News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



NYT: McCain's team erupted over his relationship with female lobbyist

by: Pam Spaulding

Wed Feb 20, 2008 at 21:45:00 PM EST


Oh boy, an all-but-certain Republican nominee who allegedly can't keep it in his pants...my, my, what else can expect in this election year?

In a lengthy NYT piecethat has been in the works for some time -- John McCain's staffers in 2000 were so concerned about the 71-year-old Arizona senator's relationship with Vicki Iseman, a 40-year-old lobbyist, that they told him to put the kibosh on contact with her on multiple occasions. Toss in some ethical issues -- she had clients who donated to his campaign. This has to be causing agita in the Tool's 2008 camp.  

Early in Senator John McCain's first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers.

A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, in his offices and aboard a client's corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself - instructing staff members to block the woman's access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.

When news organizations reported that Mr. McCain had written letters to government regulators on behalf of the lobbyist's client, the former campaign associates said, some aides feared for a time that attention would fall on her involvement.

...The lobbyist, a partner at the firm Alcalde & Fay, represented telecommunications companies for whom Mr. McCain's commerce committee was pivotal. Her clients contributed tens of thousands of dollars to his campaigns.

Mr. Black said Mr. McCain and Ms. Iseman were friends and nothing more. But in 1999 she began showing up so frequently in his offices and at campaign events that staff members took notice. One recalled asking, "Why is she always around?"

That February, Mr. McCain and Ms. Iseman attended a small fund-raising dinner with several clients at the Miami-area home of a cruise-line executive and then flew back to Washington along with a campaign aide on the corporate jet of one of her clients, Paxson Communications. By then, according to two former McCain associates, some of the senator's advisers had grown so concerned that the relationship had become romantic that they took steps to intervene.

A former campaign adviser described being instructed to keep Ms. Iseman away from the senator at public events, while a Senate aide recalled plans to limit Ms. Iseman's access to his offices.

In interviews, the two former associates said they joined in a series of confrontations with Mr. McCain, warning him that he was risking his campaign and career. Both said Mr. McCain acknowledged behaving inappropriately and pledged to keep his distance from Ms. Iseman. The two associates, who said they had become disillusioned with the senator, spoke independently of each other and provided details that were corroborated by others.

"I believe that the institution of marriage should be reserved for the union of one man and one woman, said Sen. McCain. The Protect Marriage Arizona Amendment would allow the people of Arizona to decide on the definition of marriage in our state. I wholeheartedly support the Protect Marriage Arizona Amendment and I hope that the voters in Arizona choose to support it as well."

-- John McCain in 2005, smiling with glee alongside then-chair of Protect Marriage Arizona, the late Lynn Stanley, holding some of the petitions that ensured the measure made it on the ballot.

Just imagine all the moralist McCain haters on the far right are thinking right about now. Will this hand the nomination to Pastor Huckabee? All kinds of bad jokes come to mind -- was the lobbying horizontal or vertical? Was he lobbying to be the next Viagra spokesman? Is there a not-so-hidden meaning to "Straight Talk Express?

McCain's interesting response is after the jump.

Pam Spaulding :: NYT: McCain's team erupted over his relationship with female lobbyist
From ABCNews, a stock response that denies any impropriety in regards to the "lobbying," but skirts the issue of infidelity:
McCain Communications Director Jill Hazelbaker released this statement to the press:

"It is a shame that the New York Times has lowered its standards to engage in a hit and run smear campaign. John McCain has a 24-year record of serving our country with honor and integrity. He has never violated the public trust, never done favors for special interests or lobbyists, and he will not allow a smear campaign to distract from the issues at stake in this election.

"Americans are sick and tired of this kind of gutter politics, and there is nothing in this story to suggest that John McCain has ever violated the principles that have guided his career."

McCain told the NYT that it was not a "romantic relationship." Well, no, it could have been just all about the booty call. GOP head cases lurking in their personal hetero and homo closets specialize in double lives in order to protect their hypocrisy and voter base.

No news there. Except the Right never laid off Bill Clinton for his proclivities. It will be interesting to see how they handle this. Let's get a Freeper report...


Actual Freeper Quotes

We have a country in big trouble, can't any of these turkeys keep it in their pants and pay attention to business?

Bye bye McCain, this is the bombshell that will destroy McCain, it is allover for the GOP this election, the only question is will it be Hillary or Obama now the McCain is 100% finished....

Huckabee/Clinton/NYT/Obermann dirty trick.

So, this is the story the mediaWHORES were sitting on for months, waiting for an opportune time. Shocked? Hell no, nothing shocks me anymore! Move on nothing to see here just another romance....you know like the one bubba had and the mediawhores kept telling us bubba was just sowing his wild oats.

Nobodys accusing McCain of having an affair with this lady. His crime is talking to her because she is a lobbyist. You inferrred what they wanted you to. That's the way sleazy scumbag bastards at the Times, MSNBC and the DNC operate.

Which one of our guys leaked this? This was inside information from his last campaign. Somebody who knows where the bodies are buried doesn't want McCain either.

If Huck is nominated, the dems wins at least 40 states.

Good grief...I guess this is why Ron Paul stayed in too?

Smart freakin serpent mediaWHORES, they were waiting for McPAIN to be the front runner . Also it takes Osama's wife off the front pages too. BUT, this too can be a ray of light for us, perhaps Romney can get the nomination at the convention.....HMMMM. God works in mysterious ways!

I have a bad feeling about McCain aside from his willingness to go to the other side....he just does not have the mojo to fire people up.....or to convince others that the lies are just that lies...Obama will eat McCain up in any debate.....

"This is a non-story. This will have no effect on McCain's chances."

I agree 100%. McCain will be demolished regardless of this story.

I'm just surprised that they didn't pass it on to Drudge to report. Oh wait! They'd only do that with a Democrat. Dig up dirt on a Republican, and the big newspapers and national networks spill the beans. Dig up dirt on a Democrat, and the story is passed down to an internet site to leak.

The propaganda arm of the DNC launches it's first attack on the Republican nominee and the weak kneed shmuck contingent here at FR cheers them on.

I think it was either Huck's campaign or mcCain's campaign. I find it hard believe that any would not wait til within 6 weeks of the election to release this. My guess it's Huckabee's oh so religious people.

Yes, that was the first question out of my hubbie's mouth tonight - is it too late for Romney to come back or win the nomination? We can dream, but it's a longshot. MSNBC is having a field day right now and is ripping McCain to shreds on lots of other issues, besides this story. It has begun.

McCain must now step aside, and Romney needs to get back in. Romney endorsed McCain and sent him his delegates. Now McCain must return the favor. For the good of the party.

Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
McCain, a dwarf
Like Napoleon. Wanting to have power.  Which means many sexual encounters with women.  Frankly, Cindy, usually pictured in the backgound is scary, Weird hair, weird eyes.

Well, it's not as if he hasn't done this before...
http://www.usvetdsp.com/mcaind...

He seems to be constantly "shopping" for a newer version- anyone else notice how Iseman looks like Cindy McCain's daughter?

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


Right
And he is for the sancity of marriage, one man one woman.  No one calls him on this.  It's about time they did.

[ Parent ]
Correction
Sanctity of marriage.  Sanctity of course meaning blessed by "god", whoever perceives "god" to be for their own power.

[ Parent ]
Daddy D, where are you?
Since he hates McCain with a passion (and has endorsed Huck), I can't wait for the Focus on the Anus press release...

Action
Hey, I'd take all the action I could get ,too. : )

WaPo is on it as well
The WaPo dives in. Folks, the lobbying and ethics matter are one matter, but clearly the woman was banned from McCain's office because of the "close relationship." It's all about the GOP sexual hypocrites.
"We were running a campaign about reforming Washington, and her showing up at events and saying she had close ties to McCain was harmful," said one aide.

The aide said the message to Iseman that day at Union Station in 1999 was clear: "She should get lost." The aide said Iseman stood up and left angrily.

...Concern about Iseman's presence around McCain at one point led to her being banned from his Senate office, according to sources close to McCain.



Ugh
Isn't it unfortunate, assuming no romance, that this is only a story because she is a woman in a "man's job" ?

[ Parent ]
Donna Brazlie
Hope you will pick up on this and make it into the issue about sanctity of marriage.  Thanks.  Dunkindonuts.

[ Parent ]
Donna Brazile
Sorry, I am dyslexic.

[ Parent ]
perspective
Personally, I think the story is a non-story because (a) I don't care if he had an affair and (b) there is really no proof anyhow.  The real meat of the article is the reminder that he was part of the Keating Five (why his opponents skipped that I have no idea) and that he does the same shaddy appearing dance with lobbyists that everyone, including Sens. Obama and Clinton, are forced to do.  Even if everything is on  the up-and-up, it looks sleazy.  But, that said, there is no smoking gun here.

OF COURSE, I am not part of the group that impeached a President for getting head. This can't be good news for uniting the GOP, which is good news for all the rest of us.

Maybe this will be enough to inspire a independent run from the right.  That would really help, especially if Obama is the nominee.


Keating Five = Savings and Loan Scandal
I think Tony's right that the real meat of this story is McCain as one of the Keating Five.  People here in MS, Republicans through and through, will dismiss the adultery (they always do for Repubs), but if the story keeps its legs, the relationship to the Keating Five will resonate.  People here still occasionally mention the S&L debacle.  Their history gets a little mixed up, but anything that brings it back to the forefront will make a lot of people think twice about McCain.  So, while I don't give a shit about who he's fucked or not, I hope the Savings and Loan/Keating Five meme will be the real shit to hit the fan.

[ Parent ]
Thanks Ken
For jogging my memory of The Keating Five.  It had somehow been overwritten in my aging cortex with "The Jackson Five", and Keating had been reindexed to Michael J. Fox.

Just wanted to add that the Keating scandal takes on more gravitas when you consider the state of the banks as they stand today (Did Digby invent the term "Big Shitpile"?)

It doesn't matter really though.  The sexual innuendo,'confirmed' by two independent people, is all it'll take to totally distract him from being able to attack Obama this week.  That won't be helpful to Hillary.

My overall impression of the way this has been handled by the press:  Shameful.  This is obviously something they've had for ages.  They could have played this card anytime they wanted to.  Why did they want to right now?

Enjoy.
 

Mom always told me I was special and I believed her.


[ Parent ]
Quick, Hurry, call David Vitter!!!
  His people know how to save a republican's political career after being caught caught with hookers.  This should be a breeze for Vitter's Crew.

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.

Maybe Romney can come back at the conference. We can dream...
Yeah you guys sure can dream. You should get some ort of prize for it; Adam and Eve, This is not a recession, Romney will ride again...

Joe at Americablog
wonders if this is being given such high profile treatment RIGHT NOW as a response to the attacks of his trophy wife on Mrs. Obama!  That makes a whole lot of sense to me.  It's like the NYTimes saying to the rightwing machine:  "If you wanna go there, we're gonna be right there with you this time, but we're gonna turn the mirror around just a bit on this cycle than we have in the past"

Rightwing parsing and misconstruction of progressive candidates (and war and the economy and...)is finally starting to get old?  Does this mean we can have a do over with Howard Dean, the only candidate in my lifetime that was blackballed by the media for the UNACCEPTABLE CRIME of over-enthusiasm?

Enjoy.

Mom always told me I was special and I believed her.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox