PHB Mobile

News Tips? Calendar Info?


Public Calendar

Press/media, organizations, and individuals send your time-based event info to: calendar@phblend.net

Full size PHB Calendar


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas









The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



North Carolina primary - and Jim Neal's bid and the big picture

by: Pam Spaulding

Tue May 06, 2008 at 19:00:00 PM EDT


(UPDATE: You must read Mike Signorile's take on this, which includes an informative IM exchange with HRC's Brad Luna.)

(The full liveblog of general primary coverage with BlueNC can be seen here.)

4:15 AM (Wed): Just as I got into bed around 1AM, I saw that the race in Indiana had tightened to the point that it was hard to call, but Clinton pulled out a squeaker, 51%-49%. The Obama can of whoop-ass opened here in NC (14 point win) bore out what most people around here thought would occur, based on the huge early vote.

11:45: Here is Jim Neal's post-primary speech:

10:00: Jim gave a great concession speech.

Around 9:45 PM Jim Neal arrived, and he came right over to thank me for all the blogging support -- and by extension, the netroots -- all of the Blenders and great BlueNC members who supported him in this uphill historic race.

He pulled about 20% against Hagan, and won two counties, Yancey and McDowell, both in the western part of the state.  I told campaign folks at this bash the bottom line is that, while he had a great ground operation, Jim didn't run any ads on TV, and for many low-information voters, an ad may be the only way you reach them. Kay Hagan, with all the DSCC-generated money, could cruise on ads.

For those of you with shorter memories, Jim Neal was running neck and neck with Kay Hagan in the polls and was polling well against Dole up until April (see here, here and here). What happened? Kay Hagan then started running her TV ads. However, anyone who saw the televised debate (something Sen. Hagan desperately tried to avoid) knows who was the stronger candidate and who possessed better command of the issues.

Another large factor here is endorsements, particularly black PACs. There are a lot of rings to kiss, and while Jim received the endorsement of the Independent Weekly, the large progressive newspaper here, he didn't get the nod from the Durham Committee on the Affairs of Black People and others like it, these hold a good deal of sway here. When I went to the polls on primary day, the majority of black voters going in with me had the Committee's endorsement card in hand, not the tear-out from the Indy.

And finally, as we've discussed so many times before here, Jim Neal didn't receive any kind of nod from the Beltway LGBT orgs (oh, say HRC, for an example) -- as you've seen, they focus heavily on viability, and less on advocacy. There is an imbalance when there cannot be room for supporting progress regardless of outcome in Red states -- going for the sure win (or just-miss) becomes more important. We're not talking about writing a check, but supporting candidacies that are groundbreaking. To say you've got to start off with enough $cratch to win out of the box (as in "come talk to us when you've raised a $1 million"), that's a viability issue, not an indication that it's worth moving the ball forward. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. And you know there are folks in the ivory tower in DC gloating over the margin of victory, full of bravado of the "I told you so" -- well guess what -- that attitude is part of the problem you have with the grassroots. Get out of the sterile, self-stroking environment; it's not becoming.

The goals of "advocacy" (and it has to be used loosely here) and lobbying are sometimes incompatible in this regard; we do need clarity -- and we need LGBT orgs that don't have to play this balancing act with donors and insiders. And as far as the DSCC is concerned, well, there's not much more you can say about Chuck's machine.

This race was so important to the LGBT community here, and no one left downtrodden about the race Jim ran, because we know that we moved the ball forward (even without the help from those who say that they speak for us); our civil rights issues are no longer in the closet in a NC political race.

UPDATE: A longer version of the commentary on the U.S. Senate race is here.

My earlier comments from the evening are below the fold.

Pam Spaulding :: North Carolina primary - and Jim Neal's bid and the big picture
(I had other remarks in the liveblog, but made some observations here in this post.)

8PM: Crowds are coming in to Southern Rail in Carrboro now.

7:40: CNN's exit polls are here. One interesting result:

7:30: Indiana, as most folks know, is going solidly for Hillary so far. CNN says North Carolina goes for Obama.

7:15 PM: Kate and I finally arrived at Southern Rail in Carrboro (darn traffic!), which is hosting the Jim Neal post-primary party. Folks are just coming in now. Carrboro is supposedly a town-wide Wifi hotspot, but the signal in here is miserable. And this is probably the first remote I've done where my Verizon Broadband card signal is weak too. Have to move around to see what to do.

Feel free to discuss results, distorted comments by the talking heads on the MSM, and all the usual stuff that happens on election night.

You can join me and the BlueNC crew in real time by clicking on the button below. A window will open with the CoverItLive chat. The great thing about it is that you can revisit the entire chat, which will include links and video, after it's over.

