|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile
Your blogmistress is in need of a real vacation...

I've made it to the initial round for favorite progressive blogger in the Air America Cruise Contest. I have to stay in the Top 5 before the second voting round begins, so your vote is appreciated! First voting round:

Join Stop Taser Torture on 12.4.09

33|175:175
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |

The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist." (Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger." (MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Sat May 23, 2009 at 08:00:00 AM EDT
|
I don't even know why there's hand-wringing over this. There's a divide on whether it's tactically sound to send hate crimes legislation through the Senate as a stand-alone bill for a vote versus dumping it in with a defense authorization bill. The jellyfish in the Senate are floating the latter again. (Wash Blade):Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), the longest-serving openly gay member of Congress, said in an interview Friday with the Blade that supporters of hate crimes legislation in the Senate are considering attaching the measure as an amendment to the 2010 defense authorization bill, but House lawmakers are trying to convince the Senate to pass the legislation as a standalone measure.
The bill passed the House on April 29, 249-175, as a standalone bill. The legislation would allow the U.S. Justice Department to assist in the prosecution of hate crimes committed against LGBT people that result in death or serious injury. In 2007, it was tacked onto the defense bill and because anti-war folks and conservatives opposed the bill for their own reasons, the leadership in Congress stripped the hate crimes provision out. With the different composition of the Senate this time around, the thinking is tactically it could work this time around.Frank said the Senate is considering passing hate crimes legislation in the same way this year because "they think they'll have a hard time passing it because of Senate rules." While it takes 60 votes in the Senate to end debate on legislation, amending a bill sometimes takes only a majority vote.
But while Frank said "there's been some talk" about putting a hate crimes provision in the defense bill, House lawmakers are "trying to talk them out of it." Honestly, IMHO, let the House and Senate vote on this outright, let's see who opposes this bill straight out. In particular, I want to see the roll call of Dems who vote against it. The polls are with us, purportedly the votes are there -- it's time for some legislative responsibility and ownership on civil rights matters.
So, 1) do you think a standalone bill weakens its chance of passage, and 2) which strategy will be used in the Senate? |
| Pam Spaulding :: Sigh. Look at the wrangling over fed hate crimes bill strategy |
|
|
|