News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


It's DC Emancipation Day! Who Cares About the Slaves in Our Midst?

by: ACLU

Wed Apr 16, 2008 at 12:23:39 PM EDT


( - promoted by pam)

By Vania Laveille, Legislative Counsel at the ACLU Washington Legislative Office.

How is it possible that today, 146 years after President Lincoln signed the District of Columbia Emancipation Act ending chattel slavery in this city, women of color continue to be enslaved in the shadow of the Capitol? Why do the crowds that swell at the feet of the Lincoln Memorial remain silent in the face of degradation occurring just a few miles away?

ACLU :: It's DC Emancipation Day! Who Cares About the Slaves in Our Midst?
Policy makers have ignored for too long Washington, DC's dirty little secret: in the nation's capital, the State Department unwittingly facilitates the trafficking, exploitation and enslavement of poor women of color from around the world. It does so by issuing special nonimmigrant employment visas - more than 3,000 every year - so that ambassadors, foreign diplomats, consular officers, and employees of international organizations like the United Nations and the IMF can bring their nannies and other household workers into the US. Too often, these domestic workers become slaves in the household, unaware of their rights and unable to escape. And their tormentors are shielded by the domestic worker's anonymity and by diplomatic immunity.

It's time for Congress to bring this shameful practice to an end. They must shatter the culture of impunity that has developed within some parts of the diplomatic community and has resulted in the widespread violations of the human rights of domestic workers. As the reauthorization of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act winds its way through Congress, it presents the perfect opportunity for policymakers to put into place laws that make clear the enslavement of domestic workers by diplomats within the US will no longer be tolerated.

And I'm not using the word "enslaved" lightly. Many of these women rise before the sun, seven days a week, and clean, sweep, scrub, wax, cook, serve, wash, iron, mend, fold, and care for children until well after the sun sets. They are paid a pittance - $100 for 4,500 hours of work over 11 months in one Potomac, Maryland case - or nothing at all. They are fed the family's scraps, forced to sleep on a mat on the kitchen floor and denied basic healthcare even when sick or injured. Some of these women are prisoners in their employer's home - their passports are confiscated or they are forbidden from leaving the house. Some are not allowed to practice their faith. Some are beaten, or mentally and sexually abused and are threatened with deportation if they report the abuse or try to escape.

These women came to this country from places like Zimbabwe, Indonesia, Bangladesh and Paraguay in order to provide for themselves and their families and are told, by the State Department, that they will be protected by the law of the United States. Instead, they find themselves exploited and enslaved in places like Gaithersburg, MD, McLean, VA and Washington, DC.

Alone and dependent on their employers, they face barriers of language, education, and culture, isolation in the home, and discrimination based on race and gender and are, thus, particularly vulnerable to abusive employers. In the words of Raziah Begum, who worked for a Bangladeshi diplomat, "They treated me no better than they would treat a stray dog. They tried to take from me my humanity."

Because of their employer's profession, these women are rendered even more defenseless because, in the United States, diplomats are immune from the criminal and civil jurisdiction of our courts. In other words, they cannot be held accountable for their illegal actions

How is it that this deeply troubling practice has continued unaddressed? We can't claim ignorance because, truthfully, this hasn't been such a well-hidden secret. In 1997, The Progressive published an article titled "DC's Indentured Servants." In 2001, Human Rights Watch authored a report, Hidden in the Home, that documented the abuses suffered by domestic workers at the hands of diplomats. In 2004, a report to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights described the vulnerability of migrant domestic workers employed by diplomats and urged the international community to act to protect the rights of these workers. In 2005, two human rights experts participated in a Domestic Workers Human Rights Tribunal to address the situation of domestic workers in the United States.

And, if all that attention wasn't enough to spur some action, most recently, in 2007, a shy, young woman from Tanzania named Zipora Mazengo sat before the late Chairman Tom Lantos of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, members of the committee and a packed hearing room in the Rayburn House Office Building, and recounted her story of abuse and exploitation that lasted almost 4 years until she was able to escape.  

Congress needs no additional information or time to act. The time has come. Advocates have asked for the enactment of reasonable, thoughtful measures that would protect domestic workers and help prevent this type of abuse. Some of these measures include:

  1. better training of consular officials who can inform domestic workers of their rights,

  2. a pamphlet written in multiple languages that explains domestic workers' rights,

  3. a model employment contract with clear terms and conditions to replace the haphazard and rarely-used contract recommended by the State Department,

  4. a follow-up visit with the domestic worker within three months of their arrival in the US and not in the presence of the employer to ensure they are not being victimized,

  5. the development and implementation of an insurance scheme, compensation fund or bond program that ensures domestic workers will receive appropriate compensation when the employer breaches the contract and thereby closes the gap in accountability created by diplomatic immunity.

The legislation that recently passed the House of Representatives, the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Act (HR 3887), is a good beginning. But many key provisions are missing. The Senate bill has yet to be introduced. We urge the Senate to continue the work and to finish the job. It's time to end slavery in Washington, DC. Again.

Tags: (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
HR 3887
Is it better to pressure the Senate to pass HR 3887, even if it is deficient, or should we start anew?

If you want allies, you have to be an ally.

will the Senate put such a bill on the calendar?


[ Parent ]
You ask a good question
A search of the Library of Congress' Thomas website gives this result:
Latest Major Action: 12/5/2007 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

I don't find the Thomas site to be very friendly.  Perhaps the Senate renamed the bill, and I just can't locate it.

If you want allies, you have to be an ally.


[ Parent ]
Not intro'd in the Senate yet.
That's why you can't find it on Thomas. We've been expecting it since October, and hope to see it soon.

/Rachel


[ Parent ]
Still waiting on the Senate
dale - we don't have to make that choice. We've urged the Senate and expect them to improve the House bill. But we haven't seen the final version yet.

NancyP - it's hard to say before having the Senate language.

/Rachel


[ Parent ]
Maybe
If they can pull themselves out of their washington dc hotels or cease to enjoy their washington dc vacation package then they might actually put the bill up for consideration.

[ Parent ]
Can we somehow bump this more....
For whatever reason I immediate assumed from the title and first paragraph that this was about DC citizens not having a vote in Congress (which is a serious problem and not at all related to this piece).  How about something along the line of: no seriously, slaves.... or at best indentured servants.... seriously, WTF?!?

I dunno, I'm probably in a bubble, but I really had no clue about this.  Even though the article was clearly written and means exactly what it says, little 'ol me wasn't able to grasp the concept until a few paragraphs in.  :head slap:

Disgusting.  All of it.


You're right
Washington needs representation.It has always been a travesty to imagine that the country's most politically active citzens aren't represented in congress.

-Tim from Washington dc


[ Parent ]
This is horrible
But typical of an elitist mindset, particularly in the beltway area. Pushing the bill will "inconvieninece" many friends of the powerful.

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox