News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile

Your blogmistress is in need of a real vacation...

I've made it to the initial round for favorite progressive blogger in the Air America Cruise Contest. I have to stay in the Top 5 before the second voting round begins, so your vote is appreciated! First voting round:
Nov. 16th - Dec. 3rd, 2009



Join Stop Taser Torture on 12.4.09


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Latest Attacks Of Teh HomoSEXual Agenda's Transgenderededs's Bullet Points

by: Autumn Sandeen

Mon Nov 05, 2007 at 02:45:00 AM EST


It's a little late for Halloween, but ... oooOOOooo! Be very afraid! Teh Transgenderededs's are coming to a school near you to indoctrinate your children -- BE VERY AFRAID! -- Gay Jack-O-Lantern on (Dum-de-Dum-Dum!) Teh Homosexual Agenda's Transgenderededs's Bullet Points! Terror!

- OneNewsNow (the "news" arm of the American Family Association) and the Catholic News Agency reported that a California public school canceled 'gender-switch day:'

Recently, students at Adams Middle School in Brentwood were encouraged to dress like the opposite sex during the last day of the school's "Spirit Week." The mother of a seventh-grade student found out about the activity and contacted the principal to express her concerns. The mother was told she could keep her son at home if she did not want him participating in the event.

She then contacted the Pacific Justice Institute (PJI) -- which counseled concerned parents and advised them on how to communicate with the school. The school canceled the event, and instead encouraged students to wear their school colors on the Friday of "Spirit Week."

PJI president Brad Dacus says the school did the right thing. "The only purpose that seemed to be involved with this event was for the sensitivity and tolerance of cross dressers, transsexuals, [and] transvestites. That's what the school was trying to push on these young girls and boys at junior-high age," says Dacus. He says this is also a good example of what parents and individuals can do when they stand up for what is right.


Right! Our schools should be teaching children to despise those evil "cross dressers, transsexuals, [and] transvestites," and create the kind of hate that festers violence!

[More of Teh HomoSEXual Agenda's Transgenderededs's Bullet Points regarding schools and bathrooms after the break]

Autumn Sandeen :: Latest Attacks Of Teh HomoSEXual Agenda's Transgenderededs's Bullet Points
- California's Campaign for Children And Families is warning socially conservative Christian parents to take their children out of California's public school system. They describe this as a possible scenario:
Here's what SB 777 could look like in practice in California public schools:

..."Class, for our contemporary social studies' new No-Discriminatory-Bias component, we have a special speaker this afternoon. He will share his amazing story of growing up as a male trapped in a female's body."

- "Here in our boys' sex education assembly, you need to know that puberty means growing facial hair, a deeper voice and a growth spurt when you're in junior high. If you're comfortable with those changes, great. But we're required by law to tell you some of you may have a different future. Some of you may feel more comfortable with girls and feel like a girl inside. Look at the screen. This is an 'intersex' person, who is physically male but has the gender identity of a female..."

Lost In Space's B9 RobotThe thought of these presentations created by SB 777 becoming a reality is frightening. Remember, SB 777 is a mandate, enforced by the small army of attorneys at the California Department of Education. The strong arm of the government will indoctrinate every child in California public schools by teaching children as young as kindergarten to positively regard transsexuality, bisexuality, and homosexuality.


Holy cow! Danger! Danger Will Robinson!

- CNS News and WingNutDaily are reporting that there should be No Transgender Males Allowed in Girls' Bathrooms! Beware!

The governing council in Montgomery County, Md., is considering adopting an "open doors" policy to its public restrooms, locker rooms and other facilities to meet the demands of a transgender "non-discrimination" plan, which would allow men into women's lockers and vice versa, a [Parents And Friends Of Ex-Gays & Gays] reports.

...According to notes from city council meetings, [Peter Sprigg, a spokesman for Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays & Gays] said, the only requirement will be that the person using the public facilities, including showers and locker rooms, be of the gender they present in public.

"Gender identity disorders exist in the diagnostic statistics manual," added PFOX Director Regina Griggs. "Why would we want to promote cross-dressing, changing your sex. You're not a man's brain in a woman's body and vice versa."

She noted the testimony from Dr. Renee Richards, the poster person for the transgender crowd who was a pace-setter in the man-turned-woman movement.

"I wish that there could have been an alternative way, but there wasn't back in 1975. If there was a drug that I could have taken that would have reduced the pressure, I would have been better off staying the way I was - as a totally intact person," Richards is quoted on the Reality Resources website.

"I know deep down that I'm a second-class woman. I get a lot of inquiries from would-be transsexuals, but I don't want anyone to hold me out as an example to follow. Today there are better choices, including medication, for dealing with the compulsion to cross-dress and the depression that comes from gender-confusion," Richards wrote.

The county plan, Bill 23-07, specifically would augment the state's non-discrimination plan by adding "gender identity" as a protected class.

"In addition to prohibiting discrimination in the areas of employment and housing, Bill 23-07 adds 'public accommodation' to the list, causing many to question the judgment of allowing men who merely claim they feel female to have complete access to women's restrooms, showers and locker rooms in schools, and other places of public accommodation such as health clubs, swimming pools, and store dressing rooms," PFOX said in its statement about the issue.


Yes, we all remember how PFOX has never exaggerated anything previously, right? But for argument's sake, lets assume that everything PFOX's Regina Griggs and Peter Sprigg said here is 100% true -- is the presence of people whose gender identity doesn't match their genitalia in the places PFOX lists in and of itself constituting actual danger? In other words, what previous dangerous behaviors has PFOX or others documented that has taken place by transgender people in rest rooms or locker rooms? And if they've documented any bad transgender bathroom behavior, is it statistically significant?

On the other side of the issue, Dylan Vade wrote for Curve Magazine in late 2003:

Bathrooms are places of heightened gender policing. Anyone who is not obviously feminine is suspect in the women's room; anyone who is not obviously masculine is suspect in the men's room ... What I do know is that people who don't fit rigid gender norms get routinely harassed in bathrooms, and almost every gender nonconforming person I know has had difficulty finding safe bathroom access. For many, even in San Francisco, going to the bathroom is literally dangerous.

According to a San Francisco Human Rights Commission (SF-HRC) survey, experiences in gender-segregated bathrooms range from harassment to violence to getting arrested and fired. A butch woman wrote about using men's and women's restrooms: "Women jump out of their shoes; I get harassed by the guys." To avoid attacks, another butch woman saves going to the restroom for certain moments, such as the most interesting parts of movies (bathrooms are emptiest then). Often, harassment leads to violence: An FTM said, "I have been slapped, pushed and dragged out by security guards." Some people avoid public restrooms altogether. One genderqueer person wrote, "I often 'hold' it." Another person keeps a bucket in his car.


(And, for the record, Renee Richards has never been my poster transperson. One would be hard pressed to find many transgender people who would consider Renee Richards "the poster person for the transgender crowd" at this point, especially after her comments on "better choices.")

So, to sum up, as always those darn homosexual agendaists are out there with their eeeeeevil HomoSEXual agenda's Transgenderedededs's Bullet Points ... Evil! EVIL!!

*sigh*

.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Taking children out of public schools
I sincerely hope they all do take their children out of the public schools. It seems to me that if you get rid of all the kids who are being indoctrinated to homo-hatred by their parents it would go a long way toward solving the bullying problem.

No no no no.....etc.

Leave their children in public schools. What happens if they remove their children?

They get home schooled (or taught in a "christian" school) and recieve anti-lgbt propaganda 24/7 (at home and at school, I've even heard about one family that used anti-lgbt material as part of reading and social studies homework for their home schooled children).

What happens if they stay in public schools?

Yes they may be abusive and a terrible anti-lgbt influence in the school. But also they have the chance to meet lgbt people. To talk with them, without thier parents around. I've seen this when I've done class room panels at my college and local high schools. These children talk about thier parent's hate and what the were taught to believe. But they had lgbt friends and they were outside of thier parent's field of control. So they thought about it on thier own and decided that lgbt don't have horns and don't eat children.....not as evil as thier parents claimed.

Yes there will still be the issue of bullying. But that will largely exist even without these children. We still live in a society that uses the phrase "that's so gay" to mean "that's bad." The majority of bully's are not raised in highly anti-lgbt families, they are reacting to something they don't understand.   



Help defend equality, visit One Kalamazoo http://www.onekalamazoo.com/

[ Parent ]
Don't Confuse me with the Facts

"You're not a man's brain in a woman's body and vice versa."

Zhou J.-N, Hofman M.A, Gooren L.J, Swaab D.F (1997)
A Sex Difference in the Human Brain and its Relation to Transsexuality. (PDF here)

Kruijver F.P.M, Zhou J.-N, Pool C.W., Swaab D.F. (2000)
Male-to-Female Transsexuals Have Female Neuron Numbers in a Limbic Nucleus (PDF here)

ArzteZeitung 2007 (translated from the German)

"Radiologists can now confirm what transsexuals report - that they feel “trapped in the wrong body” - on the basis of the activation of the brain when presented with erotic stimuli. There is obviously a biological correlation with the subjective feelings."

Deakin Law Review 2004

"At paragraph [252]: ‘The traditional analysis that they are "psychologically" transsexual does not explain how this state came about.  For example, there seems to be no suggestion in the evidence that their psychological state can be explained by reference to circumstances of their upbringing.  In that sense, the brain sex theory does not seem to be competing with other explanations, but rather is providing a possible explanation of what is otherwise inexplicable’.

At paragraph [253]:  ‘In other words (as I understand it) the brain of an individual may in some sense be male, for example, though the rest of the person’s body is female’.

At paragraph [270]: ‘But I am satisfied that the evidence now is inconsistent with the distinction formerly drawn between biological factors, meaning genitals, chromosomes and gonads, and merely "psychological factors", and on this basis distinguishing between cases of inter-sex (incongruities among biological factors) and transsexualism (incongruities between biology and psychology)’.

 

At paragraph [272]: ‘In my view the evidence demonstrates (at least on the balance of probabilities) that the characteristics of transsexuals are as much “biological” as those of people thought of as inter-sex’.

 They know about this stuff. They've been told about it. They just go "La La La I can't hear you".

 

There is no situation so complex it can't get even worse

Went looking for Richard's comments
I wanted to see the context.  http://www.glbtq.com...

She went through the operation in her 40's and does not recommend it for men in their 40's who have had the advantages of living as a man in this culture.  My read is that she found it very traumatic overall. 

She did say that if a younger person decided they wanted to have the surgery to go ahead.

I don't have an opinion one way or the other on her comments, but it does appear that CNS and WND have carefully cut and pasted them to change the meaning.


Richards does not speak for me.

She went through the operation in her 40's and does not recommend it for men in their 40's who have had the advantages of living as a man in this culture.

Who the hell is Renee Richards to presume to speak for me?  I transitioned at the age of 45; if I had not transitioned, I would not be here on this Earth - and, oh, I was never a man, not at 45 or 25.  I would like to know exactly what the fuck she means by "had the advantages of living as a man in this culture."  Since when is enduring 7 years of daily abuse and beatings in school, and years of sexual abuse from a former partner, "advantages of living as a man in this culture"?

Renee Richards, you've taken Janice Raymond's lies, hook, line, and sinker. 

(FYI,  Zorya, this is not a rant against your comment - it's a rant against Richard's statements.)



Social outrage is power protecting itself; it is not morality. -- Andrea Dworkin

[ Parent ]
Surprised by her remark
I met her once, back in the 1970's.  On the tennis court in Florida.  It was after her operation.  She was very focused on her tennis game, centered in self confidence, and couldn't care less about opinions from others being written about her in the press at that time.   

Make alot of noise. Life is short.

Renee Richards and Montgomery County

I know Renee, and she is a very lonely, depressed and isolated ophthalmologist. She has had a very hard time professionally since her transition, mostly because of the times and her attitude. She is anything but a poster child for our community. At least groups like HRC have learned not to use her bio anymore.

 

As for Montgomery County, I'm the one working this bill. There has been a great deal of Focus on the Anus emails the past few days to the County Council, though a giant rally scheduled for the Germantown Indoor Pool on Saturday turned out a total of 17 people (the usual homophobic and transphobic suspects in the county) and no press.

 

The bathroom language is currently that of Boston, where one must be "publicly and exclusively" presenting in one's reassigned gender to have access to segregated spaces.

 

I would ask that we all counter their blast emails with those of our own. Address them to: councilmember.praisner@montgomerycountymd.gov.

 

Thanks,

 

Dana 



Dr. Dana

Renee Richards was raised in a prefeminist era

and it sounds as if she regrets giving up male privilege because she hasn't got enough inner belief that women are as capable and worthy of respect as men. I know how that goes, having either second-guessed myself or looked longingly at those who could realistically pass as male (I am naturally broad hipped and busty), for the apparently unthinking assumption of superiority and entitlement that white upper-middle-class men display . Despite a cognitive commitment to feminism, I still have some emotional buy-in of the unworthy crap dealt out in that time to all women.  And a tendency to think of myself as "ungendered", rather than "female", because it was easier to be a gearhead if seen as an outsider freak rather than a bona fide woman.

 

I have to say that medicine is not exactly a tolerant profession outside of academia. And not tolerant inside academia, as far as surgical specialties go. And that stands even today - far worse then. Even cis-gender women were seen as freakish, in surgical specialties then, and those that succeeded had to have the hide of a rhino and a serious STFU attitude. 



[ Parent ]
Promoting Intolerance

[PJI president Brad Dacus says the school did the right thing. "The only purpose that seemed to be involved with this event was for the sensitivity and tolerance of cross dressers, transsexuals, [and] transvestites. That's what the school was trying to push on these young girls and boys at junior-high age,"]

----------------------------------------------------

So what he is saying is, that we should not want an increased sensitivity or tolerance for fellow students who are suffering and who are different--that we should NOT promote tolerance. Nice guy. He is promoting INtolerance and INsensitivity. What a wonderful example of how we as humans should try to co-exist. 

That whole movement is EVIL. They don't want tolerance or sensitivity. They don't want to promote tolerance for anyone who is different from the norms that THEY have laid down for how people should behave, and how people should simply BE.

This is truly SICK. These people are deeply psychotic. If you really listen to what they have to say, it all comes from a place of deep, seething hatred of anything and anyone who is different from them.



"The right most treasured by civilized men is the right to be let alone."--Justice Louis Brandeis

Press Release from legislator
The legislator who sponsored the legislation, Duchy Trachtenberg, issued a wonderful press release called "Separating Fact from Fiction About Montgomery’s
Transgender Legislation Rights Protection Measure Scheduled for Nov. 13 Council Vote."   You can see it here:  http://transworkplace.blogspot.com/2007/11/opposition-to-trans-inclusive.html

Dr. Jillian T. Weiss

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox