|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |
The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Fri May 29, 2009 at 09:00:30 AM EDT
|
|
I just stumbled over a very interesting around Sotomayor's nomination: Top Republican calls Limbaugh, Gingrich comments 'terrible'. It's mainly about some GOP senate politicians getting somewhat freaked out by the comments angry old white men (Gingrich and Limbaugh) are making about Sotomayor and try to distance themselves from those comments.
Senate politician Cornyn - after distancing himself from Gingrich and Limbaugh - concludes with the following quote:
"We are all a product of our upbringing and who we are and I think it's a fact people do have different backgrounds, but I don't think those background ought to determine what the law is."
Now wait a second: "law should not be determined by upbringing". This is interesting! Isn't the whole anti-gay marriage industry sometimes explicitly and the rest of the times implicitly based on 'christian beliefs' and 'christian upbringing'? But why am I surprised, it's just another piece in the big bigotry puzzle ... |
| rupi3000 :: Sotomayor, and an interesting argument about upbringing |
|
|
|
