News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Right Wing Watch video list of notable quotables.

by: Emproph

Fri May 02, 2008 at 12:59:33 PM EDT


( - promoted by pam)

Right Wing Watch (A Project of People For the American Way) has put together a video list of sound bites from a recent Coral Ridge Ministries broadcast, whose panelists consisted of:

Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council
Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel
Jordan Lorence of the Alliance Defense Fund
Gary DeMar of American Vision

Here's the video (and ps, check out the bug eye shot at the 16 second mark, especially visible in the YouTube HQ version):

Religious Right Tells Pastors Christianity Being Suppressed

And the delicious transcript:

Emproph :: Right Wing Watch video list of notable quotables.
Host: There is a phenomenon today of sexual politics. Abortion is a symptom of sexual politics, the militant homosexual agenda is a symptom of sexual politics. It has been said that sexual politics is on a collision course with religious liberty. And that whenever sexual politics, or religious liberty, are fighting against each other, it seems like sexual politics always trumps religious liberty.

Mat Staver: There is this attempt to suppress Christian viewpoints, and I think the right of conscience of Christians, is a critical battle that we're facing.

Jordan Lorence: This is not some, like, side issue, the right-wing agenda side issue, or something like that. But now what is happening is, is we're getting cases, where if people speak out against, and say this is God's standard on marriage and sexual morality [Host: Thirty seconds], they're being silenced, by hate crime legislation, by anti-discrimination law.

Mat Staver: What I hear from some of these individuals is that if you have a religious, but particularly a Christian view, you're not welcome, it's a second class citizen, and they want to suppress that. And following up on what Jordan was saying, the agenda that he was talking about in terms of the sexual politics, the homosexual agenda - is not about tolerance, it's about absolute dominance of that worldview against any other worldview, particularly Christian, that says people have morality, and marriage is between a man and woman. That's what the clash is, is to dominate that worldview.

Tony Perkins: And the idea that there should be no religious test that would preclude people who have a certain religious denomination affiliation, from serving in government, that has been turned on it's head [Host: Yes, yes.] to say that if you have a particular faith or denomination, in which you actually believe it, and you apply it to your lives, therefore, if that's the case, you can't serve in government. You have to somehow choose between actually believing what you believe, and serving in government. That's how this is being applied today and it is totally wrong, and we're losing the Christian foundation of our nation---if you want to see a totalitarian government, you want to see rights that are lost, and freedoms abused, then you lose the Christian heritage of this nation, and you go down the path that the liberals are taking us, and that's where it'll be found.

Mat Staver: In every totalitarian regime in world history, one of the first things it always sought to do was to suppress Christianity. That's what happened in the former Soviet Union.

Gary DeMar: You go back to Nazi Germany, Martin Niemoller, a pastor in Germany, the Gestapo went into his church, stenographers took down what he had to say, and used that against him, and he ended up spending time in a concentration camp.

Tony Perkins: You will see that multiplied immensely if the congress is successful in passing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and the Hate Crimes legislation. I mean, it'll be discrimination on steroids - as they come after churches who refuse to hire homosexuals in their church office, in their schools, in their day-cares, or Christian business. And what it gives the radical homosexuals, those who are pushing this agenda, not all the homosexuals are out there trying to shove this down peoples throats. [Host: That's why I like to always use the phrase militant homosexuals.] It is that group that will use this will the leverage of the hammer of the state, through the EEOC, to beat up on, beat into submission, businesses and churches, simply because of the intimidation and the cost factor associated with defending themselves.

Jordan Lorence: And to me, one of the most irritating things I find, is that guys like Mat Staver, and Jay Sekulow, and us, really have-are not committed to personal liberty. And that what we do is sort of this means to the end, and then once we take over, we're going to impose this Taliban type rule and make everybody slap on [Host: The armband.], you know, uh, stars of David, I think that's what he meant, not armbands, I think they wore stars of David. And I would say, you look at the cases that Liberty Counsel is doing, and the Alliance Defense Fund, and the American Center for Law and Justice, and there is more of a commitment to traditional American civil liberties, than the ACLU and the homosexual activists, who are into coercing unwilling people to do things, and to silence them, and all of that. There is an authoritarianism to that, that they are in total denial about, and they masquerade it, and then say that we're the fascists, and I just find that very offensive, and totally inaccurate.


~~~~

Just like the thief who thinks everyone is stealing from them...
Just like the liar who thinks everyone is lying to them...
Jordan Lorence of the Alliance Defense Fund thinks...
the ACLU and the homosexual activists, who are into coercing unwilling people to do things, and to silence them, and all of that. There is an authoritarianism to that, that they are in total denial about

Ever heard of projection, Jordan? You may want to look it up.
~~~~

Mat Staver: In every totalitarian regime in world history, one of the first things it always sought to do was to suppress Christianity.

World history, a scant 2000 years old. Photobucket
~~~~

And finally (at least as far as I'm running with this), FRC's Tony Perkins:
Tony Perkins: And what it gives the radical homosexuals, those who are pushing this agenda, not all the homosexuals are out there trying to shove this down peoples throats...

Host: That's why I like to always use the phrase "militant homosexuals."

Once again, let's get this code-speak straight:

If you are gay, and believe you deserve "equal" protection under the law, you are automatically a "homosexual activist." Because just by merely being alive, you automatically "actively," seek protection.

If you are gay and are actively working toward equal protection for all gays, then you are a "militant homosexual activist."

If you are gay and not "trying to shove this down peoples throats," then you are in the closet.

And once again, no, you B's and T's are not included in the discussion (and I'd bet my house that when they're talking about "homosexuals," they're only talking about we G's. So unfortunately, you monogamous L's don't count either.).

But there's always tomorrow... ;)
___
(cross posted @ genocide for Jesus)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
It is always you Sodomites
that they are obsessed with...

Seriously, what disturbs me about their views is their obsession that opposition to enacting their religious laws into civil and criminal law in a secular republic is somehow oppressing them.

I am married; I am a Lesbian in New York. Just how does that oppress married fundamentalist straights in New York other than denying them the legal right to deny me legal equality?

I tell you Chica that no greater abomination exists than women denying their spirit of sisterhood and instead becoming the oppressor. -Rebeca, Universidad Complutense de Madrid


Militant-Christians
  Aww you poor things, I am so sorry you are offended being called fascists.  How about Militant-Christians?  I know from the Peter you guys don't like the American-Taliban.  

 I can't just call you Christians because I have many friends that are Christians that don't feel the same way towards LGBT people as you folks.

 

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.


Bizarro world?
Mat Staver: There is this attempt to suppress Christian viewpoints, and I think the right of conscience of Christians, is a critical battle that we're facing.

Staver's jump upset because he couldn't suppress the viewpoints of the GLBT.  Waaah!

Jordan Lorence: This is not some, like, side issue, the right-wing agenda side issue, or something like that. But now what is happening is, is we're getting cases, where if people speak out against, and say this is God's standard on marriage and sexual morality [Host: Thirty seconds], they're being silenced, by hate crime legislation, by anti-discrimination law.

Mr. Lorence got it wrong.  It's those who provoke actions towards the LGBT that would violate the hate crime legislation.  Also, it's not what they say that is against the anti-discrimination laws.  It's their actions (like firing people who are different from the job).

Mat Staver: What I hear from some of these individuals is that if you have a religious, but particularly a Christian view, you're not welcome, it's a second class citizen, and they want to suppress that. And following up on what Jordan was saying, the agenda that he was talking about in terms of the sexual politics, the homosexual agenda - is not about tolerance, it's about absolute dominance of that worldview against any other worldview, particularly Christian, that says people have morality, and marriage is between a man and woman. That's what the clash is, is to dominate that worldview.

1. This from a jagoff who wants the GLBT to be suppressed into second-class citizens.

2. Actually, it is about tolerance.  It's the extremist religions like whatever these jagoffs practice.  They are the ones trying to establish a dominant worldview.

Tony Perkins: And the idea that there should be no religious test that would preclude people who have a certain religious denomination affiliation, from serving in government, that has been turned on it's head [Host: Yes, yes.] to say that if you have a particular faith or denomination, in which you actually believe it, and you apply it to your lives, therefore, if that's the case, you can't serve in government. You have to somehow choose between actually believing what you believe, and serving in government. That's how this is being applied today and it is totally wrong, and we're losing the Christian foundation of our nation---if you want to see a totalitarian government, you want to see rights that are lost, and freedoms abused, then you lose the Christian heritage of this nation, and you go down the path that the liberals are taking us, and that's where it'll be found.

1. Thank God for the seperation of church and state.  The reason why we don't have stupid religious tests is so that the religious fundies wouldn't spread their elitism into the government and have those who are not like them in.  The closest thing to Tony Perkin's ideal government is Iran.

2. What "Christian" heritage?  Even though some of the Founding Fathers were Christian, that doesn't mean that this is a "Christian" nation.  Also, Perkins whined about people losing rights and have their freedom abused, but doesn't mind doing that to the LGBT.

Mat Staver: In every totalitarian regime in world history, one of the first things it always sought to do was to suppress Christianity. That's what happened in the former Soviet Union.

Gary DeMar: You go back to Nazi Germany, Martin Niemoller, a pastor in Germany, the Gestapo went into his church, stenographers took down what he had to say, and used that against him, and he ended up spending time in a concentration camp.

Remember that the Soviets (especially under Stalin) suppressed the GLBT, and the Nazis sent them to concentration camps.  Unfortunately, these fundies failed to notice that and instead believe what Scott Lively wrote in his book of ignorance.

Tony Perkins: You will see that multiplied immensely if the congress is successful in passing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and the Hate Crimes legislation. I mean, it'll be discrimination on steroids - as they come after churches who refuse to hire homosexuals in their church office, in their schools, in their day-cares, or Christian business. And what it gives the radical homosexuals, those who are pushing this agenda, not all the homosexuals are out there trying to shove this down peoples throats. [Host: That's why I like to always use the phrase militant homosexuals.] It is that group that will use this will the leverage of the hammer of the state, through the EEOC, to beat up on, beat into submission, businesses and churches, simply because of the intimidation and the cost factor associated with defending themselves.

1. Mr. Perkins is exaggerating.  No church would hire homosexuals (unless it's gay-affirming).  And no homosexual would work for a fundies (unless that 'mo is in "the closet"...is Pat Crouch one of them?).

2. It's the fundies who are pushing their militant agenda down the throats of the GLBT.  They're the ones who attend pride (assuming that they want the GLBT agenda down their throats) with megaphones.

Jordan Lorence: And to me, one of the most irritating things I find, is that guys like Mat Staver, and Jay Sekulow, and us, really have-are not committed to personal liberty. And that what we do is sort of this means to the end, and then once we take over, we're going to impose this Taliban type rule and make everybody slap on [Host: The armband.], you know, uh, stars of David, I think that's what he meant, not armbands, I think they wore stars of David. And I would say, you look at the cases that Liberty Counsel is doing, and the Alliance Defense Fund, and the American Center for Law and Justice, and there is more of a commitment to traditional American civil liberties, than the ACLU and the homosexual activists, who are into coercing unwilling people to do things, and to silence them, and all of that. There is an authoritarianism to that, that they are in total denial about, and they masquerade it, and then say that we're the fascists, and I just find that very offensive, and totally inaccurate.

Au contrere, "J-Lo".  It's the fundies who are in denial, masquerading it as "love", and of course their the frigging fascists.  Also, you jagoffs are the ones who are very inaccurate...when it comes to creationism/science, what Paul Cameron said about gays, Bible verses, American history.etc.  And your beliefs I find very offensive.


Thanks Blood!
I couldn't have said it any better myself.  You covered most of the things I was thinking.

". . .and then once we take over, we're going to impose this Taliban type rule . . ."

Well, at least J Lo got that part right.

"And I would say, you look at the cases that Liberty Counsel is doing, and the Alliance Defense Fund, and the American Center for Law and Justice, and there is more of a commitment to traditional American civil liberties, than the ACLU . . ."

And this part wrong.  It's also very laughable.  They're all for "traditional American civil liberties" as long as they apply to fundie Christians only.

". . .and then say that we're the fascists, and I just find that very offensive, and totally inaccurate."

Let me break out my violin.  You know what they say J. Lo, if the shoe fits . . .wear it!

"You will see that multiplied immensely if the congress is successful in passing the Employment Non-Discrimination Act, and the Hate Crimes legislation. I mean, it'll be discrimination on steroids - as they come after churches who refuse to hire homosexuals in their church office, in their schools, in their day-cares, or Christian business."

Perkins being his usual ridiculous self.

". . .to say that if you have a particular faith or denomination, in which you actually believe it, and you apply it to your lives, therefore, if that's the case, you can't serve in government."

The problem we have Tony is that you and your ilk want to apply YOUR faith to EVERYONE ELSE'S lives and we believe that that is very UNamerican.


[ Parent ]
Ah yes, the 2000 year world history
I also love this one. It's so cute a fallacy.

One would think, the way Xtians talk, that transgenderism was created in the 1970's...

"It goes on one at a time, it starts when you care to act, it starts when you do it again after they said no, it starts when you say We and know who you mean, and each day you mean one more."


Wow--
It must be so uncomfortable living with such a stunted, cramped little mindset--the rationlizing must be exhausting, too.

What is so difficult about understanding that because a particular group of people would like to have the same rights as those that they live among, it does not mean they are suppressing those neighbors. I don't push my my spirituality or my sexual orientation on anyone else--and all I want in return is to not have your view of Christianity pushed on me. It's pretty simple.

"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move."

Douglas Adams - 'The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy'  


more than annoying
How DARE these knuckle dragging bible thumping morons like Tony Perkins compare ONE pastor harrassed under NAZI Germany to the hundreds of thousands of gays killed in both slave labor CAMPS and concentration CAMPS. Guess these dimwits didn't get the memo that Germany's population is 50/50 Protestants and Catholic, and all those nice Christians willingly strapped on their brown shirts and arm bands, and caused unspeakable atrocities against mentally and physically challenged citizens, gypsies, Jews, Jehovah Witnesses, communists,and gays, and dozens of other catagories of humans.
Tony Perkins makes me SO GRATEFUL I was born completely different than he was.

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


panelists including Tony Perkins
name 4 good reasons for birth control

What have you done today, to make ya feel PROUD?


~Heather Small


Oh those poor, poor men.....
How sad. They are so marginalized and suppressed. We MUST stop treating white, Christian men like second class citizens. Someone start a fundraiser........ quick!  

Liberty Counsel's Matt Staver
(based out of Florida I believe) argued against marriage equality in the early March oral arguments to the California Surpreme Court.

...and he didn't
Do a very good job of it either. Actually, helped our side I think, especially when questioned by the judges.

It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


[ Parent ]
I caught the tail end of the arguments, joyfully in time for this:
JUDGE: But you're not suggesting that the 32 percent of lesbian couples mentioned in that survey of a few years ago are per se, unfit parents?

MAT STAVER: No, no we're not, we're not saying that at all, it's not part of our argument. But we are saying that the state has a compelling interest in -- what happens differently in opposite sex relations vs. same sex relations, is the offspring of children. That is inevitably a difference that no matter whether we have artificial or reproductive assistance, we can't get around. The state has a compelling interest to be able to channel that into responsible procreation, to channel that into having these children protected in a way that, same sex relations would not produce. Same sex relations will not accidentally, unintentionally, in an unplanned fashion, produce children. But opposite sex relations, does have that as an incident of the natural relationship between a man and a woman.


Good As You has all the audio clips:
Audio: West Coast oral

[ Parent ]
haha
Tony Perkins is definitely the hottest of the anti-gays.

WE know what you mean when you're talkin' about gays shoving things down throats, Tony, WE get it.

otherwise, blah blah blah.

Same old, same old...

http://breakthterror.blogspot.com


These are some great posts...

   and I mean to the points, Blood and others. I find it hard to understand how

You have to somehow choose between actually believing what you believe, and serving in government. That's how this is being applied today and it is totally wrong

  these nitwits don't understand that we don't want their religions shoved down our throats. We're just trying to keep freedom ringing in this country by expressing our rights to equality, that for a nation to remain free is to keep these schisms out of our government and dictate government with the founding fathers intent. Freedom of religion is also freedom from religion. Thank George and others for separation of church and state!

  If one can't serve in government without preaching, and can't serve in government without attempting subversion of our rights, then one should not serve in government. Go back to the pulpit, to people who want to listen to you or if they don't, go home and shut up. Quit attempting subversion on equal rights for all. What is good for people is good for those professing christians too, so what's their agenda? Control and subversion of my free country.

No government in my bedroom window please.

  If I want to go to church, I'll go when I want to go and where I want to go and I don't want anybody dictating their beliefs into law in this country. That's one reason  many people come to this country, to get the hell away from personal religions and political beliefs of those in power in other countrys, they lack the freedom we have here. Here, they can do as they choose, unlike many places in the world. Right now the most important issue for American freedom is ENDA and we must continue to fight for our country with tenacity.  

I'd rather be a lion for one day, than a sheep for my entire life.


They know we don't want their religion...
...and they believe that the only way we will be saved is haveing their religion shoved down our throats.  They know what is best for us.  They are trying to save us from ourselves don't ya know.

 I with you, if I want to go to a church or what ever, It will be my choice.  

 I thought religion was supposed to be uplifting.  Listening to these idiots, I don't find anything they say uplifting but completely depressing.

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.


[ Parent ]
Being Bisexual
It sucks to be ignored in day to day things, but in a really long hate speech! That's just rude, I would prefer to be hated, than the subject of indifference.

If they truly understood bisexuality, they'd have to turn to their married ex-gays and ask: "Did you really get rid of all your homosexual desires?"

Rage!


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox