News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Watch the Senate Filibuster

by: Pam Spaulding

Tue Jul 17, 2007 at 23:00:00 PM EDT


The all-night debate over the failed Iraq policy is in full swing. See it live on C-SPAN.

Democratic Senators have called for an up-or-down vote on the Levin-Reed Iraq redeployment bill, but  one Bush rubber stamp GOP obstructionist senator after another has stood up to bleat objection to a vote on the legislation.

Think Progress is liveblogging it from the Capitol building.

After the flip, read Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's (Nevada) letter to Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, urging him to cease blocking up-or-down votes on bipartisan amendments to change course in Iraq.

Pam Spaulding :: Watch the Senate Filibuster
July 17, 2007

Senator Mitch McConnell
Republican Leader
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator McConnell:

There are no more solemn decisions facing members of Congress than the conduct of war and the placing of our troops in harm's way.  As you know, more than 3,600 brave Americans have lost their lives and more than $400 billion has been expended on the war in Iraq, which has now moved into its fifth year with no end in sight.  Yet Senate Republicans have chosen to prevent honest debate and action on legislation to provide an Iraq strategy that would allow us to responsibly redeploy our troops and refocus our attention on the very real threat posed by Al Qaeda.  This is partisan obstruction that I fear will make us less, not more, secure and I urge you to reconsider your course.

Today's headlines confirm the importance of allowing the Senate to consider amendments to change course in Iraq and refocus our resources so we can more effectively wage the war on terror.  These news reports indicate the violence in northern Iraq has escalated at the same time the Director of National Intelligence released a new assessment that al Qaeda has "regenerated key elements of its Homeland attack capability."  As long as our troops are mired in policing an Iraqi civil war, they cannot focus on the enemy that attacked this nation nearly six years ago; an enemy that has regrettably regenerated its attack capacity since 9/11.

Furthermore, contrary to your previous assertions, there is a long bipartisan tradition of allowing Senators to offer defense-related amendments on the Defense Authorization bill without the obstruction Senate Republicans are employing today.  The record also clearly shows that both Senate Democrats and Republicans have recently foregone the opportunity to block action on important Iraq-related provisions.  For example, just last year, the Senate voted up or down on two Iraq-related amendments on the Defense Authorization bill.  Additionally, Senate Democrats did not place a 60-vote hurdle in front of a Republican amendment to strike Iraq policy language in the Iraq Supplemental Spending bill.  Nor did votes on final passage of the Iraq supplemental require sixty votes.

Therefore, I renew the proposal I offered to you yesterday to permit the Senate to act on a series of amendments pertaining to Iraq.  Under my proposal, the Senate would hold up or down votes on the bipartisan amendments offered by (1) Senators Levin and Reed, (2) Lugar and Warner, (3) Salazar and Alexander, and (4) Nelson and Collins.  There may well be other amendments that Republican and Democratic Senators wish to offer related to Iraq, and I would be willing to work with you to ensure these amendments also receive up or down votes.

For the sake of our troops and the American people, I hope you reconsider your decision to obstruct Senate action on critical amendments that could change course the course of the war in Iraq.

  Sincerely,

    Harry Reid
  U.S. Senate

And so the all-night conservative filibuster is on.
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I tried that earlier.
One of them was standing there giving the standard Fox talking points, such as "cut and run", "they will follow us home", "democrats don't support the troops and are making the funding political to get votes", etc.  It was painful.  Our best and brightest.  At least Reid called him on the stupidity.

My America includes LGBT families.

Grrrr
I listened to Lieberman's entire speech. It was incredible. Bush is worst President ever, but I am glad Holy Joe never got a heartbeat away from the presidency.

The good news on this front is that if there is Supreme Court retirement next summer, which is unlikely, or a death, which is always possible, the Republicans can't whine about the ensusing fillibuster.  I doubt a majority could be mustered to stop any appointed by Bush.... but if only 40 votes are needed...


Democrats Grow a Pair
Robert Menendez of NJ was on fire. I loved that he called out Lieberman and pointed out the ongoing hypocrisy of the Republican Party. The GOP screams up and and down about how much the support the troops, but vote against every measure that will increase the troops safety and provide for them when they return home.

The Democrats need to continue to push hard on this issue and if the Republicans continue their obstructionist ways then they will pay the political price.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox