|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile
33|175:175
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |
The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Tue Jul 29, 2008 at 11:30:00 AM EDT
|
| [Update: I had to correct my serious typo substituting the New Republic for the National Review. It's corrected in the reference below.]
The Jon Stewart gives Elaine Donnelly The Daily Show treatment by simply replaying some of her deranged testimony last week at the House hearings on DADT and providing commentary...
The video, and a defense of her testimony by Elaine's flunkie published at The National Review are below the fold. |
| Pam Spaulding :: Elaine Donnelly honored on The Daily Show |
|
Meanwhile, if you can believe this, here comes a defense of the Center for Military Readiness doyenne by Tommy Sears of The Tank at NRO.
***
This is not satire; this is a wingnut's POV. On Wednesday, July 23, Elaine Donnelly, president of the Center for Military Readiness, and retired Army Sgt. Maj. Brian Jones testified before the House Armed Services Subcommittee on Personnel on the issue of gays in the military. They were opposed by three veterans who told personal stories that, they claimed, made the case for repealing the 1993 law, frequently mislabeled "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
Chairwoman Rep. Susan Davis (D-Calif.) promised in her opening statement that the forum would be an open and civil discussion, but it quickly deteriorated into a show hearing that would have made Stalin proud.
...The object of the hearing was to demonize as morally repugnant (bigoted, homophobic, or worse) anyone who dared disagree with the Democrats' and homosexual activists' point of view. It was a replay of the treatment received by the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Gen. Peter Pace. Sadly, Republicans were unprepared to respond in their statements or questions. The lack of apparent support for our position made it possible for the Democrats to be brutal, and matters were made worse by AWOL Republicans.
Committee members, some of whom Elaine and I had met with over many months to prepare for the hearing, just did not show up. Among those who did, some didn't even ask questions or at least yield time to respond to the personal attacks. The Republicans were MIA because they probably knew Donnelly would make an ass out of herself on national TV and they wanted no part of it. Notice that no one has surfaced to identify themselves as the members who signed off on her appearance.
For those of you who watched or read her testimony -- what personal attacks did you all see against Donnelly? Sears really goes off the deep end. Our deployed servicemen and servicewomen are, by job description, in high-risk situations. So now we're going to introduce a population (homosexuals) to the force whose risk of being non-deployable due to HIV infection is far greater than that of any other group? What kind of sense does that make? Like other Democrat members during the hearing, Snyder allowed Elaine no time to complete a response. The Democrats just refused to talk about the consequences of repealing the law.
...If the law is repealed, when people are subjected to passive/aggressive behavior that sexualizes the intimate no-privacy atmosphere, especially in close combat units and submarines, their motives will be questioned. Unlike women complaining of harassment, the presumption will be bigotry, homophobia, or worse (again, the defamation of General Pace last year shows the pattern of serial demagoguery here). So no one will complain. They will just leave - or avoid the military in the first place. As a result, the military will lose thousands of good people. As opposed to the thousands of trained and ready openly gay and lesbian service members who were discharged from the military while the standards were lowered to admit straight felons, straight gang members and straight under-educated people as recruits.
Related:
* Don't Ask, Don't Tell supporter Donnelly provides comic relief during House hearing |
|
|
