News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Rev. Wright: 15 minutes of illuminating fame

by: Pam Spaulding

Wed Apr 30, 2008 at 06:00:00 AM EDT


(See Autumn's earlier post on the coverage of Obama's press conference.)

I can't believe the MSM has spent all this air time on a pastor who isn't running for president. Oh, OK, yes I can.  Since Obama "divorced" Wright in the press conference yesterday, my question is whether the bar for the media will move even higher. His former pastor's ego was obviously bruised from the (quite frankly, sensitive) rebuke of his past comments that he received from the presidential hopeful in Obama's A More Perfect Union speech.  

Some of what Wright said at the National Press Club was clarifying and on point:

Maybe this dialogue on race, an honest dialogue that does not engage in denial or superficial platitudes, maybe this dialogue on race can move the people of faith in this country from various stages of alienation and marginalization to the exciting possibility of reconciliation.
Other parts added nothing positive to the dialogue showed a public  unraveling of the id. Wright felt dissed, and took it before the cameras, damaging his own credibility -- and he either doesn't seem to realize it -- or care.

I see clips from the NPC appearance and wonder what's next -- Rev. Wright lobbying for additional 15 minutes of exposure to  "play the dozens" with Barack Obama? I'm sure the media would be down with that too. And that's because they never dig deeper to see what's really beneath the surface.

Pam Spaulding :: Rev. Wright: 15 minutes of illuminating fame
Wright's litany of grievances -- including a perceived attack on the black church, the conspiracy theories about the government and 9/11, or inflicting AIDS on blacks (referencing the Tuskegee experiment) -- reveal a very real thread of beliefs in a segment of the black community of a certain generation who lived under the thumb of Jim Crow and in-your-face bluntly institutionalized white privilege.

Making light of this kind of thinking diminishes the fact that it comes from an element of truth, and that white privilege, though not as boldly naked as in generations past, is alive and well. It also illuminates the lack of black cultural competence in the dominant culture. This is exemplified by those disturbed by Wright's earlier remarks (and delivery) in the first place -- and generated the fear of what I call the Secret Black Radical Trojan Horse Agenda entering the White House through the vessel of the pleasant, benign Barack Obama. You could read between the lines in the commentary -- people were musing, wondering how prevalent is Wright's belief - the bizarre mix of fact and fiction -- in the black community.

This is all crazy making? Not really. Our desperate need to discuss race honestly and openly (and SANELY), is not simply a difficult exercise. Remember, we have people who will not vote for Barack Obama under any circumstances because he is black. No one wants to really discuss those conservative white blue collar workers who fall into this category -- the current demo prized by Senator Clinton. They see a "Rev. Wright eruption" and automatically see the Secret Black Radical Trojan Horse Agenda. In Appalachia, George Packer found people who just laid it on the line (h/t, DHinMI).

After [McCain's] speech, I left the county courthouse and crossed the main street to talk to a small group of demonstrators holding signs next to McCain's campaign bus. J. K. Patrick, a retired state employee from a neighboring county, wore a button on his shirt that said "Hillary: Smart Choice."

"East of Lexington she'll carry seventy per cent of the primary vote," he said. Kentucky votes on May 20. "She could win the general election in Kentucky." I asked about Obama. "Obama couldn't win."

Why not?

"Race," Patrick said matter-of-factly. "I've talked to people-a woman who was chair of county elections last year, she said she wouldn't vote for a black man." Patrick said he wouldn't vote for Obama either.

Why not?

"Race. I really don't want an African-American as President. Race."

What about race?

"I thought about it. I think he would put too many minorities in positions over the white race. That's my opinion.

...Everyone knows that race is a factor in Obama's low vote among older whites, though reporters say that no one will admit it personally. In Eastern Kentucky, people (and not just J. K. Patrick) admit it personally, without hesitation or apology.

There are a whole lot of people who will never fess up. We just don't know how many, and the MSM (and progressive bloggers) seem to have little interest in exploring this.

Why do you think the Republicans and the NC GOP used that trial balloon ad featuring Wright in a six-degrees of separation between him, Obama, and gubernatorial candidates Bev Perdue and Richard Moore? Because the dog-whistle works. And that's why it has to be called out.

***

Does this mean Obama is unelectable? No. What it does mean is that there is a segment of the population, some vocal, some not, who will not be moved because their bias is not challenged in a productive way. Why? Well, because, it's hard work. Addressing this country's problem with race is too much work for many people, because it is so vast. But we are so close - witness Obama's success so far -- he is winning this race despite the implicit and explicit biases out there.

That, friends, is why this race is playing out the way it has -- the conventional wisdom and the political power structure (including the MSM) is being challenged to acknowledge the existence of white privilege within their spheres and the culture at large, and these institutions are just as much in denial as most of the country. I'm not surprised that Rev. Wright's 15 minutes of dreadful, illuminating fame has provided them with comfort food.

Perhaps Barack Obama can put this behind him now.

My last two cents -- all of this mess with Wright (and Hagee) just goes to show you why campaigning with your faith on your sleeve (or in McCain's case, just sucking up to a fundie for votes), is dangerous, mine-laden territory. I don't care who your pastor is -- he or she isn't doing the 3AM wake up call or sending military personnel to die for our country, or appointing the next Supreme Court justice.

Let's get back to the real tasks at hand, since Dear Leader is going to leave us a helluva mess to clean up.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
One wonders how the same people who were so silent
when Crazy Pat was advocating nuking the State Department - and doing so on his television broadcasts are suddenly so all about playing loops of Rev. Wright non-stop on every network.

This just underscores how much the media not only tries to influence the election process in this country, but openly interferes with that process. It is especially heinous on Faux "News" - but at least anyone with a pea brain already expects rampant bias in their reporting and commentary. But when ABC News "creates" the Wright story from their own "special investigation" - drawn originally from their own trolling of right-wing web sites, and then follows it up with "moderating" a "debate" in which they whore their own sensationalized daily "coverage" of the "controversy" by framing questions around it, the American people need to do more than just take note. It is nothing less than abuse of the public airwaves.

The only people I've met who give a rat's ass about Rev. Wright are the con-artist con-servatives who have nothing to run on this year but their typical fear-and-smear - yet the media treats this as an "issue" specifically because the white news anchor decides that the white people should be offended.  


nail on the head, Kevin
The folks sitting in the talking head chairs and at the newsroom computers typing up their screeds about Wright and how far Obama's apology should or shouldn't have gone are just as much a problem as some of Wright's comments for the reasons you stated.

The undercurrent of media reaction during this whole controversy has been about a undefined "discomfort zone" re: cultural blackness that had been crossed and the MSM, along with others who feel similarly, want it shut down pronto by Obama.

That Wright chose to self-immolate at the same time out of ego before the very white privileged media he charged with bias and taking things out of context pretty much indicates his mission was personal.

And then he threw gas on the fire with the additional conspiracy nonsense and set off the media hand-wringing and pontificating again.

Obama in the end did the right thing, and it's clear that for him, the severing of the relationship with Wright -- and with it the positive aspects of it -- was painful for him even as it is necessary on a few levels. It should have been given the circumstances, because Wright's negativity has been something completely absent from Obama's outlook throughout this campaign.

The fact that so many, out of implicit bias, immediately attempt to hold individual blacks for the acts/words of another -- collective blame assignment and responsibility to explain it --  is something the LGBT community should identify with all too well. For Obama, the fact is Wright had a personal connection to him as his former pastor, only ratcheting up the Trojan Horse fear factor. I think Obama was schooled on this to some degree, which is why it took some time for him to digest and respond to what we've seen unfold.

How many times have we seen homophobic legislators/fundies work to pass laws preventing us from access to rights the rest of society takes for granted based on the acts or perceived acts of some small segment or individuals in our community who they can point to as the "other" and demonize? It doesn't make an entire community responsible for defending or refuting that person's choice or statement, but it often has to be done to also mollify the dominant community's fears. That's the part that receives zero analysis.

That's why it takes something monstrously egregious to get the MSM to criticize someone like Pat Robertson or John Hagee -- there is a second undeclared layer of racial discomfort that doesn't exist there, so Crazy Pat can easily be dismissed.

Boy are we messed up on these issues. It's fascinating to see it out there in all its spectacular craptitude, but the media, which holds so much sway, time after time misses the opportunity to actually get to the heart of the matter by avoiding the analysis of the cultural and racial undercurrents involved.


[ Parent ]
...thanks, good thread.

This is a good thread Pam, but I have to agree with doctorscience that the MSM continues to be in copycat mode of bad teenagerhood... and as long as their ratings hold they will never change.   



It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


[ Parent ]
Junior High kids hate truth
America is now a junior high school in terms of maturity and knowledge and thinking. Gays? titter titter giggle giggle. The nation does not want to hear about anything unpleasant.

They don't want to hear what Wright had to say. It's not nice. But much of what he said was truth and issues that should be faced by this country.

Did anyone also remind our junior high nation that freedom of speech is still allowed here?

I had a ray of hope with Obama this year and now I am depressed again because Hill-Billy and the MSM are going to destroy him and pave the way for McStain.


Wright, however, blew it
His ego -- and obvious lack of desire to accept the implicit biases in the MSM how they play out, and his more than easily dismissed conspiratorial comments -- derailed the aspects of his message that could have been heard.

Quite frankly, the Rev. probably didn't care anyway. He's not running for office, is retired from the pulpit, so he doesn't feel the need to put his thoughts through a cultural filter to make them palatable to whites unschooled in this frame of black culture. That's a grave mistake, given how the incendiary aspects of how culture, class and race are left largely undiscussed.

No entity is blameless here.


[ Parent ]
I agree, Pam
The grievances that are a result of the mistreatment of minorities in our country need to be addressed.  However, I believe that Rev Wright did not advance the dialog.  

[ Parent ]
Actual Junior High kids are much better
As the parent of a 12-y.o., you're being unfair to junior high kids.

Real middle-schoolers are desperate for information -- once I pointed my daughter toward snopes.com, she and her friends started surfing it obsessively.

They love debating meaningful issues, like "is it moral to eat meat?" The other day the kid turns around from surfing YouTube and starts lecturing me on racial stereotyping in Disney princess cartoons, and why she prefers the Brandy/Whitney Houston version of "Cinderella". (note: the kid is white.)

No, the MSM is behaving like a "bad parts version" of teenagerhood, in which immaturity, superficiality and ignorance never change.


[ Parent ]
Alas--
You reference Hagee, but so far it hasn't been dangerous.  hagee is loathsome and craze din some of his opinions, and McCain actively sought his endorsement, while Obama did nothing of the sort with Wright.  McCain's disavowal of Hagee's extremesim couldn't have been more cursory and forced, yet the media is not holding his feet tot he fire because he is their golden boy still.

Famed journalist Waletr Lippmans had the media dead to rights as far back as 1920, when it had been co-opted by the government during WW I to issue propaganda.  Everyone should read his essays Liberty and the News where he shows how a mass media bent on enetrtainment and its own objectives easily falls into the hands of the executive branch and the result is a sidelining of the legislative branch and a weakening of democracy.  If that was true before 24/7 news, it's even truer now.

As for Wright, I ams till puzzled by the mix in him of sense and nonsense. In my diary about his Moyers interview, I saw a reasonable, erudite, passionate man who seems different from the man dancing on the edge of extremism in the National press Corps interview.

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/...

He was no immolating himself in the Moyers interview.  So what led to this escalation over the course of the weekend?  Was the Moyers interview Act I of a play?  Did he plan this out?  Was he driven and not completely in command of himself?  He said so much in that interview that made sense--if only that were where he had left it, he would have contributed nobly and wisely to national discussion. (if you haven't seen that interview, the link is inside the link above).  

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


The speech, then the questions
I haven't seen the performance (as Obama called it) only read the transcript--but the speech itself reads quite well, with Wright situating himself within the traditions of the black church and within the UCC social gospel tradition.  I definitely see it as a contribution to the discussion, or a potential one, at least.

Nobody paid any attention to it, of course, including the reporters there, who were simply waiting to ask questions about "the controversy".  Perhaps Wright's ego got the better of him during the Q/A period, but frankly his contempt for the press corps seems perfectly appropriate to me (though, admittedly, neither noble nor wise).

"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain" -- Iowa state motto


[ Parent ]
Wright complained that Moyers edited him.
Wright complained at the press club Q and A that Moyers edited out his controversial statements that he had just made in the Q and A.

Wright is playing to two audiences - the intellectuals who watch an hour-long show that never reaches mainstream consciousness, and the hoi polloi who watch soundbites on network and cable tv. He wants his talented-tenth cred and his street cred. It's pretty clear, and clear to Bob Herbert as well, that It's All About Him. Not "the black church", not his own church, not Obama, but Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

I have a mind to bundle up Rev. Wright and send him to
"clergy meets the press" school taught by the gay Bishop Gene Robinson (a firm but polite guy who can hit it out of the park in interviews, and impress people as faith-filled).


[ Parent ]
You're welcome
Lippmann's work is amazing and deep. He absolutely nails the ways in which media collaboarte with the government to sideline freedom and truth:

http://press.princeton.edu/tit...

And this was in 1920! Reading him is like reading essays of Orwell's that make you see the culture of manipulation so clearly.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


[ Parent ]
Was screwing Obama a "Christian" act on Wright's part?
It seems to me that religious figures of many stripes have a completely ass-backwards view of Christianity and what it's supposed to be about.  The golden rule was no where in evidence in Wright's speeches as he threw Obama under the bus the other day.

The politically convenient thing for Obama to have done would have been to "denounce and reject" his old pastor, but instead he tried to elevate the discussion.  Don't get me started on how I feel about the stupid meme that Obama's speech sucked because it didn't miraculously solve racism.  Had Obama been Bill Clinton, you know he would have castigated Wright and disowned him... the second a camera appeared.  Then the media would have fawned all over him the way they did with Clinton while he was president.

How does Wright reward Obama's loyalty?  By throwing him to the wolves.  What a schmuck.  

Aside from Wright's statement that HIV was specifically engineered as a tool of genocide, none of the things he said initially really seemed all that batshit crazy.  Even that is still technically possible, though I don't think he's right about it.  (On a sidenote, I do think there is some credence to the theory that it was an accidental result of an experimental polio vaccine in the Belgian Congo.)

But this sort of douchebaggery is totally uncalled for.  

"A satirist is a man who discovers unpleasant things about himself and then says them about other people."
-Peter McArthur  


No, HIV engineering was NOT POSSIBLE at the time of its emergence
Trust me, the gov't was not 20 years ahead of Nobel prizewinning scientists and the international scientific community. The scientists at Ft. Detrick biowarfare research center Just. Aren't. That. Bright. And as for targeting by race - no-one knows how to do that NOW by biochemical means. The only government intervention possible is to ignore a developing situation, which it did and does to varying extent.

I have been following molecular biology techniques, and to a little extent, HIV basic research, for 27 years, since the initial MMWR article in 1981.


[ Parent ]
in the Pandagon thread
I said this, when asked why someone like Dr Wright would be trying to sabotage the Obama candidacy --

Obama's candidacy, with its approach to moving beyond the traditional dialogue (that includes framing within the comfort zone of wary whites), in Wright's mind represents a a cop out, a suspicion of sleeping-with-the enemy that will undermine those blacks without a voice.

Obama knows that in order to succeed, he will piss off both the (conscious and unaware) guardians of white privilege, as well as a segment of the black community still playing out the past traumas of the civil rights movement in today's framework. Thus the early arguments over whether he was "black enough". Now he has to deal with whites aroused by Wright, questioning whether Obama is culturally white enough and not an Angry Black Man. Witness the cover of the NY Daily News today.

That he has done so well in spite of such a narrow cultural and racial band within which to operate in our country says a lot about the man.  


The angry black man the media is trying to make a reality
The New York Daily News today:



[ Parent ]
The News is The News
I grew up in NY and TDN has always been trashy and sensationalistic.  It's what you'd expect. Riding the subways I always felt assaulted by its headlines, which aim to club you over the head. I did not, however, hear that kind of characterization in sampling pundit opinion last night on TV.

But let's focus on the real news. The Congressional Quarterly's rundown of Senate races lists 18 GOP seats as "competitive."  18!!!

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmsp...

I'm not singing "Ding dong the Witch is Dead" just yet, but I'm getting my dance steps ready.

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


[ Parent ]
...and I can't wait.
To see it... ?on YouTube?.

It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


[ Parent ]
America the Beautiful
Pam, thanks for writing this.  It's nice to hear sane things in an insane season of politics.

It's impossible, of course, for Obama to win a campaign by saying, "Hey, everybody, I'm mostly hear to remind you, let's not forget what is ugly in America".  What he can do, however, is inspire people to change their hearts and to seek a new dawn together.

Of course, Wright doesn't have to seek office, so he can traffic in truths and demand a truth-telling, which is the role of a "prophet", afterall, that he may see as a first step in a reconciliation process that he seems also to believe includes "apology".  

Unfortunately, he is not skilled with the press and, because of the media already have him in their sights, so he cannot be the one to bring the message any longer (that's the pill, after forty years of practice and learning that he probably couldn't swallow, rather than just his big "ego" at work - I've never seen anyone else who, after a lifetime, could just 'turn themselves off' - even Bill Clinton lost his political discipline and ultimately got goaded into saying those words that will forever define his weakest hour, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman").  

Anyway, even if you don't believe in formal healing or rapprochement via formal apology (even reparations). all you have to do is read the vile history-of-Amnesia from powerful (far-reaching), white commentators, like Victor Davis Hanson to easily decide where to put your sympathies in the matter, if one had to choose an emphasis.


Pam and the commenters here
have prevented my head from exploding on more times than I can count this political season...  

"It goes on one at a time, it starts when you care to act, it starts when you do it again after they said no, it starts when you say We and know who you mean, and each day you mean one more."

[ Parent ]
I'm tired of the outrage game
It only works in one direction, while right-wing shit disturbers get syndicated columns and teevee jobs.

Let's talk about what Wright actually said.  A Times editorial today accuses him of "embracing the anti-Semitism of Louis Farrakhan".  Here's what was said:

MODERATOR: What is your relationship with Louis Farrakhan? Do you agree with and respect his views, including his most racially divisive views?

WRIGHT: As I said on the Bill Moyers' show, one of our news channels keeps playing a news clip from 20 years ago when Louis said 20 years ago that Zionism, not Judaism, was a gutter religion.

And he was talking about the same thing United Nations resolutions say, the same thing now that President Carter is being vilified for, and Bishop Tutu is being vilified for. And everybody wants to paint me as if I'm anti-Semitic because of what Louis Farrakhan said 20 years ago.

I believe that people of all faiths have to work together in this country if we're going to build a future for our children, whether those people are - just as Michelle and Barack don't agree on everything, Raymond (ph) and I don't agree on everything, Louis and I don't agree on everything, most of you all don't agree - you get two people in the same room, you've got three opinions.

So what I think about him, as I've said on Bill Moyers and it got edited out, how many other African-Americans or European-Americans do you know that can get one million people together on the mall? He is one of the most important voices in the 20th and 21st century. That's what I think about him.

I've said, as I said on Bill Moyers, when Louis Farrakhan speaks, it's like E.F. Hutton speaks, all black America listens. Whether they agree with him or not, they listen.

Now, I am not going to put down Louis Farrakhan anymore than Mandela would put down Fidel Castro. Do you remember that Ted Koppel show, where Ted wanted Mandela to put down Castro because Castro was our enemy? And he said, "You don't tell me who my enemies are. You don't tell me who my friends are."

Louis Farrakhan is not my enemy. He did not put me in chains. He did not put me in slavery. And he didn't make me this color.

I certainly don't see Wright embracing anti-Semitism here, and I think it's horrible he would be accused of doing so.  Do people disagree?  Am I missing something?

Here's what he had to say about Israel specifically:

MODERATOR: You have likened Israeli policies to apartheid and its treatment of Palestinians with Native Americans. Can you explain your views on Israel?

WRIGHT: Where did I liken them to that? Whoever wrote the question, tell me where I likened them.

Jimmy Carter called it apartheid. Jeremiah Wright didn't liken anything to anything. My position on Israel is that Israel has a right to exist, that Israelis have a right to exist, as I said, reconciled one to another.

Have you read the Link? Do you read the Link, Americans for Middle Eastern Understanding, where Palestinians and Israelis need to sit down and talk to each other and work out a solution where their children can grow in a world together, and not be talking about killing each other, that that is not God's will?

My position is that the Israel and the people of Israel be the people of God who are worrying about reconciliation and who are trying to do what God wants for God's people, which is reconciliation.



"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain" -- Iowa state motto

Oh, subtle
I believe that people of all faiths have to work together in this country if we're going to build a future for our children, whether those people are - just as Michelle and Barack don't agree on everything, Raymond (ph) and I don't agree on everything, Louis and I don't agree on everything, most of you all don't agree - you get two people in the same room, you've got three opinions.

He's riffing on an old Jewish joke: Two Jews, three opinions. I wonder if anyone there caught that.


[ Parent ]
Is Wright "racist"?
That one is heard quite often.  I don't see it.
MODERATOR: Well, OK, we'll give you a church question. Please explain how the black church and the white church can reconcile.

WRIGHT: Well, there are many white churches and white persons who are members of churches and clergy and denominations who have already taken great steps in terms of reconciliation.

In the underground railroad, it was the white church that played the largest role in getting Africans out of slavery. In setting up almost all 40 of the HBCUs, it was the white church that sent missionaries into the south.

As I mentioned in my presentation, our denomination all by itself set up over 500 of those schools. You know them today as Howard University, Fisk, LeMoyne-Owen, Tougaloo, Dillard University, Howard University.

So they've done - Morehouse, Morehouse. Don't forget Moorhouse, Spelman - that white Christians have been trying for a long time to reconcile, that for other white Christians to understand that we must be reconciled is to understand the injustice that was done to a people, as we raped the continent, brought those people here, built our country, and then defined them as less than human.

And more Christians, more of us working together, not just white Christians, but whites and blacks of every faith, ecumenically working together.

Father Flagger (ph), by the way, he might be one of the one -

(APPLAUSE)

- models out what it means to be reconciled as brothers and sisters in Christ and brothers and sisters made in the image of God.

Or this:
MODERATOR: In your understanding of Christianity, does God love the white racists in the same way he loves the oppressed black American?

WRIGHT: John 3:16, Jesus said it much better than I could ever say it, "for God so loved the world." World is white, black, Iraqi, Darfurian, Sudanese, Zulu, Coschia (ph). God loves all of God's children, because all of God's children are made in God's image.



"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain" -- Iowa state motto

Unfortunately tone is more important than words
and his words could have been different too.

"Farrakhan, whatever his opinions in the past, has been an effective deliverer of social services and rehabilitator of black men needing to escape from drugs, crime, or just plain hopelessness. The NOI has helped many black families, and despite our religious differences, I respect Farrakhan for his good works."


[ Parent ]
Could have been
But if our entire national politics is revolving around which of, when, why, and how strongly our presidential candidates loathe the untouchable and radioactive Jeremiah Wright, one might expect there to be some underlying substance.

And there really isn't.  I'm very very tired of being told what and who "all Americans" must "rightly condemn", whether it's by Bill O'Reilly, or by Obama, or by the New York Times.

"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain" -- Iowa state motto


[ Parent ]
Wright's speech and after
I read the full text of his speech and there was absolutely nothing objectionable about it. He was clear, erudite, passionate (though the "different" theme was weakly handled  by such a gifted speaker).

You know what shocked me? The abject STUPIDITY of the questions that were as bad as George Stephanopoulos and Charlie Gibson abdgering Clinton and Obama.  They were utterly witless and I suspect they pushed him over the edge (though that may not have been a long trip for Wright).

It felt like bear baiting to me.  

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report


[ Parent ]
Wright is Right

I'm Appalachian, and I've heard more truth in a few minutes with Rev. Wright's words than with any candidate in any recent election.  I've also heard white Appalachian Christians respond favorably to Wright.  Our candidates deliver far more lies and half-truths... and never touch the truths of pernicious economic exploitation that Rev. Wright proclaims clearly and fearlessly.

It's absurd to say that this man merely seeks 15 minutes of fame when we're talking about contrasting him with the universal sociopathy of American political candidates.  I'm voting for Obama because Clinton and McCain are known commodities ... I trust each of them exactly as much as Bush.


His power
A Colombian neighbor told me yesterday that though she wasn't used to his kind of preaching, when she visited his church at her daughter's behest, she found him powerful and convincing, truly prophetic.  

"In order to maintain an untenable position, you have to be actively ignorant."  The Colbert Report

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox