News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



Hitchens apparently knows more about lesbians than the rest of us

by: Pam Spaulding

Mon Apr 07, 2008 at 17:00:00 PM EDT


And the problem with being a lesbian is...? I am so sick of these Cro-Magnons pontificating on the air. (Media Matters):

   SULLIVAN: Two things. One, it's important to clear up that he [Wright] did not say "The Jews are going to get you" in some conspiratorial, classic anti-Semitic fashion. I think that's just --
   HITCHENS: He [Wright] thinks only Jews are going to object to [Rev. Louis] Farrakhan and [Libyan leader Moammar] Gadhafi. Excuse me?
   SULLIVAN: No, he didn't say "only."
   HITCHENS: No, but --
   SULLIVAN: Again, you keep playing with that quote. We're happy to have it on the record. And now you've made me forget my second point, which is --
   HITCHENS: Oh, well, don't be such a lesbian. Get on with it.
   SULLIVAN: I'm sorry, I've forgotten my second point. But I do think that's important. And I don't think Wright is Farrakhan. And I don't think Obama, in any conceivable way, represents anything but racial inclusion and integration. And anybody that looks at any part of his career and can be in any doubt about that is beyond me.
   The reason he went to that church, clearly, if you read his biography, is he wanted to understand what it was to be black in America. He didn't understand. He's a very polyglot person. He grew up in Hawaii, he had some time in Indonesia.
I'm serious -- I don't know what the f*ck Hitchens is talking about here. Are lesbians slow to make a point? Foot-draggers? Jesus. It's nice to know he can combine misogyny and homophobia in one fell swoop. Admirable multitasking.

Perhaps Hitchens knows how many lesbians it takes to screw in a light bulb, or where the stock of conversion toasters are stashed. Inquiring minds want to know. Andrew Sullivan didn't even bother to counter this crap. Sigh.

Pam Spaulding :: Hitchens apparently knows more about lesbians than the rest of us
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Sully
Sullivan and Hitchens have long been close allies in demonizing the Clintons. Both were also big time supporters of the War in Iraq and called those who opposed it "traitors". I wouldn't look for Sullivan to correct stuff like this since he was the one who called gays in San Francisco degenerate leftists and hairy-backed homos.

I don't suppose
You have links for any of that stuff?

Sully supported the war, yes (just like Hillary), but I'd love to see some links to those other charges.


[ Parent ]
Im not the one making the charges; I don't need to prove it for you.
But I appreciate your willingness to provide backup for your claims. Thank you.

[ Parent ]
Hichens is a drunk
I've seen him on Bill Maher's show and he looks and sounds like a belligerent drunk.  Completely different from the Hichens who writes really well.  The lesbian remark doesn't make sense unless he was trying to make a joke and say, "Don't be so old-maidish" and give it a gay twist.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

Hitchens is a hateful old drunk
And he can't write either.

Maybe lesbians can't get to the point or remember anything.
They're both a couple of teabags...oh did I just say that? My bad.

Hitchens is a Drink-Soaked Trotskyite Popinjay... (Really!)
The man is a serious alcoholic.  I learned years ago to just let anything an alcoholic says go in one ear and out the other.

certainly he was praising sullivan, was he not?
after all, sullivan was being feisty and not letting hitchens off the hook.  so hitchens rightly recognized productive tenacity in the most concise way possible: called sullivan a lesbian.  this would explain why sullivan did not respond, since it just doesn't do to make too much of a high complement.  self-effacing low-key brits, and all.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


Couldn't tell the difference between bulls and bears.
What is Christopher Hitchens' definition of "lesbian"?  He used it in a crappy ironic way when he said it to Andrew Sullivan.  

Just a thought
If Hitchens had said "don't be such a gay" there would have been reprecussions if Sullivan had remained silent.

If Christopher Hitchens had made the "Lesbian" remark to John McCain or to Pat Robertson and they did not counter the statement we would all be screaming about it.
.

We would demand public, printed and broadcast retractions and if they did not comply we would write vehemently about the misogyny and Lesbiaphobic nature of the comment and their refusal to distance themselves from it.

Andrew Sullivan, conservative gay male does it and he gets a pass from the community.

Sorry Andrew, not from me you don't.
By letting Hitchens go on like that, by not upbraiding him on his statement, you endorse it. At least that is what we would be saying to McCain.

And I am saying it to you.
Lesbians are tired of being the window dressing in the LGBT community, the after thought when political and social objectives are discussed. We are tired of the misogyny that we experience WITHIN THE LGBT COMMUNITY.

And we will give back as good as we get, Andrew.

Women are tired of being reduced to third class citizens by gay men such as you. You stand up for the whole community or we stop standing up for the ridiculous indulgent behaviours of priviledged gay men  that we are so often asked to defend.

So, if you want to keep company with Hitchens sorts of people, fine. If you find Lesbian-bashing unremarkable, fine. Go hang out with people who feel as you do....Sally Kern, for instance. Though you might find that they don't approve of you either.


I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


huh?
are you just angry at Sullivan or do you have issues with all gay men?

"You stand up for the whole community or we stop standing up for the ridiculous indulgent behaviours of priviledged gay men  that we are so often asked to defend."

Once again huh?, plus a wtf added to that. Let me just say that my husband (of five years) and I thank you for such a fine generalization of the gay community.

BTW what I'm really trying to say is that if you get over the anger and think for a second, there a 101 other things to attack Sullivan about without resorting to attacking the gay community.  

nothing new at this time.....


[ Parent ]
well,
there is a lot of misogyny in this country, and in my experience gay men are a bit more but not substantially more enlightened than straight men.  it would be incorrect to say that "gay men are misogynists", just as it is incorrect to state that "hetero men are misogynists".  but it is completely correct to say that many gay men are the equals to their hetero counterparts in mysogeny and enjoying male privilege.  

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


[ Parent ]
It was NOT directed at all gay men
But the priviledged few, the crowd whose hypocrisy is rank, the fine men who voted Bush, who are fine as long as they have their own rights and to hell with the rest of the community.


I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

[ Parent ]
Then perhaps
just say, those gay men who are misogynists and support conservatives, to their detriment.

Remember that there are a lot of gay men slogging in the trenches, who support women, lesbians and the issues that are important to both of those groups. Your original post just made it seem like gay men are the enemy of women and that we all (gay men) engage in "ridiculous indulgent behaviours", that lesbians will stop supporting if we (gay men) don't change.

I guess I was just asking for clarification

nothing new at this time.....


[ Parent ]
And the last
"ridiculous indulgent behaviours" I engaged in was buying a $200.00 dinner for my husband and a friend. If any of my lesbian friends had been there I would have bought their dinners as well. But it was a boys only weekend, for some reason...so I guess I am also a misogynist (unless you take into account that none of the lesbians I know could make it that weekend).

nothing new at this time.....

[ Parent ]
ridiculous indulgent behaviours
was a reference to barebacking and meth.

In another post Ben wrote that "lesbians were well known for having to "process" EVERYTHING and make sure it was all spelled out in excruciating detail"

Apparently you are a Lesbian, Matt.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


[ Parent ]
my age is showing
Back in the day (the '70's) when I was a young man, lesbians were well known for having to "process" EVERYTHING and make sure it was all spelled out in excruciating detail. It was frequently all too clear, but  boring.

Stereotype? Yes, of course, but one of those stereotypes that would slap you upside the head frequently.

This was also the first time i heard the expression lesbian separatist feminist and politically incorrect. It never occurred to me that something could be.

And that's NOT funny.

:)


you apparently did not know
very many Lesbians, Ben.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

[ Parent ]
you're right...
It just seemed that the majority of the womnen I knew back then in the political campagins I was involved iwth just seemed to be overwhelmingly that way

Damned if I can figure it out
The last lesbian I had a long conversation with (actually many, as she was my grief counselor after the death of my sister) had a 4.0 in college (MBA)- smart, funny, quick-witted and sarcastic, while empathic and extremely good at her job. Never lost track, no matter how much I blathered or tried to avoid a question; helped me TREMENDOUSLY to accept and understand some very bizarre family dynamics as well as my grief.

Whatever the fuck is being implied here is flying right over me noggin.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners

Click here for DADT photobook


What is implied
is by and large gay male misogyny

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

[ Parent ]
Neither Hitch nor Sully have credibility
Hitch the sot, Sully the hypocritical barebacker. Both yellow elephants, members of the 101st Keyboard Brigade of aging warseekers.

and Sullivan is getting a pass
on letting the remark slide.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

[ Parent ]
They sound like a couple of old roosters -
Seriously, how stale is this issue? How can anyone who would consider themselves any kind of intellect still be hashing this out? Just more lame yammering to justify their careers. I think the lesbian comment was the drunk Hitchens making an insiders "that's so gay" joke as a parry to Sullivan. It's all just a game of wits to these stallions of the pen. But then that is typical of the dorks who really have no skin in the game.  

and the entire LGBT community
would be expected to support a protest if Hitchesn HAD said "Don't be so gay."
But since the cheap shot is at Lesbian...even Sullivan can ignore it.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

[ Parent ]
This gay man shares your frustration...
Sullivan certainly should not have let the comment slide as he did.  Now, it is impossible to address in situ and pretty much impossible for him to address it credibly at all.  Anyone can address anything after the fact but the real test is having the backbone and the sensitivity to address things in real time.

My opinion of Hitchens is well known, I think he's a lush and a very tedious bore.  Unfortunately, my opinion of Sullivan isn't much higher, and may actually be lower --  after all the man spent the last 6 or 7 years kissing Bush's tush so to speak.  He's generally a discredit in more ways than I can list.

This is why I almost never watch TV, all the people on it suck.


[ Parent ]
Men like Hitch
are why Ireland won independence..

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

[ Parent ]
and when I say "priviledged gay men"
I mean Sullivan and his crowd...what one authro irreverently termed the "conserva-queers"

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

[ Parent ]
Balkinization of the lgbt community by Lesbian Separatists
This is the beginning of our community's, if there ever was a lgbt community, balkinization!  Stand on your box if you will but you will be hanging alone if we're not hanging together.

Who just now started the name calling.
So you don't think that if Hitch said, "don't be such a gay" vs the "don't be such a lesbian" put down (my editorial I admit) that both the response of Sullivan and the fact this incident was posted at least here, would be different?

Some here named "male priviledge". You brought up your own hangup/concern.  I think the reaction would have been different and it appear that others here think so too.  


[ Parent ]
OK Matt
So we will just deal with whatever kinds off misogynistic nonsense gets thrown at the Lesbians, along with the fact that we make no headway with the LGBT leadership for healthcare initiatives for Lesbians.

But we will remain cohesive because the men know what is best for us. We will be just like good Baptist wives.

I am not a separatist. I am a feminist. I have simply had it with the kind of third class treatment that we are subjected to by elitits from amongst the gay male community.  

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


[ Parent ]
Hmmmmmmmmm
I think Hitch was just three sheets to the wind and was trying to make a joke about Sully's forgetfulness.

However, since Hitchens was impaired, he thought Sullivan was not being forgetful but was instead, dare I say it: "processing." Please follow that link for a more detailed explanation of the term "processing."

--------------------------------


http://www.gracethespot.com


Why does anyone listen to Christopher Hitchens anyway?
OK... the rest of you beat me to the "he's a drunk" comment.  But, he is and it shows.

Why does anyone listen to him anyway?  Has he ever said anything original?  Does he have any unique talent or insight?  Who the hell cares what Hitchens thinks?

I am always surprised that people like Hitchens are repeatedly asked to appear on TV.  

He just needs to go.  Now.  Far, far away.


beacuse he has a british accent.
and, because he is obnoxious, and this give some religionists yet another opportunity to accuse all atheists of being obnoxious haters of religionists.  he's their favorite foil.

Click HERE and sign up: Campaign For Military Partners.

Lurleen on Twitter.


[ Parent ]
Hic
Hitchens is an alcoholic, or so says his wife.  I caught a long interview with him on C-SPAN in which the booze thing was discussed.  I know a bit about that, having been through it all myself.  My feeling is that the man was "in his cups" and not entirely responsible for what he was saying.  

No, no, I am not saying his comment was excused by his having been loaded or hungover (there's not much difference to an alcoholic; you're really just as drunk the day after as the night before insofar as your obnoxious behavior is concerned).  I am only saying that we might have just a wee bit of compassion for the guy.

If you look at the YouTube of the exchange, it is clear that he realizes he has wet his pants almost immediately after he says it.  (No, not literally; I meant, he is embarrassed at the realization of what he's just said.)  He looks contrite and has a small-boy-who's-misbehaved look.  Besides, I gotta give Hitch the benefit of the doubt. He is an atheist, after all.

Against stupidity, even the angels fight in vain. --Schiller


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox