News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Million-dollar Mark Penn's real campaign allegiances

by: Pam Spaulding

Mon Feb 25, 2008 at 11:15:00 AM EST


Mark Penn, Hillary Clinton's chief strategist, would obviously benefit from a Clinton win. One thing he doesn't have is any vested interest in supporting Obama as the Democratic nominee against John McCain. Take a look at this:
Hillary Clinton's chief strategist is Mark Penn, and Charlie Black, John McCain's top adviser, is chairman of BKSH, the DC-based lobbying subsidiary of Burson-Marsteller -- of which Mark Penn is CEO.

Yes, this is the same lobbyist Barack Obama was referring to when he criticized John McCain for allowing lobbyists to conduct their business on board his bus.

BKSH is a bipartisan lobbying firm. Black, the chairman is the top Republican. The top Democrat is R. Scott Pastrick, who like Penn, supports Hillary Clinton.

Mark Penn's personal interests would clearly be best served by a Hillary Clinton victory.

A McCain presidency wouldn't be a bad consolation prize, however. It would be far better to have the head of his lobbying be tight with the president than to have a president like Obama who sought to impose new restrictions on his lobbyist operation.

Joe at Americablog has even more on Penn:  Mark Penn's tangled corporate web.
Penn has an obligation to his shareholders and clients. And his firm seems to have clients on both sides of the aisle, on both sides of this fight. If Obama wins the presidency, Penn gets nothing. He was helping the other guy, or gal. But if McCain wins, Penn's firm has one hell of a contact with the new president - heck, one of his top employees had the new president as a client and didn't even charge him! Is it a conflict of interest? Not with his clients. But how about with the Democratic party and our interests?
And the atmosphere on the inside continues to deteriorate as more staffers are leaking to the press about conflicts. More below the fold.
Pam Spaulding :: Million-dollar Mark Penn's real campaign allegiances
(NYT):
Morale is low. After 13 months of dawn-to-dark seven-day weeks, the staff is exhausted. Some have taken to going home early - 9 p.m. - turning off their BlackBerrys, and polishing off bottles of wine, several senior staff members said.

Some advisers have been heard yelling at close friends and colleagues. In a much-reported incident, Mr. Penn and the campaign advertising chief, Mandy Grunwald, had a screaming match over strategy recently that prompted another senior aide, Guy Cecil, to leave the room. "I have work to do - you're acting like kids," Mr. Cecil said, according to three people in the room.

...In interviews with 15 aides and advisers to Mrs. Clinton, not a single one expressed any regrets that they were not working for Mr. Obama. Indeed, some aides said they were baffled that a candidate who had been in the United States Senate for only three years and was a state lawmaker in Illinois before that was now outpacing a seasoned figure like Mrs. Clinton. And to a person, these aides and advisers praised Mrs. Clinton and said that she had been a better candidate than her campaign strategy and operation reflected.

What would be tragic is if she were to continue to follow bad advice from her high-paid shills, consultants and hangers-on like Penn, a hired gun who is protecting his interests, not hers. Apparently he doesn't think she can win on her experience and would rather risk, win or lose having Clinton look petty and fear-driven, filled with negativity and bitter sarcasm - oh, like Karl Rove's GOP. If Obama's the nom, he will face this sort of BS, but is this how Hillary wants to go out? It looks more like consultants flailing about trying to do CYA instead of making their candidate look good. Hillary needs to sh*tcan Penn and the rest of these losers.

Especially if the Clinton campaign is confirmed as being responsible for this. The Politico noted that the Clinton campaign did not deny the charge of circulating the photo, but did not comment further. One would think that the first thing Clinton or a surrogate would do is address a charge of someone in the campaign sending around a Muslim-baiting photo of Obama. (He's pictured in a turban and native Kenyan clothing for a ceremonial event during a 5-day tour in Africa.) It's egregious particularly since her campaign surrogates in Iowa were caught spamming the "Obama is a Muslim" email to people. I'd want my hands clean of this ASAP.

This is the non-denial response sent out by campaign manager Maggie Williams.

Statement by Maggie Williams, Campaign Manager

"Enough.

"If Barack Obama's campaign wants to suggest that a photo of him wearing traditional Somali clothing is divisive, they should be ashamed.  Hillary Clinton has worn the traditional clothing of countries she has visited and had those photos published widely.  

"This is nothing more than an obvious and transparent attempt to distract from the serious issues confronting our country today and to attempt to create the very divisions they claim to decry.

"We will not be distracted."

Ahem. If  this represents a real response, this is a sad time indeed, given the campaign has already engaged in Muslim-baiting. Sigh.

Also: dnA doesn't hold back on his opinion. Whew.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Well, I think a very simple way of addressing this is to ask the question:
Why is it that most Americans suddenly seem to know Barack Obama's middle name, but none of us have any clue as to the middle names of any of the other candidates in both parties?  

Corps hedging their bets??
In America?!?!!  OUR beautiful and perfect model democracy is manipulated by corporate interests that make sure they will have a leader to line their pockets no matter which candidate from EITHER party wins?!?!

Old news.  

This comment isn't an endorsement of Nader, but it is an endorsement of what he stands for.  Interesting that this story should come out today - the day after Nader announces his candidacy and all the Democrats in the blogosphere lost their freaking minds over it.

This story exemplifies why it doesn't matter which party wins the race for the White House.  The two parties are beholden to the lobbyists.  We saw the McCain story in last weeks NYT and remember this about Obama and his campaign contributor Exelon?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/...

We can expend every last erg of energy bickering over which candidate is better, which is worse, who is the spoiler, who is to blame for GWB and 9/11 and Katrina and chicken pox but the fact of the matter is that it doesn't make a lick of difference who has the better argument.

The winner in our political soap opera is corporate america and they win at our expense and we waste our time arguing about personal attacks that will only determine which candidate gets to do the corporations bidding...not which will do ours because none of them will put our interests before those of big biz.  


...seconded
absolutely correct. So now what? Naught Nader.

It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox