News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



LaBarbera: White House helped craft 'loose' ENDA religious exception

by: Pam Spaulding

Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 11:00:00 AM EDT


This post dovetails nicely with Autumn's diary, "Holy Cow! Fundies Say ENDA Will Protect T's Without Specific T Language!"

WingNutDaily reports, with a headline of "White House helped craft 'gay'/transsexual rights bill," on the latest paranoia and hysteria over ENDA on the right. The Peter, according to his sources, says the Bush White House helped to craft the bill in order to sign the legislation (wow, that's news to me). Check this out:
Staff members for President Bush have helped congressional staffers work on "religious exemption" language for a new "anti-discrimination" proposal that actually would codify in federal statutes an anti-Christian bias, and that will make it harder for him to veto, according to an activist group.

"Americans For Truth has learned that a White House official has boasted to pro-family leaders attending a private administration briefing that White House staffers were involved in the negotiations to craft expanded religious exemption language for the new ENDA bill," according to Peter LaBarbera's Americans For Truth organization.

"At the briefing, the White House official did not commit to the assembled evangelical leaders that the president would veto [ENDA], saying that they will wait to see the bill's final language, according to our source. This is troubling in that vetoing ENDA in any form is regarded as a 'no-brainer' by pro-family activists, who are counting on Bush to stop it," he continued
Of course the article devolves into the usual lies about persection of faith-based organizations, but The Peter and Matt "Bam Bam" Barber of Concerned Women for America are coming completely unglued and AFTAH has launched a calling campaign to contact the White House to urge a presidential veto if any form of ENDA passes, feeling betrayed by Bush.
LaBarbera said the word that White House staffers have been working on proposals makes the situation worse.

"Failure to veto ENDA would be a devastating defeat for pro-family forces and a huge gift to homosexual lobbyists. Call the president …. and urge him to 'please publicly pledge to veto ENDA ... in any form if it passes Congress,'" he said.

..."It must be remembered that top homosexual strategists now assert that their 'moral' claim (the right not to be treated differently based on their 'sexual orientation') trumps our religious/moral obligation to oppose homosexuality," LaBarbera said.

He also said the plan is built on house of cards, since there is no outbreak of homosexuals getting fired. Instead, it is Christians defending their faith in the public arena being mistreated, he said.
How can he type this drivel out and expect to be taken seriously?

The Freepers are beside themselves as well, though some seem to be blaming the messenger -- The Peter -- as not a valid source of info.

Read the hilarity after the jump.
Pam Spaulding :: LaBarbera: White House helped craft 'loose' ENDA religious exception


Actual Freeper Quotes

It's time to man the phones again folks.

Mailing Address The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500

Phone Numbers
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414 FAX: 202-456-2461
TTY/TDD Comments: 202-456-6213
Visitors Office: 202-456-2121
E-Mail Please send your comments to comments@whitehouse.gov.

It was the event in Crawford when “W” choked out on the pretzel. He didn’t have many brain cells to spare and being without oxygen damanged his brain enough for him to become a liberal.

wow. I haven't seen so much overt "the white house did this, the Bush administration did that" on a supposedly "conservative" forum since first coming here in 1998. They used to fax talking points. Now somehow they just send out thoughtwaves or give free samples of kool-aid to strategic, ummm, mouthpieces, and Poof! an instant plague of leftist rhetoric infects everyone with a freaking keyboard.

How is it leftist to be outraged by a report of White House supporting radical gay ideaologies? Granted the source isn’t the best but you weren’t attacking the source, you were attacking FReepers.

Let's all go into spasms because some official tattled some hearsay that might or might not be true. This sounds like the typical madeup-redmeat that some groups throw out to the dupes to stir them up AND typically generate fund raising donations from said 'hyped up dupes'.

Gawd how dare we question the Great Leader?

Yep, better get used to keeping your thoughts to yourself. Soon there will be special re-education camps for people who display inappropriate attitudes.

Unfortunately, it looks like the man I voted for has gone from “reaching across the aisle”, which is destructive (to our party and to our country) and disgusting, to “reaching across the border”, which is destructive and disgusting, to now, a “reach around” - also destructive and especially disgusting. What is wrong with this man?

Please, question the great leader. But don't confuse that with cheap smears based on dubious, sensationalist headlines found on fringe internet sites and echoed on internet forums.

Fifteen months left and counting of this retarded nincompoop. We will probably get someone worse, but I need a breather.

The Bushes should be flushed down the toilette of political history. Never again should a Bush hold any office of public trust.

As Rudder points out, "ENDA is not well-defined in this article..."

What is the specific language that touches upon free speech? Are we to believe the outlawing of employment discrimination based on "gender identity," (Great Caesar's Ghost! Admittedly plain silly, and admittedly enough to pull out the veto pen, if only because you want to save the courts from being choked with test cases) is infringement on the 1st Amendment? The Constitution trumps federal law, or its supposed to, I know...

This article raises more questions than it answers. I'll wait for the scholars steeped in the historic stream of Christianity and "apologetics" to inform me how this touches on free speech and, more specifically, how exactly (come again?) it reverses elements of the Civil Rights Act of 1967.

Before I help jam the White House switchboard again, I need logical talking points that put the left on defensive in the Media, not echo chamber whispers.

Look at what these laws have done and are being used for in England and Canada. That is a pretty clear indicator of where we are headed. Where pastors are jailed for their sermon. Where people are fined for quoting the Bible. That is the goal for these activists. Forget about condemning public officials who have sex in public restrooms when these laws are passed. Any reference to homosexuality in anything other than a positive context will be a jailable offense. Its happening in other countries and is coming to your neighborhood soon.

Remind me again, when is Bush’s last day in office? I can hardly wait.

Thanks for the phone numbers. I’ll be calling non-stop Monday to let these idiots know that American families are not going to stand for this alternative lifestyle garbage. This nation was founded on Christian values and yet now they are trying to ennact special rights legislation to protect some twisted sexual perverts. We need to stop this degenerate legislation in its tracks.
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Ugh.
Will that piss enthusiast and homosexual aficianado just put the noose around his neck and jump already?  What a nutball! LOL

Implication

If this has any basis in reality, then Aravosis & Co. are the shills in a particularly ugly con game, since it means that those in Congress who have been working to get ENDA passed "as is" not only tossed out trans-inclusion, but actively worked on the grotesquely expanded religious exemption. They have sold everyone out, not just the trans folks, for the sake of expediency.

 



It also means
It also means that Aravosis willingly created a wedge issue in the community knowing that. I noticed John Aravosis hasn't commmented on any of this. Isn't it odd that he was so active on trying to stop it then when all this started to come out he hasn't said a word about it.

[ Parent ]
The idiot is at it again
Go figure he would use them to try to prove his point as being right.

http://www.americabl...


[ Parent ]
What an a$$hat,
  His last comment shows what a turd he is,
PS As an aside, I've just learned that there's at least one senior transgender leader in America who is married (and I'm sure other straight transgendered people are married). That's nice, and I support their right to marry. But I do find it odd that the gay community is being asked (well, told) to put our employment rights on hold until the transgender community can get theirs, but the transgender community isn't putting its marriage rights on hold until we get ours. Then again, I'd never ask them to put their rights on hold until I got mine.

  I am a straight transwoman, and I can't get married.  And I know many others that can't as well.

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.


[ Parent ]
Peter LaBarbera Always the Lunatic

Bush -  "The Decider" has no respect for the American People. Period. Peter *thinks* Bush will listen to Peter's latest hateful rage? I would hope Peter's calls get monitored by the Federal Government, he's a terrorist towards all GLBTs.



logic?

what about my morals?  peter pete and the fundie bunch are SOOOO self-centered, i wonder if they ever stop to think about their own "special rights".  if they have a moral objection to gays (closeted homosexuals get a pass unless they "reveal" themselves, of course), then why is the rest of the public not allowed to have moral objections to religionist bigots?  why is the public not allowed to fire someone based on their religious-based bigoted stances towards certain members of the population and taxpaying public?

it's this simple: if porno pete wants to eliminate ENDA (and hate crimes, of course) because of "special rights" and "moral objections", then he must also support the elimination of religious protections in employment for the same reasons.  or do the rules not apply to him?

 



The gays stole my lunch money

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox