|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |
The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Sun Mar 02, 2008 at 07:30:00 AM EST
|
There's nothing like a fresh flaming pile of anti-gay horsesh*t from Town Hall columnist Kevin McCullough, who commented on Barack Obama's recent open letter to the LGBT community at his blog, Musclehead Revolution. Kevin practically foams at the mouth. For every Obama supporter who has written me criticizing me for statements I've made in so many previous outlets they would be impossible to tally - OBAMA likey the GAY MARRIAGE. He has issued a written statement saying to the homosexual elite radicals that he will REPEAL the National Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). And that on the issue of redefining the institution by which ALL of society has been built upon he would allow state by state any jolly perverted idea or arrangement that can be signed into law to take place.
...And of course merely saying that engaging in homosexual behavior is in fact unhealthy, detrimental and even deadly - would qualify as outright "homophobic" views in Obama's world. SO we can't teach Biblical sexuality... i.e. HEALTHY... only the gospel of condoms!
Obama supporters have tried to silence me claiming that he was never the radical activist for the homosexual lobby that I always knew him to be, but now he has proven me right - and his blinded sheep following him like lemmings over the edge of the cliff are now faced with a choice. A radical liberal activist (supporting homosexual behavior) who supports the most radical redefinition of the basic family structure in the history of the world... or John McCain.
Media Matters has more on the above.
Was he through? No, he's just getting started. The above was published on February 28. McCullough launched another attack today, March 2, on Clown Hall, entitled "Obama: America's first Gay President?." Read this nonsense after the jump. |
| Pam Spaulding :: Kevin McCullough's hard-on for Obama and the 'gay boogeyman' |
Kevin McCullough has decided he wants to be the conservative homo-hate emissary for the GOP right out of the box, so John McCain wouldn't have to. In this way he may be more "gay" than Clinton was "black" - and by a wide margin at that.
For all the shell game that Obama was able to juggle in the run for President to date on the issue of his real, underlying views on the radical homosexual agenda - this week he removed all doubts.
In an alarmingly pointed written statement Obama signed his named to the personal promise of greater advance against the institution of marriage of any candidate to ever run for the highest office. Pointedly so he gave his full pledge to overturn, or repeal, the federal Defense of Marriage Act.
...This act was signed by the last liberal President in office William Jefferson Clinton. In pledging to do so Barack Obama has now staked out turf that threatens the viability of the next generation of children that could subject them to an operative norm that would contribute to the de-constructing of families as to however one could imagine in one state - and then forcing recognition of that sexual union by its neighboring state regardless of what the citizens of that state say.
Plenty of LGBT folks out there don't feel Obama's good enough on our issues, of course when it boils down to it, this makes it clear who the real enemy is, because Barack Obama is worlds apart from McCain and McCullough's world view on the matter. Obama has now been labeled a homosexualist activist, supporting our "radical agenda" in the eyes of McCullough, who wants to make us the boogeyman yet again in 2008. Yet as someone who has followed his career since long before he was a national stage player, I have warned that his aggressive support for the radical homosexual activist agenda in America is a part of the overall picture of who he is.
...Obama displays a reckless commitment to play games with the future sexual formation of families and puts himself so firmly planted in the camp of anti-biblical views of truth, sex, and family that we have never seen its comparison in all years previous.
Make no mistake, committed Obama supporters share his uber-libertine leanings to homosexual behavior, and want to encourage more relaxation of traditional moral sexual barriers in society. And with academics like Dr. Judith Levine arguing in her book, and endorsed by Clinton Surgeon General Joyclin Elders, arguing that sex between adults and children is not harmful to the child - one can easily imagine what such relaxation of rules would lead to. The in-family squabbles over who is more LGBT-affirming -- Clinton or Obama -- makes little difference when you have attacks to contend with like this, which would be hurled at Hillary as well in some form or fashion.
The fact of the matter is McCullough has been railing about same-sex unions, homosexuality as an equivalent to bestiality, pulling out the "parts don't fit" nonsense, and other obsessive, high-strung bleatings for some time now, getting warmed up for the general election. Let's revisit some of the spittle-laden homophobic statements drooled by Mr. McCullough. Some classics...
On Mary Cheney and Heather Poe having a child: If they were to choose to engage in sex acts a thousand times over, their biological machinery would never produce what is needed - but for a different reason. There is no dysfunction in this case. Instead, the reason the sexual engagement does not work is because the necessary parts are not even present. It is the equivalent of screwing a nut onto a bolt, by using a hammer. They just don't fit. More crude drivel:Homosexual behavior and Christianity do not mix. From the standpoint of theory, theology, doctrine, and practice the two are totally and completely incompatible; as are adultery, pornography, bestiality, pedophilia, pre-marital sex, incest, cross dressing, multiple partner orgies and the list goes on. From his piece Why homosexuals despise marriage:For instance, a woman who engages in lesbianism will never know the joy of lovemaking that creates within her the product of that union -- an actual human life. She will never know the security of a true man protecting her from the dragons of the world and providing for her an environment where she can nurture and give love to that little life once it arrives, or the stamp of approval that God puts on such an experience. And because she and her partner know this, they must defy reason, biology and sexual function to create children and experiences that serve as faulty substitutes for that God-ordained picture.
Likewise, a man who seeks his perverse kicks by depositing the seed of life in, shall we say, non-life-giving cavities, may know orgasm, but never complete union, as he uses anatomy in ways for which the Creator did not create it. Given that it's McCullough's party has been the been the haven of political hypocrisy on issues regarding sexuality (see the lengthy number of posts in my Republican Sexual Hypocrites file), his rant is mind-blowing). The Republican party is filled with amoral "pillars of the community" who trawl for illicit, extramarital homo- and heterosex in the shadows while putting on pious faces in order to rail against law-abiding LGBT taxpaying citizens who live openly and honestly.
What McCullough and his ilk long for is a return to the padlocked closet of shame, self-loathing, and pathological sexual dishonesty championed by social conservatives and/or elected GOP embarrassments like Larry Craig, David Vitter, Mark Foley, Ted Haggard, Bob Allen, Houston District Attorney Chuck Rosenthal, Cabarrus County (NC) commissioner and pastor Coy C. Privette, Glenn Murphy, Jr. (former chairman of the Young Republican National Federation), the list goes on and on.
If there is anything that threatens marriage, society and public health, it's the behavior of the above representatives of the party of family values, but Kevin McCullough chooses to focus on why the government should choose to make laws to restrict the rights of law-abiding citizens who wish to have their relationships and families recognized in the eyes of the law as part of the American quilt.
The party of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have not made incessant attempts to get into the bedrooms and wombs of the American public like the party of the Republican Sexual Hypocrites. The GOP has been in control of the political agenda for far too long, and the public has simply had enough of the boogeyman campaigning on this front. One only needs to look at the Democratic turnout versus Republican turnout at the polls during this primary season. In many cases the combined votes for all of the GOP candidates was less than the votes than either Obama or Clinton. That hardly sounds like a mandate for more of the same, tired, fearmongering, Kevin. Hang it up. |
|
|
