News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


McCain meets (in private) with Log Cabin Republicans

by: Pam Spaulding

Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 21:45:00 PM EDT


UPDATE: The Freeper reaction to the hush-hush meeting is below the fold.

In a get-together not on McSame's public schedule, he met with members of the Log Cabin Republicans. Gee, why wasn't this a big public event -- you know, to help educate the rest of the LGBT community about John McCain being down with the homos, that he's "unashamed, unembarrassed and proud" to associate with the pro-marriage equality gay organization?  Gay Patriot received confirmation from LCR head Patrick Sammon:

A source with close ties to the Log Cabin Board of Directors provided information about the meeting to GayPatriot earlier this week.  This source disclosed that the Log Cabin meeting was not reflected on Senator McCain's published schedule in advance and the meeting.  A second source familiar with the Log Cabin-McCain meeting reports that Senator McCain has routine personal meetings that are not shown on the Senator's public schedule.

...Log Cabin President Patrick Sammon confirmed the meeting with Senator McCain in email correspondence with GayPatriot earlier today:

"We've had a series of productive meetings with the campaign since Sen. McCain won the nomination-including a recent meeting with the Senator.  We expect to have more conversations with the campaign as we head toward November." - Patrick Sammon, Log Cabin Republicans President - June 25, 2008
Is this what we call -- ahem -- back-door diplomacy? There's no mention of the meeting on the Log Cabin web site or its blog. Wouldn't this be news his campaign wants to break as part of his outreach to the LGBT community?

Besides, it's not like McCain's going to get Dobson's vote this time around -- if it's truly a big GOP tent in 2008, this should be nice news to promote in the MSM.  I'm looking forward to reading the McCain press release on this glorious event, particularly given the news today about Arizona's Senate rejecting a marriage amendment proposal he supported.

Pam Spaulding :: McCain meets (in private) with Log Cabin Republicans
Before we get too smug, a reminder -- Hillary Clinton did the same thing last year, meeting with the HRC, even giving a speech and didn't bother to make any mention of it on her web site, blog or post video on her YouTube page. She was asked twice about why her meeting was not mentioned at all and the response was "You'll have to ask my campaign." So the whole triangulation problem is not solely a GOP problem.

NOTE: And on the flip side -- an event not behind closed doors --  a media advisory from the the Democratic National Committee:

Michelle Obama will keynote the Democratic National Committee's June 26th Gay and Lesbian Leadership Council (GLLC) Gala at the Waldorf Astoria in New York City. Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, New York First Lady Michelle Paterson, and Providence Mayor and President of the National Conference of Democratic Mayors David Cicilline are among the other speakers at the dinner.
And here is the Freeper response to McCain's hush-hush LCR meeting...

Actual Freeper Quotes

McLame is shaking down fools for campaign cash since he's getting the big zero from the grass roots. Cash n Kerry Juan McAmnesty.

Good for McCain. Homosexuality is wrong. However, all people are equally love by Christ. Love the sinner and hate the sin.

What BS is he telling them. What fools conservatives are to ever allow these POS to become leaders of this ONCE great nation.

Pretty transparent attempt to keep the LCRs from voting for Obama, and perhaps bring middle-of-the-road Democrats across the line (the ones who are okay with gay rights but not okay with Obama's socialism). Whether this is a winning plan is a whole different question.

Gotta give him credit for trying.

"Or is there no game at all and he's simply acting out of decency towards a GOP constituency?"

I think McCain is acting out of decency. The LCR's are admirable in that they put national security and freedom over their personal issues. I am glad McCain is reaching out here.

Frankly, I have no trouble with this. I don't care what two consenting adults do in their bedroom. My problem is with the leftist anti-family "homosexual agenda." And the Log Cabin Republicans by and large oppose that agenda, too.

I agree with you and applaud you for being brave and standing above the crowd....it's not for us to judge and I also applaud McCain on this...

I live in a neighborhood with a huge gay popoulation. I Don't agree with lifestyle but there are many I speak with who are republicans and a few who are dems who can't vote for Obama and voting McCain. there are also gays I have talked with who also don't agree with the recent marriage decision here in Calif. Also know several who are gay and in the military.

Appeasement never wins. These perverts offer nothing to the GOP or McCain. Just one more click on the path to my non-vote in this election.

If the alternative were Clinton (either), Kerry, Gore, or even Carter, then I'd sit this one out. We would survive them. Problem is the alternative is Obama, the dims answer to Chavez and Imadinnerjacket. Bad as McCain is, we CANNOT let that happen.

is that meeting with the LCRs could actually cost him votes among the most strident members of a social conservative base that's not real keen on him to begin with and even less so after he dumped Hagee and Parsley. The associations with the Log Cabin Republicans or his disassociation with Parley and Hagee mean little if anything to me. He lost my vote because of his associations within the snakepit of treachery known as the United States Senate. He sleeps with Teddy Kennedy as in McCain-Kennedy.

Believe in redemption. Hate the sin, not the sinner. Whether you believe it or not, Christ loves these people(gays) as much as he loves you. Reaching out to them is extremely Christ-like. Check who Christ spent his time with.

Wow, McCain is doing his best to make it very difficult for any Conservative to vote for him. First he meets with La Raza, now he meets with the Log Cabin Republicans(perverts). Please tell me why I should vote for the lesser of two evils.

I most certainly do believe in the powers of redemption and pray that practicing homosexuals come to the realization of their sins against God and nature. Catering to the unrepentant homosexual agenda by politicians, such as McCain in this instance, does nothing but embolden them in their quest for recognition and legitimacy. Neither is deserved. By the way, this group doesn't merely wish to "be left alone in their bedrooms." Read up on them and then come back and let us know what you find in terms of their agenda.

At least he refuses to meet with Evangelical Christian conservatives.

I know gays I like and some I don't like so much. I think it's not for me to judge their soul if they live their lives decently like most the rest of us.

In 2004, the candidates on the ballot in region of the U.S. were George W. Bush for President, Alan Keyes for U.S. Senate, and Ray Wardingley for U.S. Congress. Our Log Cabin "Republicans" in Illinois supported Kerry over Bush, Obama over Keyes, and Bobby "black panther" Rush over Wardingley. Why? Because none of their "fellow" Republicans on the ballot supported special rights for gays.

I don't care what they call themselves, the Log Cabin crowd exists only to inflitrate the GOP and get it to support the RAT agenda. They are NOT Republicans, just a Democrat front group. The only "Republicans" they endorse are RINOs who promise to vote for the radical gay agenda. A REAL Republican group endorses the candidate closest to their own views in the primary, and then backs whoever the party nominee is in the general election.

If they were a group of conservative-minded gays whose motive was to get other liked-minded pro-life, pro-gun, lower-tax, less-spending, anti-amnesty, pro-WOT people who HAPPEN to be gay -- to pull the lever for Republicans, I'd be fine with that.

That is not their motive. Their motive is simply to make the GOP socially liberal and pro gay-marriage. And that is the ONLY issue that will get them to endorse "Republicans".

In short, they are the Log Cabin Democrats and ought to advertise themselves as such.

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Self-loathing
Pam, I guess we diaried this at about the same time. Anyhow, here are my comments from my diary:

Guess there's not enough room INSIDE the GOP tent for the Log Cabinettes. They have to meet outside in the bushes, like the self-loathing queers they are.



yes I just put this up
I didn't even see your diary, lol.

I really don't have a problem with McCain meeting with the LCRs, but I think it speaks volumes that he courts them behind closed doors. If this meeting is to be part of our "education" about his purported fairness, I'd think the LCRs would be eager to share with the LGBT community McCain's plans to address issues of civil equality -- on the record -- not in whispers into ears in order to garner an endorsement.

Clearly if McCain doesn't fear the vitriol of Dobson, he has an opportunity here to effect real change in the "family values" party by calling out the hypocrisy of the religious right that has held the GOP hostage for decades now. He could reject state amendments on the principle of not putting civil rights on the ballot (not punting with a statement about the right of states to do so -- also used by Clinton and Obama).

That's how the rubber meets the road. I look forward to the day when a Republican candidate actually courts the LGBT vote and the primary decision doesn't have to revolve around whether the GOP candidate isn't on a mission to deny or restrict our rights, and it can be strictly about domestic and foreign policy matters.

We all win when our votes are either discounted (GOP) or taken for granted (Dems)


[ Parent ]
correx
I meant:

We all win when our votes are not discounted (by the GOP) or taken for granted (by the Dems).


[ Parent ]
Can you have a public meeting with the Loggers?
Aren't some of them still closeted?  Would they even attend a meeting open to the press?  Isn't it possible the Cabin Boys were happy to have the meeting closed?  Look at the trouble they got Arnold into on the California Hater Amendment, with his usual eagerness to please.

Maybe the closed doors, low light and privacy are all requirements for any GOP candidate to meet with them -- their employers don't find out they are Queer, and the candidate's fluffing is all off-the-record.

Ew.  McCain fluffing.  Sorry about that....


I wanna see a transcript
"Gee, why wasn't this a big public event -- you know, to help educate the rest of the LGBT community..."

Yah...

As if any of the Log Cabin-oids said anything (positive) about the T.

Kat

>^..^<


I think we should be careful when we talk about the Log Cabinettes and
their own policies in regard to the LGBT community. For one thing, I get the feeling they are not very supportive on any level - to the transgendered part of our community at all.

I base that observation on the former campaign of Midge Potts, who unabashedly ran against the evil Roy Blount in the Republican primary of her Missouri congressional district. I was so impressed with her courage and her commitment to run, despite nearly impossible odds in a nasty conservative district, that we had quite a pleasant email exchange.

I tried to help get some support for her by contacting the Missouri Log Cabinettes (who are based in St. Louis, I think)- and they refused to offer her any support because - and I'm trying to make sure I word this according to memory - the "T's" were still designated as a sort of curable situation by the APA. I remember being very shocked and appalled.

Consequently, I spoke with the head of the Libertarians - who were cheering her campaign. Had Potts been willing to run as a Libertarian in that district, I had the feeling they would have supported her campaign.

Now I don't know if we've ever posted much here or talked about the Log Cabinettes and their relationship to the "T's" in our community, but I have a definite sense that the gay GOP is not interested in helping ALL of our community on any level.


log cabin and trans
The chapter that I was a member of was 100% trans inclusive.  I also had conversations with the national organization and they were moving the right direction. That being said, I don't have any knowledge of the policies advocated by the current leadership.      

[ Parent ]
on the issue of midge potts
Midge Potts is a peace activist, and thats why Log Cabin probally did not support her.

I do not think Log Cabin is transphobic, its just if they are wrong on the non-gay/trans issues they would probally not issue an endorsement.  


[ Parent ]
Missouri
I am no Log Cabin apologist, but the Missouri chapter (and their leader) have been in trouble consistently because of their hostility toward "T"'s.  When the chapter president spoke at Gay Pride a few years ago, folks threw tea bags at the stage (because he forgets the T in LGBT...).  While I am skeptical of Log Cabinettes in general, I do think that the Missouri affiliate is an outlier on this issue.

[ Parent ]
MO LCR dysfunctional, to say the least
The former president was a wacko and offended just about everybody in the community, although it did create publicity for the LCRs (laugh-causing Republicans). Now, they have dropped off the radar, and I can't say if they have more or fewer members than in 2002, when they had approximately 5 to 10 people at the one or two cocktail hour meetings. These were open meetings, and the Dems outnumbered them.

I am going to assume that they are still T-negligent or T-opposed, as the community in general has some learning to do, and a good many say, let the Ts have their own movement (ie, seen as a drag on LG progress).


[ Parent ]
He met with the Log Cabin Republicans?
What? Both of them?

Do the LCRs ever answer ant of the questions asked of them,
  I am sure there must be one LCR that could answer this question;

 Why should I want to be a Log Cabin Republican?

 I went to their home page and found nothing that would make me want to become a LCR.

 I even read their mission statement and again nothing to even make me consider joining the republican party.  

 I read and find nothing inclusive of Trans people.

 I didn't find anything regarding a woman's right to choose.

 IMHO, these LCRs are a screwed up bunch or maybe they need to reach out to me with answers in public forums.

If I make sense? it was quite by accident.


problems with the republican brand
Issues with the Republican brand are hardly confined to the Log Cabin Republicans.  

[ Parent ]
the fundies will start to panic
that the nominee they're stuck with is secretly meeting with gayz to write THE AGENDA.  their paranoia will simply eat them up.

Lurleen on Twitter

In all fairness...
the toaster you get for joining up with teh gayz is just the BEST- saving up my additional coupons for the hairdryer next. Or the satellite radio- can't decide.  

"It goes on one at a time, it starts when you care to act, it starts when you do it again after they said no, it starts when you say We and know who you mean, and each day you mean one more."

[ Parent ]
how many chapters of LCR
will mccain have to join to get a toaster for each of his wife's homes?

Lurleen on Twitter

[ Parent ]
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox