News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile

Access 11/5 Senate ENDA Hearing Live Blog

Access Tuesday's Election Live Blog


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


So, DNC, did that fundraiser really bring in a million bucks?

by: Pam Spaulding

Wed Jul 01, 2009 at 14:00:00 PM EDT


You'll recall that the first story out about the LGBT fundraiser was in the Advocate, where it was reported that:
The event brought in nearly $1 million, up from about $750,000 last year, according to a Democratic Party source.
This number, not corroborated by anyone at the DNC, was ponied up right quick and many took it to heart that somehow the boycott was an utter failure. However, I soon heard from a very reliable political contact and updated my post to say that there was
something fishy about that $1 Million amount claimed to have been raised for the DNC fundraiser.  So we cannot confirm that this is all queer money from this fundraiser.  

As often done, Andy Tobias as Treasurer of the DNC can apply any of his fundraising efforts or other DNC staff fundraising efforts to whichever event that in order to inflate the success of the particular fundraiser.   Many straight stockbrokers (loyal DNC'ers) could have given $30K in the months prior to the fundraiser, and had no clue where his/her money was being applied internally at the DNC.  Also there are regular Queer Donors to the DNC that give monthly and annually and this amount was probably added to the tally for the event.

FEC reports will be filed at the end of this month so we will be able to check the DNC amounts for when the $$$ was raised, and who wrote a check from the LGBT community.  My inside source says they would be lucky if they actually raised $250,000.  Still a lot of money, but no where near the $1,000,000. claimed by the DNC.

Michelangelo Signorile was also wondering about that original figure from an unnamed source, so he tried to get some answers from the DNC. You won't be surprised at the results so far.
Andy Tobias, the openly gay treasurer of the DNC, was fretting about the event and complaining to people, according to three individuals who'd interacted with him and with whom I spoke in the days before the fundraiser (and I've spoken to several others who confirmed this to me after the fundraiser as well). Publicly, DNC officials and hosts like Barney Frank were keeping a stiff upper lip, trying to tamp down the power of the blogs and the influence of all those who dropped out of the fundraiser. But privately, Tobias had pretty much thrown in the towel on the event.

...When I contacted the DNC's LGBT fundraising director, Tom Petrillo, for confirmation of the one million dollar amount, he bumped me up after a day to press office, where Caroline Ciccone took another day to get back to me, only to tell me that the DNC would not confirm the one million dollar amount and said the DNC doesn't confirm fundraising event figures. But in searching around and looking at the coverage of other fundraisers, I found this story, which, for example, attributes Obama's bringing in 3 million dollars at an event recently to DNC "officials." And this one has many details and implies they came from the DNC. At the very least, the DNC doesn't seem to want to be so distanced from the reporting on the numbers in these stories.

Much more below the fold.
Pam Spaulding :: So, DNC, did that fundraiser really bring in a million bucks?
Ooops. Sounds like trouble for that pesky queer dollar count, no? BTW, Mike  invited Tom Petrillo to come on his show to discuss the discrepancies, and well, are you surprised that Petrillo declined after the request for info was bumped up to the DNC press office? Mike:
We now need a confirmation of the one million dollar number from the DNC, on the record, with a clear breakdown of where the money comes from. With the absence of that no one should assume this fundraiser did well at all, as all of the evidence -- and the statements from Tobias to various people before the fundraiser -- points in the opposite direction. People who want to pressure the Democrats should continue to target the DNC fundraisers since it clearly really hit a nerve, to the point where they had to spin something out immediately and go so far with the numbers -- like the Iranian ayatollahs -- in an attempt to nip any revolution in the bud, even though it's now raised many more questions.
There are also a number of questions Mike posed that the DNC needs to answer to have any credibility at this point, as we await the FEC report showing donor breakdown (it's out in mid-July). Feel free to send return responses fundraising appeals from the DNC with these attached:


  • How many people are members of the LGBT Leadership Council, and are their donations throughout the year included in this fundraiser? What is the annual dues structure? Don't they then get "comped" to the dinner because they've payed their dues throughout the year?
  • How many people who were not members of the Leadership Council dropped out of the dinner, and what amount of money did that account for?
  • Are you counting all of the LGBT money raised throughout the year in the dinner?
  • How much of the one million is straight money and how much is gay money?
  • Why didn't you fill that room at the Mandarin Oriental and how many at the dinner were comped? Weren't all the elected officials comped, and weren't all those used in the fundraising letter -- those names that didn't drop out -- comped?
  • How many people actually paid for the dinner and how many maxed out in contributions, paying 30K?
  • How many paid the minimum of 1000 dollars?
  • Does the treasurer have the authority to raise money and then apply it internally to wherever he would like it to sit?
  • Does every donor whose money was applied to the event know that their money was applied to an LGBT-specific event?
  • Has all of the money been brought in, or is the one million dollars including pledges or future dues of the LGBT Leadership Council members?
  • How many attendees asked for a refund? Would the DNC provide such a refund?
  • When is the next LGBT-specific fundraising event, since this was so record-smashing successful?

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The Important Thing is the Message was Delivered
DNC can spin this anyway they want.  The truth is the message was delivered, and there was no way they got $1M from this event.  Everyone, including Obama, knows we are pissed off, which is why we are seeing these lame attempts to appease us.

Keep the pressure up.  


I agree, the press & spin is ancillary
regardless of what they're SAYING they made, if they really did make a substantial amount less, that's the important thing. Politicians listen to money more than anything.

[ Parent ]
Agreed x1000
They wouldn't be trying to say "Look, one million dollars NO REALLY IT IS" if the message hadn't come through loud and clear.  

http://chimaerandi.blogspot.com/

[ Parent ]
A Potential Benefit from the Protest?
Slightly off-topic, but it may be a sign we are having an impact and the GayTM is not as lucrative as it might be. MSNBC is reporting that the Obama administration will not appeal the judgement in favor of Diane Schroer:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31...


So?
Yeah, I suspect they shifted some money around to make the haul seem bigger than it actually was.

So what? It happens with other fundraising events. It's called posturing to impress the Republicans (who do the same thing) with your fundraising prowess.

So what? Is this a horse you really want to continue beating?

How about dropping this story ... and getting on with using blogs, contributions, and every other damned weapon in our arsenal to push POTUS and Congress (R as well as D) toward equal rights.


I think this story is important.
It's up to bloggers these days to find real truths as our MSM news is filled with nothing but propaganda. If the DNC is lying, shouldn't we know about it?

Keep up the good work, Pam.


[ Parent ]
If you don't think hitting them in the wallet--BIGTIME--
constitutes "pushing them toward equal rights," what would qualify, in your view?

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
We also want to know
how fabulous was the spa?

Did it soothe Barney's rage?
He was out of his mind in the Signorile interview...maybe he needed a good soak...especially after the lousy take at the door...and having to find a way to make it look good.

Poor Barney...can't even get respect from his community.

If only he wasn't afraid to stand up to the President.  He at least could get credit for having integrity.

If this $1 million take is just smoke and mirrors, the DNC is even WORSE than we thought.  

They won't act on our behalf, even though they campaign to us and say they will be our advocates.
They pass the buck:  ask the President, pressure congress, let the court decide.
They lie to us about the effect of our own advocacy in the hope to manipulate us into obedience.

All they've gotta do is take action...but they'd rather try to get away with doing nothing.  

Keep on this, Pam.  Someone has to...there are far too many sheepish LGBTs that just don't get it...and I don't know why...they are even sicker than the DNC.  We can't let the ones that are fooled by the Party be the ones to torpedo our own fierce advocacy.  


[ Parent ]
It reminds me of an episode of Seinfeld
where he works into his comedy routine a bit about having a friend (George) who puts in way more work into trying to get unemployment than actually finding & keeping a job would take.  

They are spending way more time & effort trying to project a false image of being supportive of & supported by lgbt citizens than it would take to just be supportive of us & in turn get support from us.


[ Parent ]
Frank is a lousy interview
because he expects the LGBT community to kow tow...he is used to getting his own way and adulation from us in exchange for very little in return.

That day is over.

He is enamoured of his power inside of the beltway; he never tires of telling us all that we don't uderstand how politics are done.

How politics is or is not done s defined by how he politicians are willing to play.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


[ Parent ]
"he never tires of telling us all that we don't uderstand how politics are done. "
You're right, of course.  But the problem--and I can't imagine Frank grasping it--is that we understand perfectly well how politics are done.  And we're had enough.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
Thanks for that,

I have been firing them back as fast as they come. especially before June 30... 

more ammo is always good. 



It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


I Can't Say but, Did You Hear???
South Carolina First Lady Jenny Sanford is blaming gay marriage for her failed marriage to Gov. Mark Sanford.

And to think, I felt sorry for this southern belle????

No more.

People ask, "How have you guys managed to stay so long?" I tell them, "Don't sweat the small stuff." It's mostly small stuff.


it's satire
Not factual. http://thediscust.com/?p=547

Read the disclaimer:
http://thediscust.com/?page_id=2

The "news" on this site is not entirely real.  If there is, in fact, actual news on this site, then it is likely marked as such, just so you can tell the difference.  This site is news parody, but if you had to actually come to this page to figure that out then you might not catch that particular nuance even as it's being explained to you so maybe you should just move along.

Actual people parodied/mocked on theDiscust are public figures (or dead) and therefore eligible for such treatment. Any resemblance in name or otherwise to any non-public/non-dead figure within the editorial content of this site is purely coincidental, unintentional, or you told us it would be ok. No public servants were harmed in the writing of this publication - that happened long before we came along.

theDiscust is for entertainment purposes only. Please do not source theDiscust in your news reports or thesis papers as you will likely regret it - though if you do, please send us a copy.



[ Parent ]
Not for real
Apparently Jenny's remarks were fabricated by a satirical site:
http://thediscust.com/?p=547
More info here:
http://thenewcivilrightsmoveme...

Gods always behave like the people who make them. - Zora Neale Hurston

[ Parent ]
From Inside the DNC. . .
Someone I talked with in he DNC told me a similar story. Check out it in my PHB post:

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/...

Close the GayTM. Only give to candidates who have actually done something other than make promises - most are just pandering for our cash.


Various Thoughts
First, thank you , Pam and Michelangelo, for continuing to follow-up on this story.  Our community owes you both a great deal of gratitude for your work.  Second, having been involved in several challenges to authority over the years, I am not surprised to read the information you have gathered.  One of the ways that oppressors maintain their power is by creating disinformation that will increase the likelihood of the oppressed giving up.  One of the most popular of these is to imply that those who are challenging them are only an isolated few, while the vast majority of others support the oppressor.  This is, of course, a variation on that theme.  I hope people will remember it as they continue to challenge the Obama administration, as it will be used again and again in an attempt to disempower us.

The Advocate is in bed with Obama
as they participated in pushing the million dollar haul story

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Plus they just put out an article 2 days ago
that listed 'good gay blogs,' and I was surprised that PHB was not on it. Seemed like they were pushing ones that are not questioning authority.

[ Parent ]
Bottom line:
blogs that question authority make their corporate advertisers unhappy.

The American people, taking one with another, are the most timorous, sniveling, poltroonish, ignominious mob of serfs and goose-steppers ever gathered under one flag in Christendom since the end of the Middle Ages.
-H.L. Mencken


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox