News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Social network activism and the future of civil liberties

by: jonpincus

Thu Oct 29, 2009 at 21:21:56 PM EDT


The most recent skirmish on the Patriot Act reauthorization battle ended badly for civil liberties.   Despite passionate speeches all around in the Senate Judiciary Committee public hearings and classified briefings, in the end, only Senators Feingold, Durbin, and Specter stood up for the Constitution.  As Marcy Wheeler says, we got rolled.

At the same time, though, the social network activism I discussed in Can Skittles fix the Patriot Act? and on the Get FISA Right blog highlights the opportunity to broaden and recharge the civil liberties community.

Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, Care2, OFA and other social network sites:

  • provide a way to engage with Millennials and other diverse groups of people who care a lot about the Patriot Act -- but are not currently involved with civil liberties activism.
  • make it easy for people to let their politicians know their feelings -- and recruit their friends in the process.
  • allow civil liberties organizations to get beyond the media blackout and provide accurate information to everybody.
  • complement in-person local campaigns like People's Campaign for the Constitution's local ordinances and good ol' fashioned letters-to-the-editor

It's a powerful narrative.  Social network sites epitomize the wave of the future, Obama's strength in 2008, and youth.  They're overwhelmingly in favor of civil liberties.  And civil liberties supporters are getting organized there.  As we continue to make progress, every political consultant and politician thinking about a primary or general election challenge in 2010 or 2012 will be paying attention.

Social network activism for civil liberties has made great progress so far.  Some simple steps from organizations and bloggers can take things to the next level.  Before getting to the suggestions, though, I'd like to discuss the diversity aspects in a little more detail.

jonpincus :: Social network activism and the future of civil liberties

A #diversitywin


The Get FISA Right poll  matches well with the trends described in Jessica Vascalero's Wall Street Journal article The End of the Email Era.  Social networks are now as important a communication mechanism as email.  Millennials in particular are very hard to involve via email.

And the snapshot of the retweeting stream at the end of this post is a great illustration of the point Tracy Viselli and I have been hammering away on all year (1, 2, 3): Twitter is a place to engage with women, people of color, migrant rights groups,  and others who are marginalized from other forms of activism.

Will you have time to help next week?
Poll from Get FISA Right's blog, October 2

I mean really, what activism campaign wouldn't want to have people like @Hegemommy, @ColinCurtisKS, @desidyke, @dreamact, @votolatino, @ColinCurtisKS, @jjpolitics, and @baratunde advocating our cause to their friends and communities?   Talk about a #diversitywin!  They've all got important battles of their own, of course; but they spend so much of their time on social network sites that it's very easy for them to tweet or share something and help out when they have a few seconds.

And yet:

  • Civil liberties organizations' action alerts today invariably push people towards email- and phone-based feedback to legislators -- ignoring social networks.
  • The "big blogs" of the "progressive blogosphere", even when covering issues sympathetically, virtually never include discussions of social network activism**
  • Activism toolkits underplay, or even leave out, social network approaches

In some ways, this isn't surprising.  There are huge generational differences in attitudes towards social network sites -- and most progressive bloggers and professional civil libertarians are over 30.  And from a privacy perspective, Facebook and other sites are creepy panoptic environments that institutionalize tracking and behavioral targeting.  So it's not a matter of bad intent.

Still, the message to Millennials and others who hang out on social networks is clear: "we don't care enough about your involvement to reach out to you on your terms."

The #1 recommendation from the Computers, Freedom, and Privacy "birds of a feather" session on New Strategies for Fighting FISA and the Patriot Act was to build a broad-based coalition -- including students and migrant rights groups amongst others.   And not to sound like a broken record or anything, but: social network sites provide a unique opportunity to engage with diverse audiences.

Taking it to the next level


Screenshot of Twazzup getfisaright page
Discussions of the Patriot Act on Twitter, via Twazzup

Organizations like ACLU,  EFF, and the Cato Institute are becoming increasingly effective at using social network sites.  Combined with Get FISA Right and our allies, we have solid presences on Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, Organizing for America, Care2, Change.org, and in the progressive blogosphere.

The challenge now is to leverage this strength and turn it to action.  Here are a few suggestions to kick off the discussion.

  • for civil liberties organizations, including Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, information in action alerts could broaden reach significantly.  Providing social network-specific ways of contacting politicians (act.ly, a Facebook app, etc.) would similarly get a lot more people involved.
  • progressive and libertarian bloggers and new media should include links to activism information when they cover the story.
  • Twitter is a particularly attractive place for civil liberties activism right now.  Civil liberties organizations and bloggers should get in the habit of using the #patriotact hashtag; retweeting important information and action alerts;taking advantage of technologies like  Twazzup, act.ly, and 2Gov; and engaging with the people who show interest.
  • as Chip Pitts, and Sarah Burris pointed out in comments on an earlier draft of this essay, social network activism is an ideal complement for and local in-person organizing.  Somebody needs to take the lead on putting this all together - and then replicating it in all 50 states.
  • Get FISA Right's online and phone organizing meetings involving social network activists, bloggers, and non-partisan organizations have led to sharing value information and creating and deepening connections.  More of this, please!

The Patriot Act battle's far from over.  Representatives Conyers, Nadler, and Scott have introduced some much stronger Patriot Act reform legislation in the House, and there's still the floor debate the Senate.   If you look at the votes from 2008 and the seats that have changed hands since then, we have a chance to win this one if we get organized.

And if we get really organized, well, there are at least a handful of seats where the civil liberties vote could make the difference in a primary or general election: Harman, Specter, Reid, Feinstein, Leiberman ....   So our leverage will only increase.

Social network activism has proved very successful for civil liberties (Strange Bedfellows, Get FISA Right) and other causes (Jena, Join the Impact, the DREAM Act, Obama).

Now's the time to take things to the next level.

jon

Also posted on The Seminal

Retweeting ...
A #diversitywin, as we say on Twitter
Tags: (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Thanks to Pam -- and so many others
Many acknolwedgements are in order:

  • to the Get FISA Right members and our allies for the hard work.  I honestly believe we're making progress!
  • to Sarah in Global Comment, Maegan on Wilshire and Washington, Julian at Cato and everywhere else, Marcy at emptywheel, Jessica and Tracy on Care2, Rebecca, Harry, the various Jims, and all the others who covered the activism and the issues; and to Kevin, Michelle, Mandy, Chip, and all the other folks from "the coalition" who worked with and linked to us.
  • to Harry, Colin, Tracy, Jessica, Ari, Chip, Jen, Doreen, Kyle, Sarah, and Deborah for feedback on the previous drafts.
  • to Pam, Baratunde, Ari, Tracy, Maegan, Gloria, Harry, Cheryl, Jen, Shireen, Willow, Prerna, Mo, Gina, Cynthia, Jason, Rebecca, Lillie, Deborah and many others for all the discussions about social networks and diversity over the last year.  I see the latest activism as dramatic evidence supporting the theories we've discussed so many times.  At some point people will listen to us :-)

This is likely to be my last activism post for a while, as I focus on my startup Qworky.  Thanks to Pam and Jason for giving me the opportunity to explore these ideas over the last year on Pam's House Blend and The Seminal!  And a tip of the hat to Join the Impact and the "Stonewall 2.0" movement, the DREAM Activists, Color of Change, and the #iranelection protestors for showing what's possible ... and most of all to Deborah for the original vision of the transformative power of social network activism for civil liberites.


jon


Jon's right --
As one of those non-Millennial privacy advocates, I admit that I still have a hard time understanding the Millennial mindset -- including the comfort with radically more transparency and strong tendencies toward consensus -- even while I greatly appreciate and admire aspects of the mindset.  Hence, I'm on Facebook but haven't yet succumbed to Twitter.  

But there's no doubt that it is the global future and that, increasingly, that future is here.  I have no doubt that human evolution will continue to evolve in that direction, with even greater technological connectedness.  So if we want to preserve what's good about the old approach -- human rights values of autonomy, diversity, empowerment, and equal dignity that have been enshrined in so many foundational documents, ranging from the US Bill of Rights to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights -- we must do a better job of furthering an updated and rich understanding of their continued relevance for this new era.

The practical relevance of such values persists:  the downside of the Millennial mindset is excessive deference to authority, an attitude forged in the crucible of 9/11 and similar terrorist attacks and the responses thereto in Europe, Asia, Africa, and all over the world.  Yet without the classic human rights values of liberty and equality, privacy and dignity for all -- so tragically sacrificed to such a significant extent worldwide in the counterterror response -- we so easily end up stumbling into a stultifying, oppressive, and chilling system like an updated, supercomputer-powered version of the former East Germany or today's Burma/Myanmar.  And that's not good for anyone other than the top officials and their minions -- as even some leaders in China realize as it gradually (too gradually) evolves toward a greater embrace of the rights that have worked pretty well elsewhere.

So . . . yes!  As systems of top-down control give way (or at least seem to change) to less hierarchical systems of collaboration and empowered equality in every realm -- ranging from politics, to business, to society generally -- let's highlight and use the contemporary social networking equivalents of the "Committees of Correspondence" that the Sons and Daughters of Liberty used at the time of the American Revolution.  

Let's just do so in ways that deeply recall, understand, and appreciate the values including autonomy, privacy (for reading and deep reflection beyond 140 characters, among other things), and self-determination as well as the crucial values of transparency, cooperation, and solidarity.  And at all times, let's remember to "question authority."  

It's absolutely essential that we retain a healthy skepticism about both old hierarchies and even the new centers of power and authority.  I would include in this not only President Obama, whose actions in this realm have been so disappointing thus far, but also the social networks themselves (and the companies running them), and even ourselves and our colleagues in the civil liberties and human rights communities.  Thomas Jefferson's comment comes to mind:  "In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock."


Agreed all around ...
Skepticism is justified, especially about the companies running these social network sites.  And I certainly agree about the importance of principles including autonomy, privacy, and self-determination.

In terms of Obama's actions, yeah, just as on the LGBTQ front there's a lot to be disappointed in so far.  That said I think if the coalition supporting civil liberties were more effective he and his strategists -- as well as Congress -- might well make somewhat different calculations.  At the CFP Birds of a Feather, we talked about how important it was to demonstrate political capital during the Patriot Act reauthorization debates.  The combination of social network activism online, BORDC/PCC's on-the-ground local ordinance campaigns, as well as the "air cover" from ACLU, EFF, the ALA and others seems like the best way to do that.

jon

jon


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox