News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Opus Cartoon about Lesbian Moms Stirs Writers' Wrath

by: dana

Thu Jun 14, 2007 at 03:21:37 AM EDT


This cartoon, published Sunday by Berkeley Breathed in the Washington Post and elsewhere, shows two boys discussing a third, who has two moms. After one says it's "cool," the other says "Makes you wonder how he'll do without a male role model in the house." At this moment, a television comes flying out the window and an unshaven man holding a beer can leans out and curses at the baseball game he was watching.
dana :: Opus Cartoon about Lesbian Moms Stirs Writers' Wrath
At least two conservative writers [updated based on Sacks' statement that he doesn't consider himself a conservative], Glenn Sacks of the American Chronicle and Jennifer Roback Morse of Town Hall, have interpreted Breathed as being anti-dad and saying that all fathers are bad role models. Sacks links the cartoon to two books by feminist academics, Rosanna Hertz's Single by Chance, Mothers by Choice (which I reviewed here) and Peggy Drexler's Raising Boys Without Men (which I reviewed here; didn't like her methodology, but admired her intent). He sees all three as sending the message "that kids don't need fathers, that moms are better than dads, and that having two moms is better than having a mom and a dad." Despite this, he claims to "support the rights of gays and lesbians to live their lives as they choose."

Morse goes further, and says the cartoon is "unadulterated, unapologetic male-bashing," and "a sickening foretaste of what awaits us as same sex parenting becomes normalized." I'm not sure how supporting same-sex parenting, which includes families that have two—count 'em, two—dads, counts as male-bashing. Morse tries to claim that same-sex parenting is a move towards making moms and dads interchangeable, and when this happens, dads will be discarded because "the connection between fathers and children is intrinsically more tenuous than the bond between mothers and children." This of course leads right into her assertion that "The social purpose of marriage is to strengthen the attachment of fathers to their children" (which raises the question of whether opposite-sex couples should be required to procreate in order to maintain their marital status.)

Let's review: Only 23% of families in this country are married mom-dad couples with children, according to the 2000 U.S. Census. While there are families among that 77% who are not doing well, it is nowhere near all of them, or our society would be in a lot worse shape than it is. The lack of non-traditional families isn't a crisis; it is a reality. Families with just moms, just dads, or just one parent, are on the whole doing just fine. This is Hertz and Drexler's point; not that society no longer has a need for dads.

Hertz even stresses that the women in her study are not trying to create a society without men. Even the lesbian moms wanted men in their children?s lives. She also hypothesizes that as fathers try to find their place in today's world, they may make more of an effort to be active players in their children?s lives, trying to bring something to the table other than genetic material (which reproductive technology may make unnecessary) or outdated gender roles.

Breathed's point, as I see it, is that gender alone doesn't necessarily make one a good parent. Simply having a man around is no guarantee he will be an appropriate role model. Breathed would probably say the same about women and gay dads. Yes, he chose to make the cartoon about lesbian moms, with a male figure as the foil, when he could have done the reverse. (Imagine a woman leaning out the window with a cigarette dangling from her mouth, in curlers and a low-cut top, cursing about a cheesy reality show.) Why did he do it this way? Blame Mary Cheney and the current buzz she's created (intentionally or not) about lesbian moms.

Maybe Morse is just upset at the positive portrayal of Opus the Penguin in Breathed's work. Everyone knows penguins have homosexual tendencies.

(Crossposted at Mombian.)

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Some people don't understand satire.
A lot of conservatives do not understand the satire of Berkeley Breathed's three comic strip series with recurring characters.

Like Bloom County and Outland before, Opus tackled such political issues.  I think Mr. Breathed based the certain strip on Mary Cheney's family.  I don't know why some conservatives are taking this the wrong way.  They claim that this strip is anti-paternal, but they missed the main point.

It's like this: not all dads are stupid.  The stupid dads are the ones like Kevin Federline, or the ones who are married to unfit mothers mentioned by Pam in a couple of entries.

I give kudos to the same comic strip artist who also mocked the "ex-gay" movement through the reparative therapy of Steve Dallas.  Keep it coming, Berkeley.


Most Conservatives have no sense of nuance
The comic is not saying that ALL men are vile, or abusive, but rather shows that having a man in the house does not always mean a good thing--it all depends on the man.

[ Parent ]
Keep in mind
that a lot of them take the bible as the literal truth too!

My America includes LGBT families.

[ Parent ]
Until they start stoning disobedient children...
...and casting bleeding women from cities, NONE of them take the Bible as literal truth.

[ Parent ]
Saw this
I saw this on Sunday and had a good laugh.  I have loved OPus and Bloom County for forever, I have an OPus Christmas ornament.  I give away copies of the book, "A wish for wings that fly" about OPus' dream of flying.  A penguin is good role model for all of us, they are family and mate oriented, leave small carbon footprints and obviously have good senses of humor.  So does Berkely.

Funny Comic Strip
Thanks for sharing, I quite liked that one! 

Sacks is basically a progressive liberal, and very gay friendly
He is just very protective of fathers, gay and straight fathers.

If you read Sacks, and I encourage you to do so, I think you will find him very progressive and very GLBT friendly.

It's late and I can't accurate characterize his exact positions, but I cannot recall a gay issue in the past seven months that I have been reading his blog in which he has not taken the GLBT friendly position, pretty much straight down the line.

He is certainly partisan in favor of fathers.  But is actually a very fair observer of the issues and will usually cite and reference people who agree AND disagree with him, and cite and discuss the actual research.  And he will invariably do it without calling his opponents names, mischaracterizing their positions, or dismissing them with ad-hominem attacks.

I would make the claim that there is very little difference between Glenn and say, a 2nd-wave feminist, and not that much difference between Glenn and even third wave feminists.

The difference comes in his concern and fight for the rights and appreciation of fathers.

And that is probably where his post is coming from.  The context of his post is that this specific behavior is not representative of most fathers, comes at a poor time -- near father's day, and is (perhaps most importantly to understanding the post), representative of how fathers are often treated today in the media.

If you read his posts you will find he is not uncritical of the fringe and hateful elements of the fathers and mens rights movement and that he is indeed appreciative of many of the accomplishments of the women's rights movement.

In this way, I truly believe it is reasonable to see Glenn as a feminist, if perhaps a 2nd wave feminist.  In this sense it can be seen why other feminists like Karen DeCrow and Erin Pizzey have also aligned themselves with the fathers' rights movement.

I encourage you to read his blog from time to time.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox