News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Ten dunces at the Reagan Presidential Library, 8PM

by: Pam Spaulding

Thu May 03, 2007 at 19:30:00 PM EDT


Gay folks looking for support for equality at any level really have no dog in this hunt, but it's definitely the most colorful field, full of adulterers and hypocritical flip-floppers.

Feel free to comment about it in the thread if you're tuning in.

It will be a battle of the fundie and faux-fundie titans at the Republican presidential debate tonight, which is sponsored by MSNBC and The Politico and begins at 8PM.

Top tier: Giuliani, McCain and Romney. Battle of the flip-flopping fundie-buttkissers will hopefully get called on their "evolution" on certain positions. [I want John McCain to be asked about his abominable statement today that lesbian and gay soldiers present "an intolerable risk to morale, cohesion and discipline." I won't hold my breath.]

Got no respect tier: Sen. Sam Brownback (Kansas), former governors Mike Huckabee of Arkansas, Tommy Thompson of Wisconsin and Jim Gilmore of Virginia, Reps. Ron Paul of Texas, Tom Tancredo of Colorado and Duncan Hunter of California. The latter two didn't bother voting on the hate crimes bill today -- I wonder why?

Unfortunately the colorful undeclared ones won't be there: Fred Thompson (who's polling higher than Romney) and Newt Gingrich.

For laughs, check out the Sizzlingly Inappropriate Republican Debate Hottie Rundown!

We should give them dunce cap ratings for performance.

***

UPDATE: It was a crappy debate. The main points
- McCain looked old, feeble and shaky.
- Tommy Thompson said it's ok for employers to continue to have the right to fire gay employees (see the video),
- We've got at least three evolution deniers (Tancredo, Huckabee and Brownback) - here's that video.
- The flip flopping continued -- Mitt now thinks getting OBL is worth moving heaven and earth.
- All of them would like to see the repeal of Roe v. Wade.
- Everyone thought the running of the Iraq conflicted was FUBAR, but somehow no one pointed the finger directly at Bush The Decider -- it was everyone else's fault. Hey, it was the GOP Congress that gave him a blank check...

Pam Spaulding :: Ten dunces at the Reagan Presidential Library, 8PM
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Eleven, Gov Arnold there too


If I make sense? it was quite by accident.

Twelve, even
I'm pretty sure I saw Chris Matthews there too.

[ Parent ]
have mercy
The Tool McCain acted like an old coot up there, he could barely string together a coherent sentence about Iraq. I don't know what on earth he was talking about when he said the war had been "mishandled." He and the rest of the GOP Congress keep rubber stamping Dear Leader's plan.

Huckabee...
Blames Bush (well, he doesn't invoke his name, or even "The President") for listening to the "guys in silk ties" () rather than the generals in dealing with Iraq.

Mitt flip flops AGAIN on OBL
He said last week that it wasn't important to catch Osama bin Laden. Tonight Mitt Romney thinks we need to move heaven and earth to catch bin Laden. WTF? Shameless.

Roe v. Wade
All said it would be ok to repeal it, including Rudy.

The 14th Amendment
If Tommy Thompson wants to be President he should have a grasp of the 14th amendment.


No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Thompson is a shameless panderer. A true profile in courage.


[ Parent ]
Tommy Thompson on firing gay employees
He said yes, employers should be able to fire an employee for simplly being gay.

but he, like the whole pack
is all about life and the holiness of each and every human being.  yeeeaaahhh, rriiiight.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


[ Parent ]
McCain, Spending cost the repubs in 2006??
  This guy is way out there..

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.

Evolution
Romney, Huckabee and Tancredo raised their hands when asked whether they didn't believe in evolution. McCain did some tap dance about seeing the hand of God when he visits the Grand Canyon. Good grief.

Huh?
Don't you mean de-evolution?

[ Parent ]
re: evolution
Yikes!!!

Did that just happen?!?

-drewed


[ Parent ]
hmm...
I really hesitate to say this, but Tancredo sets off my gaydar.  He just said something about 'measuring the drapes'.  Geez.  Is it my imagination?

Tancredo - pls
We don't want him in the club! Argh.

[ Parent ]
What Measuring the Drapes Means
It's a very old expression that means somebody is overly eager to move in and take over somebody's office.  Bush uses this expression himself, that's how cornball it is.

Not surprisingly, it makes no sense.  If you take over the office and redecorate, you measure the windows, not the drapes.

The proceedings and the participants were old, old, OLD.  Flip-flopper Romney- I think he's 60- came off as the juvenile lead.  McCain is more and more looking and sounding like Uncle Fester; all that's missing is the lightbulb in his mouth.

=>The truth usually isn't pretty. Don't blame me for telling it.<=


[ Parent ]
Wasn't it once "measuring FOR drapes"?


[ Parent ]
Yes, Measuring FOR Drapes
But it evolved into something incorrect that makes no sense.  Another example: "I couldn't care less about such-and-such" has become "I could care less..." which means you really do care.

Sad to say I see errors in my daily newspapers and hear them on TV- junior high school mistakes that our teachers would have corrected.  At least when I was there.

Nobody in my lifetime has mangled the English language as Bush.  It is obvious he doesn't read, and that includes the Constitution of the United States, and his daily briefing on little trifles like hijacked airplanes used as weapons.

=>The truth usually isn't pretty. Don't blame me for telling it.<=


[ Parent ]
dividing the wealth of iraq into thirds
and one third to the people,  I thought conservatives are against welfare?

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.

anyone else underwhelmed by the show?
i only heard the radio version - how did people's body language come across?

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


McCain/Romney
Man, the Tool looked out of it. Shaky and sloppy and trying to seem "vigorous" but he looked nervous.

Romney looked really smooth, handled himself well given the time constraints, didn't seem flummoxed. Most of the rest of them did seem rushed. Tancredo was clearly ill at ease to me.

Giuliani really didn't get a lot of time to discuss his issues, but when he opened his mouth all the right wing BS he's been practicing rolled out. He had little time to rely on his 9/11 mantra. Didn't look or come across as presidential.

The others didn't strike me as moving up from the second tier in terms of the telegenic factor. It was more of the stark contrast between everyone and McCain that struck me.

Thompson looked like a shady used car salesman up there.


[ Parent ]
romney & mccain
to my ears, romney sounded the most composed and relaxed - really good at handling talk on the fly.  mccain sounded shakey and puny, and like he was always trying to figure out how to work in his pre-fab talking points.  few others made much of an impression one way or the other, although it was clear that no one was afraid of criticizing bush.  i can;t believe they had arnold standing there while the questions was asked if they would amend the constitution to allow foreign-born presidents.  really tacky. 

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


[ Parent ]
If It was on Smell-O-Vision...
It would have smelled like Ben-Gay and Absorbine Jr.

That's how creaky.

=>The truth usually isn't pretty. Don't blame me for telling it.<=


[ Parent ]
Wrong question
I'd like to point out that, technically, no one "believes" in evolution.  In the context of the question its obvious that believe is being used in a quasi-religious sense, as in "do you believe in God", not in the "I believe I'll have another cup of coffee" or "I believe the sun will rise in one hour" senses.

I don't believe in evolution.  I accept it as the currently dominant scientific theory, and therefore likely to be true.

Now, if they asked "who here doesn't believe in creationism" that'd be a valid question, and I'd be raising my hand.

Its just one of my pet peeves.  Evolution isn't a religion, it doesn't require belief anymore than, say, universal gravitation requires belief.


What Dictionary?
Brad, you can "believe" anything you choose to believe.  You can believe Katie Holmes actually delivered a baby, Melanie Griffith is a great actress, cats can't swim, Hillary and Bill Clinton have seen each other naked since the film Flashdance came out, the planet Neptune is made of popsicle sticks, and Karl Rove has a bad memory.  I don't know where you got the notion that the word believe is only used correctly when in a religious or quasi-religious sense. 

=>The truth usually isn't pretty. Don't blame me for telling it.<=

[ Parent ]
We seem to be miscommunicating
I never said that the word believe only existed in a religious, or quasi-religious, sense.  In fact, my original post included two examples of the word in other senses.

However, its pretty obvious that when used in the context of "do you believe in evolution?" its being used in the same sense as "do you believe in God?".

No one, you'll notice, ever asks "do you believe in universal gravitation?" or "do you believe in quantum physics?"

When the question "do you believe in evolution" is asked there is an underlying assumption that evolution is somehow less fact based than other scientific theories, and that it requires belief, faith, in a quasi-religious sense.

I do not believe in evolution, it doesn't require belief.  It is simply the best theory available to explain observed reality.  Belief does not, and cannot, enter the equation.

"Believe" in the sense of "I believe that the bus will be here in three minuts" is self evidently not the sense that the word is being used in when the question is "do you believe in evolution".

There is a desperate effort on the part of the enemies of reason to equate evolution and religion, this is illustrated by their use of words such as "evolutionism" and "evolutionist".  By making the question "do you believe in evolution", rather than "do you think evolution is true", or "do you think that evolution is a valid theory" or even "what do you think about evolution" they have succeeded, in part at least, in making it a matter of faith in the minds of many people.


[ Parent ]
You Are Injecting Things
No, I don't think there's a secret religious implication.  You can be asked if you believe in globalization, believe in free-trade economy, believe in the enormous talents of Adam Sandler or believe in No Child Left Behind, and it's not necessary to add an extra six or eight words for
evolution to make it NOT sound like a religion. It's not a point worth my spending more time on, but I don't think there's any secret or open agenda by asking if one believes in evolution, phrasing it in that forthright way.

=>The truth usually isn't pretty. Don't blame me for telling it.<=

[ Parent ]
Rudi McRomney
and the Anklebiters.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox