News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Interview with U.S. Congressman Patrick Murphy (D-PA) on Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal

by: Pam Spaulding

Sat Aug 15, 2009 at 09:00:00 AM EDT


My transcription of this interview now available under the fold.... Louise

"'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' clearly isn't working for our military, and it hinders national security and military readiness at a time when America is fighting in two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. My time in Iraq taught me that our military needs and deserves the best and the brightest who are willing to serve- and that means all Americans, regardless of their orientation. Discharging brave and talented servicemembers from our armed forces is contrary to the values that our military fights for and that our nation holds dear." -- Congressman Patrick J. Murphy
On Friday at Netroots Nation I had the pleasure of interviewing the main sponsor of the legislation to repeal Don't Ask, Don't Tell (H.R. 1283, the Military Readiness Enhancement Act, the Military Readiness Enhancement Act), Rep. Patrick Murphy (D-PA-6th).  I asked him about whether we'll be able to track public whip counts, Elaine Donnelly of the Center for Military Readiness and whether he expects her to represent the opposing viewpoint on the Hill again during hearings, and his commitment to get rid of a law that is affecting our national security. I also asked him about his opposition to a stop-loss order while Congress addresses repeal.

Pam Spaulding :: Interview with U.S. Congressman Patrick Murphy (D-PA) on Don't Ask, Don't Tell repeal

Pam Spaulding: Introduce yourself...

Congressman Patrick Murphy: Sure, I'm Patrick Murphy from the 8th Congressional District of Pennsylvania. I'm wearing my 82nd Airborne pin; that's the unit I served with in Baghdad six summers ago. ("183rd Eden"? -Louise)

Unfortunately, that's where nineteen of my fellow paratroopers never made it home.  

Pam Spaulding: And, what do you feel now that "Don't Ask Don't Tell", that you've sponsored to repeal this, how do you feel the debate is going to go?  

CPM: I am very confident that as we lead the fight to repeal the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy that we're going to be successful. Successful getting it through the Congress and on the President's desk, and President Obama has promised, has took an oath and said he will sign that piece of legislature to finally, after sixteen long years, repeal the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy.  

I just came back from Iraq and Afghanistan, and I will tell you, so many troops grabbed me aside and said, "Hey Congressman, hey Patrick, keep fighting, because this policy is wrong and we need you to change it."    

PS: And you think that the leadership in the military is ready as well?

CPM: Well, you know, the military leadership takes an oath to support the Constitution and they takes their orders from the Commander-in-Chief. And if the CIC signs into law that we are repealing DADT, then the CIC says to his Secretary of Defense and his Chairman of his Joints Chief of Staff, which President Obama has already done, and says, "Guys, get ready to implement this thing, because it's changing, because it's coming from the Congress"- they will execute. They will salute sharply and execute the mission given to them.

And that is to make sure they respect people in our military, no matter what race they are, no matter what color they are, religion they are or sexual orientation they are.

PS: What do you say to people who think that the President should sign an executive order to try to stop the discharges while Congress handles the question of it?

CPM: And, listen, people have their opinions; that's what America is about. I mean, my focus has been to repeal DADT. It was a law that was implemented by the Congress and needs to be repealed by the Congress. For those criticisms of President Obama, I look at history, and I taught this at West Point.

In the 1950s, when half of our country by the way was still segregated, our military was ahead of social change, and the president signed an executive order to repeal it (military segregation). But that executive order by President Truman wasn't inconsistant with US law.

President Obama, unlike frankly President Bush, respects the political branch of government, President Obama respects US law. President Obama has gone to the Congress and to folks like myself and said, "Patrick, we need you to repeal DADT. I'm gonna sign it when you get it on my desk" and that is what my focus has been.

PS: Do you think it's okay to have a public whip count, so people can see how things are going?    

CPM: Yes, and that's why I ask people to go on "Let Them Serve", that's my website; again, "Let Them Serve". Look at what the webcount is; look at who's my co-sponsors.

I have 168 co-sponsors right now, and if your congressman or congresswoman isn't on it, I ask you please- call their office, email them, write them letters, write "letters to the editors".

Why? It makes no sense, why we've kicked out over thirteen thousand troops- since we've implemented DADT. That's over 3 and a half combat brigades, when our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are stretched so thin. Over 60 Arabic translators...

I tell ya, the senior leadership- folks like Colin Powell, who was one of the authors of the DADT policy, has even come and said now, "It's time now to re-evaluate this thing. We need to change and repeal DADT."

PS: And to think that felons, gang members and all are serving, while qualified personnel are being discharged, is a tragedy.

CPM: Yeah, and listen, I will say that our American men and women who serve our country in Iraq and Afghanistan and throughout the globe, they are our heroes and we need to support them. And we need to let all Americans serve and have respect for different upbringings, including someone's sexual orientation.

PS: And what do you think, um, that during the next set of hearings, that people on the other side are going to present? After all, last time around, Elaine Donnelly testified quite candidly and humorously- it did not do the other side much justice.

CPM: Yeah, well, listen, I have respect for Ms. Donnelly. I don't appreciate the fact that she now questions my military service and I don't frankly appreciate the fact that she doesn't think that the American soldier is as professional as the 26 other countries that allow their troops to serve openly.

But listen, that's what America is America for; and she's entitled to her opinion and her... even if I think that opinion is wrong. And um, I anticipate a strong fight from the forces of the status quo; I understand it, you know, but I didn't come to Congress to be nice to everybody and just go along to get along. I came to Congress to make sure I fight for the values and principles I believe in and how I was raised, and where I think our country needs to go.

And where our country and our military needs to go is as a country that allows everybody to serve openly, as long as they can get the job done. And when I served in Baghdad six years ago, I will tell you that the paratroopers in the 82nd Airborne Division didn't care what race, color, creed, sexual orientation someone was. They cared whether or not you could fire an M-4 assault rifle.

Could you kick down a door; could you get your job done, so we would all come home alive? That's what they cared about, not what the other forces of the status quo care about.

PS: Thank you Congressman; I hope you catch your flight.

CPM: Thanks, Pam.

(Note from Louise: My thanks as well to Congressman Murphy and my apologies if I mangled some parts of this due to lack of military knowledge!)      

     

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Great interview!
Kudos Pam; if I get a chance I'll transcribe this today and post under the fold.

In the meanwhile, here is a link to letthemserve.com, the site Rep. Murphy started and mentioned in this piece.

Thank you sir, for your service and your continued hard work.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


Transcription of Pam's interview of Rep Murphy up!
Despite the best efforts of my cat Sassafras...

Autumn, just what the HECK did Bon-Bon say to her online minions, anyways??? ;) Sas has been a mega-pain for days now!

Anyways- folks, with leadership like Patrick Murphy, my hope is growing that right-headedness will defeat DADT. Check out his website (link provided in the transcription); spread the word, contact your Congress critters!


Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


[ Parent ]
He is soo cute!
I hope this guy is ready to not only be a hero but the first gay man's pin-up overseas!

Always thinking about it...

gay pilots
Good questions, good answers. He has it exactly right. As a combat pilot in Vietnam, I couldn't agree more. We don't discharge some of our best people when there's a war going on or otherwise. How dumb is that?

They ask us to give 110% in service to our country, then cripple our efforts by discharging those who are willing and able to do the same thing.


I've had enough of politicians who tapdance around the truth
If Obama is so committed to ending DADT legislatively, why did his White House pressure Alcee Hastings to withdraw his bill that would have done just that?  Why not simply tell the truth about President Fierce, as figures like Howard Dean have?  When Obama leans on him to drop this bill too, I'm betting Murphy will defend him.

(I also think it's fairly clear now that the military leadership is part of the problem.  Will we ever see a politician with enough spine to address that?)

I'm sure Murphy is well-intentioned, and he seems like a nice guy.  But it's quite apparent that he's part of the DC establishment that is making progress difficult (not to say impossible).  NEVER criticize the president, not matter how villainous his actions.  NEVER criticize ANYBODY, no matter how stupid, scoundrelly or outright crazy they are.  How likely is it that a politician who feels compelled to explain how much he respects Elaine Donnelly will really dig in his heels and fight for this repeal?  

We need leaders who are willing to speak the truth, who value loyalty to the citizenry more than loyalty to the party, and until we get them we're screwed.  

Cynic, n.  A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be.  
-Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary


Ditto
More of the same, blah bah blah.

Yeah, well, listen, I have respect for Ms. Donnelly.

Why?? She's a deranged, vicious, lying, right-wing-psycho harpy on the christian hate payroll who would rather focus on the imagined crimes of a gay man in Iraq writing a letter to his husband back home than she would the tens of thousands of violent rapes of female troops by their own comrades, and the official cover-ups by the chain of command. She doesn't deserve respect from ANYONE, least of all an honorable 82nd Airborne Paratrooper now serving in the U.S. Congress.

Fuck Elaine Donnelly sideways with a splintered piece of plywood and fuck this political tapdancing from candyass Democratic pansies who are too afraid of offending someone who already hates and opposes them to be effective. Christ, when is the DNC going to contact a vendor about manufacturing them some cajones and stop this cowering fuckmuppetry?

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi


[ Parent ]
Someone has to get through to this guy

There's absolutely no excuse for someone as intelligent and sincere about the issue as Murphy is to still be lipsynching Obama's DISHONEST song about a stop-loss order being illegal.

"Congress has authorized the President, via statute, to suspend any law regarding military separations during national security emergencies. Hence, an executive order would not be a matter of the President choosing to 'not enforce a law' but an appropriate exercise of executive authority granted directly by Congressional statute. Hence, an executive order would be consistent with, not ignore, standing law." - The Palm Center, University of California at Santa Barbara.

 


[ Parent ]
you may have asked
him about his opposition to an executive order to suspend DADT while congress works on repeal.  But, you also let him get away with the same old LIE about an executive order by the president somehow not being as "legal" as a repeal.  He notes that DADT is a law passed by congress.  But, you failed to follow-up with him that the authority to suspend DADT through executive order of the president is ALSO a law passed by congress.  If memory serves correctly, the law tha creadted DADT is the same law that gives the president the authority to suspend its enforcement.  How can Congressman Murphy either not know or not acknowledge this?  And, how can an interviewer and member of the LGBT community not point this out to him?

he had me until " I respect Elaine Donnelly"
Then my keyboard had a projectile vomit..."accident"

"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


I took it more
as the usual "my esteemed friend from across the aisle" sort of speak than anything else. That's just par for the course- all pols do that.

But to me it was very clear he does NOT respect her one damned bit.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


[ Parent ]
All he had to say
was "She has a right to her opinion" or even "I respect her right to her own opinion."  Saying "I respect Elaine Donnelly" goes way beyond that--and way beyond what is defensible.  I can't see this as anything but another instance of a Democratic politician trying to find "common ground," er, talking out of both sides of his mouth and trying to have it both ways.

Cynic, n.  A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be.  
-Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary


[ Parent ]
But here's why both
the transcription and the actual audio/video tell the story TOGETHER.

Now, I'm relatively slow at this transcription stuff and a 5 minute tape like this takes me a good long time, as I try to make sure of each word's accuracy.

But there's no way to relate the actual TONE of how the words are said. That's the value of the video Pam took.

He personally has damned LITTLE respect for her at ALL; in fact, I'd say he dislikes her intensely and shares the same disdain for her and her ilk that I do. BUT- that is not how one conducts an important campaign and keeps a civil and productive tone.

He's got 168 co-sponsors. That's a great start but not enough. He needs more votes guaranteed to push this forward.

I believe in his sincere desire to put DADT in the history books under the chapter of "Really F*cked Up and Bad Military Ideas" forever.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


[ Parent ]
I'm reminded of an exchange in a Marx Bros. movie (I forget which one)
Margaret Dumont (to Groucho):  You have no respect for me!

Groucho:  That's not true.

Dumont:  No?

Groucho:  No.  I have very little respect for you.

Cynic, n.  A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be.  
-Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary


[ Parent ]
Here's what he said

But listen, that's what America is America for; and she's entitled to her opinion and her... even if I think that opinion is wrong.

What he said was off the cuff; were it a typed up and prepared speech, I doubt he would have phrased it that way at all.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox