News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile

Access 11/5 Senate ENDA Hearing Live Blog

Access Tuesday's Election Live Blog


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Employment Non-Discrimination Act Introduced in U.S. House

by: Pam Spaulding

Wed Jun 24, 2009 at 13:15:00 PM EDT


The official release (via email):
REPS. FRANK, BALDWIN AND POLIS LEAD INTRODUCTION OF THE EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT (ENDA)

Representatives Barney Frank (D-MA), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), and Jared Polis (D-CO) today held a press conference to announce the introduction of the 2009 Employment Non-Discrimination Act.

The legislation would extend federal employment laws, which currently prevent job discrimination on the basis of race, religion, gender, national origin, age, and disability, to also cover sexual orientation and gender identity.  The bill covers both the public and private sectors.

The bill has drawn impressive support in the House of Representatives.  The legislation has 118 original cosponsors, including both Democrats and Republicans.  Among those represented are some of the most powerful and influential members of the House, including Rep. George Miller (D-CA), Chairman of the Education and Labor Committee, Rep. John Conyers, Chairman of the Judiciary Committee, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA), Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Bob Filner (D-CA), Chairman of the Veterans Affairs Committee, Rep. Robert Brady, Chairman of the Committee on House Administration, Rep. Louise Slaughter, Chairwoman of the Rules Committee, and more than 30 House subcommittee chairman and ranking members.  Also supporting the bill is Rep. Michael Quigley (D-IL), the newest member of Congress.

Congressman Robert E. Andrews (D-NJ), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor and Pensions of the Education and Labor Committee, plans to hold hearings on ENDA in July.

"I am encouraged that we are going to be able to do this year what we were not able to do a couple years ago and that is to pass a fully inclusive bill," said Congressman Frank.  "I urge people to keep up lobbying. You can now take for granted that there will be a vote on the floor of the House of Representatives almost certainly this calendar year on a fully inclusive ENDA. At this point it is essential that everybody who cares about this lobbies his or her Representative and Senators. When you're through with that, go to other people and get them to lobby their Representative and Senators because we have a President ready to sign it, and I think things are well inclined for this to happen."

"This is an historic moment because I share Congressman Frank's optimism that we will be able to advance this legislation," said Congresswoman Baldwin. "It will be the first piece of major LGBT civil rights legislation ever enacted by this Congress.  The power of the Congress of the United States recognizing that discrimination in employment exists against people on the basis of their sexual orientation and gender identity, and saying that it is wrong, that it is illegal, is an incredibly important thing."

"Our businesses need to be able to tap into the very best and brightest to compete in a global environment," said Polis.  "Discriminating against people on the basis of race, or gender, or physical disability, or sexual orientation and gender identity, is simply inefficient and puts American businesses at a disadvantage in a global economy. By passing ENDA, we can ensure that American businesses have access to and hire the very best and brightest to be able to compete and build those leaders through those organizations."

Also speaking at the press conference were David Smith, Vice President of Programs for the Human Rights Campaign, Nancy Zirkin, the Executive Vice President of Programs for the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, Garron Levi, Associate Director of Legislation for the AFL-CIO, and Orson C. Porter, U.S. Director of Government Affairs for Nike, Inc., representing the Business Coalition for Workplace Fairness.  Other LGBT, civil rights, and workplace organizations attended the press conference, expressing their support for this timely and important legislation.

Although some states have passed laws to prevent such discrimination, it is legal in 30 states to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, and legal in 38 states to discriminate on the basis of gender identity.  According to research by the Williams Institute, there is an ongoing pattern of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity nationwide.

Contrary to assertions by some organizations that have opposed ENDA, the legislation does not afford "special rights" to any group.  Moreover, it specifically prohibits preferential treatment based on quotas; it specifically exempts members of the Armed Services, veterans' service groups, and religious organizations; and it does not require employers to provide benefits to domestic partners.

In 2007, the House passed a version of the current legislation which protects individuals against employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, but did not include a provision on gender identity.  It is expected that the present bill, including gender identity, will pass the House this year.


Update (from Autumn):

Mara Keisling Quoting Rep. Frank

Reactions are below the fold.

Pam Spaulding :: Employment Non-Discrimination Act Introduced in U.S. House
The Human Rights Campaign:
HRC PR: Employment Non-Discrimination Act Introduced in U.S. HouseThe Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) civil rights organization, hailed today the bipartisan reintroduction of an inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would create federal protections against workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.  The lead sponsors of the measure are Representatives Barney Frank (D-MA), IIeana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Jared Polis (D-CO), Michael Castle (R-DE), George Miller (D-CA), Mark Kirk (R-IL), John Conyers (D-MI), Todd Platts (R-PA), Rob Andrews (D-NJ), and Leonard Lance (R-NJ).

"Just like our friends, neighbors and coworkers, LGBT Americans work hard, provide for our families and contribute to our nation's economy," said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese.  "We all share the challenges of today's economic downturn, but our community also faces arbitrary discrimination in the workplace, simply because of who we are and who we love.  Congress must pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act and ensure that all Americans, regardless of sexual orientation and gender identity, get a fair chance to succeed at work."

...An estimated 85% of Fortune 500 companies include sexual orientation in their equal employment policies, and more than one-third also include gender identity.  More than 60 companies have joined the Business Coalition for Workplace Fairness, a group of leading U.S. employers that support the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.  To view a list of the companies, visit:  http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2009/06/enda-introduction-tomorrow-corporations-agree-fairness-is-good-business/

Note From Autumn: I haven't forgotten that the HRC was the only major "LGBT" civil rights organization that supported the less than fully inclusive version of ENDA in 2007/2008-- and never apologized for it. To say I'll be watching the HRC closely regarding ENDA this year would probably a huge understatement.

The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Action Fund:

Statement by Rea Carey, Executive Director
National Gay and Lesbian Task Force Action Fund

"Today marks a critical milestone for our community and our country. Introduction of this important legislation signals the beginning of the end of a long-fought battle. For decades, a majority of people in this country have supported protecting their friends, family and neighbors from discrimination. Congress must act, at long last, this year.

"Passage of this critical legislation would help ensure that people are allowed to participate on a level-playing field in the workplace. ENDA reflects our country's core values of fairness and equality. It is immoral to deny lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people the ability to earn a livelihood and provide for their families. People should not have to fear losing their job simply because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

"We are pleased that President Obama has expressed support for this legislation and expect the administration to play a role in assisting with its passage in both the House and Senate."

PFLAG:
"Today's introduction of an all-inclusive ENDA is the culmination of decades work, undertaken by PFLAG and others, to educate lawmakers about the daily reality so many LGBT Americans face in their places of employment," said PFLAG executive director Jody M. Huckaby. "Employment should be based on who is the most qualified person for the job, and not on the personal prejudices of those who are doing the hiring. LGBT Americans, like their straight co-worker, go to work each day to contribute to their communities, support their families and keep our economy running. Neither their sexual orientation, nor their gender identity, has any impact on their job performance. Congress should recognize as much and pass this inclusive ENDA immediately."
National LGBT Bar Association:
"The introduction of ENDA shows that Congress is dedicated to making sure that all workers are safe from discrimination," said D'Arcy Kemnitz, Executive Director of the National LGBT Bar Association. "The vast majority of Americans support workplace protections for LGBT workers, and it is long past time for federal law to reflect that reality."

... "Americans understand that employment protection is not just ethical, it is also practical," said Kemnitz. "Our members handle countless cases of workplace discrimination, and they will tell you that workers who are secure in their jobs are more productive. That is critical in today's economy."

...As the bill moves forward, a key sticking point is likely to be the inclusion of protections based on gender identity, which involves how a person identifies with his or her gender, which may be different than their sex.

..."We believe that is absolutely essential that the bill include protections for transgender employees," said Kemnitz.  "We look forward to working with legislators to preserve the bill's strengths and fend off any efforts to derail this crucial piece of legislation."

National Center for Transgender Equality (NCTE) Action Alert:

Right now, we are at a press conference on Capitol Hill about the introduction of a fully inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) which would extend the existing federal law prohibiting employment discrimination to protect people on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. Representative Barney Frank, joined by Reps. Tammy Baldwin and Jared Polis, introduced the bill this afternoon, joined by a bi-partisan group of Representatives.

NCTE's Executive Director, Mara Keisling, commented, "Day after day, we hear from transgender people who have lost their jobs for no other reason than plain and simple discrimination. This includes people who have had long and distinguished careers who, after they transition, suddenly find themselves unable to find meaningful work and young transgender people who are unable to get their first job. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act will be an important step in helping these folks get to work. When asked, Americans are consistently clear on the fact that we believe that people should be judged at work for the quality of their work, not on unrelated factors. This bill would bring the law into line with what Americans already know-prejudice has no place in the American workplace."

NCTE is calling on its members to be actively involved in the process of passing the bill, including visiting their members of Congress during the summer. Together, we can make this happen...

National Black Justice Coalition:
"This long-awaited legislation would call on members of congress to take a meaningful stand to end workplace discrimination" remarked Interim Executive Director Dr. Sylvia Rhue. "NBJC is working with congressional leaders to push for significant progress towards ending homophobia-based harassment and bigotry."

...NBJC Deputy Director and Connecticut State Representative Jason W. Bartlett noted, "Every day we hear stories of our Black LGBT brothers and sisters being discriminated against in the workforce.  Being oppressed at your place of work and feeling powerless to do anything about it is unjust.  This legislation will end a harsh reality for so many LGBT people of color.  We all must mobilize to make this legislation the law in our country."

The National Center for Lesbian Rights:
"Workplace protections for LGBT people are urgently needed and long overdue," said NCLR Executive Director Kate Kendell. "The President has said he is ready to sign this bill. All we need now is for Congress to act."

"We urge Congress to take speedy action to put this bill on the President's desk," said NCLR Legal Director Shannon Price Minter. "LGBT employees work just as hard and contribute just as much as other workers. They should not have to fear losing their jobs because of their sexual orientation or gender identity."    

Transgender Law Center:

The Transgender Law Center thanked lawmakers today for introducing a federal Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) which would protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) employees from workplace discrimination. The bill, which enjoys bi-partisan support in Congress, would add sexual orientation and gender identity to existing federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination.

"ENDA is an important step in securing civil rights for all Americans, and will ensure that all people, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity, will be treated fairly in the workplace," said Masen Davis, Executive Director of the Transgender Law Center.

Currently, California and 11 other states have non-discrimination protections for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) workers. Such laws are critical given the high rates of employment discrimination facing transgender employees. The Transgender Law Center's 2008 CA Transgender Economic Health Survey found that almost 70% of working-age transgender Californians experienced discrimination in the workplace, including 30% who reported that they have been unemployed as a direct result of being transgender or gender non-conforming. The same survey found that transgender respondents were twice as likely to have a college degree as the average California.

"Discrimination has no place in today's workplace," said Davis. "All employees deserve to be judged on their merits and the skills they bring to the workforce - not by their sexual orientation or gender."

As a member of the steering committee of the United ENDA coalition, the Transgender Law Center has been working since 2007 to educate California policymakers about the economic needs of transgender people and the importance of federal employment protections.

Tags: , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
H.R.2981
For those who want to keep track of it's progress on thomas.gov.

Still only 10 co-sponsors.


For the record...
It was introduced on Friday, not today! Look on Thomas!

[ Parent ]
It's about time!
And as I said in my diary, my Congresscritters will be hearing an earful from me... Along with our "Fierce Advocate in Chief". ;-)

Want to save marriage equality in Maine? Ask me how! ;-)

A good move--if it sticks. I won't be holding my breath.
Just wait till President Fierce decides to find "common ground" with the transphobes and the generic haters out there.  And when he consults with his five anti-gay "spiritual advisers" things are apt to get even worse.

Sorry to sound so pessimistic, but what cause do we have, really, to believe that our fierce advocates in DC will "expend political capital" on this when they been telling us for months that they won't?  If this had happened even two months ago, I'd have been exultant.  Now...I'll wait to celebrate if an unadulterated law actually passes and gets signed.

Laura Flanders on GRITtv this morning commented that Obama has such a consistent record of saying one thing and then doing the exact opposite, it's beginning to look like a deliberate campaign to drive us all crazy.  That says it perfectly, as far as I'm concerned.  I won't be even minutely surprised if Obama and his party do the same on ENDA.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


That's just the truth... as of June 2009.

No, energy in extolling this, until it is SIGNED INTO LAW,   and then ENFORCED, by the same homphobic DOJ that wrote that memo. 



It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


[ Parent ]
It seems to me
that the "trans phobes" were some in the LGBT community.

Add to that the fact that it had been stated REPEATEDLY that the agenda for 2009 was hate crimes and ENDA.

SOME people seem determined to ignore that simple fact.


[ Parent ]
You've been arguing for weeks that the Democrats
shouldn't spend their political capital on LGBT issues.  Now you're saying they've been planning to do it all along?  You really need to have your medication adjusted.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
No YOU'RE the one
that needs to pay attention. I said that they should not expend their political capital on this until they are finished with health care....which they won't because things move slowly in congress.

However, I and others have mentioned the fact that ENDA and hate crimes should and will be the priority this year. I have said numerous times that ENDA is far more important in the it impacts everyone.

Maybe if you stoped with your hysterical hate fest, you'd calm down enough to see that the issue has always been about having priorities.


[ Parent ]
"Oooh! And you're another!" LOL
That's really the best you can do?

Okay, fine, I'm wrong.  You have NEVER said that Pres. Fierce shouldn't expend political capital on us.  And even though you argue that working on DOMA and DADT would hurt his presidency (as if he needs help with that), passing ENDA and hate crimes won't.  The right wing will be pleased as punch about them, and won't say boo.  Of course.  Why haven't I realized his before?

Do you ever get tired of having yourself around?

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
SciFiGeek, I agree with your perspective on ENDA/hate crimes
I said that they should not expend their political capital on this until they are finished with health care....which they won't because things move slowly in congress.

However, I and others have mentioned the fact that ENDA and hate crimes should and will be the priority this year. I have said numerous times that ENDA is far more important in the it impacts everyone.

I know this seems to be a back and forth between you and another commenter. I don't know the background nor do I really want to.

But I want to say: I agree with you on the part of your comment I quoted above.

I am also disturbed by the underlying nastiness (for lack of a better word) in the energy of how some critics, like the one you are in conversation with here, orient toward President Obama. The more I feel of this particular energy, the more I feel a similarity between the nastiness in these cases, and the truly vile energy from some -- not all, but some -- Clinton supporters (and at times, from Sen. Clinton herself) during the primaries. It just has that same flavor to me.


[ Parent ]
Rep
I'm really proud to see my freshman Republican Congressman Leonard Lance being a cosponsor of this. Especially since it actually matches the district's views.

NJ-7 was one of the only districts in the nation to vote for Obama but elect (by quite a decent margin, too) a Republican to the House.


What's interesting about this is that
its not new. We've been hearing since January that the Democratic agenda for 2009 on LGBT issues was hate crimes and ENDA. So why is everyone surprised that those are the pecies of legislation comming before congress?

The only topics that were specifically off the agenda for this year were DADT and DOMA. So natually those were the topics that people decided to get riled up about knowing full well that the Democrats were not going to touch them now.

It seems to me that people are determined to be angry regardless of what actually happens.

Some folks are going to have to come to terms with the fact that neither the President nor Congress are going to touch DADT this year and NO ONE is in a hurry to touch the political third rail of DOMA.


some people should wear looser underwear


[ Parent ]
Or looser hats.


The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
notice the BIG GURL PANTIES around geek's ankles
that underwear shouldn't be any looser

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


[ Parent ]
Trust Issue
Yes, we all know about the deal made by HRC and the Dems to limit any touching of our issues to hate crimes and ENDA, but until the agitation of the last few weeks our status was: hate crimes languishing in the Senate (with Reid claiming they didn't have the votes to get a bill that passed the last Congress through this one) and absolutely no movement, and no plan for movement on anything else. Add to that the complete silence from the administration about LGBT people or issues (except for that one joke, of course) and the Democrats deciding the only way they needed to commemorate Stonewall 40 was by holding an ATM withdrawl meeting with the good little fags and dykes, and perhaps you can see why many of us were frustrated.

It is still an open question whether the House and Senate can or will have the guts to approve ENDA - and then to see if Obama would keep his promises by signing it. That, sadly, is now an open question given the administration's vigorous defense of DOMA and arguing against any/all LGBT rights in their anti-gay brief.

Had Obama announced the review of federal benefits and their expansion two months ago, changed course on the Census issue earlier, planned the Stonewall cocktail party scheduled for next Monday from the start of their administration (instead of throwing it together at the last minute) and defended DOMA less vigorously (or argued, rightly, that it was unConstitutional discrimination), perhaps there would be no anger, but Obama and the Dems brought this on themselves.

Now they are like the teenager who went out joyriding while drunk in his parent's car. He may be totally contrite, now that the keys are being taken away, and his parents might even believe his apologies, but the trust they once had takes a much longer time to rebuild. In our case, we will have to see both clear movement on our legal issues AND a change in tone from the Democrats and the administration (like, less fear to actually address our community or acknowledge our equality) to prove to us that we will not be abandoned at the next politically beneficial opportunity.  


[ Parent ]
Even if...
Barns can get this passed through the House with "T" attached, I'm sure the Senate will fuck it up sideways.  Even without the "T" they'll find a way to kill the bill.

Uhhhhh...
It passed the House the last time around
Not to be picky, but what was introduced on June 19th is not what passed in 2007; an Aravosisistic version was rammed through then.

>^..^<

"we are beyond that"
NOT, an apology for OFFENDING and ANGERING all transgender people and their allies.

color me unimpressed.

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


All of us together
Once the House and Senate versions are identical and pass, once President Panderer signs it into law, and when the DOJ enforces it, then I'll celebrate. Not one moment before.

It would be nice if Barney Frank and Joe Solmonese would get down off the house fag high horse and apologize for backslapping our transgender brothers and sisters in 2007, but I'm neither holding my breath nor contributing to their coffers in anticipation of Hell freezing over.

All of us together. No one gets left behind.

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi


An apology from Barney would be nice
but as long as he pulls through on this bill and delivers the goods for us, that's the nitty gritty I care most about.

As for HRC, they can go to hell. They've screwed trans people too many times, and I will never give them the benefit of the doubt again.  

Here's what I find about compromise--
don't do it if it hurts inside,
'cause either way you're screwed,
eventually you'll find
you may as well feel good;
you may as well have some pride

--Indigo Girls


[ Parent ]
Agreed
I donated to HRC a few times in 2007, then they threw transgender people under the bus. I called up and gave them an earful about why I was unsubscribing and stopping my donations, and haven't given a dime since. After Uncle Joe's smirking pandering, I don't plan on doing so ever again. All of us together.

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi

[ Parent ]
I got a snail-mail come-on from HRC just today.
In the "donation amount" blank I wrote ZERO.  Then across the face of the whole thing I wrote NUTS!, put it in the envelope, stamped it and dropped it back in the mail.  I suppose it was a bit petty, but it felt SOOOO good.  Well worth the price of a stamp.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
Barney Frank
At the House subcommittee hearing one year ago, I heard Barney Frank speak out firmly in favor of transgender inclusion in employment nondiscrimination legislation. It seemed to me he had truly had a change of heart since 2007. I've been looking forward to this. Based on his past performance he bears watching closely just to make sure he doesn't pull anything slippery this time. But I think he's finally gotten it right this time. Kudos to him for ENDA 2009 (so far, so good, that is).

Here's what I find about compromise--
don't do it if it hurts inside,
'cause either way you're screwed,
eventually you'll find
you may as well feel good;
you may as well have some pride

--Indigo Girls


Barney Frank on O'reilly tonight
Caught a blurb, channel surfing

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


It's a shame that Frank
has demonstrated himself to be completely untrustworthy on this. If he really has had a change of heart, then good. I'll believe it when I see him get it passed.

Fetch my pearls, I need to clutch them!

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox