|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile
33|175:175
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |
The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Sat Apr 26, 2008 at 14:30:00 PM EDT
|
| (UPDATE: Now you know the Clinton campaign is swirling the drain - loose cannon Bill is now chief strategist. Now that's trouble. Campaign Manager Maggie Williams:"has worked to ensure that Mr. Clinton's role is 'managed' in an attempt to prevent costly remarks." Oh, man.)
Inside the Clinton campaign bubble, they simply cannot see that it's game over no matter what the math looks like. When you have top donors not only switching to Obama but also going on the record about how Clinton is damaging the party, this is a PR nightmare. (WaPo): More than 70 top Clinton donors wrote their first checks to Obama in March, campaign records show. Clinton's lead among superdelegates, a collection of almost 800 party leaders and elected officials, has slipped from 106 in December to 23 now, according to an Associated Press tally. I mentioned in my post yesterday about the interview with House Majority Whip James E. Clyburn (SC) about the effect of the Clinton campaign burning bridges with black voters. With all of the talk about her courting of the blue-collar white vote, there has been little attention to this fact:"We keep talking as if it doesn't matter, it doesn't matter that Obama gets 92 percent of the black vote, because since he only got 35 percent of the white vote, he's in trouble," Clyburn said. "Well, Hillary Clinton only got 8 percent of the black vote. . . . It's almost saying black people don't matter. The only thing that matters is how white people respond. And that's what bothered me. I think I matter." In this primary season we've heard a lot about what doesn't matter -- caucuses, party "activists", the netroots, the delegate count, the popular vote, Southern states -- the list goes on and on. However, since blacks don't matter, are we now going to see that the Democratic donor base doesn't matter either? Will this be what it takes to get the attention of the win at any cost Clinton camp?There are signs that the anger voiced by some African Americans is beginning to extend to the Democratic donor base. Campaign finance records released this week show that a growing number of Clinton's early supporters migrated to Obama in March, after he achieved 11 straight victories. Of those who had previously made maximum contributions to Clinton, 73 wrote their first checks to Obama in March. The reverse was not true: Of those who had made large contributions to Obama last year, none wrote checks to Clinton in March. |
| Pam Spaulding :: 70 top Clinton donors switch to Obama - and go on the record |
"I think she is destroying the Democratic Party," said New York lawyer Daniel Berger, who had backed Clinton with the maximum allowable donation of $2,300. "That there's no way for her to win this election except by destroying [Obama], I just don't like it. So in my own little way, I'm trying to send her a message." What is surprising is that these wealthy donors are going on the record, and not holding back their dissatisfaction with the state of things.
Guerra-Mondragón: "Looking at it as coldly as I can, I just don't see how Senator Clinton can overcome Senator Obama with delegates and popular votes. I want this fight to be over -- the quicker, the better."
New York financier William Louis-Dreyfus: "However much one might have supported the Clintons, or one might support the usual suspects in the Democratic Party, I began to believe Obama represents a new approach. He gives off such a sense of relevance that he's sort of irresistible.
"At the end of the day, all she had to do was open her mouth for me not to believe her." |
|
|
