|
-- tips@phblend.com
PHB Mobile
33|175:175
| Best of the Blend |
|
Blog Posts
Special Events and Interviews
| Blend-o-licious endorsements... |
The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."
He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior."
(CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)
Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego)."Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008
Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:
A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)
"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)
Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush
who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"
|
Support the Blend
|
|
An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.
|
Thu Jul 31, 2008 at 13:19:43 PM EDT
|
( - promoted by Pam Spaulding)
Nothing like watching the bouquet of cold hard cash getting tossed to someone else to make voters regret passing their nasty "not in our neighborhood" anti-marriage amendment.
Nevada, wedding capitol of the world, is starting to see the light. (Emphasis added) A recent study by academics at [UCLA's School of Law's Williams Institute] estimates [that California] could see nearly $700 million pour in over the next three years as a result of having legalized gay unions...That could mean $63 million in revenue for local governments, through taxes and fees...
"Obviously," said Brad Sears, co-author of the study and the institute's director, "the big windfall comes for the first states to do it."
All that luscious cash! Oh, but none of it or you, NV, by your own rules.So if you're gay [visiting or living in NV] and you want to get legally married, you go to California. Or Massachusetts. Or Canada. So what is this costing NV? UCLA researcher Sears "crunched a few numbers". His conclusions are below the fold. |
| Lurleen :: Anti-Equality States Jonesin' for Marriage Tourism Cash |
According to his U.S. Census data, there are about 6,300 gay couples in Nevada. Based on what's happened in Massachusetts since it legalized gay marriage, he estimated about half of those couples would get married here if they could.
If each couple spent just one-quarter of what a traditional couple does on a wedding, that could mean $23.3 million spent here that otherwise wouldn't be. That would probably mean a couple of a million dollars in tax revenue too.
And that's just locals. He said there was no way to calculate quickly how many out-of-state gay couples would come to Las Vegas to get married if they could do so legally.
After all, more than 100,000 straight couples already are doing it every year.
In Massachusetts, state legislators made it clear that they repealed the "1913 law" that prevented non-resident s-s couples from marrying there because it was a simple matter of justice and fairness. But they acknowledged, and local business is panting at the fact, that s-s marriage tourism is expected to be a real economic windfall. Consider these numbers: An estimated 32,200 same-sex couples from elsewhere would travel to the state to get married over the next three years. That would pump $111 million into the economy and yield another $5 million in marriage license fees and sales and occupancy taxes.
Bottom line, people who persist in preventing marriage equality are anti-business and are against the economic development of their state. Marriage equality isn't just in the best interest of same-sex couples, it is in the best economic interests of their state. Voters in California, Florida and Arizona need to think long and hard about how much cash they're willing to lose to Massachusetts and beyond.
Cross-posted at BMG. |
|
|
