News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


BREAKING: Senate passes Defense Authorization Act with Hate Crimes intact

by: Keori

Tue Oct 06, 2009 at 21:36:11 PM EDT


( - promoted by Lurleen)

Holy cow, Blenders, take a look at this:

The Senate on Tuesday approved a $636 billion Pentagon spending bill after defeating repeated efforts by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to slash funding for the C-17 cargo aircraft.

The bill funds military operations for the fiscal year that started Oct. 1. The legislation will now move to a conference with the House, which passed its version in July.

The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act adds sexual orientation, gender identity, and disability to the definition of "hate crimes." Press reporting so far has not mentioned the inclusion of the Matthew Shepard Act, but believe me, it's in there. I know because I downloaded the 1158 page .pdf of the bill. If you're a policy nerd, or just a masochist, feel free to go to GovTrack and do the same. Or, you could go below the fold, where I've pasted the text of DIVISION E - Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act.

Now, we're not out of the woods yet. The Senate version still has to go through conference with the House, and it is possible that Hate Crimes will be stripped from the bill. The "poison pill" amendment of the death penalty is still in the text, courtesy of GOP hatemonger Jeff Sessions, as you'll see below the fold. Waymon Hudson addressed this issue back in July.

UPDATE (thanks for the tip, Kokas!): HRC BackStory reports that the House defeated a GOP initiative to strip Hate Crimes from the final bill.

Earlier this evening the U.S. House defeated a Republican motion to instruct conferees seeking to strip the hate crimes provision from the Defense Authorization bill to which it is attached.  The vote was 178 to 234.  You may recall that in July, the Senate voted 63 to 28 to add the provisions of the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act to the defense bill.  Nearly identical legislation passed the House earlier this year on a bipartisan vote of 249 to 175.  Conferees are expected to retain the hate crimes provisions in the final version of the conference report and today’s vote is a strong show of support for the hate crimes language.

So what’s next?  House Conferees have been appointed and a vote on the final conference report in the House is expected on Thursday.  The Senate action on the conference report should follow next week and then the bill will go to President Obama for his signature.  Finally the federal government will have the tools it needs to help combat hate-motivated violence.  Stay tuned for more updates.

I can't help but agree with sarasnavel and raise an eyebrow at the seemingly magical timing of this bill. Convenient that it should be ready for the President's signature mere days after an appearance at the HRC annual dinner, no?

Keori :: BREAKING: Senate passes Defense Authorization Act with Hate Crimes intact

Here is the text of the appropriate section. Emphasis is mine, to highlight the "poison pill" amendments.

DIVISION E--MATTHEW SHEPARD HATE CRIMES PREVENTION ACT

SEC. 4701. SHORT TITLE.

This division may be cited as the `Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act'.

SEC. 4702. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) The incidence of violence motivated by the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim poses a serious national problem.

(2) Such violence disrupts the tranquility and safety of communities and is deeply divisive.

(3) State and local authorities are now and will continue to be responsible for prosecuting the overwhelming majority of violent crimes in the United States, including violent crimes motivated by bias. These authorities can carry out their responsibilities more effectively with greater Federal assistance.

(4) Existing Federal law is inadequate to address this problem.

(5) A prominent characteristic of a violent crime motivated by bias is that it devastates not just the actual victim and the family and friends of the victim, but frequently savages the community sharing the traits that caused the victim to be selected.

(6) Such violence substantially affects interstate commerce in many ways, including the following:

  (A) The movement of members of targeted groups is impeded, and members of such groups are forced to move across State lines to escape the incidence or risk of such violence.

  (B) Members of targeted groups are prevented from purchasing goods and services, obtaining or sustaining employment, or participating in other commercial activity.

  (C) Perpetrators cross State lines to commit such violence.

  (D) Channels, facilities, and instrumentalities of interstate commerce are used to facilitate the commission of such violence.

  (E) Such violence is committed using articles that have traveled in interstate commerce.

  (7) For generations, the institutions of slavery and involuntary servitude were defined by the race, color, and ancestry of those held in bondage. Slavery and involuntary servitude were enforced, both prior to and after the adoption of the 13th amendment to the Constitution of the United States, through widespread public and private violence directed at persons because of their race, color, or ancestry, or perceived race, color, or ancestry. Accordingly, eliminating racially motivated violence is an important means of eliminating, to the extent possible, the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery and involuntary servitude.

  (8) Both at the time when the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States were adopted, and continuing to date, members of certain religious and national origin groups were and are perceived to be distinct `races'. Thus, in order to eliminate, to the extent possible, the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery, it is necessary to prohibit assaults on the basis of real or perceived religions or national origins, at least to the extent such religions or national origins were regarded as races at the time of the adoption of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States.

  (9) Federal jurisdiction over certain violent crimes motivated by bias enables Federal, State, and local authorities to work together as partners in the investigation and prosecution of such crimes.

  (10) The problem of crimes motivated by bias is sufficiently serious, widespread, and interstate in nature as to warrant Federal assistance to States, local jurisdictions, and Indian tribes.

SEC. 4703. DEFINITION OF HATE CRIMES.

In this division--

(1) the term `crime of violence' has the meaning given that term in section 16, title 18, United States Code;

(2) the term `hate crime' has the meaning given such term in section 280003(a) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (28 U.S.C. 994 note); and

(3) the term `local' means a county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State.

SEC. 4704. SUPPORT FOR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS AND PROSECUTIONS BY STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS.

(a) Assistance Other Than Financial Assistance-

(1) IN GENERAL- At the request of State, local, or tribal law enforcement agency, the Attorney General may provide technical, forensic, prosecutorial, or any other form of assistance in the criminal investigation or prosecution of any crime that--

  (A) constitutes a crime of violence;

  (B) constitutes a felony under the State, local, or tribal laws; and

  (C) is motivated by prejudice based on the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim, or is a violation of the State, local, or tribal hate crime laws.

(2) PRIORITY- In providing assistance under paragraph (1), the Attorney General shall give priority to crimes committed by offenders who have committed crimes in more than one State and to rural jurisdictions that have difficulty covering the extraordinary expenses relating to the investigation or prosecution of the crime.

(b) Grants-

  (1) IN GENERAL- The Attorney General may award grants to State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies for extraordinary expenses associated with the investigation and prosecution of hate crimes.

(2) OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS- In implementing the grant program under this subsection, the Office of Justice Programs shall work closely with grantees to ensure that the concerns and needs of all affected parties, including community groups and schools, colleges, and universities, are addressed through the local infrastructure developed under the grants.

(3) APPLICATION-

  (A) IN GENERAL- Each State, local, and tribal law enforcement agency that desires a grant under this subsection shall submit an application to the Attorney General at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by or containing such information as the Attorney General shall reasonably require.

(B) DATE FOR SUBMISSION- Applications submitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) shall be submitted during the 60-day period beginning on a date that the Attorney General shall prescribe.

(C) REQUIREMENTS- A State, local, and tribal law enforcement agency applying for a grant under this subsection shall--

  (i) describe the extraordinary purposes for which the grant is needed;

  (ii) certify that the State, local government, or Indian tribe lacks the resources necessary to investigate or prosecute the hate crime;

  (iii) demonstrate that, in developing a plan to implement the grant, the State, local, and tribal law enforcement agency has consulted and coordinated with nonprofit, nongovernmental victim services programs that have experience in providing services to victims of hate crimes; and

  (iv) certify that any Federal funds received under this subsection will be used to supplement, not supplant, non-Federal funds that would otherwise be available for activities funded under this subsection.

(4) DEADLINE- An application for a grant under this subsection shall be approved or denied by the Attorney General not later than 180 business days after the date on which the Attorney General receives the application.

(5) GRANT AMOUNT- A grant under this subsection shall not exceed $100,000 for any single jurisdiction in any 1-year period.

(6) REPORT- Not later than December 31, 2010, the Attorney General shall submit to Congress a report describing the applications submitted for grants under this subsection, the award of such grants, and the purposes for which the grant amounts were expended.

(7) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS- There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2010 and 2011.

SEC. 4705. GRANT PROGRAM

(a) Authority To Award Grants- The Office of Justice Programs of the Department of Justice may award grants, in accordance with such regulations as the Attorney General may prescribe, to State, local, or tribal programs designed to combat hate crimes committed by juveniles, including programs to train local law enforcement officers in identifying, investigating, prosecuting, and preventing hate crimes.

(b) Authorization of Appropriations- There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out this section.

SEC. 4706. AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL TO ASSIST STATE, LOCAL, AND TRIBAL LAW ENFORCEMENT.

There are authorized to be appropriated to the Department of Justice, including the Community Relations Service, for fiscal years 2010, 2011, and 2012 such sums as are necessary to increase the number of personnel to prevent and respond to alleged violations of section 249 of title 18, United States Code, as added by section 4707 of this division.

SEC. 4707. PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN HATE CRIME ACTS.

(a) In General- Chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

Sec. 249. Hate crime acts

(a) In General-

  (1) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin of any person--

  (A) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and

  (B) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if--

    (i) death results from the offense; or

    (ii) the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.

(2) OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR DISABILITY-

(A) IN GENERAL- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B) or paragraph (3), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability of any person--

     (i) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and

     (ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, if--

    title, or both, and shall be subject to the penalty of death in accordance with chapter 228 (if death results from the offense), if--

   (i) death results from the offense; or

   (ii) the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.

(2)OFFENSES INVOLVING ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RELIGION, NATIONAL ORIGIN, GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, OR DISABILITY-

  (A) IN GENERAL- Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, in any circumstance described in subparagraph (B) or paragraph (3), willfully causes bodily injury to any person or, through the use of fire, a firearm, a dangerous weapon, or an explosive or incendiary device, attempts to cause bodily injury to any person, because of the actual or perceived religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability of any person--

   (i) shall be imprisoned not more than 10 years, fined in accordance with this title, or both; and

   (ii) shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined in accordance with this title, or both, and shall be subject to the penalty of death in accordance with chapter 228 (if death results from the offense), if--

  (I) death results from the offense; or

  (II) the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.

   (B) CIRCUMSTANCES DESCRIBED- For purposes of subparagraph (A), the circumstances described in this subparagraph are that--

   (i) the conduct described in subparagraph (A) occurs during the course of, or as the result of, the travel of the defendant or the victim--

  (I) across a State line or national border; or

   (II) using a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce;

   (ii) the defendant uses a channel, facility, or instrumentality of interstate or foreign commerce in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A);

   (iii) in connection with the conduct described in subparagraph (A), the defendant employs a firearm, dangerous weapon, explosive or incendiary device, or other weapon that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce; or

   (iv) the conduct described in subparagraph (A)--

   (I) interferes with commercial or other economic activity in which the victim is engaged at the time of the conduct; or

   (II) otherwise affects interstate or foreign commerce.

(3) OFFENSES OCCURRING IN THE SPECIAL MARITIME OR TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES- Whoever, within the special maritime or territorial jurisdiction of the United States, commits an offense described in paragraph (1) or (2) shall be subject to the same penalties as prescribed in those paragraphs.

`(b) Certification Requirement-

(1) IN GENERAL- No prosecution of any offense described in this subsection may be undertaken by the United States, except under the certification in writing of the Attorney General, or his designee, that--

`(A) the State does not have jurisdiction;

`(B) the State has requested that the Federal Government assume jurisdiction;

`(C) the verdict or sentence obtained pursuant to State charges left demonstratively unvindicated the Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence; or

`(D) a prosecution by the United States is in the public interest and necessary to secure substantial justice.

(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION- Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to limit the authority of Federal officers, or a Federal grand jury, to investigate possible violations of this section.

`(c) Definitions- In this section--

`(1) the term `bodily injury' has the meaning given such term in section 1365(h)(4) of this title, but does not include solely emotional or psychological harm to the victim;

`(2) the term `explosive or incendiary device' has the meaning given such term in section 232 of this title;

`(3) the term `firearm' has the meaning given such term in section 921(a) of this title; and

`(4) the term `gender identity' for the purposes of this chapter means actual or perceived gender-related characteristics.'.

(b) Technical and Conforming Amendment- The analysis for chapter 13 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:

`249. Hate crime acts.'.

SEC. 4708. STATISTICS.

(a) In General- Subsection (b)(1) of the first section of the Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note) is amended by inserting `gender and gender identity,' after `race,'.

(b) Data- Subsection (b)(5) of the first section of the Hate Crime Statistics Act (28 U.S.C. 534 note) is amended by inserting `, including data about crimes committed by, and crimes directed against, juveniles' after `data acquired under this section'.

SEC. 4709. SEVERABILITY.

If any provision of this division, an amendment made by this division, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this division, the amendments made by this division, and the application of the provisions of such to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.

SEC. 4710. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

For purposes of construing this division and the amendments made by this division the following shall apply:

(1) RELEVANT EVIDENCE- Courts may consider relevant evidence of speech, beliefs, or expressive conduct to the extent that such evidence is offered to prove an element of a charged offense or is otherwise admissible under the Federal Rules of Evidence. Nothing in this division is intended to affect the existing rules of evidence.

(2) VIOLENT ACTS- This division applies to violent acts motivated by actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability of a victim.

Tags: (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
And there's another update
According to HRC Back Story, the House defeated a motion to strip the hate crimes act from the defense authorization bill - http://www.hrcbackstory.org/20...

Awesome.
And about time.

Next.


Cautiously optomistic
Don't ya hate that...when ya just want to celebrate a victory....and you're told....not quite yet.

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


Cautiously optomistic
Don't ya hate that...when ya just want to celebrate a victory....and you're told....not quite yet.

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


Ah, but at least we now know
...what President Obama will be announcing at the HRC dinner.  The timing is just too perfect, it should be in his court right around that night...

since when does congress
schedule the vote on defense spending bills to suit the president's cocktail schedule?  i think this is really reaching.  

Lurleen on Twitter

[ Parent ]
That *would* be a neat trick!
But it's not what I said.  It'll take a few days to reach his desk for signing; that's his only wiggle room for adjusting the timing.  My guess is that he'll either sign it the day of the dinner or announce that it is on his desk to be signed the next day.  My point was that both he and HRC will take full PR advantage of the signing.  And,that's not necessarily cynicism if this bill is the start of some political or social momentum.  It is a very good first step,not as controversial as some of the others that are pending and may have the effect of weaning either politicians or the public away from hatred for personal gain. All I was really commenting on was the orchestration that may become obvious.

[ Parent ]
oh, ok
if you're saying he's jsut taking advantage of coincidence, i completely agree.  what politician wouldn't?

Lurleen on Twitter

[ Parent ]
In reality, the timing is of no consequence
I join in the cynicism out of habit, but sometimes, a coincidence really is just a coincidence.

The Defense bill has been bandied about for months now, and it's already 7 days into FY2010. In truth, I'm surprised they got to it THIS soon! I was prepared to go another month without one!

Those of us who work in/for the DOD, this is a deep sigh of relief. For my own sake, I'm glad it passed; it means I will no longer be unemployed because the job I was offered will actually be funded by the end of next week.

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi


[ Parent ]
Anyone know if this bill also funds the Veterans for this year?
I read an article this week about Congress missing the Veteran Funding deadline,on HuffPo [that hunky shaved headed veteran organization leader never remember his name](which is fairly standard for Congress) but I wondered if this might also fix that?

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


Paul Riekoff is his name
Show Us the Money: Iraq Veterans React to the VA

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


[ Parent ]
I'll wade through the bill, but probably not
Defense funding and Veteran's funding are two different departments, so it's likely they'd be in two different appropriations bills. But I'll wade through 1158 pages again, because it's you asking, petey. ;)

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi

[ Parent ]
Don't wear yourself out
Paul writes regularly at HuffPo and will likely address it again in his next column

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


[ Parent ]
i really can't support this bill with the death penalty provisions....
I can't believe the Senate agreed to Lindsey Graham's death penalty provisions to kill this bill........


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Mad Professah Lectures http://madprofessah.com
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell


I thought Jeff Sessions added the death penalty?


What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


[ Parent ]
Reality check
i really can't support this bill with the death penalty provisions
And lets say that your opposition kills it.  Would that make all of the other death penalty offenses in the U.S. Code go away?

(i) death results from the offense; or

(ii) the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill.

Putting all arguments for or against the death penalty in general aside, given that there will be a federal death penalty with or without the Shepard Act being part of the U.S. Code, you're saying that that the status quo is okay - that someone should be subject to the death penalty for killing a postal worker, but not a transsexual woman because she's a transsexual woman?

As far as the non-death offenses subject to the death penalty, (1) same argument as above; and (2) the Supreme Court has been relatively clear about its position on allowing imposition of the death penalty for crimes in which no death occurs.  If the states that have tried to establish it for child rape aren't getting away with it, the feds aren't going to be allowed to get away with this provision.  If the death penalty is ever given to someone who is convicted of violating this provision via a non-death act, the SCOTUS (assuming no more christianist appointees) will rule that portion of it to be unconstitutional.

>^..^<


[ Parent ]
I do worry about kidnapping resulting in a death penalty
To me it seems more dangerous for children abducted being killed if death penalty is the sentence they are facing anyways. I have to admit there are some cases where I have zero problem executing a prisoner, if DNA proves their guilt.

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


[ Parent ]
I disagree.
You're presuming that a child abductor is a rational actor.

Criminals don't presume they're going to get caught, so they don't spend much effort dwelling on the sentencing phase, which occurs after they're apprehended, charged, interrogated, indicted, tried and found guilty.


[ Parent ]
"Criminals don't presume they're going to get caught, so they don't spend much effort dwelling on the sentencing phase"
Which is my argument against putting a great deal of community resources into enacting hate crime laws.  

Now, ones that do more than simply enhance penalties - such as this one, which addresses data collection, etc. - do have merit.  But, ones that simply tack on an ehnahcement? Or even establish a separate 'hate crime'?  Sorry, but no one involved with the murders of Matthew Shepard or Gwen Araujo gave a damn about  the niceties of sentencing laws - and that can be said authoritatively because they didn't give a damn about murder itself being illegal.

>^..^<


[ Parent ]
If I was in Congress, I would VOTE to enact the bill
But I would also try to pass an amendment to strip the death penalty provisions.

Since I am not in Congress, I can say that I do not support the bill with death penalty provisions included.

I will not be upset if the bill gets enacted, I do think it is important that some federal legislation be passed that includes sexual orientation and gender identity signed into law.

p.s. Yes, i got my southern Republicans messed up--it was Sessions not Graham who added the odious death penalty amendment


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Mad Professah Lectures http://madprofessah.com
"In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." George Orwell


[ Parent ]
Yeah, um
"  title, or both, and shall be subject to the penalty of death in accordance with chapter 228 (if death results from the offense), if--

  (i) death results from the offense; or

  (ii) the offense includes kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill."

I am not a lawyer, but will someone get the death penalty just for kidnapping another person? Don't get me wrong, all four of the crimes there are certainly bad but I'm not sure about death penalty.

"Success is not the result of spontaneous combustion, you must set yourself on fire!"


One other problem...
with the death penalty amendment: many US extradition treaties are effectively void for offences carrying the death penalty. For example, the extradition treaties with all 27 states of the EU; the EU law banning the death penalty also bans EU states from extradition when execution is a possible sentence. Nor can they deport a person to a country where their life would be in danger. In effect any person could commit a homophobic hate-crime for which the death penalty is a possible or likely sentence and, knowing they cannot be extradited or deported, fly to the EU.

The only way round this would be for the USA to agree to remove the death penalty from the list of possible sentences on each individual occasion - in effect, the USA would have to comply with an EU law despite not being an EU state, just as Norway, Iceland, Switzerland & Liechtenstein do (those four countries form what's known colloquially as the "Fax Democracy").

____________________________________
Cuius testiculos habes, habeas cardia et cerebellum.


Canada also has done the same previously
... and not extradited back to the US criminals found guilty in absentia (sp?). I agree with the harshness of the extra time but not sure on the death penalty option (and as someone who's mom was beaten to death for just being a woman, I think that is something I would understand).

But since I'm not a lawyer, I'm going to ask: do judges have to use that as the final punishment or will they have the option out of that?  


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox