News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Report: DSCC scrambled to find hetero challenger to run against Elizabeth Dole

by: Pam Spaulding

Fri Nov 02, 2007 at 16:30:00 PM EDT


Sen. Chuck Schumer, the head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which is charged with electing Democrats to the United States Senate, asked State Sen. Kay Hagan to run. She initially showed interest in challenging Elizabeth Dole, but she stepped aside when the DSCC decided to favor prospect state Rep. Grier Martin. When Martin didn't bite, the Dems were left without anyone to field against Liddy Dole, a weak, ineffective tool of the Bush Administration.

In jumped businessman and NC native Jim Neal. In the process he also announced matter of factly that yes, he was gay, and that he was running on the issues and was ready to sweep Dole out.

The first sign something was afoot at the DSCC is that two weeks after Neal announced, his presence was nowhere to be found on its site as a challenger.

Hagen then miraculously announced last week that she had a change of heart and was getting in the race. Suddenly, the same day she announced and her web site went live, the DSCC web site was updated with all announced challengers.

The PC reason cited for Hagen getting in was that Jim Neal's chances for beating Elizabeth Dole were slim because he's a political newcomer (though he is a proven fundraiser), and he has little name recognition. That is completely disingenuous (Hagen doesn't have name rec either). We're not talking about a conspiracy; we're talking about strings being pulled because pols here didn't want to back an openly gay man already out there.  From the Southern Political Report:
The inside story, according to one Raleigh source, is that both Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee Chair Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and ex-Gov. Jim Hunt (D-NC) had asked Hagan to stay out of the race in favor of state Rep. Grier Martin (D). Hagan agreed to step aside for Martin. Then Martin, son of popular former Charlotte congressional candidate D. G. Martin, backed out, leaving Neal as the only significant contender.

Schumer and Hunt then went back to Hagan, an influential member of the state senate, and asked her to get back in the race. Moreover, given that Neal, 50, though a North Carolinian by birth and education, had lived in New York and Los Angeles until a year ago, there is some doubt about whether he would be a strong nominee even were he not gay. (Neal has, however, raised money for Tar Heel Democrats in the past.)

Another informed Raleigh source tells essentially the same story, but adds that once Martin bowed out and some Democratic powers-that-be found out that Neal is gay -- which was known to his friends and family but not to the public at large -- “they intensified their pressure on Kay” to get back in the race, “for fear that [Neal] would bring down the rest of the ticket.” A Charlotte source adds, “I’m sure that some people see [being gay] as a non-starter in North Carolina.”
Some people. You know, the unnamed people that never seem to want to go on the record. More after the jump.
Pam Spaulding :: Report: DSCC scrambled to find hetero challenger to run against Elizabeth Dole
Primary voters will ultimately decide on the issues; it's clear that those who wouldn't vote for Neal under any circumstances because of his orientation, would probably vote for Dole again anyhow.

This behind the scenes PC dance shows the two-faced nature of the Democratic party --  the complete lack of institutional respect for Jim Neal's candidacy based on his orientation.  Would they be making moves to ensure a "mainstream" (re: white) candidate got into the primary race if the only announced Dem candidate for the U.S. Senate was Latino? Less than 5 feet tall? Had a pierced ear? What other characteristics completely irrelevant to the candidate's message or qualifications requires an "intervention" by people in the party that don't ever set foot in the state?

The real question for the DSCC is when will it ever be time to back an openly candidate in North Carolina, if the party preaches in public that one's orientation has no bearing on his ability to hold office? The message telegraphed is that this one quality alone is sufficient to deep-six a candidate, so why bother fielding one at all.

Let the Republicans defend their homophobia, why enable it? Or even worse, ape it under the guise of "electability" even at the primary level? What are they afraid of, hmmm? The people will decide.

BTW, I have nothing against Kay Hagan, other than she's allowing herself to be a participant in this game. No surprise; she's a politician.  For those complaining that progressives are calling Dems out on this, too bad; take responsibility for the plain truth of the political game that is being played. Own it.

As I said in my earlier post:

The fact of the matter is that Jim Neal's orientation will be made an issue by the GOP no matter what. For a gay pol these days to deny it and attempt to remain professionally closeted, given the fear and smear tactics of the GOP is, in my mind, futile, particularly if he or she is socially out.

...Mrs. Dole's heterosexuality clearly gave her no advantage in this vein -- she has done zero for the state as she rubber-stamped the destructive policies of this president, so clearly one's orientation has no bearing on the ability to serve the people. If the GOP wants to go there, fine -- they are going to have a dickens of a time defending Liddy's record and its impact on this state.
Jim Neal's official campaign web site is here. His ActBlue page is here.


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I say Pam should run.

But I'm silly that way.

 

I believe that all of us should be running if we are comfortable with that sort of attention.

 

THe more of us that run -- even if we lose -- the more of us there will be to make change for the better. 



http://www.dyssonance.com  Breaking all the rules...

Great summary
of a damn sad situation. 

Schumer's killing us softly
I used to like Schumer.  In retrospect, I think that was primarily because he beat D'Amato.  Between this crap and his announced support for Bush's AG nominee, I think he's screwed us over one time too many.

I'm only a click away.

Ms. Dole...

...has that strange over-snipped-and-tugged face.  Why does she oppose God's will for her aging?

Mr. Neal, on the other mug, has a natural face.

Yet, those many Carolina voters view Ms. Dole, the adulterer (Second marriage being adultery in the Bible) as the Godly, natural being. 



Schumer and Feinstein will also approve Mukasey for AG

The Vichy Dems have betrayed us at every turn. Torture doesn't bother them and they are fully behind Bush's war in Iraq. They are very conservative and do not represent our interests. They represent their corporate donors' interests. We are simply a means to an end, re-election. They will lie and say whatever they need to in order to get elected and then turn around and stab us in the back every time.

We need to get the money and corporate influence out of politics because if we just keep sending in more people they will continue to be corrupted by the power of corporate interests. 

It is the system that is corrupt and corrupting. Just sending in new people will not change how the system operates. 



The one thing...

The one thing standing between the democrats and a democratic majority is their idiotic catering to the far right.

Preserving your electability makes you unelectable. Get a clue.



Well...

I will definitely vote for Jim Neal in the primary. I don't like how he's been treated in this at all. Even the Wake County Democratic Party website, a couple of days ago, mentioned Kay Hagan, but not Jim Neal nor that other guy who's running.

I'm actually deeply disappointed in Kay Hagan for getting into this mess. 

 



Is there a sexuality test for public office?

If the powers that be at the DSCC (aka Schumer) will not let Jim Neal run on the issues, but limit him to his sexual orientation, they are putting themselves in the same league as Elizabeth Dole and the GOP.

Dole cannot run on the issues. Why? Because she has done nothing about them. According to her own Senate website, Dole went almost six full months without even speaking on the floor of the Senate. If you look at her 2002 campaign, full of promises, and compare it to today, you will find that she has not acted on a single promise, beyond still fluttering her plastic surgery enhanced eyelids at the President.

On all of the major issues faced by North Carolina and the United States...where is Elizabeth Dole? Her record in the Senate speaks for itself.

This fear of Jim Neal not having name recognition...that is a red herring. John Edwards election to the Senate in 1998 shows that in North Carolina, name recognition is not a requirement.

Pam is right when she says the GOP will make Neal's sexuality an issue in this race. In fact, they will make it the only issue. But it seems that Schumer and Company are not so very far removed from that attitude either. High ranking Democrats in this state seem to be so scared of Dole. I have to ask why. She is a lackluster, incompetent senator. Governor Easley, barred by term limits, has refused to run against her. Lieutenant Governor Perdue is opting for the Governor's Mansion, as is State Treasurer Moore. Attorney General Roy Cooper, well-known nationally, has also opted to run again for his current seat. These well known Democrats across the state seem terrified of vying for a race against Dole, so why not pat someone on the back who is not? Kay Hagan certainly seemed a little scared a few weeks ago.

The Republican Party will fight to the death to hang onto this Senate seat - it was once occupied by their spiritual leader, Jesse Helms. If the Democratic Party continues to screw over the progressives in this state who have raised their money and helped elect their candidates (NC's General Assembly and most Council of State positions are occupied by Democrats), then they will virtually hand Dole her re-election.

As a people, we often complain about politicians not running on the issues. Jim Neal is running on the issues, yet the politicians want to make it all personal (without, of course, saying it). And it seems that, right now, these politicians are from his own party. The party that he has been very, very loyal to.

 As for me, a progressive in North Carolina (well, a die hard liberal), I have to ask this question: Why should I give the party any of my hard earned money this election season? I wonder if it is a good investment.



"I like your Christ, but do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ." ~Gandhi


great, pointed analysis
You hit the nail on the head. The difference between the views of the DSCC and the Neal naysayers vs. the GOP is small indeed on this front. Neal's handled the orientation question, and is ready to discuss the issues, it appears the fixation of the Dem backroom folks reflects a narrow view of the support out there for a serious change after do-nothing Dole.

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox