News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


MI: Speaker Pro Tem to introduce bill to overturn state marriage amendment

by: Pam Spaulding

Sat Jun 13, 2009 at 06:00:00 AM EDT


According to the Michigan Messenger, the bill by State Rep. Pam Byrnes will face an uphill battle with her fellow lawmakers, particularly Dems up for election in 2010. Byrnes will make the formal announcement about the bill today during a Pride rally.
"The time has come," Byrnes, the House speaker pro tem, said in an interview with Michigan Messenger, which first reported the lawmaker's plan on Friday afternoon. "I think attitudes are changing. We are seeing other states flip on this issue especially when you get the former Vice President Dick Cheney acknowledging same-sex marriages then I think we definitely see a change in attitude and it's time to revisit this."

A two-thirds majority in both legislative chambers is required in order to put the measure before Michigan voters. While the Democrats control the House, which would be more likely to pass Byrnes' bill, getting two-thirds of the Republican-controlled Senate would be highly more difficult.

The head anti-gay in Michigan responsible for getting the marriage amendment on the ballot, Gary Glenn of the American Family Association of Michigan, is smugly confident that Byrnes's bill will go nowhere.
"In the unlikely event it ever does come up for a vote, we doubt it gets even a simple majority of the House voting in favor of overturning so recent a vote of the people," Glenn said in an email to Michigan Messenger. "It certainly will not get the two-thirds vote required to actually place it on the ballot. But it does make for high drama, as political theater goes, to announce such legislation during a homosexual 'rights' rally, even though it'll never see the light of day thereafter."
The polls in Michigan still show only 46.5% support the right of gay and lesbian couples to marry. The bottom line, though, is if not now, when? It will never be a good time to overturn this because pols are always looking to cover their *sses. Michigan Equality agrees.
Michelle Brown, co-director of Michigan Equality, said Byrnes' move was important, and would move the issue forward.

"If you don't ever start to talk about it, how will you ever be ready to talk about?" Brown said. "So to have someone in the legislature say: 'You know what, it's time we revisit it,' to me sort of says its a wake-up call for everybody that perhaps we all need to be listening to what the people of Michigan are saying."

Pam Spaulding :: MI: Speaker Pro Tem to introduce bill to overturn state marriage amendment
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
We need more allies
We need more allies like this NYS county executive coming out all over the country as having opposed gay marriage and having changed their minds:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06...

The energy will have to come from the states to force the administration and Congress to make change.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


It's about time!
It's about time we fought that amendment in Michigan!  I'll be calling my reps to support the bill!

For those of us in Michigan
All the money we might have contributed to the National Democratic party or to Obama's next campaign? Fight their betrayal--donate that to Michigan Equality: http://www.michiganequality.org/

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

Let me predict...
As a Michigander (Michi-goose?) I believe that the best possible outcome would be to keep the Str8 definition of marriage intact, but eliminate the language banning banning other unions.  

Michigan folks were lied to directly about the purpose of the amendment; it was said by the supporters, in their literature, that the law was about defining marriage only, and would not affect other LGBT matters and rights:  yet the Attorney General himself became an activist for eliminating benefits to gay couples.   Many folks were very surprised by how swiftly the Rethuglicans moved against their own promises.

Attorney Corporal, I mean General, Mike Cox is a toady for the right wing of the Republican party; he wants to be governor so bad he can taste it.

This will have to be on a constitutional basis, since Proposal 2 was a citizen inititiated (in theory, but the Republicans aided and abetted) amendment to the state constitution.  Anything less will be tossed out quickly in the courts.

I don't think this is the right outcome, it's still separate and unequal,  but I think it is the best likely outcome.  

For now.

Hate stops a beating heart.


What about a statewide...
ENDA?  I'm still shocked that states like Michigan, Pennsylvania, & Delaware don't protect LGBT employees from being fired.  Why are these states overlooking this?

getting ready
I get lots of calls from various Democratic fundraising committees and am preparing to say something short and sweet like this:

Your party and your president have betrayed the GLBT community and my money is only going to support Michigan Equality.

My spouse is going to say something similar.


"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


But if they advocate mob rule...
and believe voters should decide civil rights, then why not vote for this bill and... let the voters decide?!

What can I say
"If you don't ever start to talk about it, how will you ever be ready to talk about?"

So true, soo true ...


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox