News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Governor Lynch signs marriage equality into law in New Hampshire

by: Pam Spaulding

Wed Jun 03, 2009 at 18:31:26 PM EDT


Reactions abound to the great news that the governor, as promised, signed into law that separate is not equal.

New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition:

Governor John Lynch signed legislation that will give the legal protections of marriage to gay and lesbian couples in New Hampshire.  Acting swiftly and decisively, Governor Lynch signed the legislation only an hour after the legislature took the final vote on the issue.

"Today is a historic day for all Granite Staters," said Mo Baxley, executive director of the New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition.  "We applaud Governor Lynch, Speaker Norelli, President Larsen and the leadership of the General Court for making sure that all loving, committed couples have the freedom to marry.  Today, our shared values of individual liberty, freedom, and fairness have been upheld."

New Hampshire is now the 6th state in the United States to extend the freedom to marry to gay and lesbian couples.  This new law will go into effect on January 1, 2010.

HRC:
"With Gov. Lynch signing legislation passed by the state Senate and House, New Hampshire has become the latest state to recognize that loving, committed couples, and their families, should receive equal rights and responsibilities," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.  "No religious institution will have to recognize any marriage under this law, as the language proposed by Gov. Lynch and agreed to by the legislature made abundantly clear."

The Human Rights Campaign salutes the work of key state groups and leaders, including: Gov. John Lynch, Senate President Sylvia Larsen, Senate Majority Leader Maggie Hassan, Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Deb Reynolds, House Speaker Terie Norelli and Representatives Jim Splaine, Ed Butler, Paul McEachern, Barbara Richardson, New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition, MassEquality, GLAD, and the many activists, including HRC members, who have been working to build support for this legislation, and the majority of New Hampshire voters who support marriage equality.

"When the National Organization for Marriage [a group opposed to marriage equality] started making $50,000 ad buys in New Hampshire, I put out a call for help and HRC answered. We could not have done this without them," said Mo Baxley, Executive Director of the New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition.

Freedom to Marry:
"New Hampshire has now become the third state to move past civil unions to marriage, recognizing that there is no substitute for the freedom to marry and equality for all," said Evan Wolfson, executive director of Freedom to Marry and author of Why Marriage Matters: America, Equality and Gay People's Right to Marry.  "And Governor Lynch has become the latest moderate elected official to move to support the freedom to marry, providing a good example to, and continuing momentum for, the legislators now considering marriage bills in states such as New York and New Jersey."
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Executive Director Rea Carey:
"Clearly this is a momentous day for New Hampshire - a state that holds individual liberty and fairness as core values - as well as the entire country. Once again, after careful consideration, another state has concluded that denying the fundamental freedom to marry does not protect anyone; it simply places more families in harm's way and makes them more vulnerable to hardship. The marriage victories in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, Maine - and now New Hampshire - affirm the national momentum building for marriage equality.

"We salute Gov. John Lynch and the New Hampshire legislature for supporting this critical measure, and we extend our heartfelt thanks to the New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition and GLAD for their hard work and tireless advocacy to make marriage equality a reality in New Hampshire."

GLAAD:
"Gov. Lynch's signing of the marriage equality bill grants legal protections for same-sex couples in New Hampshire to take care of and be responsible for each other," said GLAAD President Neil G. Giuliano. "As people get to know the loving and committed couples at the heart of marriage equality, our culture is moving to equality."
"GLAAD congratulates and expresses our deepest appreciation to the New Hampshire Freedom to Marry Coalition and the courageous couples whose personal stories and work for fair and equal treatment under the law culminated in today's signing," Giuliano said.
Pam Spaulding :: Governor Lynch signs marriage equality into law in New Hampshire
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Best news all day,
Hopefully with most of New England supporting equality, the Wingers invading Maine will fail on the people's veto.  

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.

So happy for all of us, especially those in New Hampshire.
So sad for California, but eager for 2010.

So looking forward to when we reach that nice, even number of ten states with marriage equality.  One-fifth of the nation.  When will that day come?  This year?  Surely, no later than the next.

Would you have believed it possible as recently as six months ago?


"No religious institution will have to recognize any marriage under this law..."
Does anyone have a problem with this? Should this be the model for other states? If churches have a problem with same sex couples tarnishing their 'sanctity of marriage', then this is their out. Then welcoming churches and pro-gay florists, bakeries, caterers, photographers, etc will get the support and money.

No problem here - it just codifies most practices

There are some churches that will marry people not of their faith or even of their congregation.  

A Catholic church can turn down non-Catholic couples (--if the couple is mixed religions, don't they still require the children to be raised Catholic?)  Can christians be married in a synagogue?  I don't know.

I don't think it's needed to be spelled out in law, but I guess it makes some people more "comfortable".

But who would want to get married somewhere they aren't wanted?  Unless of course, they trying to push a point.

But then, how do churches recognize marriages other than perform them?  Is there something else this specific phrase applies to?  


[ Parent ]
that should be
There are some churches that will not marry people from outside their faith or even outside their own congregation.

[ Parent ]
I don't
There are still churches (especialy, if not just in the south) who won't marry interracial couples.

This is part of the Free Exercise Clause in the First Amendment, and it's just fine by me.

Listen to "TransTalk" every Monday from 4-5pm ET on http://www.falconradio.org beginning January 11th!


[ Parent ]
This is already the law in every state in the Union.
Church MUST be separate from State.  That's a good thing.

Lynch asked the legislature to spell it out again, only this time in big, boldface type, because the crazies are childish like that.

I'd rather ignore them entirely, but this double-pre-emptively takes away their last remaining false whining point, so, you know, whatever.  I couldn't give a rat's ass what somebody's religion thinks about any aspect of my life.


[ Parent ]
no problem with that whatsoever.
It doesn't change a thing but is an ego stroke I'm more than happy to give. . .of course we know there are many who never will be happy regardless.

We say "GOOOOOOAL!!!!"


[ Parent ]
Religion is for Bigots,
  That is what it says to me when this garbage needs to be written into a law.  When historians in the future look back and see this garbage, they will see how fucked up religion truly is.

 Sure they will read about how people killed themselves in the name of religion.  They will see how harmful to children the priests, pastors and ministers were.

 We all know that marriage equality will not be the end of the world as they claim.  Funny thing is, the religious right admit that it will not be the end as they even claim historians will view President Bush as being one of the greatest presidents ever.  To me that says good drugs will still be available and people are still using them, but by no means does it say it will be the end of civilization as we know it.

 History will also see that religion for the most part was used for evil reasons as we know today that it has been used for that in recent history.  But History will also show that there is some good to it as well.

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.


[ Parent ]
Rhode Island is next
"Most Rhode Island voters favor same-sex marriage by a margin of 60 percent to 31 percent, according to a new statewide survey conducted by researchers at Brown University."

http://news.brown.edu/pressrel...


If we got all of New England before the leaves change color, that would be amazing.
And I would be SERIOUSLY tempted to move to New England.

An entire contiguous zone of freedom and equality in America?  And it's next to Canada?  I mean yay for Iowa, of course, but living in an actual "land" of the free -- that would be tempting.


[ Parent ]
Everyone should follow that link and check out "The Current State of Relationship Recognition Across New England" at the bottom of the page.
Everything's happening so quickly, GLAD's own Marriage Initiative page is out-of-date!  They're making it happen so fast, they can't keep up with themselves!

I'm stunned.


[ Parent ]
RI's legislature and governor
are in no mood for LGBT rights this year.  Well, they're letting us make funeral arrangements maybe.  60% be damned.

[ Parent ]
i thought there
was already a report out a few days ago saying that Rhode Island will NOT pass marriage equality this year.

[ Parent ]
I heard the governor has threatened to veto??
I heard there was little chance for progress in RI except for allowing partners to make funeral arrangements when widowed.  

[ Parent ]
This says it all
:o)

does anyone have
the religious exception language that was used in this final version.  I know they changed it from what the Governor suggested.  But, I haven't seen what the final language is.

The Governor's suggested language seemed rather broad and not very specific.  It seemed like it would have provided many outs for organizations and businesses to not recognize same-sex marriages.

Did the final language end up being less broad and more specific?


I think this is what was used.
http://www.gencourt.state.nh.u...


1 New Paragraph: Affirmation of Freedom of Religion in Marriage. Amend RSA 457:37 by inserting the following introductory paragraph:

Each religious organization, association, or society has exclusive control over its own religious doctrine, policy, teachings, and beliefs regarding who may marry within their faith.

2 New Paragraphs; Affirmation of Freedom of Religion in Marriage. Amend RSA 457:37 by inserting after paragraph II the following new paragraphs:

III. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a religious organization, association, or society, or any individual who is managed, directed, or supervised by or in conjunction with a religious organization, association, or society, or any nonprofit institution or organization operated, supervised, or controlled by or in conjunction with a religious organization, association, or society, shall not be required to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges to an individual if such request for such services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges is related to the solemnization of a marriage, the celebration of a marriage, or the promotion of marriage through religious counseling, programs, courses, retreats, or housing designated for married individuals, and such solemnization, celebration, or promotion of marriage is in violation of his or her religious beliefs and faith. Any refusal to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges in accordance with this section shall not create any civil claim or cause of action or result in any state action to penalize or withhold benefits from such religious organization, association, or society, or any individual who is managed, directed, or supervised by or in conjunction with a religious organization, association, or society, or any nonprofit institution or organization operated, supervised, or controlled by or in conjunction with a religious organization, association, or society.

IV. The marriage laws of this state shall not be construed to affect the ability of a fraternal benefit society to determine the admission of members pursuant to RSA 418:5, and shall not require a fraternal benefit society that has been established and is operating for charitable or educational purposes and which is operated, supervised, or controlled by or in connection with a religious organization to provide insurance benefits to any person if to do so would violate the fraternal benefit society's free exercise of religion as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and part I, article 5 of the New Hampshire constitution.

Reading that it seems they can only deny access in relation to "religious counseling, programs, courses, retreats, or housing designated for married individuals".


[ Parent ]
this one
seems to me to be exactly the same as the first one.  I don't see any changes in it at all.

It seems to me that this language would allow, for example, the YMCA to offer "family discounts" to hetero families and deny those same "family discounts" to same-sex families.

It also seems to me if a church owned an apartment building they could refuse to rent a unit to a same-sex couple by claiming that renting to them would be a way of "celebrating" their marriage.


[ Parent ]
this one
seems to me to be exactly the same as the first one.  I don't see any changes in it at all.

It seems to me that this language would allow, for example, the YMCA to offer "family discounts" to hetero families and deny those same "family discounts" to same-sex families.

It also seems to me if a church owned an apartment building they could refuse to rent a unit to a same-sex couple by claiming that renting to them would be a way of "celebrating" their marriage.


[ Parent ]
I think these are the types of issues...
that may be tested in courts.  Not only in NH but other states as well.  My feeling is that nothing in this bill will stand up against any given state's equal protections, but it's the courts that may have to figure that out.

[ Parent ]
My take
From what I've seen of civil rights law, if a religious institution ran something like a boarding house or apartment complex, they would be forced to follow secular law, through public accommodations. This would be especially true if the complex accepts Section 8.

The Catholic Church in San Francisco, if you may remember, pulled out of providing services to the public when the courts ruled that the city's laws prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation covered them.

The Y, however, could be considered a "private club", and thus is exempt from anti-discrimination laws.

Listen to "TransTalk" every Monday from 4-5pm ET on http://www.falconradio.org beginning January 11th!


[ Parent ]
I'll look for it.
My understanding is that the final language just confirms the seperation of church/state. . .just a confirmation that any religious org has the same right to be affirmative or negative in whom they decide is worthy of the "church".

So we give them that . . .who cares?

I remember when my Sister was refused a "church wedding" from her fiance's catholic church because she'd grown up protestant & wouldn't convert.

Her husbands family was devastated. . .not so much anymore.

You can't hide behind a religious mask, but. . .when we fight for the separation of church and state, we also fight for the separation of state and church?


[ Parent ]
I want to be happy.
I want to be happy about New Hampshire today, but I keep thinking that this year, and next year, trans people in that state are STILL going to be openly discriminated against with no recourse in law. And will be going back to try to win their rights without the assistance of any organized lobbies, who will undoubtedly be working toward marriage equality in other states, heedless of the fact that the work in New Hampshire was not just left unfinished but brutally cut by a miserably unfair, unanimous down vote.

don't sell the NH equality activists short
if you live in NH, we can organize together.

[ Parent ]
I will do...
whatever I can from out of state (I am in Minnesota, so my rights in the state in which I live - where thankfully, trans rights are settled law - were not at stake, but I felt very strongly that what happened in NH was very brutally unfair).

[ Parent ]
we're not stopping
until we have full equality! For LGB and T! For All in NH, and everywhere! We're celebrating tonight, and tomorrow we get back to work. This is one step of many more that need to happen.

[ Parent ]
Who ever
Who ever said trans people are not included?

As an advocate for trans inclusion in all legislation I have to say that I'm getting frustrated. . .My Family is included . . .Trans, Gay, Bi, Straight. . .so who was it that decided that every single issue or event translates into a slam on Trans? . . .

I understand a frustration & it's the same frustration many of us took to the streets for. . .side by side with our trans btothers and sisters.


[ Parent ]
And what has Obama (or Gibbs) said about it?
[crickets chirping]

Great news.
Good things are happening brothers and sisters. Don't forget to keep sending in your postcards to the President!

http://www.postcardstothepresi...


This one was
a bit too close for comfort.

I am the lizard queen!

HERE is pic.... find Bishop Gene!


It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


Gene
that is so goofily funny and sweet.  like a kid in a school picture, lol!

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


[ Parent ]
But why wait?
I'm glad for New Hampshire, really, I am, but why do gay Granite Staters have to wait over six months to marry?  

There's a waiting period
while the law is put into effect. They need to change things like state tax and inheritance laws, visitation laws, adoption laws, property laws, things like those.

I am the lizard queen!

[ Parent ]
what has to change?
I thought with this legislation, same-sex marriages were on par and fully equal with opposite-sex marriages.  What has to change?

[ Parent ]
They are.
It needs to be placed in writing in all relevant areas.

I am the lizard queen!

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox