|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |

The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist." (Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger." (MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Fri Nov 13, 2009 at 00:59:19 AM EST
|
Is this guy for real? The Providence Journal reports that Rhode Island Gov. Carcieri who on Tuesday vetoed a bill that would have allowed same-sex couples the simple right to claim the body of a deceased spouse and make funeral arrangements, is now saying he's willing to think about backing domestic partnerships.Two days after vetoing a bill giving domestic partners the right to make funeral decisions for each other, a conciliatory Governor Carcieri told a gay-rights activist group he is open to supporting a domestic-partnership law that bestows many if not all of the rights of marriage, without the right to marry.
"Maybe it's something we should consider," said Carcieri, after meeting privately Thursday for more than an hour in his office with a half-dozen members of Queer Action of Rhode Island, a group that in the immediate aftermath of his veto had labeled him "a bigot." Hmmm, now why again would anyone call this gentleman a bigot? Could it be because last month he headlined a fundraiser for the homohaters Massachusetts Family Institute, and when he vetoed the funeral rights bill the other day he spewed this bile:"This bill represents a disturbing trend over the past few years of the incremental erosion of the principles surrounding traditional marriage, which is not the preferred way to approach this issue. If the General Assembly believes it would like to address the issue of domestic partnerships, it should place the issue on the ballot and let the people of the State of Rhode Island decide." ...
House sponsor, Rep. David Segal, D-Providence, said: "I think the man is heartless ... [this] doesn't change the definition of the word 'marriage.' " "It is completely disgraceful that Governor Carcieri has chosen to ignore and devalue the committed relationships of same-sex couples in this state," said Karen Loewy, a staff attorney for GLAD. ..."Unconscionable," echoed Kathy Kushnir, executive director of the advocacy group Marriage Equality of Rhode Island. |
| Lurleen :: RI: Gov Carcieri thinking positively about domestic partnerships |
I almost wonder if Carcieri's meeting with the Queer Action of Rhode Island might have been his first ever time he knowingly conversed with a gay person. Does anyone know?Among those attending was Mark Goldberg, the Providence East Sider whose five-week battle to claim the body of his partner of 17 years from the state morgue, had sparked the vetoed legislation.
Citing as a possible model the "everything but marriage" referendum that won approval in the state of Washington earlier this month, Carcieri said: "I don't know enough, yet. All I am saying is I understand the circumstances. I understand the difficulties" that can arise for same-sex couples and others - such as widows living with widowers, and widows with other widows - outside the legal framework of a traditional marriage.
"Let's see if we can find a way to solve that without discreet [pieces] of legislation every time something comes up. I just don't think that is the right way to deal with it," he said.
Washington's underlying domestic-partnership law, which the legislature passed in 2007, provides hospital visitation rights, the ability to authorize autopsies and organ donations and inheritance rights when there is no will. The referendum extended the law to probate and trusts, community property and guardianship. I look forward to someone asking Carcieri to explain his change of heart (or growth of one in the first place) so we can determine whether he's for real, or just yanking the queers' chain for laughs. After all, he won't be in office much longer. Maybe this is his last chance to pour salt into wounds. This is the kind of crap he was spewing at the MFI conference in October:In a particularly pointed part of his speech, Gov. Carcieri criticized the "odd state of tolerance" that has invaded our culture: "That any and all family configurations are of equal value, any household arrangement is as good as the next, and that no judgments should be made for the best environment for establishing adult relationships and raising children." He said that, in fact, the opposite is true, and that it "does matter what a family is, and it does matter what kind of family is preferred and promoted." If Carcieri is on the level, I expect prompt proof. Other states have shown that a civil union or domestic partnership law can be a relatively simple piece of legislation. Heck, I bet the Speaker of the House Rep. Fox has several versions in his desk ready to go. And of course the shortest, most efficient and fair piece of legislation is marriage equality legislation. That you can accomplish in a few sentences. Get to it Gov. Not-A-Bigot. |
|
|