"If you're gay, lesbian, or bisexual, would you sacrifice for your trans neighbors and siblings? If you're trans, would you sacrifice for your gay, lesbian, or bisexual neighbors and siblings? It's something worth knowing about yourself and those around you." --Autumn Sandeen, 4/19/2010, the night before GetEQUAL's DADT repeal protest at the White House
Public Calendar
Press/media, organizations, and individuals send your time-based event info to: calendar@phblend.net
The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend: "a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).
"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist." (Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger." (MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
I have a few questions for you. First, since when does it require 60 votes to get any form of legislation through the Senate? Of course, I already know the answer to that, never.
So, why are you requiring 60 votes to pass legislation? Cenk Uygur recently wrote an article, which is posted on the Huffington Post titled "The Sanders Rule: All Bills Get Up or Down Votes." He argues that legislation making its way through the Senate does NOT require 60 votes to pass it, which is absolutely correct, the number needed is 51. What 60 votes ARE required for is to break a filibuster, but NOT to pass legislation.
Uyger is absolutely correct when he writes, "If the Democrats don't use their 60 seat majority to break filibusters, then they are absolutely complicit. There are no excuses left. It's one thing to say you're voting your conscience on a bill (though a great majority of the time they are in fact voting their pocketbook by voting with the lobbyists), it's another to say that you will join the Republicans in upholding a filibuster. That is not acceptable." So please tell me, why do the Democrats "deserve" to have a filibuster proof majority.
Uyger also maintains that WE THE PEOPLE deserve the change that we voted for, and that you and the rest of the blue-dog Democrats are not living up to the promises made on the campaign trail. The people of this nation, you know the ones that voted you and your fellow Democrats into office, deserve TRUE leadership in the Senate. And if you are not willing to use the power, many of us feel that you need to get out of the way of progress. In short, grow a pair and utilize the power the great people of this nation have instilled you with.
