News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile

Access 11/5 Senate ENDA Hearing Live Blog

Access Tuesday's Election Live Blog


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


May Dem fundraising dollars shaky - why the gAyTM matters even more

by: Pam Spaulding

Mon Jun 22, 2009 at 10:56:00 AM EDT


UPDATE: A Blender sent in the latest plea from the DCCC for your dollars. See it below the fold.

UPDATE 2: Blender Clarknt67 has created an easy-fax form to send to the DCCC. See it below the fold.

You see, this is why the Obama administration and the DNC are apoplectic about the meltdown of the upcoming LGBT fundraiser this week. Numbers rolling in for the month of May show the following:

Short version: the DNC beat the RNC last month, thanks to a Presidential fundraiser; but the NRSC actually raised more money last month than the DSCC; and the DCCC raised only about 200K more than the NRCC.  While the cash-on-hand edge for the GOP is less than it was last month’s, it’s because the Democrats are still not retiring their debt, which is 4x the GOP’s.

Group Raised CoH Debt
RNC 5.82 21.55 0.00
DNC 8.37 12.14 5.60

NRSC 3.50 3.70 0.00
DSCC 3.45 4.00 4.17

NRCC 3.24 3.73 4.00
DCCC 3.44 5.01 6.67

GOP 12.56 28.98 4.00
Democrats 15.26 21.15 16.44

Compare to last month's:

Raised CoH Debts
RNC 5.76 24.38 0.00
DNC 4.52 9.09 5.42
NRSC 2.93 2.65 0.00
DSCC 3.13 2.63 4.58
NRCC 2.23 3.69 5.00
DCCC 3.05 4.03 7.33

Raised CoH Debts
GOP 10.92 30.72 5
Dem 10.70 15.75 17.33

The President himself is able to bring in cash, but given the tidal wave of the last election, the Congressional and Senatorial committees should be doing much better at this point and time. In an email discussion about the these figures, activist Lane Hudson noted to me that it's...
good for Party officials and elected officials to consider when not taking the steps necessary to win the trust and confidence of the LGBT community by delivering on promises made.  

I agree that much is at stake in re-electing a Democratic Majority to Congress and ultimately re-electing the President.  But I'm not willing to blindly do it and it seems there is a growing sentiment that this is the case.  There must be a pathway forward that is publicly shared with the community so that we can help work to move along that path and judge the progress that is being made.  Many of us are asking Democratic leadership for that pathway and I hope they will speak publicly about it very soon.

Peter Daou, on HuffPost, notes that this administration has a near-obsession with pandering to the middle for political safety's sake, and that includes LGBT rights issues.
Yes, pragmatism is admirable, but give me some idealism too, give me some deep-seated moral conviction and the powerful, ground-shaking words to express it.

...On gay rights, they are choosing the mushy middle, on women's rights (speaking to a global audience) the mushy middle, on the Wall Street bailout, the mushy middle, on health care, the mushy middle. On civil liberties and secrecy, they are not even bothering with the mushy middle, but emulating Bush's extremism.

...The incessant drive to the 'pragmatic center', wherever that is, the desire to please an elusive and ephemeral audience, that worship of moderation, results in the squandering of a unique moment: with Republicans on their electoral heels and Democrats in control, this is the time for bold progressive stances and the unabashed embrace of core Democratic principles. This is not the time for wishy washy policies that seem politically smart but will in fact lead to the impression of an administration and a party devoid of convictions.

Thank you. The GOP is in crappy shape with the American public. Is this President going to wait until it starts clearly outraising the Democratic party and reforming itself to actually pay attention to the constituencies that helped Obama win the White House and build a Congressional majority? Apparently crapping on various loyal constituencies and either 1) telling them to wait, or 2) accept watered down policy as a "win" is the M.O. at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

I guess they are also willing to see the gAyTMs permanently out of order .Many of names and orgs cited in the infamous Tobias 10,400-sq.-foot spa" e-blast" have dropped out of that fundraiser and panic has to be in the air. Let's look at the running list from the email below the fold.

Pam Spaulding :: May Dem fundraising dollars shaky - why the gAyTM matters even more
If you can't make the date, take a rain check and help anyway?  SUZE ORMAN just signed on that way.  ELIZABETH BIRCH signed on that way.  Lots of others.

If you CAN make the date, you'll be joining the Vice President of the United States . . .

. . . along with Virginia Governor / DNC Chair Tim Kaine . . . immediate past DNC Chair Howard Dean . . . Chairman Barney Frank . . . Representatives Tammy Baldwin and Jared Polis . . . Vermont Senate President Pete Shumlin . . . District of Columbia Mayor Adrian Fenty . . . David Mixner . . . Richard Socarides  . . . The Task Force's Rea Carey . . . HRC's Marty Rouse . . . ESPA's Alan Van Capelle . . . GLAD's Mary Bonauto . . . NBJC's Alexander Robinson . . . GMHC's Marjorie Hill . . . The Victory Fund's Chuck Wolfe . . . Towle Road's Andy Towle . . . Iraq Marine vet Brian Fricke (whom you may have seen on 60 Minutes) . . . Billy Bean . . . Joan Garry . . . Keith Boykin . . . Ray Buckley . . . Brian Johnson . . . Corey Johnson . . . Dixon Osburn . . . Paul Smith . . . Bruce Bastian . . . Mitchell Gold . . . Krystal Ball . . . and so many others, like YOU, who have been pushing the ball down the field for so long.  (Well, Krystal is fairly new to this, but what a kick to have a pro-marriage CPA triathlete young mom running to unseat a conservative Republican in Virginia.)

It would mean a great deal to have you with us:

www.democrats.org/LGBTdinner

Did I mention that the Mandarin Oriental has a 10,400-square-foot spa?

The National Stonewall Dems pulled support from the event; the former Co-Chair of the Obama LGBT Leadership Council during the 2008 campaign, Stampp Corbin has dropped out; the National Black Justice Coalition said no board members are attending.

UPDATE: Hat tip to Blender Orion45, who sent us the latest plea for money from the DCCC ("For any of you who do NOT want to contribute to Democrats until more action on Gay Rights. Here is snail mail form from latest letter:  You can fill out ZERO, or whatever and return it.")

Here's the pitch from the DCCC:

You won't even believe this. 

The Republicans called on none other than Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin to headline their big fat-cat fundraising dinner and claimed to raise over $14 million dollars in one night! 

That's right -- $14 MILLION.  


You know what I say? Thanks, but no thanks - how about you get back on that bridge to nowhere, Sarah.  We don't need you or any of your fat cat friends who are rooting for President Obama to fail. 

We've got to beat them by winning the FEC fundraising battle on June 30th. It's the first reporting deadline after the GOP's big dinner and they will be all over the news clamoring that their big cash totals prove that their fat cat friends are beating our grassroots movement.  But, not if we can help it - contribute $50, $75 or more to show everybody that America stands behind President Obama.

Better yet, if you do, Speaker Pelosi and the other House Democrats will match every one of your dollars with $2 of theirs. 

Contribute $50, $75 or more to the DCCC's Million Dollar Match* campaign. If you give today, they'll match your gift 2-to-1.

UPDATE 2: Blender Clarknt67 has created an easy-fax version of the DCCC form for you all ("I made my own version of the DNC's contribution page to send. I thought others might appreciate it too. It gets the point across quite succinctly, I think. They know what they have to do to get the cash flowing, move some legislation and don't just toss us bones and photo ops.")

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I have been saying this everywhere
It seems to me that the dems would PREFER to lose than to give the LGBT community anythign it wants in order to keep our trust, money and votes.

People keep complaining that WE are the ones cutting off our nose to spite our face.

But, clearly, it is the dem party that KNOWS what they need to do to EARN our support.  They are just not WILLING to do it.  Apparently they would rather LOSE.  Cutting off one's nose to spite one's face sounds like what they are doing, not us.

If our lack of suuport causes dems to lose, it doesn't get worse for us, it gets worse for THEM.  Why do they always expect the LGBT community to take it on the chin to save the country from repugs?  As far as I'm concerned, it's time for non LGBTs to take their turn in the box.

When they ask us to wait for our rights, ask them if they will give up their and wait with us.

the longer they wait, the bigger our demands will become.  The more they run around scraping up other crumbs to try to shut us up, the more determined we become for REAL equality.


Yep.
the longer they wait, the bigger our demands will become.  The more they run around scraping up other crumbs to try to shut us up, the more determined we become for REAL equality.

Absolutely! We won't be "satisfied" by measly crumbs any more. We want equality, and we're determined to get equality. Either they can help us and earn our respect, or step aside and watch us get it.

Want to save marriage equality in Maine? Ask me how! ;-)


[ Parent ]
You're Right
I've been saying this repeatedly all over the place for months now, mirroring your comment above:

If our lack of suuport causes dems to lose, it doesn't get worse for us, it gets worse for THEM.

The point is that if the Dems do nothing (except substantiveless scraps) then we are in no better position than if the GOP is in power in Washington.

It won't be until the DEMS understand that we will no longer be the "take them for granted because they will always vote for us" part of the base, that they will take any substantive action. That's why the boycotting if the DNC-LGBT Fundraiser is so important right now.

Close the GayTM. Only give to candidates who have actually done something other than make promises - most are just pandering for our cash.


[ Parent ]
Yes, I thought there was supposed...
To be a difference. I thought Obama was going to be worlds apart from McCain. And while I understand we wouldn't even be seeing these crumbs come from a President McCain, there still doesn't seem to be much of a "change" from GOP rule. After all, that DOJ brief sounded like it could have easily come from a McCain-Palin Administration. Perhaps they'd be going farther in pushing for FMA again, but the total inaction from Obama-Biden isn't that much better.

Now don't get me wrong, I know Dems with all their faults are always better than GOPers even at their best. But still, it would be nice if I can be given reason to vote FOR someone rather than against the other. It would be nice if I can give my time and money because I really appreciate what they've done rather than fear what the other side might do if they win.

Want to save marriage equality in Maine? Ask me how! ;-)


[ Parent ]
I forget which Blender said it awhile back
We should not have to choose between our persecution or our neglect.

Fuck the DNC. They're not our saviors.

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi


[ Parent ]
the victim role
Dems, especially Reid & Pelosi, seem to prefer to be in the victim role.
i guess its a lot easier than the leadership role.

[ Parent ]
Is that true, though?
The more they run around scraping up other crumbs to try to shut us up, the more determined we become for REAL equality.

Will this level of outrage maintain itself through 2012? Or will we crumble at the first sight of the 2012 Caribou Barbie/Anger Management Ken duo the Repubs puke onto the stage?

I'll admit I was one of the ones who swore I would NOT vote for Obama after he dismissed marriage equality as "semantics" on the Logo debates. I still held my nose, gritted my teeth, and voted for the lying weasel, because I couldn't stomach a woman who thought seeing Russia from her house qualified her to be Vice President. Yeah, I know, she didn't actually say that, but she said plenty of other things.

At this point, I can't see myself voting for him again. Not without a whole lot of action on his side of things. And I won't spend a dime for anyone - including my Rep that I dearly love, Lois Capps - unless they make substantive movement on equality for all of us. But who knows what will be on stage on 2012? I don't see the Repubs taking any sharp movement to get themselves back into the land of the sane, so I think whoever it winds up being, they're going to be to the right of Palin/McCain.

Will we really step back and allow this to happen, or will we fold like a cheap suit at the first sight of the Republican 2012 presidential candidate? I think the answer to that question is also the answer to the question of whether we'll ever actually get equality. They're not giving it to us, we're going to have to take it from them. Are we willing to pay the price?

Cause any fool knows, a dog needs a home; a shelter from pigs on the wing


[ Parent ]
Did you read any of the comments...
In that Politico article? I hate to say this, but the die-hard "Obamapologists" are really starting to scare me. Here are just a few examples:

What a whiny bunch the GLBT community is. Every day all we read about is more whining from this community. Whatever sympathy I ever had for them is now gone.

I'm fairly sympathetic towards the gay community but they seem to be, well, throwing a tizzy fit. They supported Hillary during the primaries and said many a nasty thing about Obama, for them to now act like Obama owes them the world when they were feeding Hillary's "Kitchen Sink" strategy is pathetic. I get that Obama made you promises, but get over yourselves, Obama is doing Political Triage right now and you just aren't as important as Obama's other concerns.

If gays are going to torpedo the Democratic party because they didn't get everything they wanted in the first six months, I guess that means I don't have to feel bad about not voting for any gay issues that arise in my state.

Yuck. Just yuck. And the DNC is wondering why we're angry? When they're setting up this frame of "the whining pissy gays" after we simply ask them to fulfill their promises?



Want to save marriage equality in Maine? Ask me how! ;-)


The het privilege is disgusting
The whole gays supported Hillary BS. I certainly didn't support her. I didn't support Obama either. And so how does that square for them? If I'm throwing a "tizzy fit" then I would like these apologists to:

* give up their right to marry
* have no anti-discrimination laws in place so they can lose their job on a whim based on a host of irrelevant attributes
* have their spouse without citizenship deported
* be able to be discriminated in public accommodations

the list goes on and on. Those comments reek of heterosexual privilege, and of course they wouldn't give up any of the above.


[ Parent ]
Not only that
Andy Towle was an Obama supporter from the very beginning, Aravosis may have been an Obama supporter during the primaries also (I'd have to check the archives). And we know Andrew Sullivan can't stand the Clintons and his endorsement of Obama really took off after McCain chose Palin.

Uh, and the Chicago gay community supported Obama by and large. Even at the Prop 8 protest, when Obama's name came up you could see a number of people that just didn't want to go there in criticizing the President

So this is one meme that is out in the media. And it needs to be shot down, to an extent. There were even "A-list gays" that supported Obama in the primaries (not that I want to bring that whole ugly argument back up).  


[ Parent ]
Well, I did...
But only after bouncing around for a while until I finally settled on drafting Al Gore... Then Al Gore wouldn't run. Long story short, I settled on Hillary Clinton but quickly moved to Barack Obama as soon as she announced by email that she'd drop out & endorse him.

But hold on, what does this have to do with our civil rights? It shouldn't matter who any of us supported in the primary. What matters are the promises President Obama made to us during the primary AND general election campaigns. What matters is repealing DOMA & DADT. What matters is passing ENDA & UAFA. What matters is ensuring that LGBT people are included in the universal health care program Obama wants. What matters is President Obama's promise to be a "fierce advocate" for our equality.

As I've said before, I started giving to Obama as soon as the primaries ended. I made phone calls for him. I made trips to Nevada for him (and this was BEFORE I got my place there). I believed the promises he made to us, and all I'm asking is that he remembers us and makes a sincere effort to fulfill those promises.

Want to save marriage equality in Maine? Ask me how! ;-)


[ Parent ]
that's right
I propose that our standard response to these type of comments in the future should be that:

we will wait patiently as long as you give up your rights and wait patiently WITH US.


[ Parent ]
like I said above
they are willing to cut off their collective nose to spite their face.  They always expect us to suck it up and wait.  But, no one else has to.

And the attitude that we have always wanted EVERYTHING in the first 6 months is historical revisionism to the extreme.  WE just wanted ANYTHING up until the DOMA brief.  It was the DOMA brief that changed everything.

Even then, a QUICK apology and correction of that DOMA brief would have stopped the firestorm we now see in the gay community.  But, nope, Obama can't apologize. no way.

You reap what you sow, dems.


[ Parent ]
What I find hilarious is there's a diary on Dkos's rec list
blasting Obama for talking one way on the campaign trail about HEALTH CARE, and now governing completely differently. Many of the commentors are outraged!

LOL, welcome to our world, you whiny little bitches! Feeling duped? Stop complaining, he has more important things to worry about than Healthcare, there are 2 wars and Iran!!!

(Oh god, I'm wicked.)


[ Parent ]
I try not to read the comments on GBLT issues
on most mainstream sites. It's such a reminder of how far we have to go. Most of the time some Jesus freak goes on about how God hates gays and then it's back and forth, back and forth between the Jesus freak and us.

It's depressing and, really, pointless.


[ Parent ]
Re: I try not to read the comments on GLBT issues
I think the haters must have Google alerts set up, because they seem to flood article comments every single time.

[ Parent ]
Me too
Just substitute DKos for "mainstream media sites" and "Party hack" for "Jesus freak" and you have the same dynamic.

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi

[ Parent ]
freakin' me out
this is what ive been seeing all over the blogs & its freakin me out...because ive been a part of these communities for years & now suddenly i'm being called "troll", "whiney", etc.

[ Parent ]
So another lesson has been learned--I hope--by the accommodationists
We are on our own in our fight for equality.  We are now and always have been.  Does anyone seriously believe the creeps who posted those comments would really have been there for us when the crunch comes?  

As the old song lyric put it, God bless the child who's got his own.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
The fact that they're so mad...
I see the fact that they're so obnoxiously mad as sort of a good sign. They may not like us, but it proves that they need us. If they didn't, they'd say "fine, good riddance, go away," but instead they're complaining that they're actually going to have to do something for us in order to get their own goals accomplished. And, sure, they're whining about it like a bunch of hateful three-year-olds, but they've let slip the secret that yes, GLBTs really do have some power in our relationship with the Dems.

[ Parent ]
The DCCC made it easy. There's a fax number
on that form above.  Just print it out, scrawl "I am gay!" across the thing in big letters, sign it and fax it in.  I'll will be doing that as soon as I get to work this morning.

As Jim Hightower once said:
Ain't nothing in the middle of the road but a yellow line and dead armadillos.

What the obsession with centrism is costing America: The real reforms we voted for and support is polls by 65-85%.

(The gap between policy preferences and the final score last November in the PResidential race is attributable to racism, IMHO.)

It's costing the Democratic Party the opportunity to make government WORK for Americans and move voters from policy preferences (Universal health care for one example) to lifetime Dem partisans.

Which is more pragmatic: Doing what the people voted for and being pilloried by demagogues for it? Or doing nothing substantive and being pilloried anyway?

We're just the canaries, folks. So-called 'centrism', the pragmatic approach of comforting the anti-government extremists while ignoring and attacking your base, is neither centrist nor pragmatic.

Is Dem strategy being run by a secret cabal of Libertarians and Greens?

But wait, there's more!


Or perhaps...
Is Dem strategy being run by a secret cabal of Libertarians and Greens?

KKKarl Rove's secret strategy to make Republicans the "permanent majority" again? Sure, they're still toiling in the gutter right now. But eventually, Dems won't have a "free pass" any longer and people will be asking where the "change" went. I mean, President Obama's approval rating is already slipping.

Obama, Reid, & Pelosi need to do something to fulfill the promises they made to a number of progressives soon, or "the base" won't feel too motivated to save their behinds.

Want to save marriage equality in Maine? Ask me how! ;-)


[ Parent ]
Finding "common ground"
is nothing more than a neat excuse for Obama to do nothing at all to shake up the status quo, despite all his promises.  And more and more people are noticing.  The McClatchy newspapers ran an editorial last week saying he has turned into Bush.  Ya see?  It ain't just them there whiny queers.

I am more and more certain this this will be one of the most disastrous one-term presidencies we've ever seen.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
Well, certainly if this continues
then it will be a disastrous one-term presidency.

And even some in the African American community have taken note of it, by the way.

I think Obama will realize that the country is no longer a center-right country (as it really was under Clinton) but is now a center left country. Obama's poll numbers have dropped but not as much as the Rethugs. (e.g. 74% prefer the single-payer health care option.)



[ Parent ]
Gays are the (dead) canaries in the coal mine
so true, so true. Now that Obama is caving on truly progressive health care reform, (and transparency and detention policy and...) I'm curious if all those people who told us to STFU, are sorry they didn't heed us? (Actually, I'm guessing not, they don't see it parallels, since after all, their issue is "important.")

[ Parent ]
I posted an update with your DCCC fax form
Kudos to Clark for this one:



[ Parent ]
Awsome
Thanks!  I'll be using this!

[ Parent ]
I printed
I printed out your oringinal snail mail version.  filled in my name and contact inof.  put a big ZERO in the amount and wrote the two standard messages onit
NO GAYS RIGHTS = NO GAY $$$
THE gAyTM is CLOSED

Put it in the mail today.


[ Parent ]
will definitely need more of these fax forms
When the next DNC and DSCC letters hit the inbox.

[ Parent ]
Let me know everytime a new one comes out
I am happy to make versions of those until Dems deliver the goods ,email me anytime..  

[ Parent ]
I just went to Speaker Pelosi's website and sent her the following message
Dear Representative Pelosi,

"I read this morning of your generous offer to match any donation I make to the DCCC with two of your own.  I am sorry that I won't be able to take advantage of your offer.  I think that this letter that I sent to President Obama last night will explain why..."  Of course I then copied to her my letter to the President which was published earlier today on the Blend.


The best possible response. n/t


[ Parent ]
I printed the form and sent it in
After the line "Thanks to you, the Bush-Cheney policies of the last eight years are fast becoming history" I drew an arrow to the left margin and wrote in this list:

Gitmo?
Iraq?
Afghanistan?
Torture?
Rendition?
Wiretapping?
Water-boarding?
Torture?
Bank bailouts?

I then checked Other and wrote in $0.00. Underneath the amount, I wrote:

When -- and ONLY when -- the Democratic party takes positive action to preserve my human dignity as a gay man, I will contribute.

To further underline my intent, I wrote out a check for zero dollars and no cents and placed it in the envelope with the same message written on the back. That in case they are simply throwing out forms that do not come with a check.  


I saw that too......
Obama and the Democrats are looking like Republican lite.  Sometimes it seems like they are trying to out-Republican the Republicans.  Does Obama think he can raise money from the right?  Rick Warren and his brood will not be contributing.

[ Parent ]
I am SOOOOOOOOOOOO...
...sick and tired of two things.  

I'm sick and tired of the mushy middle which is going to screw us on healthcare reform (this means you DiFi) and IS screwing LGBT people by demeaning us and promising but not delivering equality.

I'm sick and tired of Jesus.  I'm so sick and tired of Jesus that if another Jesus person knocks on my door I'm not going to be responsible for my actions.  Why don't Jesus people JUST SHUT THE FUCK UP!


Abuse all over again
Blaming the LGBT community for the short-comings of the democratic party's ability to fundraise and stay in office is sort of like telling the child to keep quiet about their abuse in order not to disrupt the family Christmas party. The Democrats really need to sort out their priorities. If they can't protect and defend the rights of American citizens then why are they in office in the first place? Better a battle with an enemy then a backstabbing friend.

Always thinking about it...

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox