News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Wingnut-Crony-laden Office of Special Counsel to investigate Rove

by: RandyH

Tue Apr 24, 2007 at 14:12:39 PM EDT


(You can read more about homophobe Scott Bloch in these prior Blend posts. - promoted by pam)

It seems The Leader has decided to have a "Loyal Bushie" investigate Karl Rove's mixing of politics and official business. Expect to hear "we can't comment on an ongoing investigation" again whenever Rove's name is brought up.

In an article titled "Low-key office launches high-profile inquiry" today,  the LA Times reports that the "independent" Office of Special Counsel is independently deciding to investigate the numerous incidents involving Rove. The purpose of the Office of Special Counsel is to investigate and prosecute violations of the Hatch Act, protect government whistle-blowers and prosecute cases of discrimination, etc within the federal government. So this would be the appropriate office to investigate these alleged violations of the Hatch Act by Karl Rove and his team.

But what's missing here is a little background on the cronies installed at the Office of Special Counsel. The head of the organization is a guy by the name of Scott J. Bloch, who originally left private practice to come aboard the Bush team to be chief counsel for the Office of Faith Based Initiatives. He was later appointed to be the head of OSC. Since taking office, it became his mission to clear the office of dedicated career investigators and lawyers and replace them with graduates of christian law schools - Loyal Bushies. It has been reported that many of these "consultants" and other employees of the office were hired outside of the rules for employing  federal employees - violating some of the very rules his office is charged to enforce.

Shortly after being confirmed to the post, he re-interpreted policy of the office based on some obscure past executive orders and halted investigation and prosecution of cases of discrimination based on sexual orientation.  This caused a stink in congress and they demanded explanation and a restoration of protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation within the federal government. He punted on the matter and, under threat of a PR nightmare, the White House reiterated their "commitment" to protecting from discrimination based on sexual orientation. His office then made a statement that they were restoring the original policies, but never effectively did.

In short, he was appointed to neuter the office so that cronyism and discrimination could run rampant in the Federal government and silence potential whistle-blowing by career federal employees until the end of Bush's term.  Now he is independently deciding to investigate all of Rove's shenanigans. Expect a report out of his office with a stern warning to Rove on the day Bush leaves office. Hopefully more media will pick up on this story.

For more information, you can Google the name Scott J. Bloch. There's tons of it out there, but here's a compilation of documents (PDF) in a case against him that I found extremely helpful in researching his time in office.

RandyH :: Wingnut-Crony-laden Office of Special Counsel to investigate Rove
Tags: (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Turdblossom to be investigated
by an A-hole...what a surprise

or should I rewrite it as
Gonzalez to investigate a shrub buddie?  it is all the same these days...

Rove will be dealt with by other gays
This is just nonsense a feckless investigation of Miss Piggy Rove. Once Bush is out of power, and KKKarl rears his ugly head in the queer community (AGAIN) {he worked the Dupont Circle Bars when Bush was governor}, then he GETS NAILED.

Investigation also centers around a PowerPoint Presentation to GSA Appointees on Jan 26, 2007
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel is expanding its investigation of a January videoconference, conducted by Karl Rove's deputy for General Services Administration appointees, to look at whether the political dealings of the White House have violated the Hatch Act, its chairman said last night.

Not long into its investigation of the presentation, Special Counsel Scott J. Bloch said, his office had collected "a sufficient amount of evidence" that merited a deeper examination of whether the White House was running afoul of the law.

from 4/24/07 WaPo: http://www.washingto...


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox