News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Stand For Marriage Maine's Facebook: Letter From Marc Mutty

by: Louise

Fri Oct 16, 2009 at 12:39:07 PM EDT


Here is SFMM/ Yes On 1 head Marc Mutty's latest posting on SFMM's Facebook, regarding their repulsive new ad:


Stand For Marriage Maine's Notes

Dear Yes on Question 1 supporters:Share

Today at 12:19pm

Dear Yes on Question 1 supporters:

With just 18 days left before the election, today we launched another powerful, persuasive television ad that casts an even brighter light on what Maine public school children and their parents might expect if LD 1020 becomes the law of the land.

Our most recent ad, called "Give Me A Break", uses a teacher's very own words to prove our point even more dramatically. National Public Radio interviewed Deb Allen, a Massachusetts sex education teacher, on the topic of how some teachers have responded to the teaching of sex education following the legalization of gay marriage in Massachusetts. The content is chilling and should be a wake up call to all those who believe our opponents lies that gay marriage won?t be taught in Maine simply because it is not expressly required in LD 1020.

The NPR reporter tells listeners that when Massachusetts legalized gay marriage, homosexual activists went right to work developing a, "gay friendly curriculum for kindergarten and up." The reporter notes that Allen "says the debate around gay marriage is prompting kids to ask a lot more questions like what is gay sex which Allen answers thoroughly and explicitly with a chart." But the most alarming quote in our ad is from Ms. Allen herself:

"I know that, OK, this is legal now. If somebody wants to challenge me I say give me a break."

Our ad actually does not tell the full extent that this teacher instructs 8th graders on gay sex. The news story shockingly reveals that students learn in detail about various ways lesbians engage in sex. The full NPR story is available here. Once the page opens, click on "Listen". However, be warned, the news report contains graphic, explicit discussion about gay sex. It is so graphic that we could't put it in our ad. Yet we risk it being taught to our children in school.

We entrust our young children to teachers every day that we send them to school. But because marriage has always been understood as being between a man and a woman, we have not had to worry about a trusted teacher teaching our sons and daughters about a new version of marriage and all that it entails. Yet all of that could change, as it has in other states, if we do not prevail on November 3rd.

Please help us get the word to Mainers that there are real consequences if Question 1 fails. We have been working hard to explain to Mainers that there are significant, negative consequences to legalizing same-sex marriage that reach far beyond the boundaries of the two people who simply want to "marry." We have laid bare the fact that legal scholars from across the country, (including those who support gay marriage) predict a new flood of lawsuits against individuals, small businesses and religious organizations who may conscientiously object to providing their services to gay couples. We have shown proof that in other states where gay marriage is legal, it is taught to young children in school. We have made it abundantly clear that such instruction is, in fact, a part of public school curriculum. We have further established  (and the state Department of Education is on record agreeing with us) that there is absolutely nothing in LD 1020 that prevents such instruction from taking place.

As you know, our opponents have collected millions of dollars from out-of-state gay marriage supporters who know that Question 1 is more than a Maine issue. It is part of their plan to move the broader gay marriage agenda forward in every corner of the nation. Won't you please help us protect the traditional institution of marriage by donating today?

We need your donation today to keep our momentum going, to keep our ads on the air and to maintain the value of traditional marriage. We only have two-and-a-half weeks left during which our opponents will continue their heavily-financed drumbeat of "liar, bigot and hater" against the backdrop of our facts, even in light of a teacher?s very own words proving our points. We need your help TODAY.

Please send this email to your friends, neighbors, co-workers, and relatives who share our desire to keep the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman.

Time is of the essence to make sure that all Mainers know the very real, very serious, and very negative consequences to society should Question 1 fail on November 3rd. We are counting on your continued support.

Sincerely,

Marc Mutty
Campaign Chairman

Louise :: Stand For Marriage Maine's Facebook: Letter From Marc Mutty
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Really?
graphic, explicit discussion about gay sex

Yeah, so apparently the words vaginal and toys are graphic now?


Also...
I wonder what Mutty thinks about the graphic, explicit discussion about straight sex that occurs in sex-ed classes today?

[ Parent ]
No kidding
I attended public high school in Connecticut in the early 1990s, before marriage equality was a reality. We had comprehensive sex ed classes that covered EVERYTHING, and it was driven by questions submitted anonymously by the students. That was my 10th grade health class - each student submitted a piece of paper with five sexual activity and health questions on it, and that was what we talked about during the term. We wanted to know about the ways straight people have sex, how gay men and lesbians have sex, how to prevent diseases no matter what you're doing, and just why the hell is everyone so upset about teenagers actually learning what a clitoris is, anyway?

We were having these conversations long before marriage equality. Whether the people having all those kinds of sex could legally get married didn't matter one bit.

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi


[ Parent ]
Don't forget intercourse...
the teacher said the i-word, too. Vaginal, toys, intercourse.

The news story shockingly reveals that students learn in detail about various ways lesbians engage in sex.

Don't you just know that Mutty sits at home, night after night, beating off to DVDs of f/f porn? I'm sure he does.

L


[ Parent ]
Mutty deliberately interpreted Susan Gendron's letter
180 degrees away from what she said and AG Janet Mills today said- and HE KNOWS IT.


Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


Can't we.....
.....fight back with the reality that ciricula can be changed without taking the extraordinary step of denying rights to a whole group?    And that marriage exists in neighboring states anyway, so that doing away with it in Maine doesn't stop kids from knowing about it and asking questions.

this isn't fairy-tale land, mutty
gay couples already exist.  marriage equality is the law in other countries and other states and has been for years now.  children of gay couples have grown into adults.  we're talking about the fact that kids are very likely to have a student in their class that has two same-sex parents at home.  or grandparents as caregivers, or a single parent, or a mixed family.      

in fact, the only fairy tale in this whole lot of nonsense is the one where man + woman = marital bliss.  how is that working, again?  oh that's right--50% of those man-woman marriages end in divorce and broken families, and who knows how many others stay together in spite of their misery.  we lie to people and kids when we say that the key to a healthy relationship only has to do with what is between their legs and not who they are as people--that the key to happiness lies in being heterosexual, not what their world view is and how it affects those around them.    

so that only leaves the question of why marc mutty wants to continue to use children as props to push his own narrow, bigoted agenda at the expense of their well-being.  why does he want to corrupt children and expose them to violence by dividing them into categories of "normal" and "bad"?

The gays stole my lunch money


Don't wingnut parents send their kids to Christian schools anyway?
And if you send your kid to public school and wish for him or her to remain an ignoramus, you can always opt him or her out of sex ed.

A minor edit, if I may
And if you send your kid to public school and wish for him or her to remain an ignoramus have furtive, unprotected sex with other good Christian kids and possibly cause an unintended teen pregnancy, you can always opt him or her out of sex ed.

I have never quite gotten over some of my strict Baptist friends using me as a beard to cover their sexual escapades.  Don’t worry mom, we won’t be alone; we’ll be with Patrick!


[ Parent ]
The heterosupremacist agenda: airbrush queers from school and then from life
We have further established  (and the state Department of Education is on record agreeing with us) that there is absolutely nothing in LD 1020 that prevents such instruction from taking place.

What does he want, the law to include a specific section mandating that queer folk, their lives, their marriages (should they so choose), etc. be airbrushed from all material ever taught in schools?

Oh, he does

<shudder>


S4MM has posted their response to AG Mills...
and I truly think that Marc Mutty is losing is mind. This doesn't even make sense! Nothing but lies and distortions. People actually believe this?

http://www.standformarriagemai...

L


My pleasure
It is interesting reading, that's for sure. I saw one post out there in the blogosphere that said that Mutty has gone from being an mild mannered, mid-level church employee to an evil man who has totally lost his mind. I think that pretty much sums it up.

L


[ Parent ]
Wonderful Jen Cyr quote
Check out this quote of Jen Cyr, SFMM's latest TV star and Charla Bansley coworker, who teaches fourth grade at Calvary Chapel:

"At the beginning of the year, spelling is not a requirement.  I am more concerned with the content of memorizing God's word and being able to use it when they need it to uplift someone else. "

Haw du i no, teh Bibul telz mee soe!

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


[ Parent ]
Scare tactics worked in California
and in other states, various scares, but still scares.

This may cost us dearly

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


[ Parent ]
It's so silly these folks trying to scare parents about sex ed in 8 th grade
The bizarro NEWS stories kids hear about of standing US Senators having hookers diaper them, or another hiring his mistresses kid and husband and his MOMMY paying them blackmail, and a governor "hiking" the Appalachian Trail wink wink.

Your 8th grader knows WAY WAY too much about sex before his/her teachers say ANYTHING.

"race, taste. and History finally overcome....and you ain't there"
by Tony Kushner


If they think...
vaginal intercourse, which is already taught in schools,  is graphic, I wonder what they think of frottage and anal.

Well, they think it's abnormal...
...of course. God forbid if they ever realized that there really is no such thing as "gay sex"...sex is sex, at least in my view.

But then, I read Dan Savage so I am probably a pervert, despite 31 happily married years to the same man...LOL.

L


[ Parent ]
I am banned form their Facebook group...
Not for posting anything offensive, but for pointing out that Civil unions do NOT offer Federal rights and benefits.

The National Organization For Marriage...well...they just delete any posts that favor the gay community, you can't even try and educate its members, because NOM is determined on controlling what its members think, feel, and read.

So sad.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox