News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


33|175:175

About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.


Five years after Lawrence v. Texas: keep your eye on the U.S. Supreme Court

by: Pam Spaulding

Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 10:00:00 AM EDT


While many of us out there have been bickering, arguing, debating and shedding tears about which Democratic candidate should or shouldn't be the presidential nominee, remember that without Lawrence v. Texas, a U.S. Supreme Court decision that came down five years ago today, that the rights we have won because of that landmark ruling marked the legal foundation upon which we've built progress.

The importance of electing a Democratic president, given the age of some of the members of the high court, is critical to moving the ball forward. Please read an excellent HuffPost piece by Judith E. Schaeffer, legal director of People For the American Way Foundation and People For the American Way:

June 26, 2003 is a day that I remember quite well. But as significant as the Lawrence ruling was, I am mindful that four justices did not join Justice Kennedy's majority opinion. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who was part of the majority in Bowers (truly a low point in her judicial career as well), declined to join the majority in overruling that decision. She agreed, however, that the Texas "sodomy" law was unconstitutional, but only because it treated same-sex and opposite-sex couples differently.

Three justices dissented outright from the ruling in Lawrence: then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. Scalia and Thomas are still on the bench today. The late Chief Justice Rehnquist has been replaced by the equally ultraconservative John Roberts, while Justice O'Connor has been replaced by the extreme right-wing Samuel Alito.

Counting the numbers, then, it's very clear that the constitutional protection of the essential human dignity of gay men and lesbians is hanging by a slender thread on the Supreme Court. John McCain has praised Justice Scalia and has also promised to put more justices like Roberts and Alito on the Court, which should be a consideration for any voter who cares about gay rights and the future of the Supreme Court.

***

I also want to point you to another HuffPost piece by Steve Ralls, "An End to Our Mourning," which discusses the disheartening poll that shows a lot of still-disgruntled Clinton supporters out there who share their resistance to moving forward using reasoning akin to that showed by the woman from Medina, OH who believes Obama is a baby-killing Arab. Steve:

A poll released this afternoon, examining the seemingly ever-shifting loyalties of Senator Hillary Clinton's presidential supporters (of which I have been an enthusiastic one), finds that, while 53% of Clinton's backers are now firmly on-board with Senator Barack Obama's White House bid, there are some who are simply incorrigible... and, increasingly, intolerable to the ears.

...While it would be admirable for any voter to decide their campaign allegiance, and their vote, on honest ideological differences with a particular candidate, the resistance among some Clinton supporters to Obama's campaign is rooted, instead, in half-truths, no-truths and flat-out ignorance about who Senator Obama is and what his campaign stands fo

Barack Obama "sounds to me like a Middle Eastern type of name and whether or not he's born here in the United States, he doesn't seem like, to me, somebody who is trustworthy," Kristie Hartle told the AP pollsters. "You can't trust anybody these days, so who's to say he's not a terrorist and we just don't realize it yet?"

Apparently, you can't trust somebody with a name like Kristie Hartle to make a rational, informed decision before she goes to the polls, either. Has Ms. Hartle talked to the soldiers in Iraq? Would they rather continue the quagmire in the desert under a commander named John than come home under one named Barack?

My reaction below the fold.  
Pam Spaulding :: Five years after Lawrence v. Texas: keep your eye on the U.S. Supreme Court
What do we do here? How do we heal to move forward with the SCOTUS in the balance?

Hillary and Barack are making a go at moving forward with a "unity" appearance today in New Hampshire (Bill is clearly a problem, but whatever - he's lost his cookies). It appears that the supporters who should know better on both sides  continue to flame war one another. As far as the poll goes, there really is a psychological dimension to these results that need to be explored -- do these people really believe Obama is an Arab or a Muslim?

Democrats need to dig deep into this resistance to moving forward. I'm quite worried comments and polls are masking an underlying, woefully under-discussed race/gender schism that has developed over the primary season (I am both a POC and a woman, but it appears that the fact we are out there and can think independently seems to be lost on the MSM).

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Be prepared
Once I began to realize the depth of prejudiced, irrational thinking that would occur regarding Obama, I began to prepare myself. When I have the chance to talk to anyone who spouts that kind of stuff, I want to a) keep my cool and b) speak persuasively. I want to give the other person some rational thoughts to chew on. Depending on who the person is, it could make a difference, or it could make no difference. At the very least, some will become uncertain of their biased view and decide not to vote at all, rather than perhaps voting for McCain.

Rational vs gut
I haven't finished reading it, but The Political Brain discusses how Dems traditionally try to convince voters using logic, but it's ineffective because people vote with their gut.  I think - wait, I feel - ;) that we should approach these folks on a emotional basis - fear-monger them regarding 4 years of a McCain presidency - whether you hit them with offshore drilling or 100 years in Iraq or McCain being owned by insurance companies or whatever.

shrug.  It's a thought.  (damn!  There I go, thinking again!)

Maybe we go with this - an Obama presidency will allow Hillary to do more than a McCain presidency would.  


[ Parent ]
Going heavily negative on McCain's policies is the ticket
It needn't be his own idea either - just get him for voting with the current administration and being a lapdog of Bush.

Ads about the war, about the war debt, about the failure to provide follow-through services for injured vets of this war (Walter Reed et al), about the tax break for the super-rich, about the cost of gas, about the rising cost of food (b/c the gas), about the failure to enact regulations preventing future Enrons and home foreclosure crises.

Highlight that after many years in the Senate and 5 years after the start of the war, McCain STILL can't get Sunni and Shi'a straight - doesn't know the difference. (clip of interview he fumbled)

Fear monger away!


[ Parent ]
Don't bother
It has become painfully obvious that somewhere between 20 and 30% of the American people are incapable of rational thought (See GWB's approval numbers).  As much as I hate to admit it, that number is probably true across the entire political spectrum.  

I really don't think that there is anything to be gained by engaging those who believe that Obama is some kind of secret agent because of his "funny" name or his skin color.  Trying to convince them otherwise is akin to trying to convince a true believer that The Rapture is not really going to happen.

So just ignore them.  We don't feed the trolls here in the internets.  We should follow the same rule of thumb in the real world.  


...little aside.

Happy PRIDE Paul.  I have friends getting married there today and doing pride this weekend, I plan to watch all the Parade...which is on the internet KRON4.

 



It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


[ Parent ]
perhaps actually dealing with the sexism?
To start with, I'm not a Democrat and don't feel I have a horse in this race but...

I don't think that Ms. Hartle comes close to representing most the people who are profoundly frustrated with the Democratic party and Obama.

If the Democrats are going to rebuild the coalition, they need to actually address the issues behind that frustration.

Appeals to "move forward" are not going to work on people who feel that the rampant unchecked misogyny coming from Obama supporters was a step backwards.  


although...
If Obama keeps playing to the conservative middle on gay rights and the death penalty, I might need more than a nosegay to vote for him in November, I might need a whole room full of flowers.  

[ Parent ]
'rampant unchecked misogyny coming from Obama supporters'
I'm still looking for this "rampant unchecked misogyny coming from Obama supporters" I keep hearing about them, with little or no attribution. Are you talking about comments here on the Blend? I've blogged about plenty of the MSM misogyny (Chris Matthews), the pigs selling the Hillary nutcracker. I'm not denying it's out there, but for many Clinton supporters, I get the feeling "rampant unchecked misogyny coming from Obama supporters" translates into ALL Obama supporters who are gloating (something that isn't productive either). It's bad form, but it's not misogyny. We all need to stop hurling charges back and forth and just present our own positions on the matter if we want to discuss the race/gender divide. We owe it that much to have a sensible dialogue to own what we put out there.

I opposed Hillary Clinton because of a host of issues (her campaign rife with bloodsucking Beltway consultants who cut their teeth by winning through race-baiting, poor management of donor funds, sense of entitlement as a Clinton, not paying small vendors, fealty to lobbyists, etc.), but certainly not because she was a woman. None of those flaws have anything to do with gender.

Actually, I'm disappointed that she, as the first woman to make it this far, has run on her gender as much as she has, given she had plenty to run on without calling attention to the matter. Obama tried mightily not to focus on race, but time and again, the subject was dragged in -- if not by the race-baiters, then the black community.

This election cycle speaks volumes about our nation's issues with race and gender, from the MSM, to the public at large. I, for one, was relieved to see the people of the Appalachian belt highlighted who openly cited race or gender as a primary reason for not voting for one or the other. The honesty is refreshing, if depressing. At least they are in touch with their biases.

I believe much of what we are seeing are people in denial that they harbor biases that come out in one way or another, and they don't like feeling them. In many respects, sexism has gotten more of a pass than racism, which in itself is a problem, but it's not a zero sum game. However, you don't see as many people trying mightily to deny their sexism as they do their racism. That's why I believe the people who are harping on the Muslim/Arab nonsense are clinging to that hoary notion -- it's apparently ok in their eyes to be biased in that manner.


[ Parent ]
Thank you.
I, for one, am so tired of hearing weird accusations of misogyny hurled toward Obama or Obama supporters.

I ran out of ways, during the primary season, not to mention now, of saying "Sorry, kids, it's about the issues, and nothing more."  

Perhaps it's going to come down to the words and thoughts of women who have supported Obama since the beginning.  

Was there misogyny AND racism in the MSM?  Of course!  Did we honestly expect any better?  

I dunno.  It's time to move past it.

http://breakthterror.blogspot.com


[ Parent ]
Suggestion
Let me preface this with I am voting for Obama whom I consider to be the lesser of two evils.

Three of the four majority California justices in the recent victory for marriage equality are Republican gubernatorial appointees.   Obama just recently agreed with McCain on that decision in that they both disagreed with the court.  That being said, we cannot rely on the letter D or R that accompanies their name.  Chris Shay, the Republican Congressman from Connecticut  shares some ideals of LGBTQ equality while maintaining strong support for the war.  

Our Supreme Court Justice nominees are chosen by presidents, but they are confirmed by the US Senate.  We should also focus our attention to inform our congressional members of our positions in regards to LGBTQ equality in an effort to circumvent any possibilty that either Obama or McCain will nominate anyone who shares the mentality of Christian superiority by excluding LGBTQs from full citizenship in this country.  

And in reference to Kristie Hartle, who can really blame her?  The current person posing as president declared himself a Christian with good intentions, many people were fooled and he proved he was untrustworthy and a terrorist.

You may not be gay, but you may be next.


As long as people look at words and not actions...
They're going to be willing to vote for the one who looks most or sounds most like them, regardless of how that affects them.

I was a Hillary supporter. I am backing Obama. A major reason for me is the makeup of the Supreme Court. I can't, through inaction or other choices, allow the court's makeup to be dictated by more Republican nominees.


[ Parent ]
Race/gender right at GRASSROOTS.

As for race/gender. I went to a local MOVE ON meeting last night. Now I must admit this was my first ever activist meeting. I have been 'active' online only.  These are the things that impressed me.

Lifelong Democrats love that Obama can get rid of the Republicans!  Liken him most to JFK.

Hillary supporters..all had no trouble at all switching to Obama... again anything to get rid of bought and paid for corporate Washington. 

One man said his nanny and maid had been black and he just wanted to see blacks do well and be treated equally in his lifetime, he hasn't seen it yet...he is about 80. 

Many people there were multiracial and were PROUD of it...it empowers them to have Obama running. Lets see there were Hispanic-American, Black-American, Japanese-AmerIndian-Penn.Dutch-Jamaican..she was quite interesting.

The full blacks, and there were 3... which comprise probably 1/10 of our whole black population! Two a young couple and one widow who said she knew her husband would know she was there and working for a good cause.

BUT, for me and all of us I think the most important STORY there was of an Iranian woman who came to the US at 17, 34 years ago.....and wants to reemake an America the rest of the world can be proud of!

Its the rest of the world we need to consider... or we start thinking llke isolationist Republicans!  We need them, they need us.. They made us by sending us their downtrodden...still do.  And I don't think the rest of the world cares whether our President is black/white/red/yellow or green... man/woman or gay...Just that we elect someone to help all of us get on with the business of living on this tiny planet. 

FYI: I made a little video that catches the 'flavor' of the meeting.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTFD1Cbnjrw


It's the Hammer of JUSTICE,
It's the Bell of FREEDOM,
It's the Song about LOVE between,
my Brothers and my Sisters
...All over this Land.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Report TOS Violations



Join the Blend Chat Room



Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox