PHB Mobile



News Tips? Calendar Info?



"If you're gay, lesbian, or bisexual, would you sacrifice for your trans neighbors and siblings? If you're trans, would you sacrifice for your gay, lesbian, or bisexual neighbors and siblings? It's something worth knowing about yourself and those around you."
--Autumn Sandeen, 4/19/2010, the night before GetEQUAL's DADT repeal protest at the White House


Public Calendar

Press/media, organizations, and individuals send your time-based event info to: calendar@phblend.net

Full size PHB Calendar


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Blend

Snail mail:
Pam's House Blend
105 West Hwy 54, Suite 265
Box #113
Durham, NC 27713









The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Stand For Marriage Maine: NPR Claims Are Ridiculous, Frivolous

by: Louise

Wed Oct 21, 2009 at 14:45:00 PM EDT


What a surprise.

Here is part of Marc Mutty's statement:


"Yesterday we received a letter from a staff lawyer with NPR asserting that an advertisement by the Yes on 1 campaign violated NPR's copyright and demanded that we cease airing the ad. This is a ridiculous and frivolous complaint," wrote Marc Mutty, chairman of Stand for Marriage Maine, in a statement.

"There has been no copyright violation against NPR or anyone else. As is made clear in the attached letter from our legal counsel, Stand For Marriage Maine has the absolute right to use news clips aired on NPR in our advertisement. This is a protected exercise of the First Amendment of the US Constitution and is expressly contemplated as "fair use" in our nation's copyright laws."

Barry Bostram, from an office in Terre Haute IN, handling SFMM's lil problem. Hmm... sounds familiar...

Oh that's right! He was in front of the Maine Ethics Committee, attending the hearing  along with NOM's Brian Brown and SFMM meatpuppet leader Marc Mutty!

NPR sees the infringement issue differently...


A spokesperson for NPR said they had sent a cease-and-desist notice to Stand for Marriage Maine saying it did not give the group permission to use part of its program in the ad.

Dana Davis Rehm, senior vice president of marketing, communications and external relations for NPR said, "NPR very carefully analyzed the use that Stand for Marriage Maine and their public relations firm Schubert Flint has made of NPR's 2004 news story. We determined that it does not meet fair use standards, and that it constitutes copyright infringement.

They have exceeded fair use standards by co-opting NPR's content for virtually the entire length of their political ad. What we are seeking to do here is to protect NPR's valuable reputation as a trusted and unbiased source of news. We don't allow use of our content for advocacy or political purposes by any group or person."

So we'll see what happens next!

Louise :: Stand For Marriage Maine: NPR Claims Are Ridiculous, Frivolous
Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The NRA Case is Completely Off Point
The issue there was whether one party could copyright a list of legislators. The intellectual property rights in this issue are not in dispute.

"Neither Lifestyle nor Agenda"

http://tips-q.com


what I don't understand is...
Why didn't NPR take issue with their "Safe Schools" ad when Donald Mendell played a clip from a NPR Interview from May 3, 2005 with "Who's In A Family" author Robert Skutch???  

Exactly.
SFMM already has one YouTube "strike" against it.

What about these other two?

Did Sherri Gould grant permission to SFMM to broadcast her image in their "Safe Schools" ad?

And, did NPR grant permission to use the May 3rd Robert Skutch interview broadcast in that same ad?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

I don't think so.  If both Sherri and NPR were to file complaints, SFMM's YouTube would suddenly be "three strikes you're out" and offline for the next 10-14 days.

How do I know?  Because I've already been through the process of filing a counter-notification in response to similar claims from folks on the Yes side.

In my case, the claims against me were frivolous.  In SFMM's case, not so much.  Sherri and NPR could make it happen tomorrow if they'd bother to file, and I'd love to see SFMM's counter-notification, because they've got nothing to stand on.  

Both Sherri and NPR would be on solid footing if they were to seek to get that ad pulled.  What I'd really like to see is for both of them to pursue that option.

exmormon.reddit.com


[ Parent ]
NPR's next step/Fair use
"Fair use" is determined by a consideration of several factors.  One of these is how much of the work was used.  In other words, if you play a few seconds of an interview, that is more likely to be fair use than if you play the entire interview.  That is probably why they didn't go after the Don Mendel ad.  For the sex ed ad, they not only played a very long clip in the TV spot, but they also put the entire interview on their website, and it plays under the S4MM logo.  Of course, this is only one factor, and I would guess that S4MM's lawyer will say that this is outweighed by the others.

At this point, if NPR is serious about protecting its copyrighted works, it should sue for an immediate injunction.  The court will decide if this is fair use or not.  NPR also would have the right to demand statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringed work.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Days left for Joe Solmonese's promise to donors of DADT repeal in 2010 to be fulfilled
Leave your comments here.


The President's State of the Union promise to repeal.



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox