News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



IL: The Peter's anti-gay speaking gig in Arlington Heights brings out demonstrators

by: Pam Spaulding

Tue Mar 24, 2009 at 07:00:00 AM EDT


Last night there was a protest of Peter LaBarbera's speaking engagement in Arlington Heights, where he addressed a pitiful number of fellow homophobes who attended the event at the Christian Liberty Academy (my earlier post here). Pastor Calvin Lindstrom, of the Church of Christian Liberty invited the Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality honcho to speak about how "the militant homosexual movement and its agenda continues to influence political decisions and laws."

The Gay Liberation Network organized the demonstration that brought out members of the community and representatives from the Congregational United Church of Christ of Arlington Heights. Blender Scott Buchicchio and his friend Larry were there as well and shared some pix. Here is part of the report from GLN's Andy Thayer.


With his breathless "undercover" reports about International Mr. Leather and other gay events, LaBarbera's obsession about gay sex has become legendary in LGBT political circles. His "activism" would be laughable if it wasn't also dangerous - LaBarbera was the principal proponent of the two failed attempts to get anti-gay initiatives on the Illinois ballot.

*** Appearing last year on a program with lunatic legislator Rep. Sally "homosexuals are worse than terrorism" Kern of Oklahoma, he said that the gay lobby "threatens America and threatens children."

*** Addressing the increasing pogromist atmosphere against LGBT people in Uganda, he said "At AFTAH, we preach Christian mercy and have denounced Talibanesque capital punishment for homosexuals in countries like Iran. But we also believe that if states and localities here in America (and governments abroad) wish to ban sodomy, they have every right to do so..."

 

*** Talking about John Berry, the new head of the federal government's Office of Personnel Management, he said "So, what we have is sort of a subversive - if you could call it that - homosexual activist, and now he's going to have an even much more visible and powerful role at OPM, which is a very powerful job in Washington."

 

While LaBarbera drew only about 30 listeners to his speech tonight, it would be foolish to dismiss the threat that he potentially represents. History has shown that far-right lunatics who gain only small numbers of adherents during normal times, can rapidly get many more followers in times of economic crisis when people fearful of losing their livelihoods and life savings are much more open to messages of scapegoating. One of the best antidotes is to, as was done tonight, relentlessly expose haters like Peter LaBarbera so that only their most hard-core haters continue to follow them.

While Peter LaBarbera attempts to cultivate an image of benevolent Christian piety, while also opposing equal rights for gay people, not all of his followers are so subtle. This man was livid with rage against our protest, yelling "FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT" at the top of his lungs:

Pam Spaulding :: IL: The Peter's anti-gay speaking gig in Arlington Heights brings out demonstrators
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
If the number of bigoted supporters
falls any lower, you're gonna see The Peter singing, "One is the loneliest number..."

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


LaBarbera and marriage legislation in Illinois
Great report!

Thanks to Pam, Andy, Scott and Larry for reporting!

It is true that LaBarbera failed to get 2 anti-gay initiatives on the ballot in Illinois.

However, the state of Illinois does have legislation that bans same-sex marriage.

The primary sponsor of that was former U.S. Senator Peter Fitzgerald (replaced Carol Moseley Braun's seat). At the time Fitzgerald (no relation to attorney Patrick Fitzgerald) was a state senator.

LaBarbera may have been instrumental in stirring the pot on that one, but it certainly would have passed anyway. Like I've reported before, Pete tries to inject himself in photo-ops in Illinois. At that time, he was new to Illinois, after moving here from DC and the Family Research Council.

It was reported that during hearings on the bill, LaBarbera was down in Sprinfield beating the bushes for support. His visibility was worth noting, although I am hesitant to give him too much credit for helping pass it-- he just inflames passions.

However, now the media recognize him for the closet quack that he is and avoid him.


The man yelling...
He would fit right in yelling "Jew" at a Nazi rally. A true hate-filled bigot.

The best way to shut him up...
....would have been to hand him a bundle of sticks and merrily say "Here's the faggot you asked for, sir!"

[ Parent ]
Or a pack of smokes
But that would require him to have cultural awareness outside his "Bible Stories For Children" picture book.

God save ornery old queens! - kevinchi

[ Parent ]
I fear someone like that
How far removed is he from driving to Hunters some night and running people down in the parking lot, or taking shots at them?

[ Parent ]
THE THREAD AND GREETINGS.
Greetings - Lee Dorsey and countless others have always told me to migrate to Pam's for great "coffee" and this morning, I decided to do so.

My ability to join you is that I have severed my blogging and commitment responsibilities with a site that disappointed me beyond words that can easily describe.

First, the thread:

The United States Theocratic Right Wing has dominance among its adherents. The majority of Right Wingers want to associate themselves with the Right Wing Religionists. They have the mouthpiece and the millions to affect their common goals.

The goals are simple. Gays and lesbians should first return to the closet. Secondly, the sodomy statutes should be reinstated. Thirdly, the APA should return the DSM-V to its "homosexuality is a sick choice" Fourthly, remove all domestic partnerships, civil unions and civil marriages from the statutes as a result of the sodomy statute. Lastly, excommunicate all gay-affirming Christians, Jews and Muslims from their faith communities. ( Did I mention that gays and lesbian "perverts" do not serve in the military? )

We gays and lesbians can complicate the issue, but it is neither complex or complicated. They want us to disappear.
We are "non-persons", and RW billionaires are willing to spend fortunes on this agenda. Do they believe their tripe?
I do NOT believe that they do believe it. I believe that they advocate it because if you follow the money, their rich and lavish "lifestyle" depends upon the persecution of our "psychosexual orientation" by "choice".

OK - I am a retired episcopal suffragan bishop. My health - coronary heart disease and several surgeries and lymphatic cancer - several surgeries and chemotherapy and chronic pancreatitis has made me quite disabled.

I have been partnered since 1976 ( no, that is not a typo ) and legally married to a Canadian citizen since 2003. We presently live in my native MA, but we have a home he inherited in NS where we now spend our summers. We adopted a son from Vietnam, now age 6 years old.

I am an American citizen of swamp Yankee New England stock.
I served in the chaplain's corps, retiring as an O-5. My spouse is a Canadian citizen with residency in the US, and our son is a dual national of both the USA and Canada.

As it seems Prop H8 will be upheld, and that eighteen thousand same-sex couples will be declared valid, the level of homo hatred will prove that it will take a century before true civil rights as found in the eight marriage nations will ever come to fruition.

It is for this, and the number of gentrified gay and lesbian "activists" who enable the homophobes, and forget that it was the radical elements like the Stonewall Stiletto Throwers and the ACT UP crowd who gave them the little that we have, that we will live permanently in Canada beginning this summer.

Canada has its homophobes, and imported ones like Dobson, but we are equal and free, and they cannot hurt us where our rights are concerned.

I was born in 1946 and my spouse in 1951. We do not have the time to wait for total freedom and to raise our child in equality....I will avail myself as his husband and obtain residency immediately.


THE NEW CANADIAN CITIZENSHIP LAW EFFECTIVE APRIL 17, 2009

A new law will come into effect on April 17, 2009, amending the Citizenship Act. The new law will give Canadian citizenship to certain individuals who lost it and to others who will be recognized as citizens for the first time. Citizenship will be automatic and retroactive to the date of loss or date of birth, depending on the situation. People will not have to apply for citizenship, but may need to apply for a citizenship certificate to prove their citizenship. Individuals who are Canadian citizens at the time the law comes into effect will keep their citizenship.

Until the new law comes into effect, the current law will apply.

This means that people who will become citizens under the new law are not citizens yet. Once the new law comes into effect, these people may apply for proof of citizenship.
As well, foreign-born persons adopted by a Canadian citizen between January 1, 1947, and February 14, 1977, must wait to apply for citizenship until the new law comes into effect.
This also means that people who will become citizens under the new law but wish to move to Canada before it comes into effect must contact Citizenship and Immigration Canada to find out what steps they must take to come to Canada using current immigration processes.
Also, people born outside Canada who are subject to the retention rules and who will turn 28 before the law comes into effect must still take action to retain citizenship.
Who will become a citizen
The law restores citizenship to the following individuals who lost it because of the rules in effect under the previous laws:

People who became citizens when the first citizenship act took effect on January 1, 1947, including people born in Canada prior to 1947, war brides, and other British subjects who had lived in Canada for at least five years before 1947 and who then lost citizenship;
People who were born in Canada or who became Canadian citizens on or after January 1, 1947, and who then lost their citizenship; and
People who were born outside Canada, on or after January 1, 1947, in the first generation born abroad, to a parent who was a Canadian citizen at the time of the birth.
The law gives citizenship to the following individuals who have never been citizens:

People who did not take the steps necessary to become citizens and who were born outside Canada on or after January 1, 1947, in the first generation born abroad to a parent who was a Canadian citizen at the time of the birth.
Who will not become a citizen
The following individuals will not become citizens under the new law:

People who did not become citizens when the first citizenship act took effect on January 1, 1947;
People born in Canada who are not citizens because at the time of their birth, one of their parents was a foreign diplomat;
People who were born outside Canada to a Canadian parent, who are not already citizens or who lost their citizenship in the past, and who were born in the second or subsequent generation abroad;
People who were born outside Canada to a Canadian parent, in the second or subsequent generation born abroad, and who lost their citizenship because they did not take the steps needed to retain their citizenship;
People who renounced their citizenship as adults with the Canadian government; and
People whose citizenship was revoked by the government because it was obtained by fraud.
Adoption
The rules that came into effect in December 2007 allowing children born outside Canada and adopted after February 14, 1977, to become Canadian citizens without having to become permanent residents will be extended to people adopted on or after January 1, 1947. For the adopted person to be eligible for citizenship, certain requirements must be met, including the submission of an application. This also includes people adopted by someone who will reacquire Canadian citizenship under the new law.

Persons born or adopted outside Canada after the new law comes into effect
The new law changes the rules for people born outside Canada. Individuals born outside Canada to a parent who was a Canadian citizen at the time of the birth will only be Canadians at birth if:

the parent was born in Canada;
the parent became a Canadian citizen by immigrating to Canada and being granted citizenship.
This means that children born in another country after the new law comes into effect will not be Canadian citizens by birth if they were born outside Canada to a Canadian parent who was also born outside Canada to a Canadian parent.

This limitation will also apply to foreign-born individuals adopted by a Canadian parent. The adopted children of Canadian citizens will be considered to be the first generation born abroad. This means that:

if a person born outside Canada and adopted by a Canadian parent has a child outside Canada, that child will not be a citizen by birth;
if a person born outside Canada and adopted by a Canadian parent adopts a child outside Canada, that child will not be eligible to apply for citizenship under the adoption provisions of the Citizenship Act; and
if a person born outside Canada to a Canadian parent, in the first generation born abroad, adopts a foreign-born child, that adopted child will not be eligible to apply for citizenship under the adoption provisions of the Citizenship Act.
There are exceptions to these rules. The limitation will not apply to a child born or adopted abroad in the second or subsequent generation if, at the time of the child's birth or adoption, their Canadian parent is working outside Canada for the Canadian government or a Canadian province or serving outside Canada with the Canadian forces.

Children who are not eligible for citizenship under the Citizenship Act may be sponsored as permanent residents and then apply for citizenship. An application for citizenship for a child under 18 may be submitted as soon as the child becomes a permanent resident.

How to prove you are a Canadian citizen
For most purposes, people born in Canada may use their provincial or territorial birth certificate to prove their Canadian citizenship. Individuals who were born in Canada, who lost their citizenship in the past and who either resumed their citizenship in the past or reacquired it under the new law should be able to use their birth certificate as proof of citizenship.

People who were born outside Canada require a citizenship certificate to prove their Canadian citizenship. Find out how to apply for a citizenship certificate.

Getting ready for the new law
CIC is preparing for the new law by:

writing regulations to support the amendments;
writing information sheets to explain the changes;
updating applications and other forms;
training staff;
working with stakeholders and partners to ensure that they know about the changes and can inform others so that they can avail themselves.


[ Parent ]
Thank you BIshop Raymond,

I was trying to figure out where to post about Canada and the new Canadian law as you have relayed to me. You found a great spot.

'Lee Dorsey' (on facebook, too.)

aka LOrion, and Orion45. 



It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


[ Parent ]
From Scott
At the time me and larry got to the protest it was 6:15 pm, and we saw about 30 walk in.
Their might of been others befor us that came in but i say about 30 that i seen.

thats me in the uper left pic on the top row.


Well, geez, I gots to be more careful
and stay in touch with my peeps at GLN other than that weekly meeting. I doubt I would have been able to attend this, with work and all, but I do have a supportive boss for stuff like this.

Small quibble
When mentioning the names of cities/towns, could you also say what state they are in, unless it's something really obvious? I am not familiar with where Arlington Heights is, and I don't think it's on the same par with, say, Atlanta, Chicago, or Dallas, where the state is known just by the city name.

The headline's first word was "IL" an abbreviation for Illinois


[ Parent ]
Something to remember
The Peter hates being compared to Phred Phelps and Westboro Bigot Church.

Porno Pete likes to think he's "respectable".

Of course, The Peter shoots himself in the foot everytime he posts a story on his website detailing all of the perverted ways and means of the "gaystapo".

Anyone who's ever read his website knows that his type of extremism routinely falls outside of the perimeters of even "respectable" homophobia - like that of Frank Schubert of ProtectMarriage.com in California.  In this way, he's somewhat impotent.


Can't you feel the Christian love?
This man was livid with rage against our protest, yelling "FAGGOT FAGGOT FAGGOT" at the top of his lungs.

Now if this guy had been paying attention to Petey, he would have been yelling "You can be healed of your homosexuality Faggot!" at the top of his lungs.


The man screaming "FAGGOT!"
...exemplifies everything about the current and future state of the anti-equal-rights movement: Older, getting frailer every year and dying off soon. Not even those Eastern European orthodox nutjobs they're recruiting on the West Coast can save them.  

LaBarbera... he's the guy who goes to International Mr. Leather in Chicago every year
Just so he can blog at length on the depravity and sinfulness he witnesses first hand, correct?

I will be at Bear Pride in Chicago this year, which coincides with IML (they even have shuttle buses running between the events.) If I see him, I'll be sure to give him everyone's love. ;-D

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même merde.


Let him know
that RainbowPhoenix considers him a closet leather queen 'kay? ;)

I am the lizard queen!

[ Parent ]
Gee Peter - how are you going to support yourself on the meager droppings
in the plate passed among 30 diehards?

Far too many can look at 5 years of same sex marriage in the NE US to keep reaching in their pockets and supporting your chosen lifestyle - especially during economic downturns.  Maybe you should take some of the stimulus money and go back to school for retraining.  

Your brand of hate is almost exclusively outsourced to the Middle East these days - theocrats and hatemongers are still flourishing there, while they continue to be marginalized throughout the rest of the world on a steadily increasing basis.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox