News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Zogby: Pennsylvania primary within margin of error

by: Pam Spaulding

Sun Apr 20, 2008 at 09:29:27 AM EDT


Not that long ago the Clinton campaign was talking about a 20-point win in Pennsylvania. In fact, most folks figured this state was going to be an easy win for the NY Senator.

Zogby has these stats out, and that lead has frittered away. Margin of error is +/- 4.1%

Pennsylvania

4-18/19

4-17/18

4-16/17

4-15/16

Clinton

46%

47%

47%

45%

Obama

43%

42%

43%

44%

Someone else

3%

3%

2%

3%

Not sure

8%

8%

8%

9%

You pair that with the fact that over 35,000 attended an Obama rally in Philly yesterday, and there has to be a certain level of panic in the Clinton camp. I don't think Obama will pull off a win here, but the fact that the Keystone state is in play at all, given the spin, will leave Team Clinton with a lot of explaining to do. 

Qs of the day

If Clinton only wins by single digits, how will that be spun?

If she wins the popular vote in PA, but the delegate split doesn't close the gap at all, how can that be declared a victory?

If she somehow manages to lose PA, how on earth will her camp explain that away? 

 

Pam Spaulding :: Zogby: Pennsylvania primary within margin of error
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
She will blame
(and not in this order):

1. The media, for constantly polling people. Every time a poll shows her (erroneuosly, of course) dropping a point, it has created a false image that she is losing ground and that false image has caused her to lose more points.

2. Moveon.org, who has intimidated folks at the caucuses and primaries against voting for HRC. Never mind the fact that one has to be a registered resident/voter in that area- no, somehow Moveone.org has managed to infiltrate the caucus/voter system like a rabid travelling pack of wild dogs.

3. Barack Obama. Because if he would just realize that SHE is supposed to be the candidate this time and not him, he would have already have had the good grace to have stand aside. Never mind the fact that he has won 28 to her 14 contests, leads in the popular vote and delegate counts. It's really all his fault.

"It goes on one at a time, it starts when you care to act, it starts when you do it again after they said no, it starts when you say We and know who you mean, and each day you mean one more."


GAH!! She's at it AGAIN!
As one brilliant commenter recently wrote here, if Obama were to suddenly walk across the Potomac, Hillary would start going off on how "Obama Doesn't Swim".

Please let this end SOON....


"It goes on one at a time, it starts when you care to act, it starts when you do it again after they said no, it starts when you say We and know who you mean, and each day you mean one more."


[ Parent ]
LOL
Or she'd complain: Why is he anti-social, why doesn't he take the ferry like everyone else??

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
She ought to blame
her own campaign handlers and her husband. There have been too many fumbles for us to believe any longer in the viability of a CLinton campaign against McCain

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Nail biter in Norristown (PA)
1) If Clinton wins by a few points, I imagine that Clinton won't split that hair and call it a resounding victory from the people of Pennsylvania.

2) The delegate count can't be closed by anything at this point in the campaign, except for death, or a live boy or a dead girl (but Clinton isn't above using any GOP tactic at this point).  

3) If she somehow manages to lose PA, she'll probably explain it away like the other primaries she lost as "It's not important".

The fact that Obama has been able to make such inroads into what was thought to be safe Clinton territory is telling.  Or it should be to the public when they stop and consider that fact.  If they do, that is.


Same Pattern Every Time
I may be wrong, but I don't know of a single state where, once the match-up was Clinton-Obama, Clinton gained on her early leads. Even in states she won handily on Super Tuesday, like California and Massachusetts, Obama was closing the gap at the very end (although not as much as the pollsters predicted). We saw the same pattern in Ohio and Texas, and now we are seeing it in PA.

IMHO, even if she somehow lost PA, and the closeness of recent polls suggest it might be a matter of turnout right now, she would try to stay in the race. I don't think she'll drop until Obama either has more than the needed delegates - both pledged and super - and/or she runs out of cash. His fund-raising has been steady, and they're doing the "million in a minute" thing on-line for Obama tomorrow, while the NYT is reporting that Clinton is struggling to find donors. In this game, money is a big necessity and running out may be the only way she'll accept it's over.  


[ Parent ]
Excellent point!
I'm pretty sure you're right, and it's the kind of pattern blogs have brought up, but the MSM has seemed to ignore.  In state after state where she was way ahead, her lead shrunk, even when Obama wasn't spending so much more than she was, as in PA.  And even the headlines now about PA focus on him trying to knock her out of the race or some such nonsense when the story is, once again, her shrinking lead in a state that was supposed to be a big win for her.

I don't think money will drive her out of the race, however.  She can always lends herself another five million, and surely that would be enough for the upcoming races in smaller states with less expensive media markets, on top of what she's able to squeeze out of her donor pool?

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


[ Parent ]
my prediction
if she wins by less than 6 percentage points, she calls it quits after she loses North Carolina.  

http://www.queersunited.blogspot.com

Clinton won't lose/nor will Obama
Whatever the point spread, she and her camp will claim victory.  Why and how?  Because they will say that Obama outspent them in advertising 3 or 4 to 1 and therefore the fact that he didn't win at all is a triumph.  They will ignore that 1) she should have won this state walking away and 2) she was way ahead in the polls.

Of course, Obama can claim a victory because weeks ago his campaign said that anything under a 10 point victory for Clinton was a loss,  but if it's over ten points they can still say that they fought her hard in a state that by rights should have been hers for a song.

It's kind of like Alice in Wonderland where everyone gest prizes.

I love this country.  So does Reverend Wright, btw, who served in the Marines while Dick Cheney got 5 deferments.  :-)

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


Pennsylvania Primary
Team Clinton will have confetti flowing down from the rafters if she wins by one vote.  At the end of the day, that is her right.

If Obama wins the Pennsylvania primary then Team Clinton will concede the nomination.

The unfortunate thing is that Clinton always gets the late-deciding folks to pull the lever on her behalf.   Obama's bitter comments coming out last week may have stunted his momentum in the state to a point that he can't overcome.

If so, then we go to the next set of contests and Indiana becomes the battleground...

peace, Villager


I don't imagine Clinton dropping out until she has to.


has to,,,AKA the Democratic Converntion.


If I make sense? it was quite by accident.

[ Parent ]
Clinton will not
concede the nomination till they pry it from her cold, dead hands (to borow a phrase from a recently deceased nutjob who almost certainly preferred her to Obama).

I am not interested in picking up crumbs of compassion thrown from the table of someone who considers himself my master. I want the full menu of rights.  -Archbishop Desmond Tutu


She'll say that
It's one of those states that doesn't count.  As a matter of fact the Clinton campaign is moving away from their past practice of listing why each state doesn't count, such as having too high a Black population, or being a caucus state etc.  They have now decided that any state which holds its election on a Tuesday doesn't count.

In fact, her campaign
is suggesting a renicknaming- from "Super Tuesday" to "So What" Tuesday... ;)

"It goes on one at a time, it starts when you care to act, it starts when you do it again after they said no, it starts when you say We and know who you mean, and each day you mean one more."

[ Parent ]
How about--
"Stupid Tuesday"?

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
But seriously (or even Butt Seriously)
It's funny how any campaign can say, Well, we won this state, therefore it means X.

No, you won that state against a Democrat in a primary.  That's all it means.  It doesn't predict squat about the general election.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


[ Parent ]
Here's my prediction:
If Hillary does NOT win the nomination, she will divorce her husband within the next few years.  I think she's been hanging on to him and putting up with his shenanigans all these years primarily because she saw him as her ticket back into the White House.  But since he has proved himself to be nothing but a liability on the campaign trail, his popularity is waning, and his legacy forever scarred, why would she put up with all his baggage anymore?  Their marriage has always seemed to me to be one of mutual political convenience.

Nah.
There's always 2012 or 2016...HRC knows she doesn't have a chance in hell now, but she's hanging as to allow McSame to be a 1 termer. Then she'll come back. Watch and see.

But next time, she'll have Bill off building houses w/Jimmy Carter or some other charitable/time consuming act as to keep him OUT of her way!!

"It goes on one at a time, it starts when you care to act, it starts when you do it again after they said no, it starts when you say We and know who you mean, and each day you mean one more."


[ Parent ]
I think not
Back during impeachment, when I was a huge defender of both Clintons (letters, emails, signing petitions, contributions) I thought it was very naive and moralistic for people to wonder why she didn't leave him. I think they are deeply bound to each other through love, life, politics, epic ups and downs. With that kind of enmeshment,  I can't see either of them wanting out.  They are a team, for better or--as we've seen in this cycle--worse.  I believe he will run for office--maybe Governor of New York. He's certainly young enough not to abandon politics entirely.  

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
One of these things is
not like the other.

This morning's NYTimes headline:
Trailing in Pennsylvania, Obama Sharpens Tone

The lead sentence of that same article as excerpted by GoogleNews (I kept a screen shot):

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, with a dwindling lead in Pennsylvania primary polls, spoke to supporters Sunday at Liberty High School in Bethlehem, Pa.

Clicking through, here's the lead sentence at the Times' website:

READING, Pa. - Senator Barack Obama sharpened his tone against Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on Sunday as the six-week Pennsylvania primary contest raced to a close, with the rivals marshaling extensive resources in a battle for undecided voters and delegates that could determine whether the Democratic nominating fight carries on.


Electricity's for light bulbs!

The GOP's right wing loves her
Vote for Hillary!

She's being boosted by:

Rupert Murdoch

Richard Mellon Scaife

Ed Rollins

Grover Norquist

The National Review

The American Spectator

http://politicalticker.blogs.c...

Who needs anyone else?

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox