The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend: "a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).
"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist." (Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger." (MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
While the Republicans continue their scare tactics about health care reform (mind you, without presenting a rational alternative), people like this woman below are being jerked around by health insurance companies making beyond outrageous demands. Here is an ad from Americans United for Change highlighting the story of Peggy Robertson, who was denied coverage by UnitedHealth Group's Golden Rule Insurance for having had a C-section - then later told she could get coverage if she got sterilized. That's literal womb control.
Tom McMahon, Acting Executive Director, Americans United for Change: "We already know that in most states, insurers can reject women for coverage simply for having previously had a Cesarean section - as Golden Rule Insurance Company reflexively did to Peggy Robertson. But it's really beyond belief how Golden Rule treated Mrs. Robertson next, literally offering her a choice between having health insurance and having another baby. We understand it's all about maximizing profits for the health insurance industry so that guys like UnitedHealth Group's CEO Stephen Hemsley can make $3,241,042 a year - but is there any limit to their greed that they would tell a mother that in order to get health coverage, she first would have to be sterilized? Would Stephen Hemsley treat his own wife or daughter this way? Does Congress need any other reason to pass reform that bans insurance companies from denying Americans coverage for any 'pre-existing condition' and establishes a strong public option so Americans like Peggy will always have a place to turn for affordable, quality care?"
FACT: In most states, insurers can reject women for coverage simply for having previously had a Cesarean section (C-section). According to the National Women's Law Center: "In most states, insurers are free to reject individuals applying for coverage in the individual market. Many women face such rejection at this underwriting stage of purchasing insurance for a wide range of reasons. For example, women have greater health needs than men and are more likely than men to suffer from a chronic condition requiring ongoing treatment, like asthma or arthritis. These conditions can lead to rejection of coverage. In addition, if during the medical underwriting process the insurer discovers that an applicant underwent a past C-section, the company may charge her a higher premium, impose an exclusionary period during which it refuses to cover another C-section or pregnancy, or even reject her for coverage altogether unless she has been sterilized or is no longer of childbearing age." National Women's Law Center; Nowhere to Turn: How the Individual Health Insurance Market Fails Women, accessed, 9/17/09
