News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



The company you keep as you reach out for votes

by: Pam Spaulding

Mon Jan 21, 2008 at 23:00:00 PM EST


I've received a few emails about the latest chapter in the "gays and Obama" saga, as it was learned that Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell, a local leader in Houston's black community, Bush supporter, and senior pastor of Windsor Village United Methodist Church, will be campaigning in support of Barack Obama.
Caldwell said Saturday that he's endorsing Obama's presidential campaign because of the senator's "character, confidence and courage." He emphasized that his support is personal and not tied to his job as pastor of the large United Methodist church.
What's not in this Houston Chronicle article is that part of the outreach of Windsor Village United Methodist Church includes an "ex-gay" ministry:
Metanoia Ministry We are pleased to announce the creation of “ The Way, The Truth and The Life”, a program created to provide Christ Centered instruction for those seeking freedom from homosexuality, lesbianism, prostitution, sex addiction and other habitual sins

...Since the fall of mankind in the Garden of Eden, men and women throughout the ages have attempted to fulfill these deep emotional needs outside a relationship with God. In doing this, sinful patterns of living were developed, preventing the fulfillment of these needs as God intended. If you desire to learn to live life as God designed it, you are invited to join “The Way, The Truth and The Life” program.

 The goal of the program is to provide:

 1. Christian Coaching.
 2. Support groups for ex-gays and those in the process of coming out of homosexuality.
 3. Educational workshops.
 4. Information for parents, family and friends.

The objective of the program is to assist participants in understanding that change is possible. In doing this, a safe, nurturing and accepting environment will be created whereby participants will be able to deal with issues without fear of judgment or rejection. Participants will be encouraged to exercise their faith in the saving, healing and delivering power of God through Jesus Christ, and to see themselves as God sees them.

OK. What does this look like to you --
A. Another example of the Obama campaign hypocrisy toward the gay community;
B. Triangulation with LGBTs to keep and gain socially conservative black votes;
C. A necessary evil to reach a large segment of a community that has been allowed to foment homophobia in its ranks;
D. Progress -- proof that Obama's public challenge the black community about its homophobia is wrong has not prevented pray-away-the-gay folks like Caldwell from endorsing and campaigning for him.
E. All of the above.

My thoughts below the fold.

Pam Spaulding :: The company you keep as you reach out for votes

The easy answer to the above multiple choice, of course, is E. All of those scenarios exist, and are valid opinions for folks to hold, depending on your perspective. That is, at its core, what Barack Obama has been trying to do in terms of reaching out to a broad spectrum (literally) of voters. That does, however, come at a steep price.

The tragic history of the damage caused by the ex-gay movement is well-documented on several blogs, and any inkling that the decision to give public recognition to a proponent of such a movement by the Obama campaign as a supporter will at the very least, raise a lot of eyebrows, if not generate outright anger. The LGBT community is tired of being an ATM and told to sit patiently at the back of the bus, or worse, wait on the sidewalk as buses pass us by.

The fact is that you cannot please all of the people all of the time. In a presidential race with so many third rails - race, gender, class, sexual orientation -- all charged issues that political parties have depended upon for years to divide and conquer in close elections -- I see no way to navigate this new territory without pissing several constituencies off.

I've certainly been peeved by the ham-handed and offensive invitation of ex-gay Donnie McClurkin to headline a gospel concert in SC, but we all know what he was trying to do. Like it or not, if he is to win the Palmetto State, he would have to win some of the votes of those social black conservatives. He could have chosen to forgo that demographic on principle, but the raw math would show that there are more religious black voters than gay folks. That's the reality. Under the bus we went.

However, it felt like the chain was being jerked when, in November he posted a Call for Full Equality at The Bilerico Project to reassert his commitment to LGBT rights.

For my entire career in public life, I have brought the message of GLBT equality to skeptical audiences as well as friendly ones. No other leading candidate in the race for the Presidency has demonstrated the same commitment to the principle of full equality. I support the full and unqualified repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act. While some say we should repeal only part of the law, I believe we should get rid of that statute altogether. Federal law should not discriminate in any way against gay and lesbian couples. I will also fight to repeal the U.S. military's Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy, a law that should never have been passed, and my Defense Department will work with top military leaders to implement that repeal.

As President, I will use the bully pulpit to urge states to treat same-sex couples with full equality in their family and adoption laws. I personally believe that civil unions represent the best way to secure that equal treatment. But I also believe that the federal government should not stand in the way of states that want to decide on their own how best to pursue equality for gay and lesbian couples - whether that means a domestic partnership, a civil union, or a civil marriage.
If you recall, before his speech at Ebenezer on Sunday, he also raised the issue of black homophobia before an almost entirely black audience at the All-American Presidential Forum last year.
One of the things we've got to overcome is a stigma that still exists in our communities. We don't talk about this. We don't talk about it in schools. Sometimes we don't talk about it in churches. It has been an aspect sometimes of our homophobia that we don't address this issue as clearly as it needs to be.
I don't think these declarations made an awful lot of friends among the homophobic black pastors, but be that as it may, he is still drawing support from ex-gay proponents like Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell. It would be interesting to know what Caldwell thinks about Obama's call to repeal all of DOMA, and lifting the ban on gays and lesbians serving openly in the military.

It's two sides of the same coin - those LGBTs who do support Obama in spite of the McClurkin incident and now Caldwell,  find they have to defend or answer for the candidate's perceived endorsement of anti-gay views held by these people by association.

Caught in the middle, by the way are those who are black and gay, particularly ones in the closet, religious, and sit in the pews of churches being assailed by homophobic black pastors. These are people afraid of being rejected by their family, their community, their firewall from the external world where race is indeed a factor in their lives. Obama's triangulation/amelioration strategy leaves these people out of the picture entirely.

Also almost completely out of the picture are white progressives, frozen by the fact that entering this fray is like walking across a field rife with landmines. They see little upside in contributing to the discussion because of the lack of engagement with either of these communities in order to navigate these landmines. They aren't helped by the defensiveness of the black community, which in some quarters exhibits itself in the "feel whites have no place in these discussions" retort, that it is a family affair. Of course, in their eyes, those who are black and gay don't exist either.

It's all a sickness, a pathology that cuts so deep that you simply don't know where to begin to address healing these wounds, never mind figure out how it can or should play out in the election of our next president. Since we don't talk candidly about these issues when it's not on the front burner (it sometimes feels like I'm one of only a handful ready to step on the third rail on a regular basis), we are left floundering, raising the room temperature to an such an uncomfortable level that everyone simply backs into their respective corners, or worse flee for the exits to avoid conflict.

Just because we don't talk about these internal divisions doesn't make them go away.

***

Aside from the issue of how the LGBT community has been a political football here, take a look at how the Christian political football is being played by the Obama campaign. Not unlike Huckabee, Barack Obama has been touting his Christian cred to voters in an overt manner. Look at this pandering flier:



Is this any different than Huck's commercial in its approach?



My answer: not really. However, Obama is declaring his faith and its influence, but he has no intent to make this a Christian nation, or to amend the Constitution to bring it into line with "God's Law." Practically speaking, Barack Obama has been forced to toss out the God card because of the continuous torrent of emails suggesting he's some sort of Muslim Manchurian Candidate. In fact, my mother-in-law just received another one of these ridiculous missives, the content of which has been thoroughly debunked for some time now.

That said, the tactics of candidates in both parties courting Christians with such direct appeals to common faith is clearly going to continue as long as there are large areas of the country where faith is an integral part of society. The pandering to groups whose political goals that are in direct opposition to one another, such as gays and socially conservative religious black community will continue, and those groups have every right -- and duty -- to expect concrete answers of these candidates as to how they will reconcile these goals.

Related:

* Obama addresses homophobia, anti-Semitism and xenophobia in MLK Ebenezer Baptist Church speech
* SC: Black minister serves up a civil equality challenge to Obama
* Yes, this Kerry Swift Boater has no problem 'going there' [on Obama]
* Time to trot out the black surrogates for dirty work
* Filing the edges off of racism
* Andrew Cuomo: 'You Can't Shuck And Jive' at a press conf
* Deb Price on the Obama/McClurkin debacle
* How to blow your campaign, Obama-style
* McClurkin hangs tough at Obama concert

[Standard tired disclaimer: I have not and will not endorse any candidate in the primaries.]  

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Don't be Black and Queer
I think the devestating aspect of this sort of tactic is the unspoken message that it is sort of ok to be white and queer but just do not be black and queer.

Obama legitimizes the hate campaign carried on by homophobic preachers in the black community by seeking their support and embracing them as respectable leaders. I cannot imagine his doing the same with a white minister with similiar views.

Can anyone picture the media fallout from Obama seeking Focus on the Family's/Dobson's support? Yet it is barely blinked at when he goes for the support of gaybashing black ministers. One's mind immediately flashes to the Iranian President's speech at Columbia with a subtle twist "We do not have homosexuals in the black community"

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


I Remember Him Well
I have to switch the focus here for a second to the black pastor in question, Kirbyjon Caldwell.

I always noticed, when I was in college, that the kids who were aiming to be politicians were the smarmiest of all. Such was Kirbyjon Caldwell, who, I am ashamed to say, was my college classmate. And he was always running for some office or other.

"But he's a preacher, not a politician!" you say? Please. Stop joking.

In any case, I have no doubt that Mr. Caldwell's homophobia exists primarily for political and financial advantage, and doesn't stem from any moral beliefs.


I see an attempt at unity,
  But not a whole hearted attempt.  Sure you can invite people to the table for discussion.  There are great inroads that can be made.  BUT, TELL THE TRUTH and quit the pandering.  

 The opening statement could, and IMHO should be made that we are a nation of citizens, who have different beliefs in god.  If Obama, or any other candidate for that matter, wants my vote, they should stand up for an individual's rights.  

 Me being a transwoman does not hurt my fellow Americans. It has not harmed my family at all.  My children have been harmed because religious people want to instill their views on how my children should heve reacted when I came out. there were no open minds to have conversation with.  My daughters got pummeled by these idiots.  Being told I am a sinner of the worst kind.  Which left my children wondering what sin?  They see me alive, loving and careing, participating in there education.  Helping them to set life time goals, long and short term.

 But I quess I made the mistake of letting them feel how they want when it comes to religion.  I let them see all sorts of religions, and let the tell me what they thought.

  True story hear, I let my youngest go to a church that I know have anti-LGBT way or teching.  The chrch group knew I was Trans, I also knew my daughter would come home and tell me about her classes at church.

 Oh, how they went on and on about a father is supposed to be a father,and if he is anything less, she needed to be free from me.  They didn't wnt to hear what kind loving parent I am, free to be me, my kids' MUM.  They wouldn't open an ear to hear what she had to say.

 For those who have followed my story as I have posted many parts here. You will know that they are welcome at my house any time.  only one rule, have an open mind and watch and listen.  

 You see, I have never given my chldren a reason for them to doubt organized religion.  I would let them go to any church as long as they where welcome, and let them make up their own minds.   Funny thing that never happened, I was never invited to that church.  and after 3 or 4 weeks, she didn't want to go back.

  And I asked why? The Reply,"Your dad doesn't fit the role of our church, he has changed his body.'  You dad is the Devil!!  

  Without ever meeting me, I am trash in that churchs veiw



If I make sense? it was quite by accident.


"The Company You Keep", etc., etc.
O'K. now, Obama has told us he will "bring us together".  I expect his next statement is that he is a "uniter, not a divider".

He has praised Reagan, and used typical Republican talking points about the 60's and 70's.  I wonder if the "excesses" he spoke of are an "excess" of freedom, opportunity, and greater equality?

Reagan destroyed what was left of the Union movement, led us to a major recession, helped ramp up the anti-woman attitudes in this country, and set the fight against AIDS back an untold number of years   ----   and that's just off the top of my head.  

He was one of the worst Presidents we have ever had.

Any Democrat who says such nice things about him  --  they do not know anything about the USA, our traditions, our history, our national goals.

Flirting with the homophobes, leading his followers with motivational speeches  --  with little in the way of specifics.  Telling us he's going to get the "smartest people" to do the work, while he somehow "leads" sounds to me just like GWB - AKA: "Chimpy".

When I listen closely to Mr. Obama  --  I hear a Republican.

I do not want another Republican.

            Tina S.


Thanks for providing the desperately needed ...
..nuance to this subject as nobody is more qualified to do than you. Thanks for helping, as always, to keep me sane.

Don't push it
I think you mean "less insane."

:-)

I'm only a click away.


[ Parent ]
It's not at all different from Huckabee --- except
Except that Huckabee is leading the charge to make this a Christian nation, and institute his religion as the state religion, simply and unashamedly.  Obama is the consummate panderer, the lazy demagogue who will not contradict any of the Dominionist hype about the nation needing a Christian leader, but would simply substitute himself as that leader for anybody dumb enough to want such a thing.

On top of that, the brotha is hypocritical too because he is prepared to turn a different face to other constituencies.  To the gay he is conditionally gay-friendly, for instance.

It's no coincidence that Obama leads Hillary among white males, the most reactionary segment of the electorate.


you hit the nail on the head
Obama is the consummate panderer, the lazy demagogue who will not contradict any of the Dominionist hype about the nation needing a Christian leader, but would simply substitute himself as that leader for anybody dumb enough to want such a thing.

I remember getting goosebumps watching Obama speak at the DNC.  My infatuation was short-lived as I noticed how quickly after he got in office he started pandering to the religious right.  This all makes me wonder how far he'll go from pandering to action to continue to appease them.


[ Parent ]
Purity is Paramount
Apparently we are wandering into a place where candidates are expected to accept support only from people who support 100% of all of their positions, and they should refuse support from anyone who supports 80% of their positions.

What a silly and self-defeating proposition.

Sunday Senator Obama made HIS views clear, and these preachers have concluded that they can still support him, but thare are absolutists in our community that would have him turn away that support, and lose purely to other candidates. What a clever idea. (Insert sarcasm emoticon here).

This is politics. Coalitions are not a luxury, they are essential.


I agree with your main point, ellipse. However
Obama has not given a CLEAR sign that he supports us.  Even in his speech to the black evangelists he was guarded and diluted the anti-homophobic statement with a few other noble causes.  No, Sunday Senator Obama did NOT make his views clear.  Not to me.

Coalitions are great, but individual members of that coalition need to watch out for who else in on board and might ultimately prevail as the leading member of the coalition.  Historically many people who initially supported a group have found themselves disenfranchised later on, once the group seized power.  I'll stop here so as not to incur the wrath of Godwin's law enforcers.

Therefore
we have the right to complain about bringing the most extreme black evangelists in, who are no better that the Pope or the Taliban when it comes to human rights.  Or at least look suspiciously upon such an inclusion.

If Obama came through with a clear statement for general consumption, like what he wrote on the BP web page, then I wouldn't question his coalitions.  Or if he were more direct and precise in his speeches to church goers.


[ Parent ]
Another J.C. Watts
I saw Obama speak several years ago and liked him.  But in the time since I've come to view him as an empty suit, an actor who reads his script well.

I decided anyone but Obama last year when embraced the so called "Ex-Gay" Taliban Christer homophobic "minister".

I then started listening to his ideas and found them to be lazy and reactionary.  He is the most republican of all the candidates running.  He offers a continuation of rather than a departure from the disastrous Republican policies of the last 40 years.

I wondered where he was coming from and then last week we found out.  He admires Reagan.  Reagan who sent the Natiuonal Guard to fire upon me and other protesters in Berkeley during May 1969.  The Reagan who couldn't say AIDS.  The Reagan who destroyed unions and furthered the class war against the poor and working class.

I'm also a feminist.  The time is right for me to support a woman.  I'm tired of a penis being a requirement for the office of POTUS.  

Further I don't trust Obama not to kowtow to the Taliban Christians on matters such as abortion, ENDA and same sex marriage.  He has already shown him self to be a Pander Bear to the Reich wing on these issues.


I agree here
I've listened to Obama for a while now, and he gives lip service to many things that I believe in. However, I keep getting this nagging little voice (probably my mother with all her little "isms") that tells me to keep a close eye and don't trust this man. This little voice keeps reminding me of old sayings like, "You are only as good as the company you keep", and "Actions speak louder than words." Some of Obama's company disturbs me greatly, and his lack of positive action in relationship with these people disturbs me even more. I understand the politics that requires politicians to cosey up to unsavory characters, but, honestly, I'm getting tired of being 'thrown under the bus' to further someone else's career.

I long for the day when it won't be a requirement of the job of president to be an old white protestant male. I long for the day when we can find a politician who will stand up decisively for what he/she believes in and refuses to back down just to grab a few extra votes. I want to win the lottery too. I might stand a better chance at the lottery.

It's time for a younger person. It's time for a person of color. It's time for a female to be president. But it's also time for that person, whoever they are, to say and DO the right things for all Americans, not just the majority. We need a person who will stand up for our rights; a person who stands with us and doesn't just give lip service to soothe the 'moral' majority and gain a few votes.
Sorry. I normally keep the rants on my own little personal blog that nobady visits. :-)


[ Parent ]
Mr. Obama just wants to be liked by everyone.
I want a President who tells the go-along-with-evil-to-get-along Republicans to shut up and sit at the back of the room like they have told Democrats to do for as long as they have been empowered. I don't want to find a way for them to be included, let them find a way by doing some long-needed soul-searching. Or not. Meanwhile,
sit down, shut up.

President Clinton had this deeply flawed trait of needing to be liked and I think it competed with needing to get something done. Mr. Obama strikes me as having this same trait. This is a time for partisanship if ever there was one. This is the time Democrats make the case that we are fundamentally, philosophically different from Republicans.

This is why Hillary scored best last night with the Independents on the dial-approvals when she forcefully said she was on task and not backing down about health care for everyone. She drew the line in the sand with Republicans and she did it with a ditch-digger. The audience also gave her a stirring round of applause.

Democrats do have core values which are clearly different from core Republican values. Mr. Obama is wheels-off ignoring this with his sappy inclusionary talk. (Oh, wait. He's just being misunderstood.)


Is A candidate judged by his supporters?
... or by what he or she says?

Look, I've gone after Ron Paul and Mick Huckabee because of their obnoxious supporters, but I've only done so in the context of statements that Huckabee and Paul have said which indicates that they agree with the positions that their obnoxious supporters hold.

Anyone can (and does) have supporters who holds obnoxious views. The question is: does the candidate share those views?

Every time Obama has spoken on gay issues, he's said all the right things (mostly -- he's for civil unions instead of marriage, just like Clinton). While he has some supporters who don't share his views on gay rights, there is absolutely NO evidence -- none! -- that he shares their views on this topic.

As for Clinton........

Bill Clinton announced DADT at a military base, and made it the law of the land.

Bill Clinton SIGNED DOMA and then paid for political advertising on Christian radio to brag about it.

Bill CLinton lobbied John Kerry to ENDORSE state anti-marriage amendments in 2004.

Hillary Clinton is NOT for the full repeal of DOMA. She says we can get rid of some parts of DOMA, but that there are some parts we need to keep.  

How's that for triangulation?

Does anyone on this forum believe we should keep parts of DOMA in federal law?  

Box Turtle Bulletin


Talk the Talk but Watch the Company They Keep Too
Obama truly lost my vote when he allowed Donnie McClurkin to not only endorse him, but allowed him to use his campaign stage in South Carolina as his own bully pulpit to spew his homophobic nonsense. I can't get past this. I understand the candidates can't stop some people from endorsing them, but they don't have to aid the endorser's cause by giving them the stage. None of the politicians are perfect and none satisfy my ideals completely. Sometimes we have to pick the best of a bad bunch. My primary vote will go to someone other than Obama, probably to Clinton since she is pretty much the only other candidate with a chance of going the whole way. I will vote for the Democratic Nominee in the general election no matter who it is because, whoever it is, they have to be better than the Republican.

[ Parent ]
Thank you
"I can't get past this. I understand the candidates can't stop some people from endorsing them, but they don't have to aid the endorser's cause by giving them the stage."

Exactly, great post.  HE'S the one running for POTUS, not Donnie!  He could and should have taken out his cell phone, made a few calls, and said "Donnie's out" (even if it meant paying a fee to McClurkin for his time).

Better to have Donnie pissed at you, than lose a bunch of guaranteed dem votes.  Nobody listens to his crappy music anyway.  


[ Parent ]
Agreed
The real test is actions.  I can forgive the company that is kept but I expect someone with integrity to speak honestly and act consistently with the message they're putting out there.  Many of my friends are Republicans (a fact that shocked me about most of them), a few of them (the ones I had assumed to be Republican) are bona fide social/religious conservatives who I'm sure vote that way.  Any one who knows me is acutely aware of where I stand with regard civil rights issues and a need to show common courtesy to those who live and act in a way this is not consistent with their personal beliefs.

You have to walk the walk for people to believe you when you talk the talk, especially if the company you keep expresses views that are inconsistent with your own.  If a candidate panders and doesn't have the balls to respectfully disagree, then (s)he doesn't have what is necessary to lead a country like the US.


[ Parent ]
Obama needs to keep watch on his campaign
Now the story is that said minister made the announcement on his own, implying falsely that he was officially part of the Obama team. This could well be, as we all remember Ken Hutcherson, he of the "Topple Microsoft" fame, tried to claim that he was a US cultural ambassador to Latvia.

Obama needs to come out and clearly state that LGBT Americans are citizens too, and that although they (we) need not be liked, we should be respected as citizens.


Obama
After the last seven years of Bush, I think we need a leader  --  someone who has a vision, and can get the nuts and bolts stuff done.  One thing about Hillary in N.Y.  --  she did a helluva good job, and won over the up-staters who started off hating her.

One of the main criticisms leveled against her was that she's a "policy wonk".  What better qualifications can someone have for POTUS in these times?  She is smart, tough, and will be far more active, have greater understanding, than our current cabal in power.

I really like John Edwards.  I like the fact he's out there telling the truth about our class structure.  It can't be fixed until we recognize it exists.  He'd make a great President - or Vice-President (to Hillary, of course).

I suspect Obama might rate highest with white males because - He's NOT a woman, and he can be looked at as their "Magic Negro"  --  which is just another incarnation of RACISM!

If you wish to rule ONLY by consensus, with little or no "arm-twisting" (remember, a decent President cannot be as inflexible, and driven by ideology as our current one - but she can "persuade")  --  there will be little or no change.  

Change does not come from consensus  --  it comes from leadership coupled with intelligence, knowledge, and an awareness of power its uses and its limits.

Obama's embrace of McClurkin, then his clumsy attempts to distance himself, are inexcusable.  If the initial embrace shows his "center" - I don't want him.  If it was just pandering, with no thought of a backlash - I don't want him.

Just remember how Bush campaigned before 2000.  He was far from anti-gay.  People were ready to excuse any anti-gay statements  --  it was just a way to garner votes.  His true "Christian ideals" soon surfaced.

I, for one have had enough of this crap.  I've had enough of all this Christian, Christian, christian, christian, stuff.

You are entitled to your religion.  I'm entitled to mine  --  this is NOT a "Christian Nation".  I think your faith is your business  --  it sure isn't mine.  Obama's "Christian" website is a disgrace.  It is, in the broadest sense  --  UNAMERICAN!


[ Parent ]
Good post!
I agree with you.

[ Parent ]
billy boy
Someone said Billy likes to be liked - that's his "flaw".

I think he was just a horny guy who finally realized he could have all sorts of women.  Looking at some of his "girlfriends", and his wife, it seems clear he likes WOMEN.  Not "little boys in dresses".

Anyway, now that he seems not to care too much if you like him, or not, now that he speaks his mind, now that he's willing to attack   ---   everyone is SO scandalized.

Isn't what he's doing EXACTLY what we wanted our candidates to do?  Didn't we scream at Kerry to show some gumption?  Didn't he say, mildly, he "should" have counter-attacked the Swift Boaters?

Now we are soooo upset when Billy does what we want to see from our candidates, and their campaigns.  

Interesting, no?


Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't?
It is interesting, and not exactly fair, but no one should expect fair in a run up to an election. I like honesty though.

[ Parent ]
An hour or so ago
I was walking home from the subway tonight and saw a car with two bumper stickers. One read, "Obama"; the other read, "REPENT. God isn't going to change his mind."

The second sentence was in small font and I had to jog (for like a second) to catch the car at a stop sign to read it. As I read it, I thought of this post.

I thought to myself, "there goes someone I'd have a vote in common with in the general election should Obama receive the nomination."

It would have been interesting to ask the driver what they thought Obama's position(s) on LGBT rights are.

Electricity's for light bulbs!


Obama and the company he keeps
I don't trust him as far as I can throw him.  There was the "Embrace the Homophobia" tour.  He heard our outcry and refused to pull McClurkin (never mind the rest of the homophobic acts).  Then he keeps Kirbyjohn Caldwell on afterward knowing full well that he'd be offensive to LGBTs, just assuming it would fly under the radar.  As soon as the story came to light he dumped Caldwell, scrubbed all evidence of association with him from his campaign Website and that's that.  

Who knows what other secret associations with "ex-gay" creeps Obama has on the sly?  He's proven that he'll sacrifice LGBTs to political expediency every time.  His campaign comes first, and we can be thrown under the bus in favor of votes and funds  from preferred sources.  

He's poison.  

http://news.lavenderliberal.co...

"If a bullet should go through my head let that bullet go through every closet door."
Harvey Milk


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox