News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Bill Richardson enthusiastically endorses Obama

by: Pam Spaulding

Fri Mar 21, 2008 at 04:30:00 AM EDT


This statement from Bill Richardson just landed in my inbox and it's huge, coming at the right time -- when we all need to discuss the impact of race -- all of us. It is apparent that Obama's speech on race and reconciliation had an impact on his decision, which had to be difficult. The AP story is here.

New Mexico Governor and former Democratic presidential contender Bill Richardson could have easily endorsed Hillary Clinton -- he served as Secretary of Energy and UN Ambassador in the Clinton Administration and he is a long-time friend of the Clintons. His mainstream candidacy touted his impressive long resume of experience in federal and state government --  it makes both Clinton's and Obama's current bickering about who is more "3AM-ready" look ludicrous.

This is a tremendous loss for the Clinton team because they publicly worked so hard for Richardson's endorsement -- don't you remember Bill showing up to watch the Super Bowl with the governor? And what makes it even more stinging is that Richardson's statement is extremely enthusiastic, calling attention to bridging the racial divides and healing the schisms rather than politically capitalizing on them.

Richardson, who has been chatted up as a running mate in the MSM for both candidates, is slated to appear with Obama on Friday at an event in Portland, Oregon. Emphasis added is mine.

During the last year, I have shared with you my vision and hopes for this nation as we look to repair the damage of the last seven years. And you have shared your support, your ideas and your encouragement to my campaign. We have been through a lot together and that is why I wanted to tell you that, after careful and thoughtful deliberation, I have made a decision to endorse Barack Obama for President.

We are blessed to have two great American leaders and great Democrats running for President. My affection and admiration for Hillary Clinton and President Bill Clinton will never waver. It is time, however, for Democrats to stop fighting amongst ourselves and to prepare for the tough fight we will face against John McCain in the fall. The 1990's were a decade of peace and prosperity because of the competent and enlightened leadership of the Clinton administration, but it is now time for a new generation of leadership to lead America forward. Barack Obama will be a historic and a great President, who can bring us the change we so desperately need by bringing us together as a nation here at home and with our allies abroad.

Earlier this week, Senator Barack Obama gave an historic speech. that addressed the issue of race with the eloquence, sincerity, and optimism we have come to expect of him. He inspired us by reminding us of the awesome potential residing in our own responsibility. He asked us to rise above our racially divided past, and to seize the opportunity to carry forward the work of many patriots of all races, who struggled and died to bring us together.

As a Hispanic, I was particularly touched by his words. I have been troubled by the demonization of immigrants--specifically Hispanics-- by too many in this country. Hate crimes against Hispanics are rising as a direct result and now, in tough economic times, people look for scapegoats and I fear that people will continue to exploit our racial differences--and place blame on others not like them . We all know the real culprit -- the disastrous economic policies of the Bush Administration!

Richardson's statement and a video from a couple of days ago that illuminates his thinking on his decision continues below the fold.
Pam Spaulding :: Bill Richardson enthusiastically endorses Obama
Senator Obama has started a discussion in this country long overdue and rejects the politics of pitting race against race. He understands clearly that only by bringing people together, only by bridging our differences can we all succeed together as Americans.

His words are those of a courageous, thoughtful and inspiring leader, who understands that a house divided against itself cannot stand. And, after nearly eight years of George W. Bush, we desperately need such a leader.

To reverse the disastrous policies of the last seven years, rebuild our economy, address the housing and mortgage crisis, bring our troops home from Iraq and restore America's international standing, we need a President who can bring us together as a nation so we can confront our urgent challenges at home and abroad.

During the past year, I got to know Senator Obama as we campaigned against each other for the Presidency, and I felt a kinship with him because we both grew up between words, in a sense, living both abroad and here in America. In part because of these experiences, Barack and I share a deep sense of our nation's special responsibilities in the world.

So, once again, thank you for all you have done for me and my campaign. I wanted to make sure you understood my reasons for my endorsement of Senator Obama. I know that you, no matter what your choice, will do so with the best interests of this nation, in your heart.

Sincerely,

Bill Richardson

Richardson can also obviously speak to the issue of that "passing the threshold" test, since he had an actual seat at the table while Hillary Clinton was garnering her now much-questioned experience. That he endorsed Obama indicates Richardson has no problem with Obama's leadership skills -- that's politically significant.

It's pretty clear that this decision weighed heavily on him. Look at this March 11, 2008  interview with Los Angeles Times journalist Maggie Farley at the UCLA Burkle Center for International Relations' second annual conference.


New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson discusses his personal experiences in the Democratic presidential primary race, the role of superdelegates and whether he will endorse Sen. Hillary Clinton or Sen. Barack Obama.

This friend and supporter of the Clintons couldn't say it in any stronger terms that it's time to stop the bickering and take a look at what will happen to this country if we allow the rancor to put John McCain into office.

What are your thoughts on the impact of this particular endorsement -- Richardson is also a superdelegate, so this is a strong signal to the Clinton campaign on that front as well.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
More to come, I hope!
Pam, I think this puts tremendous pressure on Edwards, Biden, and Kucinich to endorse Obama.  At one debate it seemed that Edwards and Obama were splitting with Richardson and Clinton, but then the things Richardson said about the Clintons made me wonder.  After he dropped out, he said their attempts to get his endorsement were like 'carpet bombing."  EVERYBODY called, and constantly.  Obama alone called Richardson, and though he was careful so say he respected both candidates, reading between the lines, I felt he was saying the Clinton camp was overdoing it.

And let's not forget, he and Bill watched the Super Bowl only because Richardson said that if Clinton wanted to see him, that was his only free time that weekend.  It wasn't as if they were lifelong buds sharing a game and some brews.

This is a HUGE blow to the Clinton campaign especially after the big misstep with the re-vote--having only wealthy Clinton supporters offer money for the Michigan primary.  It also changes the news story away from Wright and coming on Friday will dominate the weekend talk shows and columns.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


I'm feeling better
When I voted in the primary in TX I unflinchingly voted for Obama and have had absolutely no regrets.  Richardson getting on board is just one more excuse for me to feel pretty good about my vote since it had crossed my mind to actually vote for Richardson since he was on the ballot but out of the race.

Now I'm just ready for all this negative hoopla to wrap up and let's get in to the real business --- defeating McCain.  If his recent statements are any indication, I'm guessing he's on the express train to senility before November.


Gracias, Senor Richardson
During the early campaign for the Democratic nomination, Bill was my main man.  A former governor and former UN ambassador, he embodied the executive and diplomatic experience which I sought in a POTUS.  Sadly, his personality fell flat on TV, and he seemed to be jockeying for VP during the debates.  When Bill dropped out, I pinned my hopes on Obama with the ardent desire to see Bill throw his support that way in time.

Hosanna!  Hosanna!


ditto
I was a Richardson supporter early on, as well, and then eventually moved to Obama.  I kinda hoped he'd make this endorsement back before the NM primary, but better late than never!

[ Parent ]
Good timing
Thanks Gov. Richardson, for your loyal Hispanic votes in New Mexico and Arizona.

My press release
I paraphrase Bill Richardson a bit:

"As a gay man in a long term relationship with another man, I was particularly touched by Obama's words. I have been troubled by the demonization of the LGBT community--specifically same sex couples-- by too many in this country. Hate crimes against LGBTs are rising as a direct result and now, in tough economic times, people look for scapegoats and I fear that people will continue to exploit our differences--and place blame on others not like them . We all know the real culprit -- the disastrous economic policies of the Bush Administration and the ongoing ambivalence of Democrats that find the courage to talk about race and political scapegoating but draw the line at making connections between those issues and bigotry enacted against the LGBT community even though we blamed the gays for the defeat of John Kerry in 2004."

What do I endorse?  Resistance.  Unrelenting resistance.


a leader!
i have been waiting on some "leaders" in the democratic party to step forward, speak out, and end the bloodletting.
I think this took guts on Bill's part.... especially considering his friendship with the Clintons.

and, o yes, he should keep the beard...even when he is Vice President!

now, the next one who should step up is John Edwards to slam the nail in the coffin of the old politics!


I agree on the facial hair
I actually think he looks great in the beard.

[ Parent ]
My only concern...
With Bill Richardson's endorsement of Senator Obama.  Since he is a super delegate he will more than likely be voting for Barack Obama at the convention.  While I personally agree with his endorsement, I think he's doing the people he represents in his state a disservice as they voted for Hillary in the primary elections.  I really think voting against the people you represent is a bad idea regardless of who you're supporting for the nomination.

"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." -- Thomas Jefferson

Those 1,709 will just have to get over it
Clinton, defeated Obama 73,105 to 71,396 in New Mexico, a margin of just 1,709 votes  

1,709 Votes or 1 Vote

It really doesn't matter in an election if it were 1,709 votes or even one (1) single vote more than the opponent.  A win is a win.  I have great respect for Gov. Bill Richardson.  Still it is strange of him as a super delegate to be casting his vote differently than his state.  This is exactly what the Obama camp is saying super delegates ought NOT do.  Slightly hypocritical of the Obama camp.  Still, I retain my respect for Gov. Bill Richardson.


The fight for full LGBT Equality is NOT over.  Be strong and be ready to really fight!  And read my blog in your spare time! http://ravenhurst-ravenhurst.b...

It's not strange at all
That's the whole damn point of the super delegates in the first place. If they had to vote with their state they'd just be an extra bonus delegate. And what of all those DNC supers? They don't have a state constituency.

Furthermore, the race has evolved from where it was when NM held it's primary. And Richardson is looking at down ballot impact in his purple state. Clinton will be toxic for his state party in November, Obama has coattails that will greatly enhance the prospects of the NM Dems which is who Richardson should be looking out for.

If you don't like the super delegate system then work to change it next time around. But this is the way it is. Complaining about Richardson endorsing Obama when his state was pretty evenly divided just makes you sound like a bitter sHillbot. She lost this thing in February and it's finally catching up to her.


[ Parent ]
Richardson - no big surprise
Before the primaries, he had said he would be for the candidate who had the most delegates.  Surely the way all super delegates will vote.

[ Parent ]
The purpose of Super Delegates
is clearly not to represent the will of the people but to have some control over the nominee by The Party.  If 1,709 have an issue with it, complain to the Democratic Party for instituting very undemocratic rules and regulations.

[ Parent ]
Wait a Darn Minute

It's not ME that is saying the Democratic Super Delegates ought to vote with the majority of the elected primary delegates.  It is the Obama Campaign!  So it is slightly hypocritical of the same campaign to joyfully accept a Super Delegate voting against the majority vote of his state ... athat is ALL I am saying.

Personally, I think every Super Delegate should vote their conscience and their political best interest ... as Bill Richardson has done.  I respect him, as I said.  And I have repeated over and over here at the Blend that I have nothing but the deepest respect for Sen. Obama but I voted for Sen. Clinton in the California Primary in February and would do so again today.  The only thing that has given me pause n that regard is Maura's decision to support Sen. Obama and Sen. Obama remarkable race speech.  But my loyalty remains with Sen. Clinton.  If anyone is interested, I will tell why.  Otherwise, I will let it lay.


The fight for full LGBT Equality is NOT over.  Be strong and be ready to really fight!  And read my blog in your spare time! http://ravenhurst-ravenhurst.b...


Are you being disigenuous here
or do you really misunderstand the argument?  Obama's campaign and many others feel the superdelegates should go with the will of the pledged delegates of the country as a whole, not of their particular states (unless they have already pledged to do so).  There is no hypocrisy there.  

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox