News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Focus analyst responds to critique of article on same-sex marriage

by: Pam Spaulding

Thu Mar 27, 2008 at 09:30:00 AM EDT


Director of Global Family Formation Studies at Focus On the Family, Glenn Stanton, has his post up at Box Turtle Bulletin  in response to  Dr. Patrick Chapman's critique of his article declaring that that there is no support for same-sex marriage based on anthropology Check it out.

A snippet is below the fold.

Pam Spaulding :: Focus analyst responds to critique of article on same-sex marriage
Stanton:
An analysis of over 100 studies on fatherhood and child-development outcomes found that having a loving and nurturing father was as important for a child's happiness, well-being, and social and academic success as having a loving and nurturing mother. Some of these studies indicated father-love was a stronger contributor than mother-love to important positive child well-being outcomes. 5

The breadth and strength of this research on the irreplaceable influence of fathers for healthy child development is what compelled the Clinton and then Bush Administrations to both develop and execute smart federal programs to encourage greater father involvement in the United States. The research revealing that children who grow up without their fathers - regardless of the resultant family-form - face a number of serious life challenges was too great for either Administration to ignore.

Unfortunately the legalization of same-sex marriage would not help us connect more children with their fathers, but often do precisely the opposite. This is one of the leading reasons why Focus on the Family opposes same-sex marriage, along with no-fault divorce and policies that tend to encourage out-of-wedlock child-bearing.

Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I'm unclear about all of these 'studies'
If the influence of a father is so critical what sense does it make to prevent a father's influence if he is gay ?

Would two fathers double one's chances of social and academic success ?

I await these studies with great anticipation


All this nonsense that they spew out
is entirely predicated on the ideas that divorce can be avoided, or reduced; that same-sex marriage ruins children's chances; that there is some policy whereby families can be forced together into a unit or kept together.

They can't.

Conservatives oppose market regulation. This is a given. US conservatives are market capitalists; this is also a given. The penetration of corporate market values into family life; the constant advertising that tells people that they are losers if they're not self-actualising; that self is more than family or sacrifice, that there's always a better one around the next corner, not to mention the long corporate working hours that separate EVEN PARENTS WHO ARE NOT GAY OR DIVORCED from their children for 90% of the time; the technology that children use to fill the gaping holes where their family and other forms of socialising should be; they REFUSE to admit that the money culture, the culture of work, the culture of profit and consumption is FIRST AND FOREMOST responsible for the isolating and dissatisfaction of modern family life.

They refuse. They blame liberal education, hippies, feminists, gays, atheists; anybody but the people who forcibly separate parents from their children for all but 40 minutes a day and make it impossible to own a house without a mortgage and a double income.

A parent can't work a 50 hour week. Impossible.

A parent can't have less than 5 weeks holiday a year. Impossible.

Women (or men) who stay home need to be be subsidized by the government. With taxes. They need support.

Until they admit that, nothing the 'family' right say is worthy of a second's notice. Put your money where your mouth are, you losers, cheapskates, ostriches. You have the crappiest family structures in the developed world for a reason.

The reason is your prosperity, your business models and the junk piling up in the basement.



This is good news
Unfortunately the legalization of same-sex marriage would not help us connect more children with their fathers, but often do precisely the opposite. This is one of the leading reasons why Focus on the Family opposes same-sex marriage, along with no-fault divorce and policies that tend to encourage out-of-wedlock child-bearing.

Does this mean he and his ilk are going to take a break from gay bashing and go after those filthy divorce es and unmarried  
pro creators?


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox