|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |

The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist." (Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger." (MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Mon Jun 01, 2009 at 21:30:00 PM EDT
|
The White House spinners on marriage equality look like fools when the former VP looks more supportive than President Barack Obama. Cheney supports marriage equality, not civil unions (but has the same unconstitutional leave-it-to-the-states position). (Huff Post): Dick Cheney rarely takes a position that places him at a more progressive tilt than President Obama. But on Monday, the former vice president did just that, saying that he supports gay marriage as long as it is deemed legal by state and not federal government.
Speaking at the National Press Club for the Gerald R. Ford Foundation journalism awards, Cheney was asked about recent rulings and legislative action in Iowa and elsewhere that allowed for gay couples to legally wed.
"I think that freedom means freedom for everyone," replied the former V.P. "As many of you know, one of my daughters is gay and it is something we have lived with for a long time in our family. I think people ought to be free to enter into any kind of union they wish. Any kind of arrangement they wish. The question of whether or not there ought to be a federal statute to protect this, I don't support. I do believe that the historically the way marriage has been regulated is at the state level. It has always been a state issue and I think that is the way it ought to be handled, on a state-by-state basis. ... But I don't have any problem with that. People ought to get a shot at that." UPDATE: Chris@Law Dork 2.0 parsed Darth's statement and initially thought that the former VP was supporting marriage equality at the state level, but he's now Chris thinks it was just a well-parsed utterance from Cheney. First, Cheney's statement:I do believe that the historically the way marriage has been regulated is at the state level. It has always been a state issue and I think that is the way it ought to be handled, on a state-by-state basis. Different states will make different decisions. But I don't have any problem with that. People ought to get a shot at that - and they do at present. Chris says: He has not affirmatively stated a belief in government-recognized marriage equality, even at a state level. He has affirmatively stated a belief that each state, regardless of its decision, should be able to choose marriage equality if it wishes to do so.
Cheney has not ever, that I can find, stated opposition to or support for state government-sanctioned marriage equality. His stated position has gone, I believe, from leaning against recognition but supporting states' rights to come to their own decision (2000) to neutral on recognition and supporting states' rights (2004) to leaning for recognition and supporting states' rights (2009). (See the first post on this topic to see a more drawn out explanation.) Fair enough. What this really means is that the next person who asks Cheney about this has to have a bulletproof question, such as "Do you agree with Vermont's legislature, which eliminated civil unions and voted to enact full marriage rights for gay and lesbian couples? That's a yes or no question. Even if Cheney tries to parse that by saying it's a state issue, it would force him to say whether he believes in marriage equality or not himself.
Video is below the fold. |
| Pam Spaulding :: You know it's bad when the President is publicly to the right of Darth Cheney on marriage |
| Marr |
|
|