Funny short voting day story -- Since I've been on autopilot because of this cold/fever, I went home early to get some rest before tonight. I looked like hell. I was in my jammies and around 5PM the doorbell rang. I stumble to the door and it's a nice, young Obama canvasser, and he told me that I looked familiar to him. I said "Pam's House Blend?" and he said "Oh yeah...wow, I met a celebrity today."

Uh, alrighty then. A grade Z celebrity standing there in a pink nightgown with tiny little hearts all over it. Oy, talk about embarrassing.

BTW, that was our second Obama canvasser; we've not seen any Hillary canvassers, and I've seen at least one of her signs around the this neighborhood. Also, I've received plenty of robo-calls for Obama, and none for Hillary. I guess her team has written my precinct/zip code off.

Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Canvassing in Indianapolis
I was canvassing for Clinton Sunday evening along with 2 gentlemen, one from GA and the other from TX. It turned out that 2 of us were gay and 2 of us were Jewish.

Shoes on the Ground: Canvassing for Clinton in Indianapolis
http://themoderatevoice.com/po...


"Afternoon Celeb Jammie Romp"
"Married" "homosexual" activist she-devil Pam Spaulding was caught in an afternoon electronic orgy by an Obama activist as he went door to door, pushing the elitist liberal agenda down voter's throats.  Spaulding, decked out in heavy heart-clad party wear, answered the door in a "fever" and appeared suspiciously disheveled.  No explanation was offered for the tell-tale sheet creases on her right cheek.

Spaulding opened a "political" chat pad on her homosex-obsessed blog today, then retired to her "home" and jumped into lingerie.  The connection is obvious.  One can only imagine the blur of sweaty fingers flashing across the keyboard of vice.  Revoltingly, she bragged about the affair on her blog (URL withheld to protect tender Christin sensibilities.)

Reporting to you live from the shrubbery in front of the Spaulding den of iniquity, this is your upright heterosexual Christian reporter, LaPeter Barbarian.

Now that you're famous, I figured you'd like a little Brittney press. :D

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


Aside from Lurleen's sensational "news flash"
Just a note to say thanks for the continued coverage of the election and all the other issues that PHB covers.  And a side note of thanks to Kate as well!

But now that you are SO well known, please don't forget that when you and Kate get to the land of the Larry Craig Toe Tapping Shrine (aka. FallingBridgeApolis), you have a hot, steaming cuppa waiting for both of you...


[ Parent ]
I just nearly spit Diet Coke all over my computer
That was the best laugh all day! The idea of Pam being as trashy and pathetic as Brittany is itself a riot.

[ Parent ]
OMG
Thank you for your caring and respectful reporting of this disgusting incident, Mister Barbarian. You are a good American.

No doubt next there will be photos of "MS" Spaulding stepping out of her car to pump gas while wearing stilettos, an ultra mini, and no underwear...

What next? Partying with Paris and shaving her head? Oh, she's out of control... SOMEONE PUHLEEZE think of teh childrun!

Sincerely,

Mrs. Ralph (aka Sallie) Homemaker

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


[ Parent ]
Pam you're always a star in my book
I noticed the same thing in Virginia-- a young woman braved the bitter cold back in the primary in February to canvass for Obama door to door, and another stood out in the bitter cold at the polls, while I never heard anything from the Clinton campaign. It actually made me feel bad I wasn't voting for their guy. But there's something like a 50/50 chance he'll get the nomination and then I'll be out there for him (in nicer weather, heh).

Here's what I find about compromise--
don't do it if it hurts inside,
'cause either way you're screwed,
eventually you'll find
you may as well feel good;
you may as well have some pride

--Indigo Girls


ciao hillary
obama 08 hooray!  i didnt know the NC primary was today for the senate seat?

http://www.queersunited.blogspot.com

Obama canvassers
Yeah, here in Northern CO, Obama folks were everywhere, but nary a call from Clinton folks.  At our precinct, us Obama supporters, who were following our training and organizing the precincts, were accused by Clinton folks of preventing Clinton supporters from showing support for their candidate(how? from putting up posters, giving out cookies? what?). It was strange.  I asked a few women who were upset by the lack of obvious Clinton support who they had been working with to support their candidate.  Both said that no one had contacted them, they had no posters available to them, and no local organizers.

Things changed after Super Tuesday, tho!

Kelley H.


Please thank Jim
His courage in running this campaign will not be forgotten.

As a former North Carolina resident (Efland!) I know how hard this must have been for him to do. It took bravery.

Someday.


I remember back when the Civil Rights Act passed and...
black people started to come out in droves to vote. Then black people started to run for office. The thought of a black organization NOT endorsing a black candidate was just beyond the pale. And here we are with an almost ideal gay candidate and member of the LGBT community and the big LGBT muckety-mucks refused to endorse him. I believe that this bodes as the beginning of the end for our national orgs as they have rendered themselves nothing more than fund raising engines that have compromised their original reasons for being. We have learned our lesson. We are anonymous. We are legion. We will not forget.  

Greetings leaders of the DNC
We are Anonymous. Over the past few years we hsve been watching you. Your campaigns of misinformation against those perceived to be weak. Willfully turning a blind ear and eye when your members have cried out for change, for freedom. With the latest case of Jim Neal's run in NC the extent of the malign influence of the "old guard" has become obvious. There are those who trusted you, called you leader even when things were down. You have abandoned them and for this it has become obvious that your organization must be destroyed. For the good of your followers, for the good of mankind--for the laughs--we shall expel you from the Internet and systematically dismantle the DNC in its present form.

Believers will awake and see that the price of true freedom is not in whst you demand but in how they believe in themselves.

We cannot die for we are legion. For each one of us falls, hundreds will take our place. America shall be free again.

Knowledge is free.

We are Anonymous.

We are Legion.

We do not forgive.

We do not forget.

Expect us.


[ Parent ]
don't chuck all the national orgs
just because one does some very disappointing things.  most of our national orgs are wonderful and deserve ongoing support.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


[ Parent ]
2010
I was there tonight (I was the stalkerlike fanboy that squealed when I saw you and asked you to pose for a picture with me so I could brag to my sister that I met you), and the last thing Jim told me before I left was that he would run in 2010. If he can pull out these numbers in just months of campaigning, imagine the win he'll pull out in two years!

I hope he does!
I need to get a bumpersticker "Jim Neal 2010!"

watashi no yomeiri wa doko desu ka

[ Parent ]
what the race was about
I crossposted my entry to BlueNC and it generated this comment:
Jim's race was never about LGBT equality. It was always about just plain old equality. Equality for the poor. Equality for Blacks and Whites, Hispanics and Asians. Plain Old Equality.

Jim ran a great race, I was proud to vote for him. I look forward to seeing Dole lose in the fall, and I pray that the US Senate becomes even just a little more concerned about equality because of Jim's campaign.

My response:

I won't disagree with you there, he did run on a "full equality for all" agenda. That's the general (and correct) political perspective. I was speaking from my soapbox as member of the LGBT community. Jim's race was significant because it didn't focus on his sexual orientation. Remember, he could have chosen not to run as an openly gay man. As we know, it happens all the time. Why we have already had gay representation on the Hill from inside the closet, right? We have enough self-loathing elected gay folks who have no interest in promoting equality.

Those of us in the LGBT community who supported Jim's candidacy know that visibility matters, and when in the closet, our issues tend to remain closeted, particularly in the south. The presidential Democratic candidates learned between 2004 and 2008 that they could openly discuss LGBT issues without the earth opening up and swallowing them. That's how you move the ball forward on every level. Running openly means the issues make it to the table for all the candidates running. When the issues can be discussed, it means you create a dialogue to reframe the issues for those unaccustomed to dealing with them, including Dem and GOP candidates at every level of elective office. The next race is then easier. Others can follow.

I cannot tell you how many prominent LGBT activists, loyal Dems I have heard from who were appalled at the way Jim was treated behind the scenes by HRC and Beltway entities. The HRC endorsement debacle was the last straw for many LGBT activists, because it generated honest "WTF" questions from straight progressive allies, who were perplexed as to the lack of support. It's painful to have to explain to allies that our main advocacy organization has viability in mind ahead of supporting trailblazing because of its dual role as a lobbying organization interested in reinforcing its ties to the Hill and party/DC infrastructure. Not that the latter is evil or anything (since legislative advancement is extremely important), but it ties the organization's hands in the case of true advocacy time after time.

We down here at the grassroots level need national LGBT leadership that can focus on advocacy without those ties -- and has equal gravitas as HRC, because its sheer size and presence means the ally community and the MSM automatically assume it speaks for the LGBT community at large, which of course helps it maintain and/or grow HRC's size and pre$ence. Save an advocacy counterweight, we are hampered as a movement, as we've seen, when it comes to efforts like this race.



More prominence for the Victory Fund?


[ Parent ]
Victory fund was the "raise $1 million" entity
they got the backhand in my last post on this topic.

[ Parent ]
Moving the ball
Pam - you're absolutely right about Jim Neal's valiant efforts to win the Democratic nomination for the U.S. Senate. While winning is nice, we all know that the winning candidate isn't always the most qualified or the best legislator.

I've supported many losing political candidates - candidates I knew would have a tough go at the ballot box but were worthy of my financial and organizational investment. By having unconditional support from a core constituency, a candidate can "move the ball" for future progressive candidates. We should continue to urge our national LGBT political organizations to boldly invest in a new tier of political leaders.

As I wrote on Jim's Facebook page, the entire LGBT community should be grateful for Jim's courage to run for the U.S. Senate. We all expect wonderful things from him and he has done us proud.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox