News Tips?
-- tips@phblend.com

PHB Mobile


About
-- The Blog
-- Pam | My home page
-- Autumn
-- Daimeon
-- Julien
-- "Radical" Russ
-- Terrance

Contact the Baristas

The Blend Blogrolls

Activism


Best of the Blend
Blog Posts

Special Events and Interviews

Blend-o-licious endorsements...



The Christian Civic League of Maine's Mike Hein calls Pam's House Blend:
"a leading source of radical homosexual propaganda, anti-Christian bigotry, and radical transgender advocacy."

He is "praying that Pam Spaulding will "turn away from her wicked and sinful promotion of homosexual behavior." (CCLM's web site, 10/15/07)


Ex-gay "Christian" activist James Hartline on Pam:
"I have been mocked over and over again by ungodly and unprincipled anti-christian lesbians."
(from "Six Years In Sodom: From The Journal Of James Hartline," 9/4/2006, written from the "homosexual stronghold" of Hillcrest in San Diego).

"Pam is a 'twisted lesbian sister' and an 'embittered lesbian' of the 'self-imposed gutteral experiences of the gay ghetto.'" -- 9/5/2008



Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth Against Homosexuality heartily endorses the Blend, calling Pam:

A "vicious anti-Christian lesbian activist."
(Concerned Women for America's radio show [9:15], 1/25/07)

"A nutty lesbian blogger."
(MassResistance radio show [16:25], 2/3/07)


Pam's House Blend always seems to find these sick f*cks. The area of the country she is in? The home state of her wife? I know, they are everywhere. Pam just does such a great job of bringing them out into the light.
--Impeach Bush


who monitors yours Bevis ?? Just thought I would drop you a line,so the rest of your life is not wasted.
--"Joe"

Content © 2004-2008
Pam Spaulding

House Blend logo © 2005
Melissa McEwan

Photo of Pam Spaulding
© Judy G. Rolfe
All Rights Reserved.


SITE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Support the Blend




An Online Magazine in the Reality-Based Community.



The RNC police state: arrest journalists, Donna Brazile pepper sprayed

by: Pam Spaulding

Tue Sep 02, 2008 at 09:00:00 AM EDT


Ain't that America - under Bush/McCain. Let's see, the Republicans festivities have resulted in stereotypical police state violence for public consumption, and it isn't pretty. Bonus points are given for arrests and pepper spraying of journalists and politicos.

Journalists from Democracy Now -- Amy Goodman and producers Sharif Abdel Kouddous and Nicole Salazar were illegally arrested in St. Paul (they were just released) in a violent altercation near the Xcel Center as the police clashed with demonstrators:

All three were violently manhandled by law enforcement officers. Abdel Kouddous was slammed against a wall and the ground, leaving his arms scraped and bloodied. He sustained other injuries to his chest and back. Salazar's violent arrest by baton-wielding officers, during which she was slammed to the ground while yelling, "I'm Press! Press!," resulted in her nose bleeding, as well as causing facial pain. Goodman's arm was violently yanked by police as she was arrested.


Goodman's crime appears to have been defending her colleagues and the freedom of the press. Ramsey County Sheriff Bob Fletcher told Democracy Now! that Kouddous and Salazar were being arrested on suspicion of rioting. During the demonstration in which they were arrested law enforcement officers used pepper spray, rubber bullets, concussion grenades and excessive force. Several dozen others were also arrested during this action.

The Nation's John Nichols backs up the statement that the police were way out of line:
I was with Goodman earlier this afternoon, as she was reporting on the major anti-war demonstration. She and her crew were, as always, interviewing everyone they could in the calm, assured manner that has made the daily Democracy Now! program a widely-watched and well-regarded news programs on radio and cable television stations across the country
More arrests and Donna Brazile caught up in a pepper spray attack are below the fold.
Pam Spaulding :: The RNC police state: arrest journalists, Donna Brazile pepper sprayed
Also arrested was Associated Press photographer Matt Rourke. He was actually covering the protestors' assault of some RNC Connecticut delegates. Alas, news photography has now become a "gross misdemeanor riot charge."
Associated Press reports that one o their photographers, Matt Rourke was arrested, "swept up as police moved in on protesters in downtown St. Paul." AP reports that "Rourke is being held on a gross misdemeanor riot charge.

A spokesperson for AP, assistant bureau chief David Ake, said he's concerned by Rourke's arrest, that "covering news is constitutionally protected, and photographers should not be detained for covering breaking news."

And even the pundits get a taste of the police state -- the former campaign manager for Al Gore and cable news commentator Donna Brazile has also been caught up in the police violence. From the NYT (w/screenshot):

At one point, a group of about 200 protesters - many wearing black bandannas across their faces and some wearing black balaclavas - roamed through downtown, shouting and chanting and throwing street signs and concrete planters in the road. At another point, a police officer grabbed one of the youths. Others wrested him away, then appeared to knock the officer to the ground. On one knee, the officer released an arc of pepper spray.

...[A] prominent Democratic Party strategist, Donna Brazile, was hit by pepper spray while trying to walk around protesters outside the convention hall, Ms. Brazile said in an interview.

"I got a strong whiff - just toxic - and my head and throat are still hurting," said Ms. Brazile, who appears on CNN as a political analyst. "I'll avoid the protesters tomorrow."

OK, from the description of the protestors in the above NYT piece, certainly most journalists and TV political pundits don't walk around wearing black bandannas across their faces and black balaclavas, but they were all still swept up in the police action.

Should we expect the Tasers to come out soon?

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Bookmark and Share
Print Friendly View Send As Email
What do the anarchists hope to accomplish?
The vast majority of protesters are operating within the bounds of the constitution. Anarchists who break windows, smash cars, overturn garbage cans and start fires only serve to give an excuse for fascist actions and illegal arrests which the courts have always justified based on the terrorism being perpetrated by the anarchists. Who, it seems, are never actually held accountable for their actions.

What are they really doing, other than helping the fascists tighten their death-grip on freedom?

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même merde.


"the anarchists"
are hardly more of a coordinated group than "the capitalists" or "the statists".  So in any group called "anarchists", there will be disaffected rebellious teenagers along with people with a bit more experience -- but the anarchists (due to both media bias and to the tendency of teenagers wanting to rebel to gravitate towards the most rebellious-sounding ideology with a popular stereotype of acting like...well, rebellious teenagers) are the group most freely characterized in the MSM by their rebellious-teen element.

And while I'm with you on the ineffectiveness of random property destruction (though I'd keep the random in there as important), I'm not entirely convinced that staying entirely within a set of immoral/unethical laws is the best way to develop independence from those laws.  I don't think either of us, for instance, would suggest that protesting the "free speech cages" should only be done within those cages...


[ Parent ]
I would draw a very bright line between noncompliance and wanton destruction
There is a world of difference between standing up for one's constitutional rights and refusing to be herded into "free speech zones" (ah, love that Newspeak!), and engaging in pointless acts of violence.

Then again, I was taught by old school protesters about satyagraha, the philosophy of non-violent (but not necessarily peaceful or passive) resistance to injustice. I guess that philosophy is so embedded in my concept of protest that I cannot the message that these people are trying to put out. I do not see how smashing windows, beating on cars, opening hydrants, overturning garbage cans and setting fires can do anything productive.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même merde.


[ Parent ]
The usual difference...
...between anarchist and statist non-violent protestors is that anarchists have more of a history of extending the concept of "violence" to cover inanimate objects.  This leads to such linguistically odd situations as violent pacifist anarchists -- anarchists who are pacifists (in terms of human and, often, animal life) but who are hegemonically marked as "violent" due to not recognizing authoritarian claims of property as legitimate.

(This is a separate question from whether any given action against property is strategically defensible, of course.)


[ Parent ]
Political theater
My first thought was that they are doing this because they want to show America the "true" face of the loony left on Fox.  Have a few arrests which cause riots and then let the cameras in.  They love to sell fear, don't they?

My America includes LGBT families.

The account I heard
..mentioned some full-riot gear warrant-less house raids the day before that went unreported. Suddenly I can't find the article on Common Dreams...hmmm. But the Star-Tribune report insinuates that the use of force went far beyond what was required.

What are they really doing, other than helping the fascists tighten their death-grip on freedom?

That's a chicken/egg argument, they would tell you. Even the regular democratic protesters have learned to cover their faces because they are being spied on. I don't support violence but it's unfair to lay the blame solely on the "anarchists" who are often provoked into this behavior for precisely the purpose Mena mentions. I'm sure they would regard the suggestion to stop participating much the same way we would regard a suggestion to uniformly go back in the closet.

____________________

Donate to Carmen's Place


[ Parent ]
Here it is:
First the unnecessary raids, then the violence.

http://www.commondreams.org/vi...

http://www.commondreams.org/he...

What I want Tom Brokaw and Katie Couric to explain to me is why Bristol-Baby takes priority over this on the nightly news. Haven't seen a single word about the raids in the MSM, even though there is video.

____________________

Donate to Carmen's Place


[ Parent ]
good luck getting that explanation


[ Parent ]
something on the raids
can be found on www.starhawk.org.

this whole mess i just horrable and i hope the news about it is spread far and wide. THIS is the world the Repubs are working to create and they must be stopped.

Jaguar.


[ Parent ]
I would not at all be surprised to know that these groups are under the control of the power elite
To me, that is the only explanation for their actions that makes sense: Round up a group of disaffected hooligans, convince them that they can remake society in their image if they destroy it first, then let them lose.

News casts like this only help the ruling party to tighten its death grip on civil rights and increase popular calls for a dictatorship.

Plus ça change, plus c'est la même merde.


[ Parent ]
I'm surprised
That Tasers weren't used first.  

watashi no yomeiri wa doko desu ka

Tasers seem to be used...
...almost exclusively on people who are already effectively under control and certainly outnumbered by police.  Torture in front of a crowd already hostile to police would not go over so well.

[ Parent ]
Don't support violent protesters
From what I have been reading some of the protesters have gotten out of hand.  Some have gone so far as to drop sandbags on moving buses from overpasses. if a sandbag broke the windshield, the driver could be disabled or killed. Other buses have been stopped by the anarchists than rocked back and forth, damaged and then let go.

that doesn't excuse
Sloppy policing that injures or sweeps up journalists or passersby when attempting to keep the peace.

[ Parent ]
So slow, these conservatives
Democrats did the female VP thing 26 years ago, and the riots and overaggressive police thing 40 years ago.




Claim to fame: Posted first PHB diary to be demoted


Am I the only one thinking that some "protesters" were RNC provocateurs
guaranteed immunity?

Nope
I thought of that, too.

susanferman.wordpress.com

[ Parent ]
Not by any stretch n/t


Plus ça change, plus c'est la même merde.

[ Parent ]
Meanwhile...
All the pundits were predicting that the BUBBLING CAULDRON of unresolved Hillary-vs.-Obama hatred was going to turn Denver into Chicago 1968!

Now we find out they were projecting their own issues, as usual.


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?




Join the Blend Chat Room



Report TOS Violations

Premium Sponsors



BlogAds






Search the Blend
Current site


PHB 2.0 Web
Search Blend 1.0 Archives
Ad Networks


BlogSheroes BlogAds


Miscellany

RSS Feeds

Subscribe with Bloglines

Visit NCBlogs


frontpage hit counter

Stats

Powered by: SoapBlox