|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile

33|175:175
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |

The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist." (Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger." (MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Mon Jun 30, 2008 at 14:00:00 PM EDT
|
| There's an excellent article by Patrick Range McDonald on LA Weekly's LA Daily Blog, "Queer Town: McCain Plays Small Ball in California." It hits on a lot of what we've been discussing on the Blend regarding the open contempt McCain has for LGBTs by declaring support for the California marriage amendment, versus Barack Obama's opposition to it. The latter has been the center of criticism by quite a few Blenders for a) saying nothing at all about the amendment (not true); or 2) not opposing it forcefully enough -- as in front of a large media outlet.
It's pretty darn clear who has no interest in civil equality of any kind after McCain kowtowed to the bible-beaters. The statement was released late in the weekly news cycle on a Thursday evening on a web site few people read. "I support the efforts of the people of California to recognize marriage as a unique institution between a man and a woman," McCain wrote to the honchos of the ProtectMarriage.com campaign, the leading group behind the anti-gay marriage ballot measure, "just as we did in my home state of Arizona. I do not believe judges should be making these decisions."
Senator Barack Obama also didn't make too much out of McCain's stance, with no urgent press releases from the Democratic presidential candidate denouncing his Republican rival. When I called Obama's campaign headquarters in Chicago on Saturday, spokesman Ben LaBolt replied with this email: "Barack Obama has always believed that same-sex couples should enjoy equal rights under the law, and he will continue to fight for civil unions as president. He respects the decision of the California Supreme Court, and continues to believe that states should make their own decisions when it comes to the issue of marriage." And what about all those gay Republicans, such as the LCRs, who plan to educate the rest of the LGBT community about why McCain deservices your vote? After all, they took his statement that he's "unashamed, unembarrassed and proud" to be in the room with LCRs. Guess that and low taxes are good enough for them. Hmmm. There wasn't much to say after McSame's open support for the CA amendment, which shows he still craves kissing some fundie booty.As for gay Republicans, the silence, as they say, was almost deafening. Log Cabin Republicans, in California and on the national level, posted nothing on their web sites about McCain's statement. BoifromTroy.com blogger and gay Republican Scott Schmidt, though, did ask the senator, "Then when is it appropriate for judges to make decisions? Only when they agree with him?" I emailed Schmidt for additional comments, but didn't receive a reply.
GayPatriot.net, another gay Republican blog, took the opportunity to turn things around and ask where Obama stands on same sex marriage without taking McCain to task. When I contacted B. Daniel Blatt, the Los Angeles correspondent for GayPatriot.net, he sent me this email: "Obviously, I'd rather McCain had remained silent on the California ballot initiative on marriage. While he has shown a willingness to meet with gay people and showed some sensitivity to our concerns, he is not perfect on issues of concern to the gay community." Blatt later said he may wait to post something on McCain out of courtesy to me. I told him that wasn't necessary. The bottom line is that McSame is married to the far right religious fringe, even as it's pretty clear he dislikes them. It's a short-term, short-sighted political strategy he's banking on to win over social conservatives. Defeating the amendment in CA (and the ones in AZ and FL, though those may be uphill battles) would be devastating to the fringe right movement that John McCain feels compelled to bow down before. |
| Pam Spaulding :: L.A. Weekly: McCain is 'thinking small' with LGBT demonization strategy |
|
|
|