News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



The Peter takes on Pelosi with his National Press Club Folsom Film Fest

by: Pam Spaulding

Tue Dec 04, 2007 at 07:00:00 AM EST


When Dan Gonzales emailed me about this, I thought he was BS-ing me, but alas, The Peter's latest grandiose exercise in sexual subculture obsession will take place  on Wednesday when he goes to DC to hold a little film festival at the National Press Club to try to and drum up controversy for Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), whose district includes San Francisco, home of the Folsom Street Fair.

LaBarbera plans to broadcast his unedited fetish footage collection to journalists in an attempt to "educate others about liberal tolerance run amok in San Francisco," and calls for Pelosi to "publicly condemn the Folsom event and to use her considerable power to help stop similar affronts to public decency."

Read his letter after the jump.

Pam Spaulding :: The Peter takes on Pelosi with his National Press Club Folsom Film Fest
AFTAH LETTER TO SPEAKER PELOSI:

Americans For Truth About Homosexuality

December 3, 2007
Via Courier

Ms. Nancy Pelosi, Speaker
House of Representatives
United States Capitol Building
Washington, D.C.  20510

Dear Madam Speaker:

Because you frequently extol San Francisco's values to the rest of America, we are compelled to call your attention to what actually takes place at the Folsom Street Fair and other egregious and offensive "gay pride" celebrations in your Congressional District.

I was in San Francisco with a videographer on Sunday, September 30 and verified but a small segment of the most immoral and outrageous sexual behavior that ever disgraced the streets of any American city.  On Wednesday, December 5, at 1:00 p.m. at the National Press Club in Washington, we will release the un-retouched DVD of the public debauchery which we videotaped during the city's Folsom Street Fair just two months ago.  Included is raw and unedited verification of:

   â€¢ Large numbers of men walking on public streets either fully or partially naked;
   â€¢ Groups of men engaged in orgies on the public street, including acts of oral sex and mutual masturbation, as crowds waked by and snapped pictures.
   â€¢ Fully exposed men "greeting" other men by grasping other men's genitals and massaging them in full view of passers-by.  The police stood by and did nothing;
   â€¢ A man sitting on the curb in broad daylight masturbating as crowds of people gawked and took pictures (he even posed for photos with others as he sat there naked and aroused);
   â€¢ Theatrically dramatic sadomasochistic whippings and floggings - drawing blood and turning the willing "victim's" skin bright red;
   â€¢ Abundant flaunting of female nudity and real or simulated sexual acts;
   â€¢ "Master-slave relationships" in which one man or women would "walk" their subservient "slave" with a dog-collar and chain. Others imitated animals (dogs and ponies) as yet another "fetish" on display: we talked to one woman whose mouth was bridled like a horse;
   â€¢ Blatant anti-Christian bigotry in the form of "The Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence," men dressed in drag mocking Catholic nuns, greeting incoming attendees at Folsom; one male "Sister" wore a shirt that read "Bottom for Jesus" ("bottom" refers to his position in anal sex); entrance stickers featured a twisted, S&M-fetish version of DaVinci's "Last Supper" painting;
   â€¢ Young children with their parents witnessing this perverted and revolting spectacle.

Additionally, Madam Speaker, we have been told that you were presented with an opportunity to condemn this heinous event and the blasphemous artwork used to promote it.  Folsom Street Fair's promotional poster featured a drawing mocking Leonardo DaVinci's classic "Last Supper" painting by substituting sexual fetishists with their "sex toys" for Jesus Christ and his twelve disciples.  You refused to denounce both.  In fact, we understand that you maintained that Christianity would not be harmed by the poster.  Were Judaism, Islam or any other religion so offensively mocked and affronted, would you have remained silent?  We doubt it.

As a respectable lady and practicing Catholic, we assume that you have not been present at the Folsom Street Fair to witness the rampant public nudity, street orgies and perverse sexual extravagances that are allowed to occur there, on San Francisco's blocked-off city streets, without police intervention.  We give you the benefit of doubt that you are not fully aware of what actually takes place.

Nevertheless, it's time for San Francisco's cover-up to end.  Decent Americans can no longer remain silent about this outrageous, licentious and egregious conduct and illegal, flaunting behavior that insults basic decency.  Radical sexual activists, pandering politicians and complicit media can no longer disguise and misrepresent reality.  The truth is out.

We are, of course, aware that both you and San Francisco city government pride yourselves in the city's (misdefined) reputation for "tolerance."  Paradoxically, it has been widely reported that when Christian, military and other advocates of traditional values voice their views (such as the 2006 "BattleCry" Christian youth rally), they have been protested, threatened, condemned by city officials, and even assaulted by unrestrained opponents.  Where was San Francisco's much-vaunted "tolerance" on those occasions?

In your October 6 speech before the homosexual lobby group Human Rights Campaign (portions of which we will show on Wednesday, December 5th at the National Press Club), you said:

   "People always say it is easy for me ... to be out front on these issues because San Francisco is so tolerant.  Tolerant?  It's not about tolerance.  It's about respect.  It's about the respect we have for each other. It's about the pride we take in our community.  That sentiment is now spreading across America."

Should the profane, disgusting and bigoted behaviors we witnessed in your district in San Francisco be "tolerated" by the rest of America?  How much tolerance is too much tolerance?  Are you proud of the Folsom event?  Should the rest of America tolerate public nudity and homosexual orgies on their city streets?  Where was the "respect" for people of faith who saw their Lord blasphemed by Folsom organizers, working with the grotesquely anti-Christian Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence (which was a major beneficiary of Folsom)?  Notwithstanding your pandering before the partisan HRC audience of homosexual advocates, your assertions about San Francisco and failure to condemn the extreme and public perversions at Folsom impugn your veracity as a credible national leader.

After viewing what undeniably took place at a public, outdoor event in your Congressional District, as characterized above, we hope you will publicly disavow such conduct - including the "Sisters'" bigoted mocking of Christianity.  As Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives -- for all Americans -- you have a national responsibility to condemn these public perversions and use your great influence to stop them from happening in the future in San Francisco.  We are calling upon you to muster the necessary courage to take the leadership to which you were elected.

For more information about Americans for Truth's coverage of the Folsom Street Fair, please refer to our website at www.AmericansForTruth.org  or contact us by telephone: 630-717-7631.  I will be pleased to be of whatever assistance possible in accurately clarifying this important matter.

Most sincerely,

Peter LaBarbera
President, Americans For Truth

I'm not exactly sure why The Peter is shocked at the debauchery of such an event; it is San Francisco, after all. I doubt he'd see anything of the sort occuring in Naperville, IL. Perhaps the sights down at Steamworks in Chicago aren't enough for him any more and he has to find the more wild examples of the sexual underground as he can to get off these days. Most people around the country wouldn't know about or even care about Folsom if it wasn't for Peter.

It is disturbing that children would be present at such an event, IMHO, but the fact is that the parents took them there, not the consenting adults participating in the street fair -- his beef should be with the parents. And yes, that Last Supper parody might be offensive to some; there are a lot of things out there that might offend Christians, like the whoring commercialism of Christmas, for instance. How about a campaign against Light Up Flashing Baby Jesus, as opposed to slagging a retailer that wants to place a simple "Happy Holidays" sign in the window?

It's all relative. It's always the homosexuals and homosexual enablers (including the SFPD, according to Peter) that are to blame. Please. Who's the one filming and broadcasting this stuff?

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Folsom

By the way, the event raised $350,066, the money going to various charities in the Bay area.   So it looks like people do care, only in way that The Peter doesn't prefer. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Such the conundrum.
Should the profane, disgusting and bigoted behaviors we witnessed in your district in San Francisco be "tolerated" by the rest of America?

Yes, why indeed should "the rest of America" be forced to seek out "profane, disgusting and bigoted behaviors" to be "witnessed?"

Such the conundrum, should I purposefully seek out what revolts me the most, or shouldn't I?

It's those evil genitals and their homosexuals I tell ya!

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket


Correct me if I'm wrong...

but I thought there was a adult section of the Fair that was "walled off" from the general public (family section) and no children were allowed in the adult area.

And rather than just letting the Peter spread his lies, someone from the FSF and the Sisters should send any attendees to the Peter's Film Festival a fact sheet rather than waiting for the press to come to them since we all know that the press today is too lazy to look into the other side of the story.



Additionally...
The FSF isn't a "Gay Pride" event. It's a fetish event that draws people of all sexual orientations.

[ Parent ]
Peteytown - Naperville, IL
Ok Naperville is full of teh gay!  OMG it's a snooty upper middle-class (mostly white) western suburb of Chicago.  I'm pretty sure Mena will agree with me on this.

Sort of.
Naperville has grown to well over 100k people in a very short time.  It's still snooty and mostly white but it's getting a little diverse.  It doesn't seem as bad as Wheaton and Glen Ellyn with the holier-than-thou attitudes, but I really don't spend a lot of time in Naperville.  Wheaton College is scary.

My America includes LGBT families.

[ Parent ]
Ironically
Glen Elyn is where the Illinois Family Institute is based.  Coinsidence?  Maybe, maybe not.  But judging from the amount of gay themed parties I get invited to on myspace.com, they all end up being in Naperville.

I wonder if Petey boy is outside in the bushes with his ambush cam.


[ Parent ]
IFI is the Peter's old gig.
It's in an office park near the intersection (well the turn off for) of Roosevelt Rd. and Rte. 53.  I guess the Peter was tired of the commute and decided to work out of his basement instead.  He probably wouldn't have to worry about people walking in while he was doing "research" that way.  
As for the parties, keep in mind that about 20 years ago Naperville was about 1/4 to 1/3 the size it is now.  Any fairly large town isn't going to be insane and fundy for very long.  

My America includes LGBT families.

[ Parent ]
Oh I'm well aware of Petey's last "job"
He handed that off to David E. Smith.  Ironically Petey Boy posts on the IFI site as "Americans For Truth" LOL!

Now I have to ask Mena - are you Google Earthing the IFI address?  Or...... tee hee!


[ Parent ]
Nope.
Not Google Earthing, I have just been around here for a VERY long time and it has come up in conversation before.  It's on the way to the grocery store and near H&R Block, you see.  

My America includes LGBT families.

[ Parent ]
FYI
Matt Barber and a represenatative from PFOX are also going to be at the press conference.

question ...
With all due respect, why is this queen so obsessed with you Pam?  Could it be he likes the PR?  I never heard about him before I read about him here, and he still seems like simply a comic relief.

Peter and Folsom

"As a respectable lady and practicing Catholic, we assume that you have not been present at the Folsom Street Fair ...."As opposed to Peter, who's not a respectable lady at all.

Peter goes to more fetish events than all the kinky people I know combined. Must be nice.



I will say that regardless of your orientation,

sex should be an intimate dignified private act.



Porn Pete was on Hannity and Colmes,
  Colmes asked Petey many times, "Why just go aftr Nancy Pelosi, and why not Arnold?"  Blah Blah Blah.  Alan asked,"Why are you(Petey)spreading porn?" He claims he is not.

 Petey did agree that the children being there was a parenting problem.  I was a bit suprised for him to admit this.  Calls it "Progressive Parenting"

 Oh, and her comes that last supper poster deal. And along with the "sisters of perpectual indulgence"

 Than Sean says,"Nancy needs to address this."  Colmes says, "So does the Govenor."

  Peter might have some traction on Faux News.  

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox