harm to or discrimination against gay people and their families under secular law.  There may be nothing you can do to actually make things right without jeopardizing your position within the hierarchy, but at the very least you can stop doing affirmative harm to my people.

In the Peace of Christ, I remain,

Joann Marie Prinzivalli
Serva servarum Deae


Madam, I salute you!
Brilliant.  Might I suggest submitting it to the Portland Press Herald as a full opinion page column?  Well done!

Question:  What does an atheist do when they fall to the floor and start "speaking in tongues"?

Answer: Get a CAT scan.


[ Parent ]
They are just jealous...This from Father Cutié...
Father Cutiés Indulgences.

A few days before he was caught indulging himself with an attractive woman on a South Florida beach, the now-dismissed Rev. Albert Cutié told a TV interviewer that he thinks all Catholic priests should have the option to marry. "If they want to discipline me, let them discipline me, but I think the option would be better and healthier."

A good point, Father, even in retrospect.

As Catholic League President William Donohue told CNN's MarK Sanchez, priestly celibacy is policy, not dogma. "They could change this tomorrow if they want to," Donohue said in an interview about the Cutié affair. But if they do, Donohue continued, they're just going "to exchange this problem for another one. Look how many rabbis and imams and ministers who are married and cheat on their brides."

for more from article:

newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2009/05/father_curies_indulgences.html?hpid=talkbox1


It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox