News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Mitt was for homos before he was against them -- on the record

by: Pam Spaulding

Fri Dec 08, 2006 at 20:43:07 PM EST


Go enjoy Laura Kiritsy's "Romney is a big fat liar" over at Bay Windows. I want to see homophobe Mitt Romney tap dance out of the pro-gay statements he made in an interview with BW back in 1994 when he was battling Ted Kennedy for the U.S. Senate seat. Here's some delicious self-destruction.
In the interview, Romney emphasized that he would be an advocate for gay civil rights. And he offered some surprisingly thoughtful reasons for his positions — surprising only because of his demagoguing on gay rights today. He tied his willingness to advocate for the rights of gay people, for instance, to the Mormon concept of “free agency”:


“When I speak of free agency, I don’t just mean that each person can do what they want to do, I mean that our society should allow people to make their own choices and live by their own beliefs,” said Romney. “People of integrity don’t force their beliefs on others, they make sure that others can live by different beliefs they may have. That’s the great thing about this country: it was founded to allow people to follow beliefs of their own conscience. I will work and have worked to fight discrimination and to assure each American equal opportunity.”

So what changed, Mitt? Did you find a special clause in the Good Book that blew "free agency" out of the water when it comes to gay folks? But wait, take a look at his position on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" -- in 1994, he stated that gays and lesbians would be able to serve openly.
Pam Spaulding :: Mitt was for homos before he was against them -- on the record
“I believe that there will be change over time as the military establishment and the rank and file become more comfortable with the realities of sexual orientation in the military,” said Romney. “I will support progress being made in that area as time progresses and the military and society becomes more accepting.”
My favorite pro-gay Romney tidbit is the news that he courted the Massachusetts Log Cabin Club during that Senate race in '84, writing the organization a letter pledging to be more pro-gay than Kennedy -- good grief, the fundies are going to eat this hypocrite alive!
An original copy of the letter has yet to surface. But on Oct. 17, 1994, the Globe reported that Romney wrote to the group and said, “as we seek to establish full equality for America’s gay and lesbian citizens, I will provide more effective leadership than my opponent.” An Oct. 13, 1994 Bay Windows article also quoted from Romney’s letter: “For some voters it might be enough for me to simply match my opponent’s record in this area. But I believe we can and must do better. If we are to achieve the goals we share, we must make equality for gays and lesbians a mainstream concern. My opponent cannot do this. I can and will.”
Now pols can "evolve" on their positions over time, but this is another case of a switch of epic, craven proportions. It's clear that Mitt believes homos are an easy mark, we can be thrown under the bus with little political impact on his potential candidacy.  After all, this is the same man who said in 2005 that marriage equality will destroy the international rep of the US.

I doubt Mitt's campaign ambitions are going to go far once The Base gets wind of this. It would be nice if the MSM forces him to explain his political conversion.

Also check out Kiritsy's Mitt's Secret gay history II, a collection of Mitt's pro-gay quotes from 1994 that will come back to haunt him. My fave snippet...

On why the gay community should support Romney over Kennedy, given Kennedy’s record of supporting both civil rights and the gay community:

“Well, I think you’re partially right in characterizing Ted Kennedy as supportive of the gay community, and I respect the work and efforts he’s made on behalf of the gay community and for civil rights more generally, and I would continue that fight.

“There’s something to be said for having a Republican who supports civil rights in this broader context, including sexual orientation. When Ted Kennedy speaks on gay rights, he’s seen as an extremist. When Mitt Romney speaks on gay rights he’s seen as a centrist and a moderate. It’s a little like if Eugene McCarthy was arguing in favor of recognizing China, people would have called him a nut. But when Richard Nixon does it, it becomes reasonable. When Ted says it, it’s extreme; when I say it, it’s mainstream.

“I think the gay community needs more support from the Republican Party and I would be a voice in the Republican Party to foster anti-discrimination efforts.

“The other thing I should say is that the gay community and the members of it that are friends of mine that I’ve talked to don’t vote solely on the basis of gay rights issues. They’re also very concerned about a $4 trillion national debt, a failing school system, a welfare system that’s out of whack and a criminal justice system that isn’t working. I believe that while I would further the efforts Ted Kennedy has led, I would also lead the country in new and far more positive ways in taxing and spending, welfare reform, criminal justice and education. That’s why I believe many gay and lesbian individuals will support my candidacy and do support my candidacy.

“I have several friends in the gay community who are supporters, who are working in my campaign. I think they believe I would be a better senator.”


Do you think Mitt will be held accountable for his hypocrisy?

Hat tips to Tony and Autumn.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Mitt's been hanging with too many fundies
Now he is going to go down thinking that his current rhetoric is going to play well with the fundies...

They don't support you Mitt....they are already turning on you...see the light

Stay tuned for crashing Mitt in 2007 kids!


Hey, if I say that I hate homos,
will I get to run for the presidency on the Republican ticket too?

only if you mean it
but dont let us catch you haggarding behind our backs!

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


[ Parent ]
Romney
is just like 41 - says anything, does anything, and shamelessly, if he thinks it will get him the next election victory.

He may have a little more of "the vision thing", but a little more than absolutely none isn't saying much.

He will go nowhere, and will deserve it!


A nit...
Mitt's Senate run was in 1994, against Ted Kennedy, not 1984.

And, BTW, in Mitt's 2002 run for MA's Governator, he did express some affection for gay rights.

I'm glad that others have picked up on the "First Mitt was for 'em (equal rights for gay people) before he was against them" meme.  He'll have a lot of 'splainen' to do.


Two faced?
I think that Mitt genuinely believed that gay people shoud be given full civil rights and freedom from discrimination. It just didn't occur to Mitt that gay people would want MARRIAGE. Imagine that.

Liar
When I read this story in the NYT today I wanted to howl except it's seriously unfunny.  Aside from being a liar, he has proved he can sink to the lowest depths of politics -- anything at all for political gain.  And that makes him dangerous as well.

Two Bigots Enter, One Bigot Leaves...
"Do you think Mitt will be held accountable for his hypocrisy?"

Oh, I'm fairly confident that Sam Brownback will have the answer to that question.


Sam
If Brownback runs I think we can count on that!

[ Parent ]
Formerly insightful about integrity
He started by insisting that it isn’t enough for Americans to tolerate each other, people of integrity fight for each others’ freedom.

He ended by insisting that tolerating gay families in his neighborhood is not just wrong, they must be fought when they use the same words to describe their families. And gay families must be fought when they demand the same rights and responsibilities as his family. But most of all, Mitt now believes that America’s schools and institutions must never admit that ordinary gay families exist.

It amazes me that he once had an idea of what integrity meant as a believer in a pluralistic society, but no longer.


It amazes me that he once had an idea of what integrity meant as a believer in a pluralistic society, but no longer.
I now doubt everything he says.  I don't think you can trust anything he says to be based upon any principals except winning the next election.

George H. W. Bush was exactly that way.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox